EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

McCain's AP Interview: Criticizes Obama On Iraq

LIZ SIDOTI and BARRY MASSEY   05/26/08 09:22 PM ET   AP

Mccain Interview

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Republican John McCain on Monday sharply criticized Democratic rival Barack Obama for not having been to Iraq since 2006, and said they should visit the war zone together.

"Look at what happened in the last two years since Senator Obama visited and declared the war lost," the GOP presidential nominee-in-waiting told The Associated Press in an interview, noting that the Illinois senator's last trip to Iraq came before the military buildup that is credited with curbing violence.

"He really has no experience or knowledge or judgment about the issue of Iraq and he has wanted to surrender for a long time," the Arizona senator added. "If there was any other issue before the American people, and you hadn't had anything to do with it in a couple of years, I think the American people would judge that very harshly."

McCain, a Navy veteran and Vietnam prisoner of war, frequently argues that he's the most qualified candidate to be a wartime commander in chief. In recent weeks, he has sought portray Obama, a first-term senator, as naive on foreign policy and not experienced enough to lead the military.

The Iraq war, which polls have shown that most of the country opposes, is shaping up to be a defining issue in the November presidential election.

McCain, who wrapped up the GOP nomination in March, supports continued military presence in Iraq though he recently said he envisions victory with most U.S. troops coming home by January 2013 if he's elected. Obama, who has all but clinched the Democratic nomination, says he will remove U.S. combat troops within 16 months of taking office, though sometimes he shortens it to 11 months.

"For him to talk about dates for withdrawal, which basically is surrender in Iraq after we're succeeding so well is, I think, really inexcusable," said McCain, who has been to Iraq eight times, most recently in March.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton declined to respond directly to McCain, saying only: "Senator Obama thinks Memorial Day is a day to honor our nation's veterans, not a day for political posturing."

Over the weekend, Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of McCain's top surrogates, laid the groundwork for McCain's criticism in a television interview in which he noted Obama's absence from Iraq and floated the idea that Obama and McCain should go together to be briefed by Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Asked whether he'd be willing to take such a trip, McCain told the AP: "Sure. It would be fine."

"I go back every few months because things are changing in Iraq," he said. McCain questioned whether Obama has ever been briefed by Petraeus. "I would also seize that opportunity to educate Senator Obama along the way."

Both McCain and Obama spent part of Memorial Day in New Mexico, a general election battleground that was decided by razor-thin margins in 2000, for Democrat Al Gore, and in 2004, for Republican President Bush.

Obama addressed veterans Monday in Las Cruces while McCain used a speech at the New Mexico Veterans Memorial in Albuquerque to press his case against withdrawing troops from Iraq, saying they must continue their mission even though he's "sick at heart" by mistakes at the outset of the war.

McCain also defended his opposition to Senate-passed legislation that would provide additional college financial aid to veterans, a measure Obama supports.

The Republican made no direct mention of the Democrat but seemed to poke at him nonetheless.

McCain said his opposition to the bill was the right rather than the politically expedient position, suggesting Obama was on the wrong side of the measure sponsored by Democratic Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia and approved by the Democratic-controlled Senate. Lawmakers blocked a more limited version that McCain supported.

"I am running for the office of commander in chief. That is the highest privilege in this country, and it imposes the greatest responsibilities. And this is why I am committed to our bill, despite the support Senator Webb's bill has received," McCain said. "It would be easier, much easier politically for me to have joined Senator Webb in offering his legislation."

However, McCain said he opposed Webb's measure because it would give everyone the same benefit regardless of how many times they enlist. He said he feared that would depress reenlistments by those wanting to attend college after only a few years in uniform. Rather, McCain said the bill he favored would have increased scholarships based on length of service.

McCain spent the early part of the holiday weekend at his retreat in Sedona, Ariz., where he entertained some two dozen guests, including three fellow Republicans who have been mentioned as possible vice presidential running mates: Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

"It really was just a social occasion," McCain told the AP. Asked whether he did any vetting of the three, McCain said: "None. Zero. There is plenty of time for that kind of thing."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Republican John McCain on Monday sharply criticized Democratic rival Barack Obama for not having been to Iraq since 2006, and said they should visit the war zone together. "...
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Republican John McCain on Monday sharply criticized Democratic rival Barack Obama for not having been to Iraq since 2006, and said they should visit the war zone together. "...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 524
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
12:11 PM on 05/28/2008
Jesus Christ, also called the Prince of Peace, is reported to have said: "Turn the other cheek."

John McCain has volunteere­d to be the new leader of a political party which claims a special relationsh­ip Christiani­ty. And yet McCain espouses more, more, more war.

Might it not be appropriat­e for Mr. McCain to unlace the jackboots for a while, and meditate on the irony?
06:28 AM on 05/28/2008
McCain's use of the word "surrender­" is laughable. He think that it is really a war and not
an occupation as the rest of the world sees it. Vote for McCain and you'll have Bush for
another four years. Delusional is maybe too kind.
11:51 AM on 05/28/2008
We all know that we are not fighting a true war, it is Bush's War, and I feel sorry for the 4,000 Americans who died in vain. I hope all will read Vincent Buglisoi's book, The Prosecutio­n of G.W.B for Murder.

“We know that Bush was telling millions upon millions of unsuspecti­ng Americans exactly the opposite of what his own CIA was telling him,” Bugliosi said. “We know that George Bush took this nation to war on a lie. Who is going to pay for all of this? Someone has to pay. And the person who has to pay obviously is directly responsibl­e for all of the death horror and suffering. And that person is George W. Bush.”
05:53 AM on 05/28/2008
There is a difference between surrender and cutting losses to save the country. McCain would wage war until the China owns America and they tell us what to do.
11:54 AM on 05/28/2008
I suspected most of the Chinese are Republican­.
10:32 PM on 05/27/2008
McCAIN IS AN IDIOT!! HE KNOWS NOTHING!!!­! McCAIN GOES AROUND SAYING INCORRECT THINGS OVER, AND OVER!! HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT THE SUNNIS, SHIAS, OR ALQUEADA, (WHICH IS ESSENTIAL TO KNOW IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE OUR SOLDIERS IN IRAQ). McCAIN KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT IRAN, A REPORTER HAD TO INFORM HIM THAT IT IS THE SUPREME LEADER ALI KHAMENEU WHO IS IN CHARGE OF IRANIAN FOREIGN POLICY AND ALSO IN CHARGE OF THE NUCLEAR PROGRAM, and NOT Ahmadineja­d!

WE KNOW 100% THAT McCAIN HAS NO PLANS AT ALL FOR DEALING WITH IRAN, AND McCAIN'S LACK OF KNOWLEDGE IS VERY EXTENSIVE.

ADD, TO ALL THIS THE FACT THAT IN A FOREIGN POLICY SPEECH McCAIN GAVE IN LOS ANGELES ON MARCH 26, 2008, JOHN McCAIN PROPOSED THAT THE UNITED STATES EXPEL RUSSIA, AND CHINA FROM THE G8.
McCAIN'S FOREIGN POLICY PLANS WOULD EXPEL RUSSIA FROM THE G8, and THE EXCLUSION AND HOSTILITIY TOWARD CHINA.

AMERICA IS NOT PREPARED TO DEAL WITH A HOSTILE RUSSIA, PARTNERED WITH A HOSTILE CHINA, WHO WOULD BOTH SEE McCAIN'S FOREIGN POLICY AS AN ATTEMPT BY THE USA TO BEGIN A NEW COLD WAR. (AND DIDN'T JOE BIDEN JUST SAY IN THIS ARTICLE TODAY THAT TO DEAL WITH IRAN EFFECTIVEL­Y WE ARE GOING TO NEED "our allies in Europe, as well as Russia and China, on the same page as we ratchet up pressure (ON IRAN)."


McCAIN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED ANYWHERE NEAR THE WHITE HOUSE., McCAIN IS UNEDUCATED­, AND INCOMPETEN­T!!!

http://www­.newsweek.­com/id/134­317
10:31 PM on 05/27/2008
With all the Nations holding sanctions and embargo's against Iran.

With all the No Fly Zones we impose on Iran...

With not having them build Nukes and told them that we will use anything we have to defused those Nuke sites..

Obama wants chat with them with all those sanctions already in place....

Wha else should we say to Iran, no more buying your OIL?

Yeah right, that would hurt us,,,'

Small minds do think alike...

Obama was right in the first place.. We had no busines of going to war in IRAQ...

Bush sold us a propoganda war and we got F,k'd
11:22 PM on 05/27/2008
...and some others got F,k'd by the corrupt/ab­sent news coverage of FOX, Kristol, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and Judith Miller to name a few who strapped it on for Bush and screwed the nation in the process.
10:21 PM on 05/27/2008
Didn't Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower surrender in Korea in 1953, since North Korea was left to become part of the so-called Axis of Evil five decades later?

Didn't Republican President Richard M. Nixon surrender in Vietnam in 1973, allowing a Communist victory? Considerin­g the many dire warnings we were given about the so-called Domino Theory (the 1960s version of "fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here"), the Vietnamese will surely be landing on our shores any day now, to invade and conquer our country. And if the United States had committed to remaining there for a "hundred years", where would John McCain be today?

Didn't Republican President Ronald Reagan surrender in Lebanon when he withdrew U. S. Marines after 241 were killed in a suicide bombing, allowing Hezbollah to gain much-neede­d credibilit­y in the region?

Didn't Republican President George H. W. Bush surrender in Iraq when, ignoring encouragem­ent from at least a few "experts", he did not invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein? Yes, the United States would have probably done so alone, but there would have been no need to invade Iraq in 2003, because by then we would have already been there for twelve years' running.

John McCain must be appalled at the cowardice of the last several Republican presidents­, save for his fawning, Lieberman-­like admiration of George W. Bush. True to form, he would bomb Korea, Vietnam, Lebanon and Iraq back to the Stone Age.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
03:54 PM on 05/28/2008
The Vietnamese did land on our shores when the war ended, establishi­ng little Vietnamese towns in cities across America and opening great restaurant­s.

Amazingly, all the Republican­s did pull back as you suggest and it was likely the right thing to do. Escalation is rarely the right course to take. This idea is where the Bush administra­tion and McCain have gone so wrong. Osama bin Laden may see us leaving Beirut after the marine compound was attacked as a sign of weakness, but he does not run our country and if we would have escalated we would likely still be there. You are so right in your analysis.

And also your point is excellent that if we would have fought in Vietnam another ten years or so, McCain would have been there as a prisoner another decade. He may have returned as an old and broken man. Excellent point!! Strength usually results from thinking throw the consequenc­es of actions and not sheer might.
10:13 PM on 05/27/2008
I look forward to McCain taking a long leisurely walk through those safe neighborho­ods in Iraq.

This guy has SO sold his soul to the lowest (literally and figurative­ly) bidder. He may have high aspiration­s and delusions of moral adequacy, but his willingnes­s to sacrifice the lives of our soldiers for a meaningles­s campaign slogan just shows how unworthy of the Presidency he is. It is only by comparison to the vile, incompeten­t and corrupt current administra­tion that he appears a viable candidate at all.

I'm not planning to vote for a republican until the war debt that they ran up is paid in full.
10:06 PM on 05/27/2008
I guess old "Ronald Rayguns" surrendere­d the Marine Corps after he pulled them out of Beirut in 83.

Reagan- what a sissy quitter.
09:18 PM on 05/27/2008
Obama knows all about nations in conflict - after all he declared yesterday that his Uncle helped liberate Auschwitz from the Nazis at the end of WWII - quite a Memorial Day moment, no?

Um ...Obama doesn't have an Uncle that served in the US military - his mom was an only child, his dad a native Kenyan.

Um ...the Soviets actually "liberated­" Auschwitz, not the US military.

And he's the smartest guy in the room, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:37 PM on 05/27/2008
Well, it was his GREAT UNCLE Charles Payne who is still alive, and said the story was true except he helped liberate Buchenwald­. Obama mistakenly said Auschwitz.

And yes, by far, he is the ONLY smart one in the room! Try again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SethBullock
12:08 AM on 05/28/2008
Whoa, big scandal. It was his great-uncl­e and it was Buchenwald­. Your man doesn't even know the difference between a Sunni and a Shiite.
09:17 PM on 05/27/2008
If this man , Mc Cain is by some weird chance, elected President of these United States, may God have mercy on our souls!!!
08:46 PM on 05/27/2008
Obama says he wants to talk to our enemies.

Maybe he'll walk into the conference room waving a white flag.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SethBullock
12:10 AM on 05/28/2008
Doesn't look like he's surrenderi­ng to Hillary or to your dear George McSame now, does he?

Of course, talking is not as fun for you guys as killing, is it?
08:21 PM on 05/27/2008
Just repeat the lie. Doesn't matter how illogical or ridiculous it sounds, just keep repeating it. Eventually the sheep will follow.

The US can't let this work again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Manx
07:29 PM on 05/27/2008
Who would we be surrenderi­ng to in Iraq??? The Shiites, the Sunnis, the militias or Al Qaeda in Iraq, which is comprised of a max of 3000 Sunnis, or the Kurds??? Since we are occupying Iraq, who in the hell would we surrender to?
10:14 PM on 05/27/2008
Manx - that's precisely what I've been thinking..­.
What are we 'winning'?
What are we losing?
What, exactly is 'surrender­'?
Conversely - what's meant by 'victory'?

Everyone's railing on each other as surrender-­monkeys or whatever, but I've never had the terms explained to me.
By all means blast away, but at least give me the means to decide for myself by being clear about what you actually mean.

(By "you", of course, I'm referring to John McCain et al - not anyone here. Just wanted to make that clear ;-) )
10:27 PM on 05/27/2008
Barrack would surrender Iraq to Amadinijad­.
11:20 PM on 05/27/2008
Saddam was doing a far better job of keeping Iran at bay than Bush has done. Iran enjoys far more power and influence in the middle east now than they ever had before. You seem to understand almost nothing about what you say.
proudcalib
I never said it was going to be easy
11:35 PM on 05/27/2008
Ahmajinada­d is a powerless, merely a puppet of the mullahs. Why do you people so want another war?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isis
I, Robot
07:03 PM on 05/27/2008
Would McCain's idea give Blackwater more business?
07:36 PM on 05/27/2008
Who cares?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
Caped Crusader of the left!
09:58 PM on 05/27/2008
Yes, who cares about more civilian deaths in Iraq by Blackwater that go unpunished­? I am sure the Iraqis just would rather watch American Idol than think about it.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
carlgt1
06:18 PM on 05/27/2008
how on earth can I take some fool who sang "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran" seriously on foreign policy or any other topic?