Will Thomas

BIO

Will Thomas

The Huffington Post

Obama Vice President Picks: Who Are The Frontrunners?

May 9, 2008 11:47 AM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

About Will Thomas

Will Thomas is an Associate News Editor and Political Reporter at the Huffington Post. Previously, he worked as a researcher for Talking Points Memo and TPMmuckraker. He lives in New York.


With the Democratic nomination now in its endgame, it's time to speculate on that question that makes politicos weak at the knees: who will be tapped to be vice president? Unlike the top job, there is no election here, and it's the first big choice that we get to see the candidate make about his cabinet.

So, who will Obama pick? Will he favor someone with experience like Joe Biden? A Western governor like Janet Napolitano? Or will he satisfy the media's desire for a dream team and try for the Obama/Clinton ticket?

We've identified 10 possible VP choices for Obama, as well as the general criteria that might guide his decision. Think we're missing someone? Let us know in the comments section. And be sure to register your favorite on HuffPost's Vice President poll.

WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN A VEEP

  • Location, location, location: A VP who is popular at home can help land a win in a tossup state. It's one reason why someone like Sherrod Brown (OH) could be a good pick. Of course, location isn't everything; Cheney, after all, is from Wyoming.
  • Strong anti-war record: It's not a requirement that someone be against the war to run on an Obama ticket, but they will have to have a good track record explaining why they changed their mind. Otherwise, expect all those comments about Hillary Clinton to come up, as well as one word: "opportunist."
  • Post-partisan record: If you're running to overcome the divided state of politics, you probably won't inspire confidence by picking Sen. Russ Feingold as your running mate. Sen. Jim Webb (a former Republican) or Gov. Schweitzer (picked a Republican as his Lieutenant General) are good examples.
  • Complementing record: On the one hand, a VP can balance a candidate's weaknesses. On the other hand, they can magnify those shortcomings. Richardson and Biden, for example, have long resumes that let them go toe-to-toe with McCain, but it could remind voters of Obama's inexperience.


THE TOP TIER

Jim Webb
Webb is the closest thing to a frontrunner for Obama's VP these days. A former Republican, he served as Secretary of the Navy for Ronald Reagan. Webb defeated George "Macaca" Allen to become a junior senator in Virginia.

Pro: Webb is a good foil for Obama's post-partisan message, and he's got the military credentials to match up with John McCain. He's good at playing the attack dog, which will let Obama take the high road. And he's from trending-blue Virginia, which would be a great pickup in November for Democrats. He's also pro-guns.

Con: Webb can be a little out-of-control as attack dogs go.

---

Hillary Clinton
This ticket is either a dream or a nightmare. Some see it as the only way to reunite the Democrats in time for November. Other see it as the fastest way to destroy the Obama brand.

Pro: Strong appeal with working class voters and women.

Con: See Iraq War vote, 3AM phone call, Bill Clinton in South Carolina, and the month of March.

---

Bill Richardson
You know him, you love him; he's the New Mexico governor with a heart of gold, a kickin' mustache, and -- thanks to James Carville -- a new nickname.

Pro: You've heard them all before. A foreign policy resume a mile long, executive experience, and a lock with Hispanic voters. And he picked Obama, despite his Clinton ties.

Con: Did you watch any of the debates?

---

Joe Biden
He is Mr. Foreign Policy. He also claims the best line of the primary season thus far. Too bad no one told Iowans he was running for President.

Pro: He trumps any foreign policy claims that McCain brings to the table. He can hit McCain hard.

Con: He tends to hit everyone hard. And he's a Washington figure, which could hurt a campaign running against Washington.

---

Brian Schwietzer
Never heard of him? You should. Schweitzer has been Montana's governor since 2005, and is currently one of the most popular governors in the country.

Pro: In addition to his executive experience, Schweitzer has spent a good amount of time around the world (including the Middle East) in his former life as an irrigation developer. His popularity and his pro-gun stance could help Obama in the Mountain West area. He also refused PAC and special interest money during his 2004 campaign. He's also criticized the economic consequences of the Iraq War, an approach that Obama has recently adopted.

Con: Despite his travels, he has no official foreign policy experience. He also doesn't bring in any delegates from his own state (though that could be offset if he helps in places like North Dakota, Wyoming and Colorado).


WORTH WATCHING

Janet Napolitano
Another popular Western governor, Napolitano has settled into a second term in McCain's very red home state. She also backed Obama early in the race.

Pros: She has proven her executive capacity in Republican territory, as well as the Southwest, which will help sway Obamicans. A female candidate could also help reunite the Democrats.

Con: Her stance on immigration could prove costly among Hispanic voters.

---

Sherrod Brown
Brown is a favorite among progressives for his economic populism and outspoken criticism of the war.

Pro: Could help deliver an important swing state.

Con: Doesn't really satisfy the idea of a unity ticket.

---

Chuck Hagel
A Republican senator who has fought with Bush tooth and nail over the Iraq war, Hagel is one of three Republicans who voted with the Democrats over a withdrawal plan. He also has served on the Banking, Foreign Relations and Intelligence Committees. Hagel has also said he's considering endorsing Sen. Obama.

Pro: Broad Senate experience. A living embodiment of Obama's commitment to work with like-minded Republicans. Also is a veteran with experience in Reagan's administration

Con: He is still a Republican (especially on abortion and health care), which would not sit well with a lot of Democrats.

---

Wesley Clark
Rhodes Scholar turned four-star general and once-presidential candidate. A star resource for Democrats on military affairs.

Pro: John McCain would have to salute him. And he has Southern appeal.

Con: Backed Clinton early and has been a very active surrogate. Not always the best politician on a national stage.

---

Kathleen Sebelius
Talk about reaching across the aisle. This Kansas governor convinced a Republican to leave his party, become a Democrat, and run as her lieutenant governor. Kansas is rife with stories of Republicans undergoing conversions, and Sebelius gets a good amount of credit for this.

Pro: Another Red-state governor with an excellent post-partisan record. Having a female VP could be a strong ticket.

Con: Sebelius didn't wow anyone with her response to the State of the Union, which raises questions about how she would do on the national stage. And her location in Kansas doesn't add much that Obama doesn't already get from Illinois.

---

Tom Daschle
The former South Dakota senator, Daschle has been a strong supporter of Obama's campaign; he's a national co-chair and is rumored to play a big part in the campaign strategy.

Pro: Can bring in votes from his home state.

Con: Weak campaigner: he lost his Senate seat while he was the sitting Majority Leader.


HONORABLE MENTION

Mike Bloomberg
Sure, most voters have never heard of him. And sure, he's never been a national player. But the current mayor of New York has been a darling of the media, as they spent months seeing if he would get into the Presidential race. Coupled with some private conversations with Obama that caused a tizzy in the fall, a Bloomberg candidacy could cause some media attention that would rival that of even John McCain.

Pros: Excellent economic record. Interested in policy minutiae. Post-partisan (former Republican switched to Independent). Media darling.

Cons: Unheard of outside his home state. It's tough not to seem like an elitist when the world 'billionaire' applies to you.

 

Comments
1675
Pending Comments
0
Post a Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (19 pages total)

Obamma has to choose someone CFR approves of and who is on that list, just as simple as that folks. This rules out many who are on the short list. Hillary is on that list, Gore is on that list, Bill Clinton is on that list. Whether Webb, Clark, or any of the other people get chosen, unless they are on the list, He can't choose them. The public has to understand this. Trust me, they know who has to be chosen, hIllary or Obamma, which is another reason McCain is freaking out. He doesn't want anyone on that list. That is the bottom line.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 05/11/2008

It always amazes me that the media always puts potential VP names on these lists that would do nothing but raise the question "Who the hell is that..." rather than helping the candidate. Does it really make sense to have a VP who is a woman or a minority when the concern is whether you can win over white males or at least be competitive with McCain for them? Does it make sense to add a governor to a ticket that needs to shore up it's foreign policy and defense position? Did adding an experienced hand to the ticket hurt JFK or Bush? Certainly not. Stick to the experienced helpful possibilities like Biden, Clark and Webb

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 05/11/2008

Another A+

Well, an A.

I had to dock you a little for Clark. Good guy, and bright, but I want someone who can deliver a verbal punch early and often if need be.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 05/11/2008

Jim Webb or Bill Richardson, yes; the others? No.
Definitely NOT Hillary.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 05/11/2008

Clear and concise. A+

For those of you suggesting Sebelius, Pelosi, Schweitzer (I'm guessing it's not Albert), McCaskill, etc.: Whatever you're smoking, I'd like some...

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 05/11/2008

I bet on Edwards ...
Seems like peeps forgot about him :)
He has tremendous appeal to "white blue collars"
Plus, like Obama, he tried to run a "different campaign" by not taking PAC and federal lobbyists money.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 05/11/2008

It is possible that so much has changed on the American political landscape since the last presidential election that it won't matter who Senator Obama chooses to share the ticket with because this is the year of the Democrat! However, just in case we are back to politics as usual this fall and people, once again, insist on voting against interest - their own and that of their country - I would suggest that Senator Obama has a very critical decision to make as to who he will select as his running mate. And, merely concentrating on an important state and who will help him win it will, I think, be a losing proposition.

Since this presidential campaign promises to be about foreign policy and national security, first and foremost, and given that Senator Obama does not have a strong footing in either realm, as has been much in evidence throughout this campaign, his running mate should be the leader among Democrats on foreign policy/national security and have credentials in these areas that are impeccable and unimpeachable.

Now, of course, I don't believe Senator Biden should accept the veep position in an Obama administration UNLESS he is given full reign over the Iraq file and carte blanche to implement his strategy to promote and facilitate a sustainable political settlement in Iraq, regardless of what the incoming SOS has to say about it!

...continued...

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 05/11/2008

...continued...

If Senator Obama doesn't have a foreign policy heavyweight with him on the ticket who can say, for example, that "the military option for Iran is OFF THE TABLE!" and have the credentials worthy of backing those words up and resisting being knocked down as "soft on national security", then we better start preparing our collective psyche for another four more years of more of the same, maybe even eight!

I'm not saying that John McCain has a more sound judgement on foreign policy, particularly on Iraq, because he most certainly does not. But, I'm not convinced that the kind of foreign policy/national security arguments McCain will undoubtedly be making won't sway a very large swath of the electorate. Barack Obama needs a running mate who can not only counter those arguments but obliterate them.

Bottom line...I don't think Obama wins the general without Biden on the ticket. But, again, Biden shouldn't even consider the offer unless it comes with substantial influence over US policy in Iraq.

And, if anyone can make us forget all about Cheney, Biden certainly can. I can damn sure guarantee y'all one thing, come January¦after having the opportunity to see Biden in action under the spotlight of the national media for a few months (they will have no choice but to cover Obama's VP selection, right?), many in this country will be scratching their heads and wondering why on earth Biden isn't the one sitting in the oval office!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 05/11/2008

What about Robert Kennedy Jr.?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 05/11/2008

Enough of the symbolic VP candidates. The only thing that matters is can the VP deliver a state that's otherwise up for grabs.

Picking Edwards in 2004 because he had the "message" or Leiberman in 2000 because he had some conservative/Jewish appeal failed to accomplish the one thing needed to win: Deliver one more state.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 05/11/2008

Good point but I gues he will be as frail as Obama when it comes to National security issues... what do you think?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 05/11/2008

has already come out for Clinton....

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 05/11/2008

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Strickland

The Democratic governor of Ohio was elected in 2006, and previously served six terms in the House of Representatives. He is 66 years old. He has two masters degrees, one in theology and a doctorate in psychology. When he ran for governor, he was endorsed by a bunch of law enforcement types, the Ohio Legislative Black Caucus and the NRA. (Hey, I hate them, but they won't come out in 2008 and say they were wrong.) 340 Republicans endorsed his candidacy for governor, as did many Ohio newspapers and mayors. Strickland's high approval/low disapproval ratings have been adversely impacted recently, probably due to his support for Hillary Clinton for president.

Why Strickland? Because all my adult life I have heard it said that Republicans can not win the presidency without Ohio. Plus, picking a HRC supporter could help mend some rifts.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 05/11/2008

find out who brian schweitzer is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0i9o-ThOPM&feature=related

you may not be disappointed.

anti-war, pro-choice, anti-PAC, anti-Real ID, pro gun, bi-partisan. His number one issue: ween the US off of foreign oil in 15 years by any means necessary, creating new jobs and preventing more war.

if not veep, then secretary of energy.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 05/11/2008

Ed Rendell can deliver PA!!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 05/11/2008

Are you an Amateur Copyright attorney or what? This comes under fair use and political speech of A short-excerpt exception, but I do appreciate the correction and apologize for my laziness. My point is that the above THOMAS LIST is not a credible list. I"ve heard whispers that Mit Romney is also a Veep candidate, which proves TO ME that the two-party system is a sham. Anyone who believes they are being represented by either of the two major parties has swallowed too much of the RIVER LETHE. Will Joe LIEBERMAN turn out to be McCain"s running mate? Then we can all laugh our way to our polling places. I"d recommend voters leave both parties in-Mass.

Again, I apologize. (And, thanks for the insulting reply). I"ll guarantee this was not written by Novak or anyone but Willl.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 05/11/2008

I really like Tim Kaine for VP. He's the Democratic Governor of Virginia, a catholic and gave a great Democratic response to Bush's State of the Union Address in 2006.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 05/11/2008

Arianna Huffington.

Pro An intellectual. Unafraid to speak her mind. Can kick O'Reily and Hannity's ass any day of the
week. Can speak Greek. Et.c. Etc.

Con. None

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 05/11/2008

There is that natural born citizen problem in the Constitution.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 05/11/2008

The only combinations that can save the Democrats now are Gore-Obama and Clinton-Obama, but Obama will refuse second billing, so forget about it.

Obama would need a whole football-team of VPs to get rid of his weaknesses and he is only allowed one...

10 of the 11 are jokes.
Webb, even shorter in the senate than Obama, which is a feat... Does have military record, but is that enough?
Richardson could not even win Latinos in Florida and failed to deliver his state in 2004. Useless, his voters will be thrilled that he considers her win in NM a "technicality".
Biden is a foreign policy expert with limited national appeal. Obama feels that foreign policy is his strong suit...
Schweitzer is running for re-election, so forget him.
Sebilius did not manage to burst into the national arena. Kansas is too republican and does not bring much electoral college votes.
Napolitano gimme a break!
Brown Who he?
Hagel forget him! Nobraska!
Clark is a Clinton man and a national policy greenhorn.
Daschle Nobody likes him.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 05/11/2008

Written like a true Clintonian. Obama doesn't need Gore and he will do better without Hillary. She has become nothing more than a joke and a thorn in the Democratic party.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 05/11/2008

An excellent choice for a VP for Obama: Senator Chris Dodd is number two on the foreign relations committee. He is strong on protecting the environment and the Constitution. (Dodd worked against the Senate bill that would grant retroactive legal protection to any phone or internet company that helped with the president's secret, warrantless wiretapping program.) He is savvy about the economy and stresses having a job as number one in importance to voters. He would be in his 70"s after eight years, so all the other present top choices for VP would be free to run then without competition from him.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 05/11/2008

Someone also needs to come up with a creative way to keep Clinton in the loop, but NOT as VP. Way too controversial and her hubby has proven unable to stay out of the spotlight.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 05/11/2008

Keep her in teh senate and let her rise up in power there to push forward agendas. Or possibly have her as secretary of education.
Personally, I prefer she stay in the senate.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 05/11/2008

After the Iran statement, certainly not State or Defense or Ambassador to the UN; after her deficit, certainly not Treasury or Commerce. Not good at Homeland Security; not enough legal experience for SCOTUS...what does that leave? I think she would make a great governor of New York. Make Bill an ambassador to Micronesia.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 05/11/2008

He'd like Ambassador to Thailand.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 05/11/2008

I'd throw out the idea of Obama not only announcing his VP but also giving a nod as to who his Sec. of State and Sec. of Defense would be as a way to counter the claims that he doesn't have experience and the McCain War Hero status.

Originally I would have said Biden, but with the state of the party, I'd now give the nod to Kathleen Sebelius as VP. When I was volunteering for the Biden campaign he raved about her and she could potentially keep many female Clinton supporters in the loop.

I'd announce the following all on the same day:

VP: Sebelius
Sec. of State: Biden
Sec. of Defense: Clark or Webb

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 05/11/2008

Richardson should be considered for State.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 05/11/2008

How about Ron Paul?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 05/11/2008

I really like the idea of Hagel. That would give huge "different kind of candidate" and "post-partisan" appeal and you would have someone on the ticket that out-Mccains Mccain.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 05/11/2008

Isn't he a strong opponent of pro-choice?