iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

McCain Swims With The Sharks

First Posted: 06/02/08 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 01:35 PM ET

Mccain Swins With Sharks

At a time when the public is sick of Washington insiders - just look at the 2006 election results - it's difficult to decide who poked a sharper stick in the eye of the electorate, Hillary Clinton hiring Mark Penn as her chief strategist, or John McCain signing up Charlie Black as his senior adviser.

On the surface, it's a tie. Both Penn and Black have become millionaires by exploiting their political connections; each headed a company - Burson-Marsteller and BKSH, respectively -- specializing the promotion of corporate interests over public interests; and each, interestingly, ran a subsidiary of WPP, a massive lobbying and public relations conglomerate.

On close examination, however, Black beats out Penn as the top campaign operative most out of sync with today's reform mood.

First, Black has not only been in the business for 28 years, far longer than Penn, but he was a pioneer in crashing through traditional ethical boundaries.

After working in the 1980 campaign of Ronald Reagan, Black joined forces with Roger Stone and Paul Manafort (and later, Lee Atwater) to form Black, Manafort and Stone. It became the first consulting firm to go "double breasted".

Before 1980, there had been a firewall between political consulting, on the one hand, and lobbying on the other. Political consultants viewed themselves as specialized professionals whose skills would be sullied by lobbying.

That was not the case for Black and his colleagues. What better service could a lobbying firm offer than the fact that its partners had helped guide a coterie of senators, congressmen and governors to victory? Would, for example, Jesse Helms or Strom Thurmond, two of Black's political clients, ever fail to return his phone calls?

"I think I've got -- if you just want to call it access -- I guess I've got access to just about anybody in the government," Black said in an August, 1989 interview, when the first President Bush was in office. "I think I know most of the [people in the Cabinet] through the experience of campaigns and around town. I guess I know most of the people in sensitive positions in the administration."

Asked about the ethics of lobbying public officials he had helped elect, Black argued: "I think there is a great advantage in dealing with people who you personally know and trust . . . most importantly, can they [elected officials] trust you [the lobbyist] to tell the truth . . . there is an advantage to the client and to the person in position of authority to deal with someone they know and trust," Black said.

Going "double-breasted" turned out to be a goldmine -- never mind the continued blurring of lines between campaign staffs and special interest pleaders.

Second, the more important reason why Black edges out Penn is that Hillary, in contrast to McCain, never claimed to be an anti-lobbying crusader. For her to hire Penn, chief honcho at Burson-Marsteller -- with clients ranging from Colombia to Coke -- may have run counter to prevailing public sentiment, but it did not shatter a reformist image Clinton had built her public persona on.

Not so for McCain. The Arizona Senator won the hearts and minds of journalists, editorial writers and self-styled public interest activists as Mr. Straight Arrow, the Republican who took on the corporate interests, sponsored the McCain-Feingold campaign finance act, and broke GOP ranks to denounce earmarks and tax cuts.

McCain's maverick form of integrity appealed to independents, who flocked to his 2000 campaign in every open primary he entered. Reporters clamored for a seat on the Straight Talk express where each would, for the first time in memory, get a chance to engage in give and take with a politician who appeared to say what he was actually thinking -- seemingly without talking points -- as McCain denounced sleaze, and with just the right kind of humility, defined himself as the political offspring of trust-busting Teddy Roosevelt.

But when McCain pieced together his 2008 campaign organization, it turned out that of all the candidates seeking the presidency, Democrat or Republican, McCain had filled the most top staff slots with registered lobbyists.

And who was a prime target of these lobbyists - lobbyists whose clients including such telecom companies as AT&T, Verizon and SBC Telecommunications; tobacco companies like Phillip Morris, UST Public Affairs and Lorillard; drug interests such as Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, GlaxoSmithKline and Bristol, Myers Squibb; and defense contractors Lockheed Martin and United Technologies?

None other than John McCain, the number one ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee and the number two Republican on the Senate Commerce Committee.

Equally problematic for McCain are the controversial current and former clients of his top campaign aides. These clients include former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos; Iraq wheeler-dealer and proponent of the US invasion Ahmed Chalabi; and the government of Myanmar (aka Burma).

As disclosures of such connections have trickled out, the McCain campaign has let at least five top aides go, and has established its own new in-house code of ethics barring staffers from serving as registered lobbyists. It is not clear whether these rules will be easily understood by the public: the policy exempts both campaign manager Rick Davis and senior adviser Charles Black, who have left their private firms for the duration of the campaign.

Black, speaking on behalf of the McCain campaign, on May 20 told reporters that all the fuss over lobbyists is merely political hype.

"This is complete inside-the-Beltway nonsense," Black said. "I do not believe that average voters out there care."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

At a time when the public is sick of Washington insiders - just look at the 2006 election results - it's difficult to decide who poked a sharper stick in the eye of the electorate, Hillary Clinton hir...
At a time when the public is sick of Washington insiders - just look at the 2006 election results - it's difficult to decide who poked a sharper stick in the eye of the electorate, Hillary Clinton hir...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 74
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:07 PM on 05/27/2008
you neglected to mention that david axelrod,obama's campaign manager, has also made a fortune working as a lobbyist . he tried to cover this up by going through a third party organization. just the whole story man
12:20 PM on 05/27/2008
"This is complete inside-the-Beltway nonsense," Black said. "I do not believe that average voters out there care." He is right. That is because too many people "reporting" the news don't "report" the news. They are afraid tat they will be denied access to the POTUS and that they will not be invited for "exclusive" interviews with POTUS and VPOTUS and other high officials in this criminally corrupt administration. John swims with the sharks because he is a shark also. He is not a victim of the sharks. He has gone out of his way to be helpful to them. He had no money when he met his future second wife, while still a naval officer serving as a liaison with Congress and the Navy Department after the Vietnam war. He divorced his first wife and married Cindy who used her beer distribution inheritance to finance his Senate run. He has not accounts, except for a checking account, un his name. He has been servicing his big money contributors ever since.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:46 AM on 05/27/2008
A look at McBush:

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21470
12:10 AM on 05/27/2008
McCain...you there?...you think we didn't notice your opposition to the GI bill on the grounds that it was too expensive?

You think we didn't notice the Congressional Budget Office's prediction that shows Webb's bill would have no net loss (16% increase in attrition, 16% new enrollment) due to an increase in benefits ?

You think that those of us with family members serving in the military agree to waiting 12 years before being eligible to maximum benefits under your and Graham's bill?

You think that we don't know about transferability of benefits under Webb's bill?

You think we didn't notice that you had no bill to offer until days before Memorial Day?

You think increasing Americans' competitive edge by equipping them with an education isn't a good investment economic investment?

Oh, that's right, the economy isn't your thing (your words)--except when it comes to catching a piece of for yourself from the failed savings and loan institutions.

And lastly, you don't really think we have confidence in you handling the war, do you?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GerryS
I WANT to pay $1 million per year in taxes, or mor
07:52 PM on 05/26/2008
the sharks won't bite McLame- professional courtesy
07:50 PM on 05/26/2008
When I first heard him speak, I was encouraged by the rhetoric of Mr. Obama (even if I did not agree with his policies). He told us he would tell the American people the truth even if it was not want we want to hear (like we should not spend billions of dollars to subsidize wealthy farmers even as commodity prices soar???...didn’t he mean that kind of truth???) or that we should not be distracted by the typical inside-the-beltway mainstream media politics of spin that so often consumes our politics. Then Obama pulls the ultimate politics of distraction move. Obama began talking about John McCain’s campaign aids having lobbyist ties and then claiming his (Obama’s) paid staff do not have such ties…even though its well know he has plenty of unpaid lobbyist working for his campaign…and all the while Obama is voting with the lobbyist on the farm bill!

Of course the media covers the meaningless McCain story which gives cover to Obama to vote unnoticed with the lobbyist on the farm bill. I don’t care who runs your campaign, I care what you say you want to do and how you vote. The Farm Bill is the ultimate pork barrel, lobbyists rewarding “politics as usual” type of bill.

So to all of you Obama fans, what good is it to supposedly disassociate yourself with lobbyist in your campaign when you vote with the lobbyists on the floor of the Senate?!?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skibum49
08:25 PM on 05/26/2008
Just to be accurate! Senators Obama, Clinton and McCain were not present for the vote to accept the conference report on the farm bill.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00130
09:03 PM on 05/26/2008
Obama indicated his support for it. McCain opposed it.
09:05 PM on 05/26/2008
More to the point, how do you justify Obama's support for the Farm Bill in light of his campaign rhetoric. Its completely hypocritial....no?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glaze
07:07 PM on 05/26/2008
Couldn't happen to an older guy...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kasinca
Liberal Vietnam Veteran
06:58 PM on 05/26/2008
The (R) after the name indicates: crook, liar, thug, or words to that effect.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:19 PM on 05/26/2008
Thats right, sharks will not eat a republican.............professional courtesy..............
05:49 PM on 05/26/2008
I swim with sharks rather often. I was free diving with them two days ago.... I think that comparing lobbyists to sharks is unfair and discriminatory to the sharks. Sharks are what they are, ancient creatures who live by hunting. They are honest, complex (more so than we give them credit for) and a bit of a mystery. There were five of them passing within arms reach of me as I sat on the sand at 40ft without air tanks. Take a look at these pics:

http://www.eliossub.com/html/enl_news.php

Shark related incidents killed seven people world wide last year and injured about three dozen. Sixty thousand people will die in car wrecks this year but I bet most of you will be getting into cars today....

McCain doesn't have the balls to swim with sharks....McCain swims with a far more dangerous and ugly critter that accounts for many more deaths.... lobbyists.

Lobbyists choose to be what they are and act as tools to suppress democracy and maintain the hold of corporations over our government and our lives. As such they are heartless eating machines with no higher brain function beyond feeding their corporate masters and the politicians who do their bidding. They often operate on the lowest instincts that humans are capable of. Their efforts often result in death, destruction, pollution and corruption....

Lobbyists scare the crap out of me. We should be making horror stories about THEM rather than sharks.
wiseapple
. just can not fail, if we never, ever stop
11:52 AM on 05/27/2008
Although it was a very informative article, I was expecting something a little different, too, because of the title. I tried to picture McCain swimming with sharks which led me to think that he'd do better swimming with Joe Frazier! Headcap and all.
04:05 PM on 05/26/2008
Americans,
Are we gonna let this slime Bush ball ruin the country even further? We need to defend this country from enemies within. Rove is an enemy of the people. If he wins again, we can expect more soldiers dying in Iraq and a war with Iran which will bankrupt us and reinstate the draft.
Mobilize. Get the vote out. Volunteer.
Now is the time for patriots to step up.
01:59 PM on 05/26/2008
AND IT LOOKS LIKE ONE OF THOSE SHARKS...

Bit his balls off -- a long time ago....
03:24 PM on 05/26/2008
No, No, No, No, No . . .
The axiom is:
It's easier and more entertaining to drink with the sharks than it is to jump them . . .
Problem for the conventional wisdom is:
The pilot fish are piranha this election cycle.
There's blood in the water and conventional Beltway-Boys are all crying foul as they are politically consumed.
It's all too polite. Let's have some real prosecution and jail time for these grievous offenders against the Constitution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:46 PM on 05/26/2008
Remember the big 2 are run by special interests and lobbyist. It might be more interesting to compare
Black and Axelrod. They are both very good at media and internet manipulation. However, the people may be unhappy to learn how manipulated they are by McCain, Obama and Hillary.
But, Huff will not comment on exposing Axelrod, as this is one of his manipulated sites.
I'd like the people to know more about the Chicago political machine connections as well.

Contrary to the facade, there is not a nickels difference in the candidates among the big 2. However, McCain is the most dangerous due to his Napoleon complex
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Eoin45
06:30 PM on 05/26/2008
"Contrary to the facade, there is not a nickels difference in the candidates among the big 2". So you think that voting for a war that has resulted in the deaths of thousands for no reason and not voting for it are less than a nickel's worth of difference? Your opinion isn't worth a plug nickel.
01:27 PM on 05/26/2008
Not only do I care, but I firmly believe that cleaning up the process by which we elect our representatives in government is core to getting back to a government of the people, for the people, by the people. It's all about 'access' and money, and we need to toughen up the rules in this regard.
01:12 PM on 05/26/2008
People who support murdering Tyrants and even those who are sometimes cannibals, just naturally seem to gravitate to John McCain..there must be something about him they see in common with these other barbaric swine murdering totalitarians...