Politicians Line Up To Save Anheuser-Busch Shareholders From Profits, InBev

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Politicians Line Up To Save Anheuser-Busch Shareholders From Profits, InBev stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHRISTOPHER LEONARD | June 12, 2008 06:33 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

ST. LOUIS — U.S. politicians are already protesting Belgian brewer InBev's unsolicited $46 billion bid to buy Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc. and absorb the iconic brewery to create the world's fourth largest consumer products company. But it appears lawmakers have little leverage to stop the deal, which might ultimately be approved on antitrust grounds.

"It's going to cause a lot of the angst and hand wringing," said Douglas Cogen, a mergers and acquisitions attorney with the Fenwick & West law firm in San Francisco. "In the end, there isn't a lot of regulatory clearance that this deal needs."

There are signs Anheuser-Busch is trying to thwart the deal. The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday the brewer has begun preliminary talks with Mexico's Grupo Modelo SAB about a possible merger. The paper cited anonymous sources who said Anheuser-Busch approached Carlos Fernandez, chief executive of Modelo and an Anheuser-Busch director, about a deal in recent weeks.

Anheuser-Busch already owns a roughly 50 percent non-controlling stake in Modelo. If the companies merge, the combined company could be too big for InBev to purchase. An Anheuser-Busch spokeswoman said no one could comment on the report.

Modelo issued a statement saying it would closely follow the talks between Anheuser-Busch and InBev, but said its objective was to "remain a proudly Mexican company." Alvaro Zarza, Modelo's head of press relations, declined to comment on the report of recent talks between Fernandez and Anheuser-Busch executives.

InBev Chief Executive Carlos Brito spent part of a Thursday morning conference call trying to calm political and regulatory concerns about the deal.

Brito said the merged company, which would be the world's largest brewer by far, would not violate antitrust laws because it would combine breweries that operate in different geographic markets. Brito downplayed the prospect that InBev would slash U.S. jobs and promised not to close any Anheuser-Busch breweries.

"This compelling combination would create significant value for both companies' shareholders," Brito said.

Story continues below
advertisement

InBev's offer translates to $65 a share for Anheuser-Busch stockholders, a rich premium over the company's stock price of $58.35 Wednesday before the offer was made public. Anheuser-Busch's stock jumped more than 5 percent Thursday to close at $61.40 a share.

Anheuser-Busch management has been largely mum about the deal. The company said Wednesday its board of directors would consider the offer and respond to InBev "in due course," but did not elaborate. A spokeswoman did not comment further, and did not return a message seeking comment Thursday.

Even if senior executives and the board oppose the deal, they might have few options to stop it, said Andy Baker, a vice president of special situation strategies at the New York-based investment bank Jefferies & Company, Inc.

Anheuser-Busch's bylaws allow shareholders to bring a motion to vote if just 25 percent approve of a deal, Baker said.

That means the board or senior management must convince shareholders they have a plan to push the stock price to $65 in the near future. The stock has been largely flat over the last two years, hovering in the $50-per-share range, and options to boost it are few, Baker said.

The company could spin off its theme-park division, but that segment only generates $100 million in annual cash flow, compared to Anheuser-Busch's overall 2007 revenue of $16.7 billion. A merger with Grupo Modelo wouldn't reach the scale of the InBev deal in terms of revenue for shareholders, Baker said.

"It would take years for the company to get to $65. From a financial point of view, (the InBev offer) makes senses," Baker said. "There is such a clear path for shareholders to supersede the board that they can do this themselves."

While the offer might look good on paper, political reaction has been swift, with both of Missouri's senators publicly opposing the deal

Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., sent a letter Thursday to Attorney General Michael Mukasey, asking him to closely scrutinize the acquisition.

"The proposed foreign acquisition of Anheuser-Busch is troubling to me because it potentially raises antitrust issues under existing law by putting a significant market share of the U.S. in the hands of fewer competitors," the letter said.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said she was "nervous" about the deal, and planned to send a letter to Anheuser-Busch's board of directors asking them not to allow the deal to move forward.

"On behalf of me and all my friends that like nothing better than a Bud Light every summer, it makes us very upset," McCaskill said.

Missouri's Republican Gov. Matt Blunt said he opposes the deal and has directed the state Department of Economic Development to see if it can stop it. Blunt's former chief of staff co-founded a Web site called SaveAB.com that has passed an electronic petition opposing the deal to federal lawmakers. The site promises to hold anti-InBev rallies in the downtown St. Louis Busch Stadium.

Political repercussions from InBev's offer even touch the presidential race.

Republican presumptive nominee John McCain's wife Cindy shares roughly $1 million worth of Anheuser-Busch stock with the McCain children. Cindy McCain's father founded Hensley & Co., a Phoenix beer distributor that describes itself as the third-largest Anheuser-Busch wholesaler in the United States.

Hensley & Co. sold more than 23 million cases of beer last year and is among the nation's biggest beer distributors regardless of brand. Beverage industry analysts put Hensley's annual sales at $300 million or more.

McCain's campaign did not return a message seeking comment.

It's unclear how distributors like Cindy McCain's father James Hensley will view the InBev bid. The national network of independent distributors is a key competitive advantage for Anheuser-Busch, helping the brewer keep its products widely stocked at choice retail locations. The distributors, in turn, are reliant on Anheuser-Busch for a steady stream of products and lavish marketing campaigns.

In spite of any political rhetoric, the only major regulatory hurdle would be passing antitrust concerns with the U.S. Department of Justice, Cogen said.

A Justice Department spokeswoman wouldn't comment on the proposed combination. But last week the department approved a joint venture between SABMiller PLC's Miller Brewing Co. and Molson Coors Brewing Co. to distribute their beers in the United States.

Brito pointed out Thursday that InBev has a strong presence in European and Latin American markets where Anheuser-Busch is a niche player. In the United States, where Anheuser-Busch controls nearly half the market, InBev has small presence.

Without substantial overlap between the InBev and Anheuser-Busch, "it's unlikely that the Justice Department will challenge the merger," said James Fishkin, a partner at Dechert LLP and former antitrust attorney at the Federal Trade Commission.

Joseph Krauss, an antitrust lawyer with Hogan & Hartson, said political concerns about job losses or other issues are unlikely to have much impact on the government's review.

Spokeswomen for House and Senate committees that oversee antitrust issues said they would wait until the deal is completed before commenting.

___

Associated Press reporters Sharon Theimer, Sam Hananel and Christopher Rugaber in Washington and Theresa Bradley in Mexico City contributed to this article.

ST. LOUIS — U.S. politicians are already protesting Belgian brewer InBev's unsolicited $46 billion bid to buy Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc. and absorb the iconic brewery to create the world's fourth ...
ST. LOUIS — U.S. politicians are already protesting Belgian brewer InBev's unsolicited $46 billion bid to buy Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc. and absorb the iconic brewery to create the world's fourth ...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
280
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)

Don't really see the problem. Americans have been going around the globe for decades, buying what they want, splitting it up, keeping the valuable parts, cutting jobs, leaving factories in ruins, etc. etc. But when the shoe's on the other foot, it's another story, I guess.
Besides it seems to me to be analogous to asking "what's our oil doing under the Iraqi's sand?" I guess the Belgians asked themselves what their beverage is doing in Bud's cans? At least they don't plan to send the Pentagon to get it and don't need Cheney et al to pretend they have a justification. It's just business and it might improve the beer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 06/12/2008
- IowaGirl I'm a Fan of IowaGirl 11 fans permalink

Why exactly do people care who owns some product as long as they can get their hands on it? If jobs are affected, I understand, but it seems very unlikely anyone's going to find it profitable to move a BREWING operation overseas! This particular product is such a national embarrassment, quality-wise, that I can't imagine wasting more than a minute worrying about which corporate coffers are getting filled unloading it on those without taste or alternatives.

Rice water. That's all it is, rice water. Brought to you by the lovely folks at Anheuser-Butsch, so they could make zillions of dollars off of you, laughing all the way to the bank that they convinced people to "desire" such swill. And now, apparently, even to fight for the right to have it remain in American (i.e., the rich owners') hands. Wow. Talk about a brainwashed population.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 06/12/2008
- hollyo I'm a Fan of hollyo 2 fans permalink

This made me laugh out loud...it does taste like a bodily waste.
And the commercials appeal to the lowest 'male' traits.

I wonder if it will affect Cindy McCain's wealth which is
Anheuser-Busch based.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 06/12/2008

Why all the hoopla now? Isn't this a little late? We've been heading down this road for so long, I thought it was a common agreement that money comes before country. I'm surprised we don't have a "Greed Before People" Amendment to our Constitution. Patriotism only matters to our leaders when it serves an alternative agenda, most times related to money. I'm all for an angry mob trying to turn our country around, but come on, please don't make a lame beer the subject of our rally cry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 06/12/2008
- KarateKid I'm a Fan of KarateKid 302 fans permalink
photo

Just who invented Budweiser, anyway? Sorry folks, it's not Anheiser Busch. Budweiser is a Czech beer and is sold and distributed in Europe. On tap, it takes 7 minutes to pour a glass so it's better to order two at one time. And, boys, it tastes great, nothing like the imposter pseudo Bud that Anheiser makes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 06/12/2008

The Czech Budweis is not the same. They are two different "inventions" that share the same name. You are free to choose your favorite regarding taste, but don't claim that one is inherently better than the other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 06/12/2008
photo

Couldn't we just sell them Cindi instead?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 06/12/2008
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 47 fans permalink

gr8 idea
larry lynch

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 06/12/2008
- haleywins I'm a Fan of haleywins 2 fans permalink

Say it ain't so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 06/12/2008
- Wilbur I'm a Fan of Wilbur 22 fans permalink

What will be the new slogan to protect A-B: "Save Our Bud ?" (i.e., S.O.B.)

Let 'em sell it to the Europeans - maybe they can change Budweiser's flavor so it won't taste like battery acid (as it always has).

So much for the GOP's support of laissez-faire, free-market economics when something in THEIR back yard is proposed to be sold to overseas investors!

Wilbur

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 06/12/2008
- Indubio I'm a Fan of Indubio 25 fans permalink

"The board will pursue the course of action that is in the best interests of Anheuser-Busch's stockholders." If one statement epitomizes what is perhaps the major short coming of modern American capitalism...as a corporate entity, AB was given the right of citizenship by an activist conservative SCOTUS in the 1880s but the court failed to establish that with citizenship rights come citizenship responsibilities. Instead corporations are managed in the best interests of shareholders and the public, society, and the nation be damned. The AB directors are legally required to make decisions that benefit their shareholders even it those decisions aren't good for the nation. We need to change this equation fast.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 06/12/2008

$40 billion in debt? This deal not only stnks, it sounds like a Repuke idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 06/12/2008
- KarateKid I'm a Fan of KarateKid 302 fans permalink
photo

More hot air proffered by politicians. Who cares about the national origins of companies? Does anyone pay attention to that? The bottom line is quality v.s. price. Consumers are reading labels now, and with beer you have to be real careful. Some time ago, Miller bought the license to my favorite beer, Lowenbrau Munich, and began to make it cheaper but crappier tasting. All Japanese beer is now made in Canada or Los Angeles, and doesn't taste the same in spite of their palaver, "brewed under strict supervision...."

Let the foreign companies buy whatever they want. Chrysler made lousy cars; Anheiser Busch made lousy beer. Everyone making nasty comments probably drives a Honda or a Toyota anyway.

This false nationalism is not shared by the shareholders of the companies that are selling out.

And as a consumer, I could care less who owns the company. Just because it's made in the USA doesn't mean it's better; in fact, most times it means it's inferior.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 06/12/2008

"everyone making nasty comments..."

You mean like "crapier tasting" or "inferior"?

WIth nearly half of the beer consumed in the US coming from A-B, would you at least agree that not everyone shares your haughty sense of taste quality (however imaginary it might be)?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 06/12/2008
- hollyo I'm a Fan of hollyo 2 fans permalink

Maybe politicians care if the company is foreign owned they won't/don't
pay lobbyists and politicians for favors.
Just a thought.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 06/12/2008
- Axekick I'm a Fan of Axekick 15 fans permalink
photo

I'm not a beer drinker but Budwiser is the best selling beer in the world, suggesting it's inferior to others, in quality or in value is therefore ridiculous.

I drive a Saturn, American made and gets up to 46mpg, what do you drive?

As an American I do care who owns the company. I live in St. Louis and Anheuser-Bush is far more than just a brewery here.

In my opinion you're entire argument is bogus by every reasonable measure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 06/12/2008
- MajorKong I'm a Fan of MajorKong 383 fans permalink
photo

Anheuser-Busch has been a very good corporate citizen to St. Louis over the years. I doubt that the new owners would be as civic minded as AB has over the years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 06/12/2008

Agreed, I am thinking you will no longer see support for cultural institutions. You will no longer see the company shutting down canning operations and switching to canning fresh water for disaster victims throughout the country, You probably will see the themes parks closed. We will have to lose the national commercials solely dedicated to thanking US troops or honoring disaster victims. None of those things add much to the bottom corporate line and are done in a spirit of citizenry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 06/12/2008
- RRonin I'm a Fan of RRonin 19 fans permalink
photo

If they are going to cut costs they can start with the stupid commercials they have on TV. AB's advertising budget has got to be huge, and the commercials are just irritating. Mark my words, "saving" AB will be the only piece of legislation to get through Congress this year! And the arguement they will use is "American jobs going overseas". Like one of the comments posted said, most of the jobs going overseas will be executive positions. I say good riddance to bad rubbish. I wonder how this will play in the election, with Cindy McSame's fortune based on AB, and the un-Christian right not eager to save "demon rum."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 06/12/2008
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 59 fans permalink
photo

Sounds like Matt Blunt is an appeaser. Send him to Gitmo!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 06/12/2008
- jpcline004 I'm a Fan of jpcline004 11 fans permalink

Well maybe they will finally have a Euro-Busch Gardens....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 06/12/2008
- ChiGuy I'm a Fan of ChiGuy 322 fans permalink
photo

The arguments against this are the same ones proffered when Daimler bought Chrysler. The dire predictions never came to fruition. In fact, post-Iacocca Chrysler was reborn yet again under foreign ownership.

Besides, the swill coming from Anheuser-Busch doesn't rate against European brews at all.
Maybe this will improve their profile by adding some more product lines with at least SOME flavor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 06/12/2008
- Gordon I'm a Fan of Gordon 28 fans permalink
photo

screw american jobs.

we need better beer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 06/12/2008
- ChiGuy I'm a Fan of ChiGuy 322 fans permalink
photo

Oh, knock it off Gordon.
Any jobs lost would be in product development. In other words, minimal.
AB is a massive company with well established production facilities and product line. Manufacturing of said product wouldn't be out-sourced.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 06/12/2008
- KarateKid I'm a Fan of KarateKid 302 fans permalink
photo

The local microbrews are the only good tasting American beers. And I agree with your assessment of the lack of flavor in Anheiser products.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 06/12/2008

Totaly and absolutely untrue. The sale of Chrysler (supposed merger) not only stripped a company of nearly 4 billion of profit, but turned the once highly rated company into a dismal after thought. The once cutting edge (Viper, Prowler, P. T. Cruiser) gave way to the bland Aspen, overweight Durango, and unapealing Crossfire. German technology was imported and found to be less than stellar. Once the profits were gone, and a tremendous amount of jobs were eliminated, and factories closed Diamler sold it off. Market share was lost, consumer confidence plummeted, and reliability ratings went down. Not one damed good thing came of that sale for the American consumer. NOT ONE!
For AB it would be devastating to their company. A control of the company THAT MAKES A GOOD PROFIT by a foriegn group of bankers spells disaster. A very short term gain for shareholders, but a long run of lost jobs for workers. Foriegn banks are not in it for the Americans but totaly for the Europeans. Deutsch Bank ranks amongst the worst.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 06/12/2008
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

and who are you to decide all that? buy a block of share and vote with it then.

A public company belongs to the shareholders not to general non owner public. get it.

shouldve let AB stay private. I can understand if the public demands that all these companies should stay private. there is logic in that.

but to force public companies to cater to whim of general public and politicians is just absurd

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 06/12/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect