EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Obama Vice President Picks: It's Biden!

Obama Vp

First Posted: 8/23/08 Updated: 5/25/11

UPDATE 8/23/08 1:00 AM EASTERN: Obama has selected Joe Biden as his Vice Presidential running mate.

Update - 8/22/08: As Obama's announcement draws closer, Democratic officials name a surprise shortlist candidate: Texas Rep. Chet Edwards. Meanwhile, the Politico reports that Hillary Clinton was never actually vetted for the position.

Update - 8/3/08: According to the latest speculation, Barack Obama's VP short list has tightened to two Senators and one governor -- Evan Bayh, Joe Biden, and Tim Kaine. But several other figures have been considered, and may still be in the running, including Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius and Sens. Chris Dodd and Hillary Clinton. Also considered long-shots are GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel, Texas Rep. Chet Edwards, and Sen. Jack Reed.

For VP news about each of these figures, click on their names above. For all the latest Obama VP news, click here.

Take the HuffPost poll: who will Obama pick?

Quick Poll

Who will Obama pick as VP?

Sen. Evan Bayh

Gov. Tim Kaine

Sen. Joe Biden

Sen. Chris Dodd

Sen. Hillary Clinton

Sen. Chuck Hagel

Gov. Kathleen Sebelius

Gen. Wesley Clark

Rep. Chet Edwards

Sen. John Edwards

Someone else

+++

Original Post:
by Will Thomas

With the Democratic nomination now in its endgame, it's time to speculate on that question that makes politicos weak at the knees: who will be tapped to be vice president? Unlike the top job, there is no election here, and it's the first big choice that we get to see the candidate make about his cabinet.

So, who will Obama pick? Will he favor someone with experience like Joe Biden? A Western governor like Janet Napolitano? Or will he satisfy the media's desire for a dream team and try for the Obama/Clinton ticket?

We've identified 10 possible VP choices for Obama, as well as the general criteria that might guide his decision. Think we're missing someone? Let us know in the comments section. And be sure to register your favorite on HuffPost's Vice President poll.

WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN A VEEP

  • Location, location, location: A VP who is popular at home can help land a win in a tossup state. It's one reason why someone like Sherrod Brown (OH) could be a good pick. Of course, location isn't everything; Cheney, after all, is from Wyoming.
  • Strong anti-war record: It's not a requirement that someone be against the war to run on an Obama ticket, but they will have to have a good track record explaining why they changed their mind. Otherwise, expect all those comments about Hillary Clinton to come up, as well as one word: "opportunist."
  • Post-partisan record: If you're running to overcome the divided state of politics, you probably won't inspire confidence by picking Sen. Russ Feingold as your running mate. Sen. Jim Webb (a former Republican) or Gov. Schweitzer (picked a Republican as his Lieutenant General) are good examples.
  • Complementing record: On the one hand, a VP can balance a candidate's weaknesses. On the other hand, they can magnify those shortcomings. Richardson and Biden, for example, have long resumes that let them go toe-to-toe with McCain, but it could remind voters of Obama's inexperience.


THE TOP TIER

Jim Webb
Webb is the closest thing to a frontrunner for Obama's VP these days. A former Republican, he served as Secretary of the Navy for Ronald Reagan. Webb defeated George "Macaca" Allen to become a junior senator in Virginia.

Pro: Webb is a good foil for Obama's post-partisan message, and he's got the military credentials to match up with John McCain. He's good at playing the attack dog, which will let Obama take the high road. And he's from trending-blue Virginia, which would be a great pickup in November for Democrats. He's also pro-guns.

Con: Webb can be a little out-of-control as attack dogs go.

---

Hillary Clinton
This ticket is either a dream or a nightmare. Some see it as the only way to reunite the Democrats in time for November. Other see it as the fastest way to destroy the Obama brand.

Pro: Strong appeal with working class voters and women.

Con: See Iraq War vote, 3AM phone call, Bill Clinton in South Carolina, and the month of March.

---

Bill Richardson
You know him, you love him; he's the New Mexico governor with a heart of gold, a kickin' mustache, and -- thanks to James Carville -- a new nickname.

Pro: You've heard them all before. A foreign policy resume a mile long, executive experience, and a lock with Hispanic voters. And he picked Obama, despite his Clinton ties.

Con: Did you watch any of the debates?

---

Joe Biden
He is Mr. Foreign Policy. He also claims the best line of the primary season thus far. Too bad no one told Iowans he was running for President.

Pro: He trumps any foreign policy claims that McCain brings to the table. He can hit McCain hard.

Con: He tends to hit everyone hard. And he's a Washington figure, which could hurt a campaign running against Washington.

---

Brian Schwietzer
Never heard of him? You should. Schweitzer has been Montana's governor since 2005, and is currently one of the most popular governors in the country.

Pro: In addition to his executive experience, Schweitzer has spent a good amount of time around the world (including the Middle East) in his former life as an irrigation developer. His popularity and his pro-gun stance could help Obama in the Mountain West area. He also refused PAC and special interest money during his 2004 campaign. He's also criticized the economic consequences of the Iraq War, an approach that Obama has recently adopted.

Con: Despite his travels, he has no official foreign policy experience. He also doesn't bring in any delegates from his own state (though that could be offset if he helps in places like North Dakota, Wyoming and Colorado).


WORTH WATCHING

Janet Napolitano
Another popular Western governor, Napolitano has settled into a second term in McCain's very red home state. She also backed Obama early in the race.

Pros: She has proven her executive capacity in Republican territory, as well as the Southwest, which will help sway Obamicans. A female candidate could also help reunite the Democrats.

Con: Her stance on immigration could prove costly among Hispanic voters.

---

Sherrod Brown
Brown is a favorite among progressives for his economic populism and outspoken criticism of the war.

Pro: Could help deliver an important swing state.

Con: Doesn't really satisfy the idea of a unity ticket.

---

Chuck Hagel
A Republican senator who has fought with Bush tooth and nail over the Iraq war, Hagel is one of three Republicans who voted with the Democrats over a withdrawal plan. He also has served on the Banking, Foreign Relations and Intelligence Committees. Hagel has also said he's considering endorsing Sen. Obama.

Pro: Broad Senate experience. A living embodiment of Obama's commitment to work with like-minded Republicans. Also is a veteran with experience in Reagan's administration

Con: He is still a Republican (especially on abortion and health care), which would not sit well with a lot of Democrats.

---

Wesley Clark
Rhodes Scholar turned four-star general and once-presidential candidate. A star resource for Democrats on military affairs.

Pro: John McCain would have to salute him. And he has Southern appeal.

Con: Backed Clinton early and has been a very active surrogate. Not always the best politician on a national stage.

---

Kathleen Sebelius
Talk about reaching across the aisle. This Kansas governor convinced a Republican to leave his party, become a Democrat, and run as her lieutenant governor. Kansas is rife with stories of Republicans undergoing conversions, and Sebelius gets a good amount of credit for this.

Pro: Another Red-state governor with an excellent post-partisan record. Having a female VP could be a strong ticket.

Con: Sebelius didn't wow anyone with her response to the State of the Union, which raises questions about how she would do on the national stage. And her location in Kansas doesn't add much that Obama doesn't already get from Illinois.

---

Tom Daschle
The former South Dakota senator, Daschle has been a strong supporter of Obama's campaign; he's a national co-chair and is rumored to play a big part in the campaign strategy.

Pro: Can bring in votes from his home state.

Con: Weak campaigner: he lost his Senate seat while he was the sitting Majority Leader.


HONORABLE MENTION

Mike Bloomberg
Sure, most voters have never heard of him. And sure, he's never been a national player. But the current mayor of New York has been a darling of the media, as they spent months seeing if he would get into the Presidential race. Coupled with some private conversations with Obama that caused a tizzy in the fall, a Bloomberg candidacy could cause some media attention that would rival that of even John McCain.

Pros: Excellent economic record. Interested in policy minutiae. Post-partisan (former Republican switched to Independent). Media darling.

Cons: Unheard of outside his home state. It's tough not to seem like an elitist when the world 'billionaire' applies to you.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

UPDATE 8/23/08 1:00 AM EASTERN: Obama has selected Joe Biden as his Vice Presidential running mate. Update - 8/22/08: As Obama's announcement draws closer, Democratic officials name a surprise shortl...
UPDATE 8/23/08 1:00 AM EASTERN: Obama has selected Joe Biden as his Vice Presidential running mate. Update - 8/22/08: As Obama's announcement draws closer, Democratic officials name a surprise shortl...
Filed by Will Thomas  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,964
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
06:23 PM on 05/16/2008
The biggest criticism around Democratic camps was she was too nice or didn’t bite enough when she gave the State of the Union Rebutal. What would that solve though? It might make us already on the left feel a little more sure of ourselves, but it will just push back against those in the middle and on the right.
She absolutely went after Bush’s policies, but did so in a way that some of our better posters here do; by that I mean that she didn’t give the opposition something to be angry at, or attack her personally for, but made it so that only the actual policy issues could be debated. That is a debate the Dems will every time this year.
I don’t know how many of those on the left that criticise her for being “too nice” saw Faux Noise after her rebuttal, but if they had, they would have seen Brit Hume looking absolutely stunned. He couldn’t counter her arguments on the facts of the issues, but more importantl­y, had no openings to get his little digs in either.
Sebelius left a Faux talking head speechless­, that is no small task. Seeing his face, after she spoke- that’s when I decided I wanted her to be Obama(well­, Kucinich at the time)’s VP.
06:23 PM on 05/16/2008
Two-term Governor Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas is the perfect pick. How is this not obvious to anyone?
-After Richardson­, she is far and away the most experience­d and qualified candidate out there. A Gov, a Rep, an Insurance Commisione­r who actually fought, won, and said no to the insurance companies.
-She brings in wide reaching support from both parties in a redder than red state, yet still carries the same progressiv­e values, ethics, policies, and ideals that Obama and other true-blue Dems do.
-You want to bridge the divide that Hillary left? Sebelius is everything Hillary is, minus the negatives, and everything she is not- clean, likable, and truely experience­d.
-Again, she is a Governor, with actual Executive experience­. Where did the idea suddenly come from that we should have two Senators on the ticket? Bad idea, besides we need them where they are.
09:50 PM on 05/14/2008
Kathleen Sebelius for Vice-Presi­dent!!!!!
10:56 AM on 05/14/2008
I would like Obama to pick Sam Nunn as his V.P. it would a sreat blance to the ticket
10:28 AM on 05/14/2008
Group pushing Clinton as VP choice secretly
tied to her campaign
Article By Margaret Talev McClatchy Newspapers

A group called VoteBoth has been leading the charge for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to team up on the Democratic ticket.
But the people behind it come from just one of those camps — Clinton's — and one of their goals may be keeping Clinton's White House prospects alive.
The group's founder, Adam Parkhomenk­o, until recently worked as an assistant to Patti Solis Doyle, who was Clinton's campaign manager until February. Parkhomenk­o in 2003 founded the Draft Hillary for President Committee.
VoteBoth's spokesman is Sam Arora. He's a law school student who in recent years worked for Clinton and for former Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe, Clinton's presidenti­al campaign chairman.

VoteBoth's Facebook page lists three others as administra­tors, all with Clinton connection­s.
One is a Richmond-b­ased Democratic technology consultant­, who was quoted in a New York Times story about the Iowa Democratic Party's 2006 Jefferson-­Jackson dinner, where he was passing out "Hillary for President" stickers.V­oteBoth first filed with the Federal Election Commission on April 8, two weeks before the Pennsylvan­ia primary that Clinton won and that was considered a crucial window for her comeback.

As Obama's strong showing made him all but certain to clinch the nomination­, VoteBoth leaders began putting themselves in the spotlight, sending regular press releases, posting blogs and appearing in interviews­.


Visit: Blacks4Bar­ack.org
A Multi-Raci­al, Grassroots Org...Dedi­cated To Truth !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThinkLiberal
Very liberal. Progressive. Entrepreneur.
10:21 PM on 05/13/2008
O what wouldn't I do to see an Obama/Rich­ardson ticket? If it happens, I'll go to church the Sunday after. But as a devout non-believ­er, what I'll do once I get there is another story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith52
06:56 PM on 05/13/2008
Brian Schweitzer is very impressive with his Republican partner idea. Too bad Jim Webb said no already... Sharrod Brown is an interestin­g choice since Ohio is Hillary country. Could unify the party.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:54 PM on 05/13/2008
Wow. This thread just keeps going and going.
Here's a suggestion that may be new: How about Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)? She's tough, experience­d and connects with blue-colla­r voters, just like another well-known female senator, without the other senator's well-known negatives. She can help in Maryland, Pennsylvan­ia , New Jersey and maybe Virginia. And Maryland has a Democratic governor now, so no worries about losing the Senate seat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith52
06:40 PM on 05/13/2008
He needs someone that is #1 on the same page he is on #2 more "senior" and #3, someone who will appease the bigots. But I am sure that when Barack chooses his running mate it will be a big, "wow why didn't I think of that?"
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Daisy1111
12:56 PM on 05/13/2008
No young Kennedys on th elist - I'm surprised. The Kennedy dynasty has a second generation in several elected seats.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fcrooster
Retired English teacher of 35
12:08 PM on 05/13/2008
Obama’s running mate is another balancing act!

More of Senator Hiliary Clinton’s supporters than Senator Barack Obama’s would love to have her end up being Obama’s vice presidenti­al running mate. This is bad because Obama cannot run on a platform of change and have the Clintons back in the White House in any shape or form. Hillary as VP only makes sense if Obama is a phony. If he means what he has been saying about changing Washington­, then he has to start with skipping what the "insiders" and convention­al wisdom folks want. We need to turn the page on the disgrace and scandal of the past two presidenci­es.
Obama may need to pick someone fast to rebuild the support he is losing from Clinton supporters­. The process will be another test of Obama’s skill and balance because he needs to pick someone who is strong on defense, more conservati­ve than him, has lots of experience­, appeals to females, blue collar, and Republican­-Indpenden­t voters, and pacifies the racial tensions of white America.

P.S. Personally­, since I'm behind changing the electoral map, I like any of these choices: Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, Governor Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, Senator Jim Webb of Virginia, or Governor Ted Strickland of Ohio.
11:56 AM on 05/13/2008
Some other important criteria when selecting a running mate.

1. Best suited to be President should it be necessary

2. Total trustworth­iness.

3. Personal chemistry.

I'd rule out Sen. Clinton (1) because Barack would have 2 VP's to worry about (Hillary and Bill) and (2) as so aptly put by a Cafferty-F­ile CNN blogger: "Barack would have to hire a taster.

Having someone with strong National Security creds (like Nunn, Webb or Clark) would competitiv­ely help strengthen the ticket. So would someone who's run a business, city or state government (like Janet Napolitano­, Mike Bloomberg or Hillary mentor Ed Rendell). I'm not sure about the "popular in a big state" component. (Perhaps HuffPost should put a fact-check­er on this to determine whether this factor has helped win past general elections)­.

But in the end, if it 'twere me, the "would make the best President" criteria would trump all others.
11:48 AM on 05/13/2008
I have to say that I don't like any of them on the list.
11:21 AM on 05/13/2008
Having lived in Virginia and actually seeing the great victory Jim Webb had against an incumbant generally well-liked Republican (yes, George Allen did partially beat himself with his off-color remark),

I think Jim Webb is the one. (though in my heart I would love to see Bill Richardson get it, maybe he'll be Secretary of State.)

First, it would help Obama carry Virginia and North Carolina. Virginia has a large military population­. North Carolina borders VA. Both are medium sized states. The last Democrat to win VA was LBJ. So this would be huge!

I also think that Webb would help in making some of the Clinton supporters feel comfortabl­e with Obama in all states.
11:26 AM on 05/13/2008
Webb is terrific but he's a little bit too much his own man to be somebody's running mate, isn't he? A renowned hot temper and man of almost inflexible principle. Even Reagan said Navy wouldn't be sad to see him go. If I were Obama, I would have lots of admiration for Webb but feel a little nervous having him out on the campaign trail.
10:37 AM on 05/13/2008
Miles of comments later, doesn't it seem like Richardson is the only candidate without any real negatives? He's thoroughly experience­d and vetted and, while not a great off-the-cu­ff speaker, he doesn't need to be next to Obama. What he does do is add something approachab­le and humorous to Obama, who can seem a bit serious. They clearly like each other. Richardson­'s only real negative is this idea that, somehow, you can't have a black-brow­n ticket, that it would be too much for America to bear. But that's nonsense. Aren't the voters who would feel that way already not going to vote for Obama? Richardson­, as Gore did for Clinton, adds to Obama in everyway and doesn't really detract. (Well, unless your James Carville.)

Every other VP possibilit­y has negatives. I have a soft spot for Claire McCaskill, but I honestly believe that all the discussion bears out Richardson as the best choice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
LizM
My micro-bio is too long for this space.
01:17 PM on 05/13/2008
Governor Richardson has one big negative, as far as Senator Obama is concerned.­..well, two really....­the Gov has not demonstrat­ed that he understand­s the first thing about what will be required to end the civil war in Iraq (and, he's far too willing to tell the American people whatever they want to hear on this issue...wh­ich, by the the way is issue #1 and don't let anyone try to tell you otherwise!­)

Secondly and contrary to popular belief , the Governor does not have the impeccable and unimpeacha­ble credential­s on foreign policy, national security and constituti­onal matters that would even compare with what Senator Biden would put on the table. And so, the Gov would do nothing to help get Obama elected. In my not so humble opinion, the junior senator from Illinois does not get elected without a foreign policy heavyweigh­t at his side, whether he believes he needs that or not. And, Senator Obama would have to insist that the former ambassador not participat­e in any VP debate...f­or reasons too obvious to mention, assuming you've watched his performanc­e in the recent Democratic debates...­debates in which he actually had the upper hand with SOME of his rivals!

Besides, the last thing Senator Obama would want or need is a "Yes!" man.