Sam Stein

BIO

Sam Stein

The Huffington Post

Chuck Hagel Takes On McCain, Repeatedly Praises Obama

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

May 20, 2008 10:06 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

About Sam Stein

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C. Previously he has worked for Newsweek magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity. He has a masters from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and is a graduate of Dartmouth College. Sam can be reached at stein@huffingtonpost.com.


Chuck Hagel is quickly becoming Barack Obama's answer to Joe Lieberman.

The Republican Senator from Nebraska was a political thorn in McCain's side on Tuesday night, repeatedly lavishing praise on the presumptive Democratic candidate and levying major foreign policy criticisms at the GOP nominee and the Republican Party as a whole. At one point, Hagel even urged the Arizona Republican to elevate his campaign discourse to a higher, more honest level.

"We know from past campaigns that presidential candidates will say many things," Hagel said of some of McCain's recent rhetoric, namely his policy on talking to Iran. "But once they have the responsibility to govern the country and lead the world, that difference between what they said and what responsibilities they have to fulfill are vastly different. I'm very upset with John with some of the things he's been saying. And I can't get into the psychoanalysis of it. But I believe that John is smarter than some of the things he is saying. He is, he understands it more. John is a man who reads a lot, he's been around the world. I want him to get above that and maybe when he gets into the general election, and becomes the general election candidate he will have a higher-level discourse on these things."

Hagel, speaking to a small gathering at the residence of the Italian ambassador, took umbrage with several positions taken by the McCain campaign, including the Arizona Senator's criticism of Obama for pledging to engage with Iran. Engagement is not, and should not be confused for, capitulation, he argued.

"I never understand how anyone in any realm of civilized discourse could sort through the big issues and challenges and threats and figure out how to deal with those without engaging in some way...."

Hagel then offered a wry tweak of his GOP colleague. "I am confident that if Obama is elected president that is the approach we will take. And my friend John McCain said some other things about that. We'll see, but in my opinion it has to be done. It is essential."

Hagel, who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, went on to belittle the tendency for some within his own party to disparage those who tout diplomacy. "You take some risks in talking about this," he said, "especially in the Congress, because you can immediately be branded as an appeaser."

And when asked to respond to rumors circulating within political circles that the Bush administration was ginning up the possibility of war with Iran, the Senator even raised the specter of impeachment.

"You've got the power of impeachment, now that is a very defined measure if you are willing to bring charges against the president at all. You can't just say I disagree with him, let's impeach him," said Hagel. An attack on Iran without Congress' consent, he added, "would bring with it... outstanding political consequences, including for the Republican Party."

Finally, he charged that if the preeminent foreign policy objective is to achieve security in Israel and stability within the broader Middle East, then the Bush track -- which McCain has endorsed -- is ill-advised.

"If you engage a world power or a rival, it doesn't mean you agree with them or subscribe with what they believe or you support them in any way," he said. "What it does tell you is that you've got a problem you need to resolve. And you've got to understand the other side and the other side has got to understand you."

Much of Hagel's address, hosted by the Ploughshares Fund, was spent weaving between Obama praise and McCain quips. He urged the media, for example, to focus on important policy issues an "not just why Barack [doesn't] wear flag pins on his lapel."

Asked whether he would be open to serving as Secretary of Defense in a hypothetical Obama administration, Hagel demurred. But in the process, he praised the Illinois Democrat for being open to a bipartisan cabinet.

"Take me out of the equation," he said, "I do think that the next president and Obama has talked about this, and McCain not as much, I think he is going to have to put together a very wide, smart, experienced, credible, bipartisan cabinet. And that is going to be required absolutely."

 
 

Comments
766
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)

what a great veep he would be, if barack would select him and if he would say "yes"...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 05/24/2008

Why yes!
A Republican V.P. that is "a heartbeat away from the presidency", as Hillary would say.
What could go wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 05/24/2008

Thanks Hagel for going beyond party lines and making a honest assessment. This is what the people need right now from our leaders.
Can't wait to rap this demo nomination on June 3 and get to the VP nods.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 05/24/2008

Although there are at least 4 GOOD VP CHOICES among the DEMS
like BIDEN RICHARDSON EDWARDS and DODD etc.................
for the sake of VICTORY AND UNITY 08 Sen. CHUCK HAGEL is a GREAT CHOICE.
The dissafected REPUBLICANS will realize that OBAMA really is a Post PARTISAN politician who wants to unite the country to solve our Nation's problems/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 05/24/2008

It is time to make a trade:

Hagel for Liebermann.

Wait! Also throw in Arlan Specter and the Republicans are still coming out ahead!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 05/24/2008

DELUSIONAL. You should wear this on a shirt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 05/24/2008

HAGEL SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND LUGAR SECRETARY OF STATE. HILLARY AMBASSADOR OF IRAQ

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 05/24/2008

What I like about Hagel and often wondered why he was a republican -- he's seem to have tons of common sense. Not a wonder he finds himself at odds with his repug party. I could see him as a VP choice not sure how the Dem leaders would feel about it though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 05/23/2008

I'm not crazy about Hagel being VP, however, if it would guarantee us victory in November, I'd gladly welcome him aboard.

Obama/Clinton '08 = NEVER!!!
Obama/Hagel '08 = Maybe
Obama/Webb '08 = Perfect

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 05/23/2008

You want guarantees? Are we that insecure? We are in a zone where not only should we be Democrats but we MUST BE Democrats! It is time to boldly stand on our own two feet and lead!

Obama/Webb '08 = Perfect

I would say Obama/Webb '08 = LANDSLIDE! There is no dreamier dream ticket! YES WE CAN!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 05/24/2008

LOVE IT! 100% in agreement

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 05/23/2008

I like Hagel at Sec of State. Richardson or Webb at VP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 05/23/2008

Richardson is my second choice after Webb for VP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 05/24/2008


The VP slot belongs to a loyal liberal like Richardson or Edwards, not a Republican.

I would like to see Hagel on our Cabinet at Veterans Affairs where he could assist

all of our own war victims after we end the Crusade for Muslim Resources in 2009.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 05/23/2008

Speakingtruth - actually I'd never thought about that, you're right wouldn't be very fair to democrats who are just that "democrats". Like Hagel allot, still wonder why he's a republican, same goes for Powell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 PM on 05/23/2008

I wonder why Leibermann claims to be an Independent, while caucusing with those who have nothing but hatred for him.

This put him in the same category as the Vermont Senator (no, not Leekey), who would not make a single decision without referring to Das Capital, first.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 05/24/2008

Scat, troll

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 05/24/2008

Sorry if I missed it, but does anyone know Hagel's domestic policies? He's great on the war, but we can't risk having an anti-choice, anti-tax, love-those-lobbyists Republican on the ticket, no matter how good he is on Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 05/23/2008

Relax. He won't be on the ticket. He SHOULD be embraced by the Obama administration in an appropriate defense/foreign policy role . . . the United States of America has to get on track to recover our geopolitical soul. Hagel has some bona fides that partisan politics - or domestic disagreements - should not impair.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 05/23/2008

Hagel could be a risk to help Obama get elected but he would be an asset in his cabinet. But he does keep the war as the main issue which is a plus. Question is whether Obama ran a great campaign or Hillary ran a poor one. I think both are true. I think the super delegates are quiet in order to get rid of the power of the Clintons. She reminds me of a chicken who had his head cut off and is still running around. Obama has plenty of time to figure out the VP, whose main job is to get him elected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 05/23/2008

I have been an admirer of Sen. Hagel for years. Here is a guy who stands by what he says, and his VietNam experience is fantastic. I vote him for VP and/or Jim Webb. I thought I would give Hill a pass, but just can't do it. I changed my mind. Period. Why? Because she would suck the life out of Obama and would drive him crazy. His BP would rise accordingly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 05/23/2008

Viet Nam experience counts for nothing. It did not help John Kerry. Lack of it did not hinder George W. Bush. Doubtful if it will help John McCain. Nor would it help Jim Webb.

When the VietNam veterans came home in the early seventies, they were spat on, called baby-killers or worse by the same people who - along with their misbegotten offsprings - claim to honor, support and respect the troops, today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 05/24/2008

As opposed to W, who whiled away his time being AWOL and blitzed on cocaine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 05/24/2008

I have a very funny feeling that Mr. Hagel will be the next VP of the United States (Mr. Obama will be president). Put that in your pipe and smoke it, folks. (and I approve of this message !!)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 05/22/2008

Would it not be absolutely hilarious if Obama (presumptive Democrat Presidential candidate) picked Hagel, a maverick Republican, to be his VP, AND John McCain picked Joe Leibermann, a maverick Democrat, to be his running mate?

Now, THAT would be a good stuffing for anyone's pipe!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 05/24/2008

McCain / Hillary would be funnier, and also would explain a lot....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 05/24/2008

I totally agree with you. I live in Silicon Valley now, but was born and raised in Nebraska. I left there at the time Chuck Hagel was running for Governor against the democratic encumbent; Ben Nelson and won! His campaign was free of dirty tricks and mudslinging. When you think of Chuck and his politics no labels apply here. I have never ever voted republican, but I would in the case of Chuck Hagel. I like the way he stands up to George Bush and his thug friends and is the example for free and brave Americans. He should've ran for president. And with his no nonsense politics all this crazy stuff that's going on now would be completely shut down!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 05/23/2008

I can see this Senator as the VP candidate to run with BO. Could there be a better way to nullify J McSame as a candidate. He has everything they say BO needs in a running mate and brings votes no one in the Democratic Party could. He has the chops and charisma and fits perfectly with message of "Change" This could be the major blowout in election history!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 05/22/2008

I would rather have a democrat as VP but i wouldnt be mad if Chuck was picked. He is a stand up guy and i pretty much always agree with alot of what he is saying, the fact that he hates Bush is a great, I really like the guy and i sure would support him if he was on the Ticket. If he isnt on the ticket i would love to see him in the administration with a very powerful position. I LIKE CHUCK HAGEL.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 AM on 05/24/2008

True that!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 05/23/2008

I said this a few years ago, that when it comes to protecting his country whether on the battle field or in the Senate, Senator Chuck Hagel is not from a Republican, Democratic or Independent party.

First and most he is a kind of a man who will say "America First." Now, that we need all the good men to fix the mess we are in, I am sure, if Obama asks him to be his VP he will say, yes. If that does not work Secretary of Defense will be perfect for him. Maybe he is leaving the Senate, because he was unable to accomplish what he was set out to do in Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 05/23/2008

We like Chuck.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 05/22/2008

me 2

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 05/23/2008

I keep blogging "Chuck Hagel for VP on Obama's ticket". Just think another first! Maybe this country will have a chance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 05/22/2008

As regards impeachment it's just more of the same rhetoric. Those who can make possible a definite move towards the start of impeachment proceedings always back off or change subjects when pressed. Why talk about impeachment in the context of Iran when Bush and his cronies have done enough to deserve impeachment ten times over already?. Why talk about it at all unless you are prepared to do more than that and are actually starting to do it? It's become a hollow threat and just another reason for the world to ridicule the US.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 05/22/2008

I agree with Chuck regarding impeachment. It is too naive of democratic majority not to have set the ball rolling at least by starting the procedure. At least by that act, they would have shaken the stubbornness of Bush and Cheney and their administration and would have been more affective that arose regarding Iraq and a lot of domestic programs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 AM on 05/22/2008

Another reason to adore Kucinich. He tried.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 05/24/2008

My senator may be a fiscal conservative to my Trotsky populism, but he's a man, a statesman of principle forged in the organic realities of life, not the abstractions of detached insularity from the consequences of life by privilege and connections.

Bugsy Heretical Polemicisit
Job 1:6-12

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 05/22/2008

Job 1:6-12 indeed. How long shall we remain Satan's plaything? Even united the tower of babel fable awaits us. Nevertheless, pubic honesty and collaboration is all we have. Sometimes I feel like a motherless child. Freedom. Let it ring.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 AM on 05/22/2008

Here is a snippet of Chuck Hagel's voting record in the Senate:

He does not support a women"s right to choose

Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation

Voted NO on repealing tax subsidy for companies which move US jobs offshore.

Voted for the bankruptcy bill

Voted YES on allowing lobbyist gifts to Congress.

Voted YES on require photo ID (not just a signature) for voter registration

Voted NO on funding for National Endowment for the Arts

Voted YES on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers

Voted NO on adding 2 to 4 million children to SCHIP eligibility

Voted YES on limiting medical liability lawsu