iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

McCain's Offshore Drilling Position A Flip From Three Weeks Ago

Flipper

First Posted: 06/26/08 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 01:35 PM ET

It is hardly a secret that when it comes to offshore drilling, Sen. John McCain was against the idea before he was for it. On Monday, the Arizona Republican told a crowd in Texas that he was abandoning his long-time support for a federal moratorium on drilling along the nation's coastlines in favor of allowing states to decide for themselves.

But how recent a convert is McCain to this position?

In late May, during a campaign town hall, McCain was asked about the prospect of coastal drilling. His answer then was far more nebulous and skeptical of the idea compared to his recent, full-throated endorsement.

On a campaign stop in Greensdale, Wisconsin, the Senator suggested that turning to the nation's coast for energy needs would be something of a waste in time and effort and do little to resolve America's broader energy needs.

"[W]ith those resources, which would take years to develop, you would only postpone or temporarily relieve our dependency on fossil fuels," McCain said when asked about offshore drilling. "We are going to have to go to alternative energy, and the exploitation of existing reserves of oil, natural gas, even coal, and we can develop clean coal technology, are all great things. But we also have to devote our efforts, in my view, to alternative energy sources, which is the ultimate answer to our long-term energy needs, and we need it sooner rather than later."

Those remarks differ widely from the sentiment offered by the Senator yesterday, in which he presented coastal drilling as a move that would "be very helpful in the short term resolving our energy crisis."

"I believe it is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions and to put our own reserves to use," he said on Tuesday, "as a matter of fairness to the American people, and a matter of duty for our government, we must deal with the here and now, and assure affordable fuel for America by increasing domestic production."

In part because of these limited benefits, McCain was far cooler to the idea of ending to federal moratorium on drilling offshore back in May. Responding to an audience question, the presumptive GOP nominee stated his respect for states' rights while adding a healthy dose of concern about forcing states to open up their coasts.

"Can I just say that this young man just pointed out that that he believes in states' rights, and so do I. And the people of Louisiana decided that they wanted to drill off of their coast. And they do. The people of California and the people of Florida, those two states decided that they didn't. What I would like to do, frankly, is to maybe give them a greater source of the revenues to help maybe encourage them to allow some kind of exploration far off of their shores. But if I told the state of California, you've got to have drilling off of your coast, that would frankly be a contradiction of what were just talking about, about -- that's their land and that's off of their coast."

That McCain would, two weeks later, offer a full endorsement of removing federal restrictions on the drilling practice seems hard to attribute to the high price of gas (after all, gas prices were similarly priced in late May), but rather political posturing. A Republican with an environmentalism streak, the Senator has long stood against drilling offshore, arguing that longer-term solutions were needed to end the energy crisis. But the general election has changed that dynamic.

On other issues as well, McCain has found himself back-tracking from his prior advocacy.

In mid-May 2008, for example, the Senator was quoted saying he didn't "like obscene profits being made anywhere," and, as such, would be "glad to look" at a windfall profits tax on oil companies. Yesterday, however, he criticized Barack Obama for wanting "a windfall profits tax on oil to go along with the new taxes he also plans for coal and natural gas."

Update: McCain's position also seems at odds with a study recently completed by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) which in their Annual Energy Outlook 2007, reported:

"The projections in the OCS access case indicate that access to the Pacific, Atlantic, and eastern Gulf regions would not have a significant impact on domestic crude oil and natural gas production or prices before 2030."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

It is hardly a secret that when it comes to offshore drilling, Sen. John McCain was against the idea before he was for it. On Monday, the Arizona Republican told a crowd in Texas that he was abandonin...
It is hardly a secret that when it comes to offshore drilling, Sen. John McCain was against the idea before he was for it. On Monday, the Arizona Republican told a crowd in Texas that he was abandonin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 374
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
07:23 AM on 06/20/2008
"allowing states to decide for themselves"

OK, I'm from Kentucky. I vote to refrain from drilling for oil in the Kentucky River. So there.
08:21 AM on 06/20/2008
Great! Be sure that when you express that opinion known, do so frequently and tell everyone you are a democrat and Obama feels the same way.

McCain 08
03:47 PM on 06/19/2008
If the U.S. were to be on a war footing like it should be, the only market it be on would be the U.S. market, so I could afford to drive to the market.
03:27 PM on 06/19/2008
Oh..and McCain just lost Florida.
03:26 PM on 06/19/2008
People may be buying this 'energy independence scam' of the Republicans to get hold of ANWR and drilling offshore, but the fact is, any oil gotten from these sources will join the general world market pool of oil..and some other country will just cut production, driving up prices. It's won't be 'our' oil--the only oil that's 'ours' in the Strategic Reserve. The rest goes on the market.

We're being scammed again.
02:44 PM on 06/19/2008
It is extremely unlikely the US will become energy independent anytime soon. It is even more unlikely drilling offshore and in Alaska will do much to offset our oil dependence. We have 2% of the world's oil and use 25%. McCain is just pandering. I think Obama needs to raise fuel standards, close the Enron loophole to get speculators out of the market and rethink nuclear power. I was against nuclear power plants in the past but I think in the relative short term they have a place in reducing green house gases. More people in the enviromental movement are rethinking this too. I doubt we are a close to a majority but we do see it as the lesser of two evils (green house gases vs. nuclear waste). Europe seems to have had good success with them.
04:04 PM on 06/19/2008
What does Iran want right now ? Nuclear power plants. Hmmmm...good idea ?

Can't get past the nuclear waste issue - it's poisonous forever, and can be used to make bombs. Nuclear power plants are prime terrorist targets, I would think. Ideal for poisoning whole sections of the nation, and the terrorists don't need to bring anything with them. Same with offshore oil rigs - what could be easier to sabotage, harder to defend, and produce more disasterous results ?

We need massive solar farms - the sun shines every day (and night, too). Free energy every plant knows about. We just let it blow by as we wonder what to do. SO STUPID. We need to perfect solar energy and make it CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP. Like it truly is. This is the technology of the future. No waste !
02:39 PM on 06/19/2008
Not only should we drill offshore, but also in the Green River formation. Where the largest oil reserves in the world
800 billion barrels of recoverable oil
3 times the size of Saudi Arabia's
110 years of
use If this all that oil on the market, the price has to go down. The gov needs to fast track oil production. LET'S ACT LIKE COUNTRY AT WAR.
If McCain wants to win in November, He needs to flip on all if his energy policies and force the Dem's hand to vote against lower oil prises. Obama will be routed, the congress will back in Republican hands.
04:10 PM on 06/19/2008
We don't have to ACT like a country at war - WE ARE AT WAR, thanks to the Republicans. We need to ABANDON oil, it is the heroin our country is addicted to. More cheap heroin is NOT the answer. It's killing us, and the whole world. America needs an INTERVENTION, it can't clean up by itself so long as OIL MEN like Bush and Cheney are in charge. America is like Amy Winehouse, more drinks will NOT help.
01:41 PM on 06/19/2008
The price of oil is not a supply problem it's a speculator problem. This article from the Daily Telegraph demonstrates that there is a daily average surplus of 2.5 million barrels of oil a day. That surplus has held constant for the last 10 years at least. Governments need to take over the markets and coordinate them like other international institutions.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/05/22/ccoil122.xml
11:16 AM on 06/19/2008
Why is there no article here related to teh Dems proposal to nationalize the refineries? I guess Huffpo does not want to give fair coverage to the issues...
03:13 PM on 06/19/2008
That was yesterday.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
11:01 AM on 06/19/2008
He flip flops from years ago, also.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ajm5JTf7jZs
11:27 AM on 06/19/2008
I thought he was very true in what he said, and he certainly wasn't owned. I think Russart was very good with the interview and all I saw from McCain was truthful answers.
11:31 AM on 06/19/2008
He not only flip flops, but is showing his lack of knowledge about off shore drilling. An expert concerning off shore drilling stated that it could take as much as a quarter of a trillion dollars to drill in most of these areas per hole, and would not be available for 5 or 6 years.
08:30 PM on 06/23/2008
A qtr of a trillion dollars, so $250,000,000 yes that is sadly enough fairly common but the potential of the offshore reserves makes it economical to risk thoses dollars and it is totally at the discretion of oil companies to do that- it is their money to risk. Yes deepwater can take 5 years to bring the product to marekt - do you think we won't need it 5 years from now?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
plages
Take a plunge
10:46 AM on 06/19/2008
Watch this: http://imvotingrepublican.com/
11:20 AM on 06/19/2008
Thats a rediculous 527 ad.
photo
2bad
I'll be takin these Huggies and any cash ya got.
01:57 PM on 06/19/2008
that's it, rediculous? take issue ray, don't just dismiss! what about each of the things stated in the add aren't true?
photo
DMW1
Carpe diem
03:16 PM on 06/19/2008
There are over 2 dozen McCain videos here:
http://www.stopthinkvote.com/videos/videos1.html

McCain and Miss Teen SC on the Economy is pretty funny. Watch his facial expressions.
10:36 AM on 06/19/2008
I feel repressed that I cannot speak the truth as it comes to me at times. I know that as a nation, Americans are inherently kind and generous, especially to groups that are susceptible to being disenfranchised. But we are talking about the highest office in the land here. It's okay for McCain to be old, and we honor his old age. However, its evident that he is already going senile and will no doubt have demetia in a couple of years. I really do not think that we need to think long and hard on this one. Let us not fool ourselves either, age is an issue when we are talking about presidency. McCain will not stay at 71. Everyday after today he will be getting older and will in fact be almost eighty when he leaves office; if he survive the rigour of his 1st two years of presidency. We need more than we have gotten from any other president because these are the years of advanced technology and globalization. We need someone who is sharp and knowlegeable about the way the world is changing. Maybe Barack can be that person but I am sure McCain is not and can never be that person.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
blueshield
11:23 AM on 06/19/2008
Well, Charm17, in today's America we need Presidents who'll say what's necessary and generally stay out of the way, just like GW. Intelligence, reading, all that mental stuff - hey, it just gets in the way of getting things done. When the chips are down and America needs to get the oil out, the boys in charge need to be able to move and move fast, without complications from branches of government, or sentimental props like the Constitution. And, hey, believe me, you don't need to worry about him running things! With McC in the White House, Americans can feel safe again, even if he's only capable of telling stories to the grandkids.
10:36 AM on 06/19/2008
Even John McCain dosen't know what he believes - he panders to whomever he's speaking to at the time.
10:47 AM on 06/19/2008
So does all politicans. so what else is new. His mind is sharp as a tack.
10:49 AM on 06/19/2008
If the Viet-Cong couldn't crack him, what makes you think you can.
photo
2bad
I'll be takin these Huggies and any cash ya got.
01:59 PM on 06/19/2008
what makes you think they didn't crack him, because he told you! lol

you need to do some homework sparky! why did he have his military records sealed? robits like you who blindly follow without question is how we get $4+ gas!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:21 AM on 06/19/2008
McCain is more than befuddled and confused. does he even know what he is doing from moment to moment?
09:49 AM on 06/19/2008
Cuz it's the environmentalists who are causing high gas prices, not Bush's Iraq war...
11:29 AM on 06/19/2008
very true, along with the speculators.
09:34 AM on 06/19/2008
Why is eveyone losing sight of the real fact in the drilling theory? Even if they do drill in these new areas it will take years before we see any oil from these wells. This oil won't last forever either, people need to realize that. Also it won't affect the oil prices now, and now is what needs to be addressed. Now we need to develop new alternative energy, and this is already under way. While new energy sources technology is relatively small now, it should be expanded. This can mean new jobs for our economy, and independence from foreign oil, something this country needs. There is too much blood on the oil from Iraq.
09:48 AM on 06/19/2008
No one has lost sight of the years it will take to bring it to market. Americans are aware of that, that we have enough oil, coal and shale oil to last many generations and that we would not be in this bind if democrats had not done and said exactly what they are doing and saying now, for the last ten years.
Two thirds (and rising) of Americans understand that if their children are going to have a future we need to develop alternative energy technologies and start exploiting our resources now. That's why we call them resources. Democrats can try as hard as they like but Americans have listened for more than a decade to democrats putting us into energy dependency and inflated cost. The chickens are coming home to roost. You guys do the republicans a big favor, keep telling Americans it's just too bad, suck it up.

Wikipedia: Natural resource are natural capital converted to commodity inputs to infrastructural capital processes.