Earthquake Prompts Chinese Officials To Clarify One Child Policy

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Earthquake Prompts Chinese Officials To Clarify One Child Policy stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CARA ANNA | May 26, 2008 05:01 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A mother of a student who died in a collapsed school in May 12 earthquake cries at the site in Juyuan, southwestern China's Sichuan province, Monday, May 26, 2008. The death toll from a powerful earthquake in China that toppled buildings, schools and chemical plants climbed Monday to 65,080, Cabinet spokesman Guo Weimin said, with 23,150 people still missing and 360,058 others injured. (AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko)

BEIJING — Chinese officials said Monday that the country's one-child policy exempts families with a child killed, severely injured or disabled in the country's devastating earthquake.

Those families can obtain a certificate to have another child, the Chengdu Population and Family Planning Committee in the capital of hard-hit Sichuan province said.

With so many shattered families asking questions, the Chengdu committee is clarifying existing one-child policy guidelines, said a committee official surnamed Wang.

"There are just a lot of cases now, so we need to clarify our policies," said Wang, who declined to elaborate.

The May 12 quake was particularly painful to many Chinese because it killed so many only children.

The earthquake has left more than 65,000 people dead so far, with more than 23,000 missing. Officials have not been able to estimate the number of children killed.

Chinese couples who have more than one child are commonly punished by fines. The announcement says that if a child born illegally was killed in the quake, the parents will no longer have to pay fines for that child _ but the previously paid fines won't be refunded.

If the couple's legally born child is killed and the couple is left with an illegally born child under the age of 18, that child can be registered as the legal child _ an important move that gives the child previously denied rights including free nine years of compulsory education.

China's one-child policy was launched in the late 1970s to control China's exploding population and ensure better education and health care. The law includes certain exceptions for ethnic groups, rural families and families where both parents are only children.

The government says the policy has prevented an additional 400 million births, but critics say it has also led to forced abortions, sterilizations and a dangerously imbalanced sex ratio as local authorities pursue sometimes severe birth quotas set by Beijing and families abort girls out of a traditional preference for male heirs.

Though commonly called a one-child policy, the rules offer a welter of exceptions and loopholes, some of them put into practice because of widespread opposition to the limits.

For example, in large parts of rural China, most families are allowed a second-child, especially if the first was a girl. Local officials often have wide discretion on enforcement, a fact that has made the policy susceptible to corruption.

Many Chinese have shown interest in adopting earthquake orphans, and Monday's announcement says there are no limits on the number of earthquake orphans a family can adopt. The adoptions, or even a future birth to a family that adopts an orphan, will not face the limitations of the one-child policy.

Officials estimated last week that the quake left about 4,000 orphans, but they warned they would make every effort to connect children with other family members.

BEIJING — Chinese officials said Monday that the country's one-child policy exempts families with a child killed, severely injured or disabled in the country's devastating earthquake. Those fam...
BEIJING — Chinese officials said Monday that the country's one-child policy exempts families with a child killed, severely injured or disabled in the country's devastating earthquake. Those fam...
Filed by Max Follmer  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
33
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- NoOtherWay I'm a Fan of NoOtherWay 3 fans permalink
photo

I'd like to see a no child policy.

In this day and age, having a child is equivalent to child endangerment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 AM on 05/27/2008

There are still thousands of Chinese orphans in that country.

Instead of allowing the Chinese families to "replace" children that they lost, why not encourage them to adopt the children there who still need homes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

They are serious about their birth control...­.kind of envious and disgusted at the same time...wis­h we put some breaks on procreation here....li­ke that family that is on their 20th kid or whatever that was.

overpopulation is a real burden...t­o all of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 05/26/2008
- 23000Days I'm a Fan of 23000Days 104 fans permalink
photo

As dictatorial, demeaning and archaic as this policy is, it has saved the world from 400M (almost half a billion!) in additional population. That's the total population of the U.S..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 05/26/2008

If the United States had adopted the "one child" policy years ago, there would be fewer young college educated first time voters to hijack the Democratic Primary process. At least change the Democratic platform to make abortion legal, safe, and often, instead of legal, safe, and rare.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 05/26/2008
- 23000Days I'm a Fan of 23000Days 104 fans permalink
photo

Yup, that's what we really need: Less college educated Americans! Do you by any chance hail from appalachia? Or perhaps you are a Rockefeller or a Bush.
Of all the comments I've read on hupo, and there are some insane wackos posting here, yours is far and away the most thoroughly asinine!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

ehrmmm...y­ou may be misreading his point.

hijack in a good way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 05/26/2008
- ohiomark I'm a Fan of ohiomark 121 fans permalink

Isn't Communism great?

You need a certificate to have another child.
I wonder if you can pick one up in the form of a gift card at the local mall food court.

Why again is communism a better form of government?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 05/26/2008

Who said communism is a better form of government? I don't think many people here would agree with that statement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

Who says it is? AND this isn't really communism, it's just a dictatorship becoming increasingly controlled by the corporations thus it is really a fascist government. No defense of communism, but the word is bandied about incorrectily in it's truest form.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 05/26/2008
- MsLiz I'm a Fan of MsLiz 105 fans permalink
photo

So I guess you are against single-payer health care, because of some Rube Goldberg logic?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 05/26/2008

This isn't the result of communism you dope. Let's remember that this same group once encouraged it's people to have children into the double digits, and now they're faced with this problem.

China is no more communist than we are. They have tasted free market capitalism, and they like it a lot. It is totalitarianism that is the problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 05/26/2008
- NewArtz I'm a Fan of NewArtz 83 fans permalink
photo

Well, with all those extra unmarried males in China, there seems to be a need for the one and only proven not to conceive children sexual relationship: homosexual. You think I'm kidding. Nothing will help stem the population growth more than allowing gay men and women to flourish.

You think China sees it that way?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 05/26/2008

I always wonder about what the anti-abortionists think about China's policy, and how they implicitly support it by buying products imported from there. Hypocrisy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 05/26/2008

they can support it because at the end of the day they prefer the cheap goods they can purchase at WalMart over their convictions as nut case hardline rednecks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

Truth be told, that is the way it is.

Cheap goods over conviction. Complete hypocrites.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 05/26/2008
- Yaa I'm a Fan of Yaa 2 fans permalink

China's One Child policy is too harsh.

Allowing a couple to have two children seems to eventually reach zero population growth, and at the same time evens out the ratio of boys and girls. I think that right now there is an overabundance of boys in China and not nearly enough girls for them to marry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 05/26/2008

Personally, I think having an overabundance of males in China is a good thing. I hear because the competition amongst them for a female is so tough, they are some of the most desirable males to marry. There is a complete role-reversal there with the males doing all the housework (cooking, cleaning, child-rearing). This is good for a traditionally male-dominated society.

Male-order husbands, anyone? lol!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 05/26/2008
- Yaa I'm a Fan of Yaa 2 fans permalink

I cannot picture a huge number of males taking over all tradtionally female tasks. Do the women become the chief wage earners? I cannot picture that situation either.

Where do you get your information?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

While I understand your attempt at humor the harsh reality is totally different. Females are routinely kidnapped at all ages. Stolen from families then raised to marry a male from another town or village.

In the cities, the idiocy of having only a male child is becoming a part of the past, BUT since most of China is still stuck in the ideology that a family with a male child is a blessed family and a girl is a curse, that is still the norm to abort and outright kill live female births.

Midwives are usually tasked with suffocating the female baby at birth and declaring it a stillborn so the family can try again. Two, three, and more killings happen routinely before a male child is born.

YET the pro life folks could care less about those babies, because it's easier to picket around their local women's clinic or advocating the killing of abortion doctors BUT give up them cheap Chinese goods at Wal Mart?

What are you ..........­..........­...Crazy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 05/26/2008
- escapee I'm a Fan of escapee 3 fans permalink
photo

maybe they should allow them to add a spare just in case...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 05/26/2008
- emerywood I'm a Fan of emerywood 4 fans permalink

Like it or not, China's One Child policy is China's contribution to fighting global warming and carbon emission. Imagine if India and other countries with huge population and pollution can join in, they won't need carbon tax or such desperate measures. It is totally correct to stop that for now in the earthquake ravaged areas for those parents who had lost their only child.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

Yes, but we only have ten years before the damage from CO2 is irreversible. It takes an entiire generation before the effects of a one child policy is detectible.

I think that a truly progressive nation, would make the one child policy retroactive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

I'm a first born, so I could go for that. ;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 05/26/2008
- apoyo I'm a Fan of apoyo 41 fans permalink

Retroactive? How do you do that? Euthanasia? Only the first born are exempt?

Even though their policy sounds harsh, it is their contribution to the world. Imagine what would be said if they had runaway reproduction. The same people criticizing them now would be complaining about their population growth.

People in this country flip off drivers who maintain the speed limit. Conservation? What is that? It sounds inconvenient.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 05/26/2008
- Soule23 I'm a Fan of Soule23 2 fans permalink

Ummm...are you really trying to say that China is a model country as far as sustainability is concerned? I'm pretty sure that they are tied with US as the worst...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

China actually has exceeded the US in CO2 emissions. But that's irrelevant. As long as they're getting rid of all those excess fetuses, we give them kudos for their effort.

Sometimes you have to ignore the results, and just praise their good intentions!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

yes but china has one billion people we have 300 million-its apples to orange the us is the CO2 pig.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 PM on 05/26/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect