Why Won't Fox Reveal "Analyst" Karl Rove As A McCain Adviser?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Salon   |  Amanda Terkel and Matt Corley   |   May 20, 2008 08:08 AM



It has now been more than three months since Karl Rove first appeared on television as a Fox News political analyst on Feb 5. In no fewer than 57 appearances, he has increasingly been welcomed into the Fox News fraternity, even joking that the "Hannity & Colmes" show should be renamed the "Colmes & Rove" show. After departing from a Bush administration in political tatters last August, he has reemerged to hold forth at length on the 2008 presidential race. And he may have plenty of seasoned political wisdom to offer Fox's audience. Rove, however, is playing a strategic role that he and the network refuse to reveal to viewers.

Fox News hosts routinely introduce Rove as a "former senior advisor to President Bush," "the architect," a "political wizard" and a "famed political consultant." But never has he been introduced as he should be -- as an informal advisor and maxed-out donor to John McCain's presidential campaign.

To political news junkies, a disclosure of Rove's relationship to the McCain campaign may seem unnecessary. But whether the public simply assumes that Rove supports McCain isn't the point. The "most influential pundit" in America, as Fox likes to trumpet, should have to play by the same rules as other high-profile political analysts. For example, Paul Begala and James Carville are regularly identified as supporters of Hillary Clinton when they appear on CNN. But Rove has been able to act as an independent observer while criticizing Clinton and Barack Obama, McCain's likely general election opponent.

There is nothing shocking about Rove's attacking Democrats, of course. And his operating with a duplicitous air of independence probably isn't going to make or break Fox's claim to "fair and balanced" coverage. But will the greater public catch on?

Read the whole story here.

 
Comments
129
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

Because he's not probably is the reason.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 05/21/2008

Careful karlbuncle,..................your stepping in that polar bear sh!t..............

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 05/21/2008

Ruppie Murdoch and Roger Ailes (Fox Noise) are both rich corporatists who what to keep control of the government so they can continue to cheat the average American. I think many of these "average Americans" are wising up finally (they are not buying the fear factor anymore) and November 2008 will be a day that will live in the history books as the date Americans woke up to the lies of the rich and threw these clowns out of office en masse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 05/21/2008

If you've actually watched his commentary, he's done as much advising to the Obama and Clinton campaigns has he has to the McCain campaign. They're always asking him "What should Obama do to overcome his problems with blue-collar workers?" or asking "how Clinton can secure the nomination?"

Why is it assumed that he's an advisor to the McCain campaign? It's stated that he's an "informal advisor" - what does that mean?

If you have to reveal everyone's support of a particular candidate, then every CNN and MSNBC newsperson would have to open their commentary with "BTW, it should be noted that I support Barack Obama".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 05/21/2008

Yeah, right. Just what we Democrats want. Advice from that felon.

In fact commentators SHOULDN"T support any candidate. They can like candidates. They can talk up candidates.

But they shouldn't give money to them or give advice to campaigns.

If they do that they should be in some other line of work. It is called CONFLICT OF INTEREST. A long standing legal concept.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 05/21/2008

Whatever. I suppose we should all be listening to Rove. Clinton's quoting his numbers crunch as being in her favor. If he's good enough for Clinton, "the working person's candidate", he's good enough for me!

NOT!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 05/21/2008

As the entire network is BUSH COUNTRY, it is understood that they are part of the RNC.

But, I guess, for purposes of openness, it should be revealed what role he plays in the McCain campaign.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 05/21/2008

Why Won't Fox Reveal "Analyst" Karl Rove As A McCain Adviser? Because he works for Hillary Clinton.

Last night Clinton was using Karl Rove's maps of how she was going to win the GE. When Hillary used to bash the "vast Right wing conspiracy", she neglected to tell us that she and Bill were part of it.

Using Karl Rove as a strategist during an election in which 82% of America believes we are headed in the wrong direction is the most bone headed thing Hillary could have done. We are in the Twilight Zone!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 AM on 05/21/2008

Why didn't HuffPo carry the story of Obama's advisor negotiating with Hamas?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 AM on 05/21/2008

huffo didnt carry the story of the obama advisor negotiatin with hamas because they are JUST LIKE MSNBC and the ALPHABETS...............................

the truth if FOREIGN TO ALL OF THEM....this rag included.................

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 05/21/2008

ROFLMAO: Reading residentchimp and rjean troll posts. I try to have a good laugh at least once a day. You idiots provide it. Thanks

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 05/21/2008

Folks, let's face it. Karl Rove has given our nation a "Hot Karl" over the last eight years. He's literally crapped all over us, and yet, the Repubs keep loving him all the more. Why is that? What is wrong with these people?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 05/20/2008

Once a turdblossom always a turdblossom.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 05/20/2008
photo

Liars don"t believe in lies. They believe in stretching the truth. Why would fox, a wolf in sheep"s clothing say truth or point out anyone who does not live in the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 05/20/2008

His a$$ will end up in JAIL and I hope he takes FOX NEWS with him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 05/20/2008

Here's a guy that knows he is untouchable and can do or say what he wants and work as he see's fit.
Isn't it scary? Just like the Bush/Cheney coup.
But what is really weird is that this guy looks like a Cherub. I mean, like those men who like doing it with boys.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 05/20/2008

I'm sure Fox News will reveal Karl Rove's ties to the McCain campaign as soon as MSNBC reveals Keith Olbermann's position as the offical mouthpiece of the DailyKooks and official cheerleader of Barak Obama on cable TV.

I won't hold my breath.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 05/20/2008

.
Oh, please DO hold your breath!
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 05/20/2008

Thanks for keeping the stereotype alive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 05/20/2008
photo

I wish you would, you would turn Blue, being already Red.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 05/20/2008
photo

Wow defending that disgusting fascist fat pig, much less unabashedly affiliating yourself with anything having to do with him. You've outdone even yourself, ohiomark.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 05/21/2008

His official title is "fat f-ck."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 05/20/2008
photo

Makes sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 05/21/2008

Karl Rove is not a man of TRUTH. So anybody who works for him or with him is the biggest LIAR in the world. Why would the FOX liars tell you the truth? What's in it for them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 05/20/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect