A Dream Deferred

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Huffington Post   |  Rachel Sklar   |   June 9, 2008 10:11 AM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Is this how dreams end? In a not-quite-filled Washington hall, soaring but generic the way D.C. Buildings can be, draped in American flags as feel-good pop rolls on a loop in the background, making sure to cycle through "American Girl" first so it can be reused?

It was where Hillary Clinton's dream ended, the one about being the next President of the United States — or at least the Democratic nominee.

On a sunny, sticky day this past Saturday in D.C., she came to meet her staffers, supporters, onlookers and others (read: the media) to say a final farewell, and to pointedly and emphatically endorse Barack Obama for president.

The speech was scheduled for high noon at the National Building Museum — an ironic site for an official dismantling — a large, open space with bleachers set up at one end and a bank of TV cameras, reporters and journos with laptops at the other, with a dais on between flanked by the stars and stripes on all sides — three on either side, one hanging above and smaller versions waving in the crowd gathering below. Above, balconies filled, but behind the big press knot about a quarter of the space was taped-off, empty and unused.

But no matter. In the allotted space, excitement was high (and so, in truth, was the smell, depending on whom you were standing next to — it was cool in the hall but hot enough outside for travel time to have done the damage). By the bleachers, supporters wearing Hillary garb (buttons, stickers, t-shirts, hats) hugged each other and snapped photos. There were moms with strollers and dads wandering around with children on their shoulders, both boys and girls; one little girl riding above the crowd wore a t-shirt that said "I Can Be President." There were older women, pointedly wearing Hillary garb (buttons AND stickers AND t-shirts AND hats); one woman wore a sign on her back that said, "Remember In November, Vote Present."

In the airy, high-ceilinged hall with sunlight beaming in through high windows and upbeat pop tunes bouncing through the sound system, the atmosphere was almost celebratory, but these women weren't feeling it. A number of them at or stood quietly on the sidelines, waiting for the woman they'd thrown their hopes behind. "I'm your girl," she'd said at one of those earlier debates, confident and smiling, and she was. Or had been.

No, was — that was clear from the crowd as Clinton finally approached the stage. The applause electrified the room — it really did — and built in a wave of excitement and anticipation as she, Chelsea and Bill Clinton mounted the stage. If she was feeling regret, it didn't show; she looked as happy as she had ever looked, even back when she was inevitable.

"Thank you, thank you so much," she said, amid cheers, applause, and whistles. "Well--this--" she started, but the cheers kept going. Hands clapped high over heads. Hats waved. Cameras flashed. "Thank you, thank you so much," she exclaimed.

"This isn't the party I had planned, but I sure like the company," she said, grinning, and the crowd roared.

Then she started into the speech, and rang some familiar notes — thanking supporters, her 18 million, the women in their 80s and 90s born before women could vote, the parents showing their children that, see, they could be anything.

It took a few minutes — nine — to get to Barack Obama, and no doubt some were getting antsy. For some, it had been nine minutes and four days. I got one email about then, from a beat reporter saying it was "all about Clinton." Up to that point, she'd mentioned old women, Latinos, a Marine who waited months for health care, a woman who worked three jobs but couldn't afford insurance, 13 year-old Ann Riddle from Mayfield, Ohio, 88-year old Florence Steen from South Dakota who filled out an absentee ballot from her hospice, and "women and men, young and old, Latino and Asian, African-American and Caucasian, rich, poor and middle class, gay and straight."

But Barack Obama was the reason she was there, after all — not only why she was dropping out, but because this was the only thing she'd left undone in her run for the nomination: concede.

"The way to continue our fight now - to accomplish the goals for which we stand - is to take our energy, our passion, our strength and do all we can to help elect Barack Obama the next President of the United States."

There were cheers, some boos. She ignored them. "Now its time to restore the ties that bind us together," she said. She mentioned Obama fifteen times in her speech, often with the refrain "that is why we must help elect Barack Obama our president."

She offered no apology for her husband — just praise, and thanks, noting that Dems had won 3 of the last 10 elections, and "the man who won two of those elections is with us today." She didn't need to name him. Point made.

She used that to pivot forward: Losing wasn't an option this time. "Think about the lost opportunities of these past seven years...We cannot let this moment slip away. So today, I am standing with Senator Obama to say: Yes we can."

She also mentioned the twin milestones she and Obama had reached — she as the first woman to run for president, he as the first black American. She cited those milestones in her vision of "a more perfect union" — referencing Obama's famous speech on race from back in March, and making a point of adding gender to the mix.

There were times during the campaign that Clinton was accused of playing the gender card, but the chatter after this speech has been that her feminist agenda had been muted during the campaign, as she strove to be seen as the qualified candidate rather than the woman candidate. But her feminist sentiment was not muted here, it was pointed: "We must make sure that women and men alike understand the struggles of their mothers and their grandmothers" (and perhaps, extremely pointed: "There are no acceptable limits and there are no acceptable prejudices in the twenty-first century").

Of course, there was a limit: What Clinton called "that highest, hardest glass ceiling." Said Clinton to the crowd: "Thanks to you, it's got about 18 million cracks in it." A few thousand of those cracks roared in response.

It was, by even the less generous accounts, a genuine, inspiring, magnanimous speech, filled with grace and wisdom, exactly what she needed to leave the race with dignity and ease her supporters to Obama and the Democratic party.

But for some, it was not enough. For some, they saw that there was, in fact, an acceptable prejudice in the twenty-first century. "The media went to town on her...MSNBC and NBC, they tore her apart," said a disconsolate woman afterward. "They were sexist, they were misogynist...The democratic party didn't stand up for her, the media didn't stand up for her.

"Today, democracy died."

Such dissonant voices may not number 18 million, but they do represent cracks of their own — cracks in Democratic unity and trust in the Democratic party to recognize and value all voters. It will be a problem going forward — perhaps not one big enough to affect the election, since the alternative for women is McCain and the Roe-overturning court he will provide — but one the Dems will need to take seriously nonetheless.

It should be said that the crowd was diverse on many levels — parents and children, older women and even some men, young adults of all races, black Americans of all ages. Some gay men. Kids. Asians, Hispanics. Young women looking energized. Older women looking pained. More young men than I would have expected — and all of them seemed to want a photo with Terry McAuliffe, who threaded beaming through the crowd, stopping to shake hands and pose with anyone who asked. "I love you, man," said one young man. "I love you too," said Terry. "Keep fighting, everybody!"

The question is, of course, for what and for whom to keep fighting. "Every moment wasted looking back keeps us from moving forward," said Clinton, but some of her followers just may not be able to follow her there. What will happen to a dream deferred? For Clinton, it will mean picking up and moving on, as she has done all her life. For those left behind, it may not be so easy.



*************************************************************************************
Her full speech is here Below are photos taken at the event on Saturday, June 7, 2008.





Wishin', and hopin', and prayin', and dreamin'...about next time.

A day to remember
An outfit to remember
Gentle reminder
Not-so-gentle reminder
Behind the action, space, and an unobstructed view (of the TV).
WaPo's Dana Milbank and Garance Franke-Ruta.
The Observer's Choire Sicha and Politico's Ben Smith. It looks like Sicha's getting ready to dap!
Congressman Anthony Weiner berries and walks through the crowd.
Candy berries. (Actually, candy berries would have been delicious right about then, or even water.)
Hillary's sentries.
I don't know this guy's name, but he was a jerk. Rebecca Traister stood on a chair by the press area, and then he came over and demanded that she move because it was "his" chair, and he'd moved it there. He'd been away for at least 20 minutes. "Are we going to do this nicely, or what?" he said to her. Whoever you are, dude, you're a prick. Update: According to Choire Sicha, he's Glenn Thrush from Newsday, apparently "one of the best-regarded and most hilarious and helpful of reporters working during this endless campaign season." Oh! That makes sense because he totally helped himself to the chair! Funny how Choire tries to make this an issue of sexism; I didn't. Just general rudeness.
Maybe if Glenn Thrush had one of these...


Michael Calderone of The Politico. He's polite, unlike some people.

Hooray, indeed!
MSNBC's Ron Allen didn't have to fight for a spot, but if he did, we bet he would have been very nice about it.
She speaks! Hillary takes the stage for a 30-minute speech that flew by. Well done.
The next generation of superdelegates.
A shot for posterity.
Earnest commentary dutifully recorded by even more earnest cub reporter. Update: ...who happens to be Sasha Issenberg of the Boston Globe, writer of The Sushi Economy . Sushi would not have lasted long in that hall.
Terry McAuliffe loves you back!
You, too!
And you and you and you! Terry loves everybody!
The post-speech scrum (Hillary is somewhere in the center)
A sea of hands, paper and digital cameras.
A woman crawls under a barrier to get into the scrum around Hillary.
Longtime Hillary aide Huma Abedin, from the center of the scrum.
Shirts! They've still got plenty of good wear left.
"Terry, now that the campaign is over, I just want to say...I love you."
A disconsolate Hillary supporter. "Today, Democracy died," she told me.
On second thought...maybe not.
A shirt deferred.
 
 

Comments
53
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- pbump See Profile I'm a Fan of pbump permalink

The first woman to run for President? And Barack, the first African-American?

Setting aside Jesse Jackson who not only ran twice but won primaries, and setting aside Alan Keyes indefinitely, let's not forget Shirley Chisholm.

Chisholm, a black woman, ran for President in 1972 from a Congressional seat in New York State.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Chisholm

A great quote:
I am a candidate for the Presidency of the United States. I make that statement proudly, in the full knowledge that, as a black person and as a female person, I do not have a chance of actually gaining that office in this election year. I make that statement seriously, knowing that my candidacy itself can change the face and future of American politics - that it will be important to the needs and hopes of every one of you - even though, in the conventional sense, I will not win.

Worthy of remembrance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 06/10/2008
- austinmayor See Profile I'm a Fan of austinmayor permalink

"On second thought...maybe not."

Ms. Sklar,

The little girl in that photograph certainly could be President, if she a) doesn't ignore the caucus states and b) keeps her husband's mouth under control.

-- SCAM

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 AM on 06/10/2008
- cheforacle See Profile I'm a Fan of cheforacle permalink

You say a "dream deferred". The matter of who the next President of the United States is goes far beyond the realization of a dream whether that dream is to see a woman or an African-American be the next leader of our country. Voting is a matter of who would best serve the country. I would have gladly voted for Clinton over McCain if she won. But to complain now that not all Obama supporters have embraced her, (I, for one, was thrilled and impressed by her speech) is petty and only serves the purpose of dividing this party at this crucial time and smells of sour grapes. She ran a vigorous campaign. Now we must move to the general election which involves matters of grave importance to this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 06/09/2008
- wondering See Profile I'm a Fan of wondering permalink


"Such dissonant voices may not number 18 million, but they do represent cracks of their own " cracks in Democratic unity and trust in the Democratic party to recognize and value all voters."

Okay, here's what I want to know: Does the Democratic party stand for nothing? Is it interchangeable with the Repubs - just another white boy club?

Apparently, "Democratic unity" hinges on electing a woman, any woman, to the Presidency - policy, tactics, and message, be damned.

Did these Hillary-or-death people only join the Democratic party in the past year? Does party loyalty and platform and history mean nothing to them? Did these Clintonistas become Dems solely because it looked like a woman was going to take the nomination?

If you're willing to back McGhoul just because Hillary lost, then you are a monarchist, and not a Dem at all. You are cutting off your nose to spite your face. Do none of you have sons or daughters or grandchildren of draft age? Then give them lots of kisses and hugs now, because Ol' Grampa McC has definite plans for them should he get into office. Do we need to once again rehash all the anti-woman policies that will continue to exist (or be enhanced) with 4 to 8 more years of Repubs in the White House? Supreme Court choices alone will send this country back to the 19th Century.

A vote for McCain is a vote against women.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 PM on 06/09/2008
- ericfolkerth See Profile I'm a Fan of ericfolkerth permalink

You wrote:
Okay, here's what I want to know: Does the Democratic party stand for nothing? Is it interchangeable with the Repubs - just another white boy club?

This takes me back to 2000, when Nader and his minions screamed, over and over, that there was no real difference between Repubs and Democrats.

How many folks have believed this, really, during the past seven years?

So, why start believing it now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 06/09/2008
- BrianZ See Profile I'm a Fan of BrianZ permalink

Oooo another scary post of what you can expect if you don't fall in line with Obama. Give it a rest. You'll need to do much better than rehash the same, tired scare tactics used for years to intimidate women in to voting as you see fit.

Your complete and total dismissal of the main point, that the sexist and misogynistic messages that were allowed to not only propagate but to flourish during this compaign is of great shame on us all. People were so eager to point out perceived racism, and just as eager to have fun commenting on Senator Clinton's pant suits, her makeup, hair style, size, aggressiveness ... things we would NEVER tolerate otherwise. So, get the hell over yourself and your narrow perception of what a Democrat really is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 06/09/2008
- wondering See Profile I'm a Fan of wondering permalink


Why can you Hillary-or-Death NAFTA-loving war-mongerers (another poster objected to being called a Clintonista) never admit that your candidate was flawed?

I guess it looks like a 3rd major political party is called for: the Head-in-the-Sand Party. It's platform will be simple: elect Hillary Clinton, all else be damned. And when Her Ladyship passes from the Earth, the HitS Party will cease to exist.

Hillary-or-Death. Hill-arious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 06/10/2008
- KPinSEA See Profile I'm a Fan of KPinSEA permalink

"... allowed to propagate and flourish."

I'd be very interested to hear what you think the alternative to that is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 06/09/2008
- useyourbrain See Profile I'm a Fan of useyourbrain permalink

Using the term "Clintonistas" is the same as called a black person the "n" word. It's a Limbaugh creation and belies your ties to the DNC. These Hillary supporters have probably been Dems before you learned to play with yourself.

Since the internet is anon. it could be you, or another Rove plant on these blogs trying to tear the DNC apart, so it could be an RNC website. Yes, in the heat of battle there are people who still are bitter and cannot let go so soon. Do you think if it was Obama conceding that there wouldn't be people saying they wouldn't vote for HRC or worse.

If you want a lesson in DNC loyalty, you don't have to look further than Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton. Trashed as they were by so-called Obama supporters, they are still in the game and will work their tails off to make sure the Dems take both houses by larger margins and have the WH.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 06/09/2008
- wondering See Profile I'm a Fan of wondering permalink


"Using the term 'Clintonistas' is the same as called a black person the 'n' word."

You, sir or madam, understand nothing. You are an insulting, whiny bunch of sore-losers. Stop playing the victim. Hillary lost.

Honestly, what do you Hillary-or-Death types think would be different if Hillary had got the nomination? Would the glass ceiling disappear at any major corporations? Would your children or grand-children be less in danger of fighting in Iraq with Clinton or Obama as Prez? Is Obama going to put rabid anti-choice justices on the Supreme Court?

Margaret Thatcher was a woman - how did that go for the cause of women's rights?

Your argument is logically empty. It stems solely from emotion. You don't like the term Clintonista - fine, from now on you will be "Hillary-or-Death NAFTA-loving war-mongerers". Tee hee.

Gotta go - Karl Rove is on the phone with my marching orders. (Yeah, the Rove/Limbaugh comparisons REALLY hurt.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 06/10/2008
- nomobull See Profile I'm a Fan of nomobull permalink

enough with the clitonistas and the obamabots please

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 06/10/2008
- Balzac See Profile I'm a Fan of Balzac permalink

Terry McAullif is a douche. Dana Milbank is a pecker-wood. Candy Crowley is full of it. Weiner is a weiner. And Hillary is a shameless war-pig.

If Democratic leaders gave a rats ass about this country, Bush and Cheney would be impeached and Pelosi would be president before Obama.

If not for people like Hillary, we'd already have our woman president and we'd also have Obama coming up next.

Please quit whining, Rachel. I can't produce one scintilla of sentimentality about either of the Clintons. They are Bush's friends, not mine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 06/09/2008
- useyourbrain See Profile I'm a Fan of useyourbrain permalink

Go back to your boss, Rove, and stop posting here as an Obama supporter. You words and thoughts are the antithesis of his campaign. That you can equate them with Bush shows your ignorance. That you call her a war-pig, when you know why she, and many of the 76 other Senators believed Bush when he said it was not a declaration of war (which it isn't -- the war is illegal) and that he would come back to Congress for such a declaration.

Obama has said he doesn't know how he would have voted if he were in the Senate. He has also voted for every war funding bill and voted against a Dem plan for a timetable to remove the troops.
So be careful who you call a war-pig. If she is then Obama is too.

Obama came to the Senater to run for President and in 2004 said he would not be a candidate in 2008 since he was too inexperienced and needed to learn. He was right on. He could have waiting 4 or 8 years and then we could have had a successful HRC administration that would set the country back on course and a set up for Obama to have 8 years of his own. I am afraid that the country might not be ready to vote to Obama. We are ready but we aren't the country. With his rush to run, we lost the chance for 16 years of progress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 06/09/2008
- SeriousBlack See Profile I'm a Fan of SeriousBlack permalink

The day "democracy died"?

Just overstating it a TAD, doncha think?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 06/09/2008
- ericfolkerth See Profile I'm a Fan of ericfolkerth permalink

"What will happen to a dream deferred? For Clinton, it will mean picking up and moving on, as she has done all her life. For those left behind, it may not be so easy."

And the last line of this essay is EXACTLY why so many of us begged for this primary season to be over months ago....precisely because it *takes time* for those who "lose" a race, any race, to recover.

There are only five months to unify what is now a very divided party. Obama needs to be spending his time going after independent voters and "swing" voters, not *convincing* voters that should be in his corner to come along.

The reality is that many of us knew that, mathematically, this race would end *exactly* as it did end...and could have been effectively over long ago...giving more time for a healed and unified party to go forward.

But, because it was somehow important for Clinton to stay in as long as humanly possible (including not even conceding on the night she officially lost...) we now have a very short window to unify a very divided party.

At this point, if Dems lose this election, I will blame in on a contest that went on far too long, out of an abundance of respect for the Clintons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 06/09/2008
- useyourbrain See Profile I'm a Fan of useyourbrain permalink

If you feel your position is true, just ask how demeaning you would have felt it was for the press and others to be demanding he quit after each primary win he had. Try the other foot and see if it fits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 06/09/2008
- allentown See Profile I'm a Fan of allentown permalink

It's time for partr peace. Clinton was a good candidate, who achieved much, but chose to run as a hawk when the country was sick of the Iraq war and in no mood for a Kyl-Lieberman expansion into Iran. She changed to anti-war at the end, but I didn't trust her conversion.

It's time to say no to the rewriting the history of this campaign. She was not dissed by Obama. She was not unusually mistreated by the media. There were personal attacks. But the first was on Edward's haircut and doomed his campaign. Media favored certain candidates. But those were Clinton as well as Obama. Before any vote, they decided to only cover two candidates, with crumbs for Edwards. Clinton ran on experience, but on that criterion Richardson, Biden, or Dodd win.

Obama treated Senator Clinton gently. He didn't say she wasn't qualified, challenge her 35 years experience or the relevance of being First Lady, mention the scandals, say the Republican might make a better President,, label her the female candidate, call her supporters cultists, mention Bill's pardons or business deals.

Clinton's nomination wasn't stolen. Obama followed the rules and won the most delegates. The party just enforce its rules and the superdelegates ratified the primary results.

The complaint that certain Clinton supporters have against Obama is that he ran against her. Too young, not his turn. But Bill was the same age and there is no assigned turn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 06/09/2008
- gopwreckedusa See Profile I'm a Fan of gopwreckedusa permalink

What is the message to women everywhere?

You can be smart.
You can be rich.
You can dedicate your entire life to the public.
You can even be a former first lady.

But you WILL NEVER be president in the USA.

Now get your ass back in the kitchen.

That was the message, heard LOUD AND CLEAR.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 06/09/2008
- tuttlemsm See Profile I'm a Fan of tuttlemsm permalink

"What is the message to women everywhere?

You can be smart.
You can be rich.
You can dedicate your entire life to the public.
You can even be a former first lady.

But"

...Hillary Clinton....

"WILL NEVER be president in the USA."

That doesn't mean a woman candidate much better than the deeply flawed Hillary Clinton cannot be president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 06/10/2008
- rbdc See Profile I'm a Fan of rbdc permalink

Hardly!

Yes, there were a few morons who wore shirts suggesting that HRC get back in the kitchen, but that was not the reason she lost the campaign. The LOUD AND CLEAR message is that a woman WILL be POTUS and relatively soon, that this year a woman did garner almost enough votes to be the Dem candidate.

Hillary lost because she ran a campaign with a message and tone that shifted from week to week, a campaign that in total was suboptimal to Obama's. She demonstrated incredible tenacity (although, IMHO, it did not seem to the end of the greater good but rather to the end of her own personal ambition; this speech, however, was a great start towards healing the rift in the party and electing a Dem pres). I believe Hillary would have been the nominee had she and her campaign consistently demonstated the same knowledge, intelligence, and concern for Americans that she showed in 2007 particularly at Town Hall meetings. When she and the campaign started going negative, it seemed like politics as usual, and I personally was no longer sure who it was I had voted for; where had that very appealing candidate gone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 06/10/2008
- KPinSEA See Profile I'm a Fan of KPinSEA permalink

You have to hear with better ears than that. Richardson's loss was not a message to Hispanics to get back to pickin' the crops, Biden's loss was not bias against the hair-impaired, and Hillary's loss was not a rejection of 2 X chromosomes ....

Hillary lost my state and we put two women in the Senate and another in the Governor's chair. Sometimes, a loss is just a loss.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 06/09/2008
- MrMike513 See Profile I'm a Fan of MrMike513 permalink

How sad your view of the world.

Hillary did not lose because she is a woman, she lost because she chose to support an unpopular war and chose to use Republican (Rovian) campaign tactics in a DEMOCRATIC primary. She used the exact type of politics that many of us want to vote out of every office up for election this year, from president to dogcatcher.

I started this campaign a Hillary supporter, but gradually edged to Obama. Not because Hillary is a woman. I ended up supporting Obama, not only for what he represents, but also for the "old politics" that Hillary came to represent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 06/09/2008
- BlueOnBlue See Profile I'm a Fan of BlueOnBlue permalink

Our country needs a Democratic President.

Our country needs Barack Obama.

Obama needs these Clinton supporters.

Clinton's supporters also need him. That is, if they think they still need our country. This is not just about them; it is about all of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 06/09/2008
- tuttlemsm See Profile I'm a Fan of tuttlemsm permalink

I've got three words for the Clinton supporters who threaten to support McCain: enjoy the draft.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 06/10/2008
- MoeB See Profile I'm a Fan of MoeB permalink

After this long primary, I must say I was very upset with the Clinton camp and the type of race they ran against Obama. But I am not sure how ANYONE can look at that speech she gave and not be moved...for women, for minorities, and yes, for working middle-class whites. As an Obama supporter, I could not have asked for more. Everyone wanted her to endorse Obama. Well, she did. Resoundingly.

My favorite quote from her speech: "We may not have broken the ceiling, but there are 18 million cracks in it!". Marvelous. Regardless of what I think of her campaign TACTICS, her campaign was also historic, and my apologies that everyone who worked so hard on her campaign had to watch it come up JUST short. I can only ask that now you focus on what is best for you, your family, your future generations, this country and the world. I think that once you do, you will see that Obama is the choice in November...that is, unless you are one of those few (I'm hoping) folks who don't want to vote for Obama because his skin is darker than yours...in which case I say to you: please, make the switch to republican. We don't want or need you in our party.

Obama 08
Winning back democracy for America and the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 06/09/2008
- eshalom See Profile I'm a Fan of eshalom permalink

Who are you to tell me what to think or what to do? And who are you to even think of criticizing Clinton's campaign tactics? And where does your assumption come from that racism is evil, but your sexist, misogynist tirades against Hillary Clinton are okay? Every time I scanned the comments on this message board I felt ill from the obscene assaults by the never ending swarms of Obama supporters who slimed Clinton repeatedly with their limited vocabularies of sexist, misogynist slurs. Were you one of the Obama supporters who wore a Tee-shirt with the slogan: Bros not Hos?

(How despicable that the Obama camp stooped to hiring 400 more internet slimers toward the end of the campaign to make sure they could dominate the blogosphere with their hate-mongering.)

I think the only fitting response for Clinton supporters at this point to get the message across to the DNC that sexism and misogyny are no longer acceptable is to remember to vote present in November.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 06/09/2008
- tuttlemsm See Profile I'm a Fan of tuttlemsm permalink

"I think the only fitting response for Clinton supporters at this point to get the message across to the DNC that sexism and misogyny are no longer acceptable is to remember to vote present in November."

Okay, enjoy the draft, then. Hope it's your son or daughter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 06/10/2008
- yeswecancan See Profile I'm a Fan of yeswecancan permalink

Ummm ... I was an Obama blogger and I'd love to get my check -- do you have an address where I can send in my time? OK, sorry, I just couldn't help it. Just as angry as you were to see ant