Sam Stein

BIO

Sam Stein

The Huffington Post

McCain's Catholic Committee Full Of Controversial Figures

May 5, 2008 11:14 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

About Sam Stein

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C. Previously he has worked for Newsweek magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity. He has a masters from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and is a graduate of Dartmouth College. Sam can be reached at stein@huffingtonpost.com.


Religious affiliations have proven, in the course of this campaign, to be a tricky business for politicians -- none more so than Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the controversial former pastor of Sen. Barack Obama.

But John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, also has religious figures associated with his campaign that could pose problems for his electoral hopes. And they extend beyond the two infamous endorsers who have received the most attention: Pastor John Hagee -- who once called the Catholic Church the "great whore" -- and Reverend Rod Parsley -- who accused the government of enabling "black genocide" through legalizing abortion.

McCain's own "Catholics For McCain National Steering Committee" includes several figures that, while not personally connected to the senator (a la Wright to Obama), nevertheless create thorny issues for his candidacy.

Chief among these individuals is Deal W. Hudson, publisher of the Roman Catholic journal Crisis, and one of the more influential Catholic figures in Republican circles. Hudson rose to political fame during the Bush administration as he worked with Karl Rove to target Catholic votes from a strict anti-abortion and anti-gay posture.

But in August 2004, it was revealed that Hudson had an affair with an 18-year-old Fordham University student while he was a teacher at that institution. The sordid story, reported first by the National Catholic Reporter, involved Hudson joining a group of students at a pre-Lenten "Fat Tuesday" party in Greenwich Village, bringing the drunk student back to his office, and ultimately, exchanging sexual favors. When the affair, which cost Hudson his tenured position, was exposed, he resigned from the Bush reelection team.

Of course, Hudson was never McCain's personal pastor or religious adviser. In fact, his work with the senator, at least recently, has been focused on helping him counter the negative perception that came with Hagee's backing. But unlike, say, William Ayers (the unrepentant Weather Underground whose tenuous link to Obama has come under fire from McCain), Hudson is, in fact, directly associated with the Arizona Republican. Moreover, he is not the only figure with past controversy with ties to the Senator.

Frank Keating, the former Oklahoma governor, serves as one of two Catholics For McCain Co-Chairs. In June 2003, Keating was forced to resign from a Catholic Church review board after he suggested that the bishops were engaging in Mafia-like activities in their efforts to obstruct investigations into the child sexual abuse scandal. "To act like La Cosa Nostra and hide and suppress, I think, is very unhealthy," he told the Los Angeles Times. The comments earned him some plaudits among critics (and there were many) of the church. But they were also viewed as unnecessarily antagonistic. Keating refused to apologize.

Another member of McCain's Catholic Steering Committee -- Martin Gillespie, formerly the Republican National Committee's Catholic Outreach director -- called the Democrats the party of "drug legalizers."

And yet another, Robert Destro, built a career battling any and all efforts to legitimize same-sex marriages. A controversial appointee to the U.S. Civil Rights Commission during the Reagan administration, Destro's Marriage Law Project has tirelessly pushed an anti-gay-marriage platform in numerous states.

"Their role has been to try to give the veneer of scholarship and objectivity onto what is really an attack effort to cement discrimination against gay couples into the law," Evan Wolfson, executive director of New York-based Freedom to Marry, told the National Catholic Reporter.

Taken together, these Steering Committee members, in addition to Hagee (who blamed Hurricane Katrina on the "sinfulness of New Orleans' residents) and Parlsey (who has urged Christians to wage a "war" against the "false religion" of Islam) present an interesting political dilemma for McCain. After all, this was the candidate who railed against "agents of intolerance" on all sides of the political spectrum during the 2000 primary.

But for religious and political observers the real issue lies not simply in political associations, but a matter of policy.

"These are the usual suspects," said Chris Korzen, Executive Director of the liberal Catholics United and co-author of the forthcoming book, A Nation for All: How the Catholic Vision of the Common Good Can Save America from the Politics of Division. "In general terms, these are folks who have a history of putting partisan politics ahead of the teachings of their faith. It is more of the same, and if they were serious about being engaged Catholics they would be challenging McCain on the war and torture where McCain is not on the side of Catholic theology."

 

Comments
105
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Sam:

While you are at it why aren't you asking:
Why hasn't the media questioned catholic politicians "why do you stay in a church that has enabled pedophilia and institutionalized the sheltering of pedophiles?"
Tim Russert said he could not think of anything to ask the Pope.
Russert should be embarrassed to call himself a journalist if he could not think to ask the Pope "why he"s sheltering Bernard Law?" Russert should have asked the Pope "why do you persist in calling pedophilia by priests "the American problem; while ignoring the worldwide problem of pedophilia within the catholic church?"
Why is it acceptable for McCain to actively seek the support of agents of intolerance?
Why is it acceptable for white ministers to be divisive agents of intolerance?
Why is it when McCain makes egregious statements that highlight his short comings the media including Chris Matthews spend less than 2 minutes discussing the issue, for example as Matthews did on 05 May 08?
McCain has been making idiotic comments that are highly questionable while McCain"s buddies in the media down play these comments as mere gaffs and as Chuck Todd says "McCain gets away with it because he has plenty in the bank."
Why is it when Obama mis-speaks it is portrayed as a major weakness and weeks are spent on the comment?
Your journalist colleagues must come to terms with their bigotry, bias and racism

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 05/06/2008

Just this evening I heard Tim Russert gloss over McCain's "We are fighting in Iraq for oil" statement as piffle. The determination of the MSM to ensure McCain wins in November is becoming painfully obvious.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 05/06/2008

Wow indeed, your misleading headlines continue to amaze. There are literally 100 names listed on the page announcing the group. Did you personally google everyone and look for dirt and this constitutes your "full of controversial figures" list?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 05/06/2008

Before he became the pope,he was the head of the protect pedofiles club of the catholic church.He had the dirt on everyone no wonder he became the pope!Cardinal law of mass. who knew and covered up the scandel{did you know the nambla was started by a priest in mass?} and now hes living large in rome?He got promoted too.At what point can you reguard the acts of many in the church as NOT criminal?Obamas preacher said some controvercial things but the catholic church showed itself to be a criminal enterprise by allowing these things to go on for decades in many countries.I guess we can thank god we dont have a catholic running for president because they would be responsible for not leaving a church that protected pedofiles.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 05/06/2008

Great, that's just what we need. More self important fools who say they have the ear of God. Must be the reason I never hear from Him. Too busy "advising" these lunatics.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 05/06/2008

How are these controversial?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 05/06/2008

That's the most disappointing list of controversial figures I ever read. What do you expect from a coalition of Catholics-- and some actually sound positive, such as the one who stood up to the Church. Your 'controverisial twist?' Too strident.

Puleeze. Its time for the distant-guilt-by-association to stop. It makes you look as if you have a weak argument.


Obama 08

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 05/06/2008

Wow! These guys are really controversial. I bet the marxist philosophy that Obama supports will be totally against these wild eyed centrist ideas.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 05/06/2008

Chimp, you certainly aren't the brighest ape.
Kos
"Recently it has come to light that John Hagee declared "America is under the curse of God" but Hagee has also stated that, in the war he predicts will ensue after a US or Israeli attack on Iran, God may well punish the majority of Americans living, immolating them in a Russian nuclear strike on America's east and west coasts or devastating the United States with terrible natural disasters. The reason Hagee suggests for a possible divine nuking of the coasts ? - a failure, on the part of Americans living in those regions, to back the vigorous defense of Israel which Hagee claims will be necessary when Islamic and Russian armies march on the embattled nation, in the course of a war Hagee himself has advocated starting."

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 05/06/2008

how dare these people presume to represent people of the catholic faith. as i have said before, mc cain wouldn't have tolerated hagee's remarks if on some level he didn't agree with them

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 05/06/2008

What's missing from this argument is how religious leaders and their beliefs affect U.S. policy. Bush told world leaders that God told him to attack Iraq. Hagee said after his meeting with Bush that he and GW see eye to eye on mid-east policy. It appears that McCain sees eye to eye with Hagee also, and their next victim will be Iran.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 05/06/2008

These religeous people should watch> http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com < Let them explain this to their supporters.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 05/06/2008

There is no difference between accepting the endorsement of a hate filled religious extremist and having a close 20 year relationship with one.

To us on the left, everything is equivalant.

USA and the Soviet Union
Christians and Muslims
Good and evil

Vote Obama for the primary!

BHO '08!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 05/06/2008

"accepting the endorsement of a hate filled religious extremist"
This statement is false. McCain sought out the support of Hagee in effect endorsing Rev. Hagee.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 05/06/2008

So now in HuffPo land seeking support is the same as endorsing.

Thanks for making my point.

Everything is grey and the same.

That's why I'm for our guy all the way!

BHO '08!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 05/06/2008

You have no point, Yes seeking someone's support is an endorsement, especially when you have that endorsement on video tape. Thanks for showing your ignorance.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 05/06/2008

So what you're saying is we have in the same campaign:

Catholic Robert Destro - an obviously closeted gay, gaybasher

Catholic Deal W. Hudson - a petty Bill Clinton philanderer

vs

Protestant Rod Parsley - a conspiracy theorist who operates under an assumed name

Anti-Catholic John Hagee - a lunatic wanting to jump-start the end of the world

Let's lock the all in a closet together, tape it and sell it to Fox.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 05/06/2008

HUDSON AND CO. REPRESENT AN EXTREME ELEMENT OF CATHOLIC practiice--and one can
easily find that the "cafeteria" Catholicity they always damn is very much their own. Hudson and
his crowd argue for example that the Vatican II mass is invalid--a positiion never taken by the current Pope Benedict XVI--and dismissed by him several times. The Church accepts every ritual and reform
from Vatican II as binding--and that means every syllable of the current rites for the Mass--including
broader use of accepted traditiional forms recently---but no one at least in authoritataive office--accepts
Mr.Hudson's basic tenets. It is no surprise that he would be Karl Rove's associate in ensnaring Catholic votes--they bragged to the arch-bishop of NJ that Catholics put Bush into office--and he himself, Bush,
said so on various occasions. They never mentioned that all three of the last Popes have condemned
our wars in the middle east as violations of morality and international law--John Paul II called the Iraq
use of pre-emptive strikes a violation of every Christian principle. But Mr. H never even alludes to that---
nor for that matter did the archbishop of NJ!! J.Gorman

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 AM on 05/06/2008

So many of my fellow Catholics are obsessed with only one issue....abortion, abortion, abortion.

Once you are on this earth you are on your own, or so the rhetoric would lead you to believe. Adopt a few othe most unwanted, provide food and services for the poorest, as well as BIRTH CONTROL
INFORMATION and the credibility could be there. As it is, it all seems a little hollow. No wonder they all joined the Republican Party.

Apparently no amount of hypocrisy is off-putting for the anti-abortion Catholic Republicans. McCain is coming very late to the game.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 05/06/2008

Catholics are like repuglicans. They are pro fetus - but forget about the child once its born. They are all bunch f'ks.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 05/06/2008

Actually that's not true of all Catholics. It is true of the leadership of the Catholic Church however. When Benedicy was here he didn't have any qualms about mentioning abortion but when the leader of the world's largest church had a chance to talk to Bush about the war and tell him how repugnant he thinks it is he did not. After reading all the gaga crap in the papers about this "holy" man I could only come to the conclusion that he's a coward.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 05/06/2008

Not necessarily a coward. Just a politician. I can see the source of your confusion.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 05/06/2008

I like to think that we are becoming more enlightened and more able to think for ourselves. Our founding fathers believed in the separation of Church and State, and we are now experiencing in this country the inherent hatred which goes along with the incorporation of those two. It seems our founding fathers were so much wiser.

Faith is best served on an individual basis, with each person choosing how to think and live, rather than a government telling us what is "right" or "wrong". The Middle East is an example of the perfect storm when sectarian theocracies rule a people.

We must think for ourselves, rather than elect another religious-based administration. We have had "religious" rule for nearly 8 years. What we have is a killing field in the Middle East, a crumbling infrastructure, weakened education system, violence and widespread poverty -- much like the Middle East. Take America away from the religious and return it to the Americans.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 05/06/2008

Bravo!!! The only disagreement I have is that I don't think we are becoming more enlightened: I think that we are becoming more "dumbed down" to address only the shiny thing over here, while totally disregarding the important disturbing thing in your face. Though I am an Obama supporter, I also believe that the dems are more harmful (and less willing to address truth) than the repubs. This is very scary for me.
I am a licensed and ordained minister of the Gospel, but I DO NOT want a theocracy, because it might not be my religion that is sanctioned by those in charge.

Just my thoughts.

TZR

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 05/06/2008

As a ordain minister you should seperate your self and the church from Politics! You should not mention who you wil vote for, so your congregation does not feel obligated to vote how you do! church leaders have to much influence over people in certain church's! you must be very careful twighlightzoneResident! Isn't that a strange name on line for a ordained minister sir? Your dumb-down phrase is that of some one who looks down upon people. Did you know that! Your words are not phrased as that of a minister either, sir. I wish not to be disrespectful, but I think you not a minister or a very unenlighted one! Or a young one, who has a lot to learn about talking about or too people!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 05/06/2008

I use the nom de plume for the purpose of keeping my politics and religion separate. Although I am not a Pastor, I do have some significant responsibilities at a large church. However, your statement that my "dumb down" phrase indicates that I look down on people is far from the truth: it indicates that people, even highly intelligient, sophisticated and successful, have been trained to pay attention to the items that are emotional and shallow (and require no intense introspection), and not necessarily the things that are substantive and important to the masses, or even in some cases the individual. Hence we have entire segments of "newscasts" devoted to what Brittany is or is not wearing. Bush admitted that he not only knew about the discussions concerning torture, but approved them: what coverage has that gotten? I am not a young minister, and I do consider myself enlightened, in that if JESUS were here today, I feel that HE would be more than disgusted with how this country has used religion to separate, divide and imprison (minds, bodies and spirits). My rantings on here are not meant to make you feel good, but hopefully to make you think, even if your conclusions are different than my own. As for the name, I feel that I am living in the twilight zone, in that the NCLB is setup to keep the masses under-educated, and Operation Iraqi Freedom has enslaved us all to the war profiteers.

Just my thoughts

TZR

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 05/06/2008

Combine your statement "I DO NOT want a theocracy, because it might not be my religion that is sanctioned by those in charge" with the reflection by MissingAmerica that "The Middle East is an example of the perfect storm when sectarian theocracies rule a people" and you have a present day justification for the separation of church and state valued by our Founding Fathers. There is no justification for "faith based" government services or philosophies in the working mechanics of this nation.

I do take issue with your statement that democrats are "less willing to address truth" - whose "truth" are you referring to? The "truth" has been savagely abused by the republicans in every venue; this nation and We The People are paying a very high price as a result.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 05/06/2008

HippieChick, I agree with you. Even if my religion was chosen, I would not be in favor of a theocracy, because all religions have a major problem: they are lead by humans. There is no basis for faith-based government here in 'merca. Spirituality cannot be legislated!!

My statement about truth stems from Reid and Pelosi (to pick on them) ignoring the will of the people and the rule of law, justifying the continuation of the war, approval of illegal and on-going acts of treason, dems playing the same old tired attack politics on each other, even when it is obvious that it is sound bite material only. When have the dems stood up to truth through action, and not lip service? Even when the law clearly is on their side (subpoena power of congress ignored by the B/C cabal). I know that the repubs have stood up to truth thru action by trying to kill it everytime. TALKING a good game means nothing at the end of the day.
For jupitor, my last statement responding to you is a very short list of a great many things that have been used to play the shell game on the 'mercan people.

Just my thoughts

TZR

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 05/06/2008

That picture of McCain creeps me out.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 05/06/2008

Republican Catholics are a bit of a joke. They focus on abortion as the be all end all. Do they not read any of the papal encyclicals? Did they forget how forcefully John Paul II condemned the Iraq War? Are they aware that the Church's opposition to abortion also includes opposition to the death penalty? Do they subscribe to the Church's very tolerant position on refugees and migrants? What about the social gospel? Conservative parties in continental Europe all support strong social welfare policies in part because of their roots in Catholic social theory.

Now there is plenty wrong with the Catholic church (treatment of women, paedophile priests, etc) but, as with most of Christians, if Republican Catholics actually practiced what they preached, they would be forced to abandon the party and its heavy emphasis on laissez-faire economics and hyper individualism.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 05/06/2008

Catholics rarely refer to themselves as Christians. I grew up in a very Catholic home and went to catholic school and had to receive communion every morning at 7AM mass. We also went to Catechism. We were never taught the Bible.

I left the church at age 17 and never looked back.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 05/06/2008

Great Post CanuckforObama, thanks for the insight.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 05/06/2008

American Catholic's, especially the younger generation are not the lemmings that the right wing evangelicals are. They love to worship God and Jesus and they are Christians: (the original ones by the way), but they also realize that the Church has made many mistakes over the centuries and I am sure the people responsible are paying the price now in eternity. But please keep in mind, interpretation of the bible and many rules emanating from organized religions are made by humans, not God. And as we all know, humans are not perfect. People, please think for yourselves.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 05/06/2008

Oooooooh, this is good!

The conservative catholics, the only ones to be wooed, as the rest of us can think for ourselves, will not go for people who have committed crimes, misdemeanors, and other sins!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 05/06/2008

It is such a crying shame that their is a double standard between McCain and Obama and not to forget Hillary and her Family Cult in Washington. I truly believe that the MSM are out to get Obama because they (MSM) wold rather see a Mcwars vs Hill battle because they think Mcwars can beat Hill and will get his A$$ kicked against Obama, the MSM are afraid Obama is going to bring change for the good of all Americans not just the wealthy.The MSM ,cable news and radio are all for the REICH(wealthy) and will do everything illegal to keep the White House neoconsrvative and WARMONGERING even though they don`t cover much of Iraq anymore, this confirms to me that Mcwars could go to SATAN for advice and it would not even show a blip on the radar screen but if Obama or Hillary would do such a thing my g-d you would think the world was ending. The MSM does not do anything but entertain with fluff on Mcwarsand his bungling gaffes and these guys fawn all over it like he is a god.