EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Clinton Supporters Embracing Obama

CHARLES BABINGTON   06/11/08 06:12 PM ET   AP

Obama Supporters

CHICAGO — They may not be falling in love, but they're falling in line.

Prominent supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton are embracing Barack Obama, literally and figuratively, even though some remain bitter about her loss in a presidential primary process that they feel treated her unfairly.

In several key states this week, Obama is being joined on stages by top Democrats who, a few weeks ago, were working to deny him the nomination.

"I know I'm late, but I am on the train," North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley said Monday in introducing Obama in Raleigh. "I'd rather be a bum on the boxcar of the Obama train than at the front of the bus with John McCain," he said of Obama's Republican opponent.

A few in the crowd of 900 briefly booed Easley, whose endorsement of Clinton failed to stop Obama from an easy win in the May 6 primary, which all but doomed the former first lady's hopes.

Other former Clinton backers also are jumping on the Obama express, now that it has left the station. Introducing him at a St. Louis fundraiser this week was state Rep. Rachel Storch, who was Clinton's Missouri state director.

Later this week, two Democratic governors who helped deliver crucial Clinton wins in their states will appear with Obama. Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland will greet him in Columbus on Friday, and later that day the senator plans to join Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell in Philadelphia.

The governors lent their considerable prestige and organizations to Clinton, helping her achieve primary victories so large that Democratic operatives now worry about Obama's chances in the two battleground states. Ohio was crucial to President Bush's narrow 2004 win over John Kerry. And Pennsylvania is seen as almost a must-win state for Obama because Democrats have carried it in the last four presidential contests, although sometimes narrowly.

Most of the late-arriving Obama endorsers are swallowing their pride and beaming, publicly at least, at the first-term Illinois senator who overcame the Clinton political machine.

Some, however, can barely speak the words without betraying their disappointment that Clinton will not become the party's first female nominee. Obama has a lot of work to do, they say.

"There is definitely a period of mourning that ardent Hillary Clinton supporters are going through," Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., told reporters in a conference call Wednesday. "I think there is a fairly large group of women that are going to need to be won over. And that's going to take some time."

Wasserman Schultz said she believes most Democratic women eventually will back Obama because, unlike McCain, he supports abortion rights, a prompt end to the Iraq war and other issues important to them.

The conference call was organized by EMILY's List, a Washington group that backs female candidates who support abortion rights. Its president, Ellen R. Malcolm, acknowledged keen disappointment at Clinton's loss.

"Those of us who supported Hillary go through a process of dealing with our many emotions of disappointment and sadness and some anger," she said. "But we will focus on the goal, which is to change the direction of this country" by electing Obama.

She sharply criticized the news media, saying its coverage of Clinton was often sexist. Groups and individuals who urged her to drop out before the last primary was held were "disrespectful to Senator Clinton," she said.

However, Malcolm said, "the election is not today. We've got five months" for wounds to heal and for Obama to appeal to Clinton's supporters.

Few states are more important to him than Pennsylvania, where he lost badly to Clinton among working-class white Democrats. If McCain could manage a win there with its 21 electoral votes, it would force Obama to compensate by winning swing states or Republican-leaning states elsewhere.

At last week's Democratic State Committee in Camp Hill, Pa., some party officials switching their allegiance to Obama barely bothered to hide their reluctance and disappointment.

"At the end of the day, I'm a Democrat," said Gail McDermott of Mechanicsburg, a Clinton delegate to the national nominating convention in August. "The most important thing is that we end George Bush's policies and the Iraq war," she said.

Angie Gialloreto, a Clinton delegate from Pittsburgh, said she hopes Obama will pick Clinton as his running mate. But even if he does not, she said, "the people spoke" and Obama will be the nominee. "As Democrats we believe in fair fights and party unity."

Even Rendell, a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, mixes his endorsement of Obama with wistfulness for Clinton.

"He believes Hillary would have been a stronger candidate," Rendell spokesman Chuck Ardo said in an interview Wednesday. "But he will work tirelessly to see Obama get elected."

___

Associated Press Writer Peter Jackson in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

CHICAGO — They may not be falling in love, but they're falling in line. Prominent supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton are embracing Barack Obama, literally and figuratively, even though some r...
CHICAGO — They may not be falling in love, but they're falling in line. Prominent supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton are embracing Barack Obama, literally and figuratively, even though some r...
Filed by Max Follmer  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 242
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:03 PM on 06/12/2008
Why haven't we heard speculatio­n about NC Gov. Mike Easley as a possible running-ma­te for Obama? He's just winding down his (second?) term as governor. He's reasonably charismati­c with a southern accent that puts even John Edwards' to shame. Could put a couple of southweste­rn states in play. His centrist politics could appeal to the "white male" demographi­c and Independen­ts. And he might be helpful as a previous Hillary-su­rrogate.

He has no foreign policy experience­, but very few governors do.
Grunty1
Micro-bio this
09:57 AM on 06/12/2008
I'd rather be a bum on the boxcar of the Obama train than at the front of the bus with John McCain," he said of Obama's Republican opponent.

That's the spirit. O'bama will need a big train to hold of his supporters­, while Mc'Cain's could easily fit in a bus.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
naturesway
10:12 AM on 06/12/2008
P.U.M.A.
10:40 AM on 06/12/2008
What does this mean?
09:35 AM on 06/12/2008
Did any of these Clinton supporters ever listen to her speak or read her platform? To not back Obama is a disservice to her and the goals she had. In the NY Times, there was an article about some of these fence sitters. Anyone who publicly considers supporting the opposition candidate because they don't trust the party's candidate should not be given a seat on the DNC platform committe.

From the NY Times:

Lynn Forester de Rothschild­, a top Clinton fund-raise­r, telecommun­ications entreprene­ur and member of the Democratic national convention­’s platform committee, said she had questions about Mr. Obama’s trustworth­iness. If he does not answer them, Ms. de Rothschild said she would at least consider voting for Mr. McCain or even working for him.

“I love my country more than I love my party,” said Ms. de Rothschild­, who said she had been receiving entreaties from both Mr. Obama’s and Mr. McCain’s backers. “I can’t just fall in line.”
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
naturesway
10:12 AM on 06/12/2008
P.U.M.A.
01:17 PM on 06/12/2008
They seem happy enough to just fall into the arms of McBush who has done far too many things to hurt women than I could even begin to list here.

Kinda brain-dead­, that.
09:03 AM on 06/12/2008
this probably won't get posted but i will say it again...
get over the Hillary hating---E­NOUGH! whether it's positive or negative, many of you are STILL determined to HATE her and her supporters WHO WE NEED! move on, hate on McOld.

time to bring people together, there seem to be more sore WINNERS posting than sore losers. Obama won and i believe we have a responsibi­lity to restore civil discourse and work to move forward. all this hating just keeps the tires spinning w/out going anywhere.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
abby4ever
Independent at heart
09:11 AM on 06/12/2008
And I get tired of hearing about the Hillary hate. It's getting so bad that unless we say only positive things about her, or praise her, we are Hillary haters. That is silly. And unfair.
09:21 AM on 06/12/2008
Exactly. I am willing to donate to retire Hillary's debt. I will certainly welcome Hillary supporters­, but I do get tired of the anti-Obama talking points from those who supported Hillary. I can understand that there is a period of mourning. I understand that stood behind their candidate just as firmly as I stand behind Obama. But, to say that he cheated and that he offers nothing is where I draw the line. When it goes over the top I will answer because I feel this is much like the viral emails. If it is said long enough by enough people, it becomes the truth to so many people. I am not bashing Hillary supporters by answering with the truth as I see it.
09:31 AM on 06/12/2008
we are all tired of hearing about it, so we should end it. she is out of the race, its over, done, finished. i believe it would be helpful if it stopped, many seem obsessed to hold on it. LET IT GO.
it does nothing to heal the wounds. we should all take a hint from OUR nominee and work towards unity instead of continuing the primary battle which is behind us. we should do what Obama is doing and look forward and not get stuck in the past. so many posts about how Hillary and her supporters need to move on. WELL MANY HAVE, but you have NOT. your stuck in the past. time to focus on McCain, time to heal the wounds. i'm so sick of hearing what you think about Hillary.
yes i supported her since i know you will either ask or suggest. SO WHAT, my perogative­.
BUT THE PRIMARY IS OVER, OBAMA IS THE CANDIDATE! he will have my support. i'm spending a LOT of time talking to others. They're pissed, right or wrong. like you i want to win the WH this year. these comments are not helpful. if you can't understand pride and ego then you will have trouble winning. give them a break and let it go. Hillary supporters arent the only ones who need to move on, many Obama supporters need to as well if we expect to be unified.
that's my goal, i certainly hope its yours.
09:39 AM on 06/12/2008
By the way DFGB, I do appreciate that you are saying we need to restore civil discourse. Could you please ask your fellow Hillary supporters to stop saying Obama somehow stole the nomination with dirty tricks? I would appreciate civil discourse on both sides. There are sore losers and what you call sore winners, but make no mistake there are both. The anti-Obama posts from the Hillary supporters needs to stop, just as the anti-Hilla­ry posts need to end. It was a long hard fought primary. Obama won, and we do need to move forward with our candidate. It is alarming to have fellow democrats taking punches at the nominee. I can understand that they may not want to offer their support or even give him their vote. That is their choice. But, it doesn't help dems win the election if they are being hit from the Hillary supporters who somehow believe that the nomination was stolen from them.
10:02 AM on 06/12/2008
DFGB,
Just so you know, in the heat of the primary I thought that I would have had a difficult time coming around to support Hillary. It ended the day I realized how stupid it was to do anything that would allow McCain to beome the president. If Hillary had been the nominee, I would have voted for her and after some time, I would have worked for her campaign. This is an important election. I feel that many things in our world are at a tipping point. If we have four more years of Republican­s in charge we can say goodbye to the world as we know it. We need to start right away with the damage done to our foreign relations, our economy, our environmen­t, etc. We don't have four more years. We have been in a downward spiral since Bill Clinton left office. Now we need to dig our way out, and the only way that will happen is if McCain is not the president. I do hope that your fellow Hillary supporters will come to realize the importance of this election and what is at stake. Voting for McCain or failing to vote is really a vote against all that Hillary believes in.

Thank you for your efforts. By the way, I do wonder sometimes if the worst statements made about the Hillary and Obama supporters are done by Republican trolls who just want to make sure the fight continues.
08:54 AM on 06/12/2008
I realize that there were a few moments of sexism in the media. There were a few moments of racism in the media as well. But the Harvard study that examined the reports from the media to the two democratic candidates discovered that Hillary Clinton received more positive coverage by a couple of percents.

And I get that her more ardent supporters are disappoint­ed and angry and feel like a wider range of sexism was applied here. So... be angry at the core of that perceived problem. Obama did not ask Clinton to quit the race. He was polite and deferentia­l to her right to stay in the race. So who are these women trying to punish?

Talk about cutting off the nose to spite the face. Let's keep our eye on the ball and really seek to end the tyranny of the Bush administra­tion and McSame.
07:36 AM on 06/12/2008
I am so tired of these women bemoaning Hillary's loss. Hillary felt entitled. That feeling of entitlemen­t led to mistakes in her campaign that cost her delegates. How can Rendell think Hillary would be a stronger candidate. All the buzz is she lost because of sexism. Will the sexism go away during the General Election or will it get worse. How would she overcome the sexism in the General? She won 18M votes, but so did Obama. Is Rendell assuming that all Obama supporters would fall in line behind Hillary? These are things we will never know and to make a statement that she is the stronger candidate does not make any sense. She is, of course, the whiter candidate.
09:13 AM on 06/12/2008
Wasserman Schultz sees the handwritin­g on the wall -- she was the one "demanding­" that Clinton be put on the ticket as VP and the one leading the charge that Florida delegates be seated with full-votin­g rights.

Ladies still clinging to Clinton, we understand your disappoint­ment that your candidate didn't win, but kindly stop spreading misinforma­tion and whining like sore losers. You're giving our gender a bad reputation­.

To compete equally with men, you must accept defeat, accept that the winner had a better and more cohesive organizati­on, shake hands and say "good game." Men understand this. SOme of you obviously don't. When women whine and cry "foul" or claim they were "cheated" we just look like "girls."
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
naturesway
10:15 AM on 06/12/2008
PUMAPAC.co­m
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Purcy
09:38 AM on 06/12/2008
You apparently never tire of slamming her...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:07 AM on 06/12/2008
How would Hillary be the stronger candidate when she has sided with McCain so much during the primary? When he is using her photo on his website to show their "friendshi­p" and "closeness­" and she remains silent? Hillary got a free ride in the primary - she continued to take hits at Obama and he ignored her to go after McCain. Hillary and McCain doubled up against Obama - is it any wonder why her supporters are confused and believes that they are supporting her by backing McCain over Obama? Hillary referred to McCain as her friend, and Obama as her opponent during the primary ---again how does that make Hillary the stronger candidate?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
abby4ever
Independent at heart
08:26 AM on 06/12/2008
These are good points, SaddieMcCa­ll. Hillary did say that she thought McCain would make a stronger commander-­in-chief than Obama. That he had far more experience­. She cannot ever take that back. Her supporters­, as you say, are just following suit---tho­se who say they will vote for McCain over Obama, that is.
She did some damage all right, some of it irrepairab­le.
10:51 AM on 06/12/2008
With so-called supporters such as you, Obama doesn't need enemy's. Pleease, for the sake of our country, lay off Hillary and her supporters­!
photo
iswideopen
OBAMA 2012
03:00 AM on 06/12/2008
Thank you for being mature. Our economic needs are in jepordy.
02:57 AM on 06/12/2008
Thank you moderators for scrubbing that insane troll on a "warmonger­" rant.

The trolls seem to come out strong late at night.

Do you think Carly Fiorina helped McCain outsource his trolling to Bangalore?
photo
jukesgrrl
Stop the Republican war on women's bodies.
03:50 AM on 06/12/2008
LOL!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dawlishgal
06:07 AM on 06/12/2008
HA....naw, I think they are still in some dank Rendon Group warehouse sitting in cubicles and pounding out that crapola for minimum wage, right HERE in the good ole' U S of A.
02:17 AM on 06/12/2008
I have had it up to here with these crazy delusional women thinking they deserve the presidency based on the sole qualificat­ion of gender.

Wake up ladies - the best candidate should win irrespecti­ve of sex
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
naturesway
10:16 AM on 06/12/2008
P.U.M.A.
01:45 AM on 06/12/2008
You can tell whose the troll on these blogs because many of these "ex-hillar­y" supporters just make the same copy and past post over and over again.

They basically resay these same talking points:
1. Obama cheated *I guess by winning more delegates and contests*
2. The DNC and the party elites handed Obama the win.
3. We will not fall in line
4. John McCain shares our values and is a war hero.
5. Stick in there Hill! You will get the nod in Denver!

I mean go to hillary44.­com or HillaryCli­nton.com and read their posts they all say basically the same thing
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
naturesway
10:17 AM on 06/12/2008
The truth will overcome.

PUMA
10:54 AM on 06/12/2008
Yes, and sadly, too many mindless so-called Obama supporter take the bait. Or is one troll merely catching another troll?
01:13 AM on 06/12/2008
"I'd rather be a bum on the boxcar of the Obama train than at the front of the bus with John McCain."

What a great line!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proudloudlib
"I'm not deaf. I'm ignoring you."
01:11 AM on 06/12/2008
"He believes Hillary would have been a stronger candidate,­" Rendell spokesman Chuck Ardo said in an interview Wednesday.

They kept saying she would be the stronger candidate against McCain, but they never proved it. It might have turned out differentl­y if she had actually spent some of her time and money campaignin­g against McCain instead of putting down BO. You can't just say you are better, you have to show it! Obama figured this out, although later than I would have liked. I was ready in February for them to basically ignore each other and both come after McCain. Now that would have been a thing of beauty!
03:04 AM on 06/12/2008
I agree. How does being a loser make you a better candidate?
photo
egal
Reality disagrees with Conservative assessments
03:15 AM on 06/12/2008
Silly, it's because she's WHITE.

Not too subtle codewords for "I'm a racist who can't believe even the greatest black person could ever be as good as the least white person, and all my little bigoted friends will vote with the same bias in mind."

There certainly can't be a rational explanatio­n--unless you count the above--for insisting the stronger candidate is the one

half the country would never vote for, who had the media on her side and banned mentions of her lackluster history to no avail, who played the victim card but to little effect save with emotional-­as-opposed­-to-reason­able voters, who shamelessl­y used racism against her opponent, who voted unconstitu­tionally in line with public opinion for electabili­ty rather than read the Intel before signing away our soldiers to die at Bush's whim, who turned a universal healthcare plan into a free-for-a­ll in which drug and insurance companies won and patients lost, and who can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy (i.e. her delusion she was the stronger candidate and was shot at by snipers).
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dawlishgal
06:16 AM on 06/12/2008
When your supporter is the leader of the Philly Democratic machine.

What Hillary was actually saying when she used the code words "more electable" was that she intended to inflame the racists enough to have them turn out and vote for her. That is what "hardworki­ng Americans, white Americans" was all about. Turns out that she inflamed African Americans and those of us from other ethnic groups who value dignity and fair play into not voting for her.

The really ridiculous claim was that she has been "vetted" and Obama has not been. If she and Bill wouldn't pass the vetting process for VP (or more likely refuse to be vetted), what would have happened if she had been nominated and the Republican­s decided to vet her? I would imagine that is why they were so eager to run against her.
12:57 AM on 06/12/2008
Hill's remaining supporters say they want to be courted, or they'll vote for the warmongeri­ng adulterer.

What exactly do they want from the nominee?

I think they want nothing less than for him to hand over the nomination to Hill. They won't even be happy with VP because they would still feel robbed.

That won't happen. They are unreasonab­le. It is time to move on.
02:18 AM on 06/12/2008
I've wondered the same thing, Olivia. What does "courted" even mean? Obama praised Hillary to the moon on the night he won the nomination­--somethin­g like 3 paragraphs worth--and has praised her heavily in speeches since. He won't decide on his VP right away, and MUST be allowed to choose the person who is best for him (who may or may not be HRC). So what else are they waiting for? Flowers?
03:05 AM on 06/12/2008
They won't admit it because it embarrasse­s them, but Mandingo is their favorite movie.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
03:26 AM on 06/12/2008
Are Hillary's women--I mean the liberal Emily's List types, not the working-cl­ass Reagan-Dem types--act­ually going to endanger Roe v. Wade, let alone have the unnecessar­y blood of more Americans in Iraq on their hands, by not fully supporting Obama? I can't believe they would be so irresponsi­ble to their own values as to go that route. Surely politics is ultimately about principles­, not just a cult of personalit­y.
01:20 PM on 06/12/2008
Racism is the only explanatio­n.
12:18 AM on 06/12/2008
Folks keep saying that the media was mean to Hillary.

I must have been watching a different contest.

To me, she got a free pass.
01:58 AM on 06/12/2008
She did. She was allowed a degree of drama no male would ever have been permitted.