Ford Sales Plunge In June

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Ford Sales Plunge In June stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM KRISHER and DEE-ANN DURBIN | July 1, 2008 09:36 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
The hoods of a Toyota Corolla, foreground, and Yaris are seen Tuesday, July 1, 2008, at a Chicago dealership. General Motors Corp. soundly beat Toyota Motor Corp. in June to retain its traditional U.S. sales lead, but GM sales still dropped 18.2 percent during a dismal month for most large automakers. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)

DETROIT — Nearly all the major automakers reported steep sales declines for June, but for General Motors at least there was consolation: Toyota, its leading international competition, had it worse.

Even Toyota, with its flexible, efficient factories, couldn't make the shift from trucks to cars as quickly as American drivers. Its sales for June shrank 21 percent.

So the Japanese automaker fell short of some analysts' predictions that it would overtake GM as the U.S. sales leader. June sales at GM had a still-dramatic drop of about 18 percent.

The overall market fell 18.3 percent, according to Autodata Corp. It was the worst June for the industry in 17 years, said Jesse Toprak, chief industry analyst for auto information site Edmunds.com, who predicted more misery ahead.

Toprak said automakers simply did not react quickly enough to the staggering rise of gas prices.

"I think the gas price rise that we've seen from March through June was so fast and so dramatic that even Toyota, which is known to really forecast consumer demand, was caught off guard," he said.

The shrinking market continued its shift toward more fuel-efficient models. Some automakers were caught with too few of the smaller cars.

That includes Toyota Motor Corp., which didn't have enough of its fuel-efficient Prius, Corolla or Yaris cars at dealerships to keep up with demand. Prius sales were hurt by a battery shortage, while sales of the Corolla and Yaris suffered because of plant capacity.

Story continues below
advertisement

When consumer tastes change as quickly they have this year, it's tough for automakers to react in a matter of months. Additional workers have to be brought in to factories and trained to build different cars.

Ford has been trying to raise output of the lone factory near Detroit that makes the Focus compact, but still couldn't meet demand this month. Both GM and Ford have announced plans for new subcompacts, but it will take at least two years to gear up factories for the new products.

"That just shows the market forces changed extremely fast. No automaker was ready for it," he said.

Only Honda Motor Co., whose lineup is tilted toward smaller and more fuel-efficient cars, reported a sales increase for June _ slightly over 1 percent. Honda car sales were up nearly 20 percent, truck sales down 24 percent.

Elsewhere, the picture was far worse. Nissan Motor Co. reported sales off nearly 18 percent. Sales at Ford Motor Co., which still relies on trucks and sport utility vehicles, plunged almost 28 percent. And Chrysler LLC took a huge hit _ down nearly 36 percent.

To help boost sales, Chrysler said it would extend its offer of $2.99 per gallon gas through July 31. It had been scheduled to expire July 7. Chrysler pays the difference between $2.99 and the pump price for 12,000 miles a year under the offer.

The promotion started in May, but car sales at Chrysler still fell by almost half. Its truck sales dropped 30 percent.

The overall market dropped to about 1.2 million vehicles sold, down more than 266,000 from last June. U.S. car sales were down about 10 percent for the first half of this year.

Ford sold 41 percent fewer of its perennial bestseller, the F-series pickup truck, and it sold fewer than half the number of Explorer SUVs as it did in June 2007.

George Pipas, Ford's top sales analyst, said SUV sales are probably down for good.

"Our view is that gas prices aren't likely to go down, and more importantly, many consumers have moved on," he said. "We believe that the segment has merit for certain consumers but is not likely to rebound at any point."

Toyota overtook General Motors Corp. in global sales earlier this year. It passed GM for global vehicle production last year.

GM reported selling about 262,000 vehicles in June, about 69,000 more than Toyota. Car sales were down 21 percent at GM and 9 percent at Toyota. Truck sales were down 16 percent at GM and nearly 39 percent at Toyota.

Ford stock sank to a 52-week low of $4.41 early Tuesday but recovered to finish at $4.71, down 10 cents. The shares have traded as high as $9.64 over the past year.

GM managed to beat analyst estimates. Mark LaNeve, GM's vice president of North American sales, said it was not possible to figure out how much GM's month-ending three-day sale boosted June sales.

Shares of GM _ which on Monday traded at their lowest point in more than half a century, according to the Center for Research in Security Prices at the University of Chicago _ rose 25 cents Tuesday to close at $11.75.

The Associated Press reports unadjusted auto sales figures, calculating the percentage change in the total number of vehicles sold in one month compared with the same month a year earlier. Some automakers report percentages adjusted for sales days. There were 24 sales days last month, three fewer than in June 2007.

___

AP Business Writer Bree Fowler in New York contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

Ford Motor Co.: http://www.ford.com

Toyota Motor Corp.: http://www.toyota.com

General Motors Corp: http://www.gm.com

Honda Motor Co.: http://www.honda.com

Chrysler LLC: http://www.chrysler.com

Nissan Motor Co.: http://www.nissanusa.com

DETROIT — Nearly all the major automakers reported steep sales declines for June, but for General Motors at least there was consolation: Toyota, its leading international competition, had it wor...
DETROIT — Nearly all the major automakers reported steep sales declines for June, but for General Motors at least there was consolation: Toyota, its leading international competition, had it wor...
Filed by Daric Snyder
 
Comments
72
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Unlike the Japanese, Detroit cannot make a profit on small, inexpensive, efficient cars. Because their labor costs are too high. Ford and GM have have a unionized work force that has traditionally won generous wages and benefits; Japan does not.

And those labor costs are fixed: A worker on an assembly line gets the same health care package and benefits package, regardless of whether he's building a subcompact or a big SUV. If he's building an inexpensive subcompact, the money from the sale of that car may not be enough to cover his labor costs, especially health care whose cost has skyrocketed in recent years.

The fundamental problem is that the American worker is being priced out of the global marketplace. As long as there are workers, in Japan, India or elsewhere, who are willing to work for less wages and benefits than American workers, they will get the work, and the Americans will become unemployed.

At minimum, America has to find a way to take the health care burden off the back of America's corporations. Universal health care, paid out of general Government revenues, would eliminate the need for Ford and General Motors to pay for their own employees' health care. That would lower their labor costs by an average of at least $2,000 per car they sell, making it possible for them to sell smaller, cheaper cars and still turn a profit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 07/01/2008
photo

This is a tired old argument that holds very little water. If the American car companies gave the consumer true value for their dollar instead of trying to continuously peddle half-baked/reskinned crap, this would translate into more units sold. More units sold = more money coming in. The problem has been a continuation of years of the same outmoded thinking and old debunked complaints by the companies themselves. When these car companies have turned a profit, they've taken those profits out of the company and have payed ridiculously enormous compensation to executives who have made the continued bad decisions.. They have not reinvested it (other than at a bare minimum) in research/development translating into new car technology which then translates into consumer confidence and industry leadership (SALES!).

I have seen it from the inside having been an engineer with GM and Ford. Yes, unions years ago drove salaries/benefits out of sight for the factory worker, but between so many union concessions over the last 25 years, massive layoffs and plant closings, the tired old argument of "It's the American worker." is about as relevant as "Duck and cover" is today. The big three created this mess that they are in with bad corporate decisions (profit raiding mentality) and a pathetic product through the years which was destined to be outbuilt and outsold by companies that have proven time and time again that topnotch product sells cars and produces strength.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 07/01/2008

The problem with the American car companies is not labor by a long shot. These CEO's who make HUNDREDS of millions of dollars are the biggest drain, its not even heath care, or labor by a long shot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 AM on 07/02/2008
photo

As soon as Ford and GM figure out how to ship SUVs to Saudi Arabia in empty oil tankers, sales will go up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 07/01/2008
photo

welp this is america for ya

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 07/01/2008

One of the reasons alot of people don't get decent gas mileage is because they drive like gas was a $1 a gallon. You don't have to drive slow but don't drive foolishly. But they are the ones who cry the most. How many people really needed a truck, it is all status.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 07/01/2008

And then there's me... 6'6" and 315 lbs. You show me a fuel efficient vehicle that fits me comfortably and I will buy it. Until then, I will have to continue to pay $100 per fill-up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 07/02/2008
photo

Who cares if every business goes down the tubes as long as the Oil companies are making money..

The Texas State Treasurer has a $10.7 Billion dollar surplus for this year alone...

Keep electing them Republicans and soon we'll go the way of the Soviet Union..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 07/01/2008

America conducts its electoral processes, especially that for President, like Detroit bulids cars.
And that is how you get a George W. Bush in that office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 07/01/2008

I agree with everything naabro said. You people who laugh at the downfall of the Big 3 will be laughing while your college educated kids are flipping burgers, or wont 'cha? I for one dont see the humor in tens if not hundreds of thousands of people losing their jobs. People who, when working, keep the economy going, by spending what they earn at the Best Buys and the Lowes of the country. They take their vacations to all over the country. Studies have shown that for every American autoworker job lost, it indirectly affects 13 more jobs....I for one dont see the humor in that. Keep buying those foreign products people, it is great for everyone who works at Wal-Mart (which will be considered a good job real soon). Buy up those Japanese cars people, they love you over there...I on the other hand sure dont. Do your children a favor, and look for the Made in the USA label when you shop. The job you save may be your own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 07/01/2008

Who is laughing? The big 3 brought this on themselves with short sightedness and hubris. Sorry but I have no sympathy for any corporation that shoots itself in the foot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 07/01/2008
photo

EXACTLY! I worked for two of the big three and have seen their demise in the cards since the decade of the 70's. If a company insists on constantly cutting corners and producing crap, sooner or later the majority is going to wise up and spend their hard earned money on a product of better quality. It's funny how the corp exec salaries at any of the big three, especially GM and Ford grew exponentially during the last three decades yet these companies are always "hurting". Companies like Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and even newer Korean manufacturers such as Hyundai have wiped the floor up with the big three in quality, technology, and in standard equipment. Unfortunately the big three should have learned by the early eighties that they either lead in technological advancements and quality or they would eventually be severely hurting. Now they are. Too bad that their collusion with Big Oil has delayed the inevitable over the last 15 years or so, and they are stuck with their sales based on behemoths/SUVs/pickups. Big Oil won't be there to prop them up though now that these gas guzzlers are no longer selling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 07/01/2008

You might want to ask the great naabro what the most fuel efficient car is HE ever helped to design.

Look, in a winner take all society, which the US is, the loser gets laughed at. That's just life. If US car makers can't compete because of their own meddling with US efficiency standards, that's just too bad. And your engineer kid can still work in the automobile industry. He or she will just have to get a job at Toyota, Honda or one of the other successful players.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 07/01/2008

KillTheMessenger said: "Look, in a winner take all society, which the US is, the loser gets laughed at. That's just life. "

The problem as I see it is that as long as the executives are not held accountable, as long as they can fail miserably and still walk away with millions, tens of millions, we're (average Americans) the losers while the executives are the ones laughing. How many pensions, directly or indirectly via investments, rely upon American companies such as the automakers? These people need to be taken to court by the shareholders and if found derelict in their duties, sued into the poor house.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 07/01/2008

I am not laughing at the downfall of the Big 3. What is even more disgusting is the Big 3 execs who made the decisions to build these gas guzzling vehicles are rich no matter what happens. It's the folks on the assembly line who get hurt, the people who had little to no input into the decision making process, just did what they're told - perform their jobs. Detroit is getting a loud and clear message - build fuel efficient cars that people want to buy, or go under. Hopefully, we will send a similar message to DC very soon - start listening to American citizens' needs and "walk the talk", other wise walk to your plane and go home for good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 07/01/2008
photo

I just love efficient markets...Ford & what's left of Chrysler will be bankrupt in a few years unless the gov't bails them out or the Chinese buy them...GM will be a vastly reduced company...message to the US automakers...build efficient reliable cars & you will be guaranteed success & longevity...the Japanese have learned their lesson & continue to teach us ours...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 07/01/2008
photo

C'mon, where's the Bush-voting O'Reilly-bots blaming it on unions? I thought I'd see the U-word in here a few times already.

At any rate, before they do: car-maker CEO's in Japan actually credit unions for their success. There's nothing wrong with economics that respects the producer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 07/01/2008
photo

this is totally management's fault at the big 3 American companies.
Any moron could have seen this coming for the past thirty years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 07/01/2008

Incompetent management = poor results

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 07/01/2008

Everyday these execs prove that Scott Adams portrayal of management in the Dilbert comics strips is accurate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 07/01/2008

Ford has some excellent cars coming out such as the Ford Edge, Ford Flex and the vastly improved Ford Focus. Also the Ford Fusion is a very exciting car. Mark my words that by next Fall, Ford will be sitting pretty. These cars are economical and stylish.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 07/01/2008

http://www.fordvehicles.com/crossovers/flex/features/specs/

Those are the specs on the Ford Flex. 17 mpg city. Yep very exciting car. Only Ford would wait for gas prices to sky rocket and answer it by releasing their version of the suburban.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 07/01/2008

ROFL. Really. Great reply!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 07/01/2008

ugly too!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 07/01/2008
photo

My 10 year old, 4 cyl, Chevy s-10, without a tail gate and with an efficient K&N air filter usually get around 30mpg as long as I drive with a light foot and keep it under 60 on the highway.

And I can haul a lot of crap in the back

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 07/01/2008
- JBS I'm a Fan of JBS permalink
photo

My old Ford Escort wagon got around 30 mpg city
... and my current Mazda (owned by Ford) 626 gets 28 mpg city.

Both would make excellent platforms for a plug-in hybrid design.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 07/02/2008

I feel bad for Ford, but am frankly surprised how long they have lasted. I have owned one car built by Ford, a 94 Taurus that I owned for 6 years. Constant engine problems, customer service non-responsive, bad dealers.

Had a broken seatbelt that they tried to worm out of fixing, said children had damaged. Tried to duck warranty work.

The shame is that Ford built bad cars, gas guzzling cars, and abused their customers. Not a model for success.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 07/01/2008
- JBS I'm a Fan of JBS permalink
photo

A lot of that depends on the dealers in your area. I had pretty much the same experience with the Chevrolet's I've owned, but never with Ford.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 07/02/2008
photo


These industry bosses should all be fired for building big SUVs and behind

the times, smaller cars, while making ZERO progress in fuel consumption!!

Ford should have been building simple cars, much like an old beetle with a

battery up front, a rear wheel drive trans-axle, a crush zones and air bags. By

offering cheap maintenance, easy repairs & common parts, they could have

sold Zillions of "VoltsWagons" for the common folk who can't afford SUVs!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 07/01/2008


Didn't some paper in Europe ask how 49 million Americans be so dumb after we reelected Bush?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 07/01/2008
- JBS I'm a Fan of JBS permalink
photo

It was the headline in a lot of places. I happened to arrive in Scotland on R&R leave the morning after in 2004 & it was on the news stands there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 07/02/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect