War Costs For Iraq And Afghanistan Hit $850 Billion

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - War Costs For Iraq And Afghanistan Hit $850 Billion stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN FELLER | 06/30/08 05:44 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, right, pauses during a statement after signing the wartime supplemental budget in the Oval Office of the White House on Monday, June 30, 2008 in Washington. From left, Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, and Bush. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday signed legislation to pay for the war operations in Iraq and Afghanistan for the rest of his presidency and beyond, hailing the $162 billion plan as a rare product of bipartisan cooperation.

"This bill shows the American people that even in an election year, Republicans and Democrats can come together to stand behind our troops and their families," Bush said in an Oval Office ceremony.

Bush made clear to thank members of both parties in Congress, singling out some sponsors of the long-delayed, compromise measure for praise. His positive comments contrasted with the confrontational tone that has dominated the debate between Congress and his administration over Iraq.

The legislation will bring to more than $650 billion the amount Congress has provided for the Iraq war since it began more than five years ago. For operations in Afghanistan, the total is nearly $200 billion, according to congressional officials.

"Our nation has no greater responsibility than supporting our men and women in uniform _ especially since we're at war," Bush said. "This is a responsibility all of us in Washington share, not as Republicans or Democrats, but as Americans."

The package approved by Congress includes a doubling of GI Bill college benefits for troops and veterans. It also provides a 13-week extension of unemployment benefits, $2.7 billion in emergency flood relief for the Midwest, and tens of billions of dollars for food aid, anti-drug enforcement, Louisiana levee repairs and many other items.

The bill will fund the wars well into next year, when their fate will be in the hands of Bush's successor.

It also gives the next president several months to set Iraq policy after taking office in January _ and spares lawmakers the need to cast more war funding votes closer to Election Day.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Though it took more than 500 days for the new Congress to get it done, the combat forces serving in Iraq and Afghanistan will now have sufficient funding to carry out their missions through next spring," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said in a statement.

The Democratic majority in Congress has tried, unsuccessfully, to force troop withdrawals and other limits on Bush's ability to conduct the war. Bush said the bill will allow troops to prevail in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"I appreciate that Republicans and Democrats in Congress agreed to provide these vital funds without tying the hands of our commanders and without an artificial timetable of withdrawal from Iraq," Bush said, flanked by some of his top officials, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

Many war opponents in Congress, in fact, have expressed frustration and a sense of resignation at having to yield to the lame duck president.

No lawmakers attended the ceremony, White House press secretary Dana Perino said, because "they're all out of town." Congress is in recess.

The new GI Bill essentially would guarantee a full scholarship at any in-state public university, along with a monthly housing stipend, for people who serve in the military for at least three years. It is aimed at replicating the benefits awarded veterans of World War II and more than doubles the value of the benefit _ from $40,000 today to $90,000.

The GI Bill measure, authored by Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., had such extraordinary support from both Democrats and Republicans that White House objections were easily overridden. The bill also allows veterans to transfer their benefits to their spouse or a child, an idea Bush has championed.

The White House tried much harder to kill the effort to extend unemployment benefits as part of the war funding bill. But Bush's administration ultimately supported the compromise version, which requires people to have worked for 20 weeks in order to be eligible for the extended payments.

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday signed legislation to pay for the war operations in Iraq and Afghanistan for the rest of his presidency and beyond, hailing the $162 billion plan as a rare ...
WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday signed legislation to pay for the war operations in Iraq and Afghanistan for the rest of his presidency and beyond, hailing the $162 billion plan as a rare ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
54
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- MikeDu I'm a Fan of MikeDu 148 fans permalink
photo

Its kinda funny how the projected cost of the war can go to 1.5 trillion, then be balloon to 3 trillion, then magically drop back down to $850 billion, Did somebody give a trillion dollar back? I've seen the same trend with civilian casualties, from an estimate of 650,000 (usually accompanied by groundless claims to have 'debunked' the number in the press), then a year later passing a million, then dropping down to 93,000 again. The 'quoted' figure on U.S. casualties hasn't moved from the 30,000 round number for months and months. These don't seem to be the sorts of numbers that should ever go down. There's no such thing as un-dying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 07/02/2008

What I find to be the most amusing fact about this whole sharade is that everybody knows its a sharade and still it goes on and on...Pathe­tic....

You could build a small continent with that money, you could rebuild your nation, you could invest that in education, global warming, food production, anything but this... But hey, its America. People's power. Yay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 07/01/2008
- DMcD I'm a Fan of DMcD 11 fans permalink
photo

$850 billion (so far) to avenge the acts of 19 mass-murdering scumbags with $40. worth of razor knives --- sounds like a fair trade (not). Maybe in Texas anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 07/01/2008
- tjntn I'm a Fan of tjntn 3 fans permalink
photo

I find it amusing that Bush gave himself and John McCain credit for the bill when they both fought it ever step of the way. But he did the same thing in the debates leading up the 1980 election when he claimed credit for a Texas law that removed the insurance gatekeeper for certain womens' medical issues. In both cases, he only signed the law because there was enough bipartisan support to override a veto.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 07/01/2008
- Nova16 I'm a Fan of Nova16 34 fans permalink

This phony war from the start was a matter of profit. The money for his debacle has been transferred from our national treasury into the hands of businesses like the Haliburton War Corporation and oil companies. When Bush leaves office and returns to whatever he does and Cheney leaves "government service" to his sometimes job as CEO at Haliburton, they will both live like Saudi princes on the money pilfered from the nation and place into the hands of their enablers in and out of congress. What has happened to our country in the past seven and a half years is an abomination from which we may never recover.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 07/01/2008
- edgraham I'm a Fan of edgraham 4 fans permalink

I really hate these people. War doesn't make any sense. They are criminals and the Democrats are enablers.

When will it end?

Ed Graham

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 AM on 07/01/2008
- helonias I'm a Fan of helonias 247 fans permalink
photo

And that would have paid for how many solar panels and wind mills that could have generated how much energy and what would the price of oil be after all that alternate energy kicked in?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 07/01/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 276 fans permalink

All of our energy needs can be met by about 1T$ worth of solar and wind over the next 10 years.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/research

(after the impeach bush stuff)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 07/01/2008
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 141 fans permalink

Change the word "cost" to "P-R-O-F-I­-T."

Notice also, all of you who are pinning your hopes either on the tail of a donkey or the trunk of an elephant, that once again you got sold down-the-river by both sides... and that the path has been greased such that the profiteering can continue unabated once the "little bump in the road in January" has come and gone.

All I want to remind you to do, and to tell your friends to do, and especially to get your children to get their Internet-aware friends to do (for they will still probably be the ones to die first), is to LOOK UP and READ what General "Ike" Eisenhower said about this monster that he originally dubbed "the Military Industrial Congressional Complex." He warned you that it would trump every other social priority, and it has.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 07/01/2008

This is now Pelosi's and Reid's occupation, not just Bush's. All who voted or supported these budgets knowingly funded war crimes. But deluded progressives, despite all of the evidence to the contrary, still claim the Dems are the lesser of the evils and we must vote for them. They received over 90 votes in the Senate for funding, meaning if the people elect 67 Democrats in November, they'd still fund the murder and maiming of our young and claim they're supporting the troops. The Dems would still lie that immediate, safe withdrawal will cause a calamity of biblical proportions.

But these Dems have nothing to worry about because Pavlovian, so-called progressives will salivate votes for the Democrats when they ring the Nader-baiting bell.

Dems and progressives are so removed from the impact of this occupation that they simply give Obama, Reid and Pelosi a pass for consciously funding war crimes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 07/01/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 276 fans permalink

No. We don't give obama reid pelosi a pass. All the progressives and most democrats (not in congress) are pissed off about it.

We are actively trying to remove the DINOs like pelosi, Rahm, Reids, the DLC and blue dogs. Rahm loves war, and picked candidates to run in 2006 who loved war, but they are deceived us by claiming they were anti war.

The Kucinich Progressive caucus are about 1/2 the house dems. All but a few of the senate dems are DINOs.

It sucks. But some progressives is better then all fascist corporatist conservatives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 07/01/2008

Billions more for an illegal war and we have BOTH parties to blame.

F them - vote 3rd party

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 AM on 07/01/2008
- igmond50 I'm a Fan of igmond50 2 fans permalink

The Democrats (with few exceptions) have us fooled. A super majority (while likely come November) will not change anything. The extent to which things could have changed since 2006 has not been realized and any hopes for change after 2008 are simply foolish. The Democrats are the weakest political entity known to the Western world. Big words...fa­t promises..­.no action...w­ith lots more to follow from Obama...Pe­losi and Reed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 AM on 07/01/2008

Oh the things we could do here at home with that money ! But instead we pee it down the rat hole of stupidity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 AM on 07/01/2008

Before you go all hysterical- a big chunk of that is for the new GI bill , unemployment and flood relief. I think though they should have had some kind of sunset provisions on this funding...­.then again they should have ahd provisos on the last 5...yet Bush keeps dipping his hand in and the DLC keeps saying "you'll spoil your dinner". They are being held hostage by rhetoric, and are kowtowing to the watercooler mentality of "you don't support the troops/contractors" if you don't give the funds. And yet the GAO cites billions in fraud and waste.
4.39 a gallon here in NYC, and summer's just starting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 AM on 07/01/2008
- piul05 I'm a Fan of piul05 57 fans permalink
photo

850 Billion dollars - it' nice to have all this money to spend on role playing Alexander the Great..oop­s, hang on a second...i­s that a Chinese credit card I see?

The main question is how long is China prepared to prop up the dollar before cutting their losses and calling in their debt - my guess is so long as the US administration doesn't do something as foolish as attacking Iran. If they do, I can see (and Russia) flexing theirf inancial and energetic muscles.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 AM on 07/01/2008

Has anyone noticed the Democrats have been running congress for over a year and a half? They promised to end the war in Iraq and instead keep choosing to fund more and more war without conditions. Yet the people who elected the Democrats, based on their promise to end the war, have no problem with what the Democrats are doing. Seems the war in Iraq is fine and that if Democrats do exactly what Republicans were thrown out of office for it's fine because they're not Republicans. This is another good example of why it is most important to vote on the issues and to hold the candidates feet to the fire on the issues.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 AM on 07/01/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect