Solar Moratorium Scrapped, Bureau Of Land Management To Allow New Plants

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Solar Moratorium Scrapped, Bureau Of Land Management To Allow New Plants stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ERICA WERNER | July 2, 2008 06:21 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — The government said Wednesday it is calling off a recently announced moratorium on applications to build solar plants on public lands.

The Bureau of Land Management made the announcement after public opposition to its original decision, reached at the end of May.

The BLM had wanted to put new applications for solar plants on federal land on hold while undertaking a comprehensive review of potential environmental impacts from such plants. That review was not scheduled for completion until May 2010.

Meanwhile, BLM planned to keep processing the applications it's already received for 125 proposed solar projects on about 1 million acres in Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada.

BLM has yet to approve a solar project on federal land; the solar projects already built or under way in this country are on private property.

Still, industry officials already impatient about the BLM's pace worried that putting a stop to new applications would allow other industries to lay claim to federal land that could go to solar. They feared it would also send the wrong signal to potential investors just as the solar industry is getting started.

"Hitting the brakes before we'd really gotten off the ground was definitely a scary prospect for the industry," said Katherine Gensler, manager of regulatory and legislative affairs for the Solar Energy Industries Association.

BLM Director James Caswell said the agency's action Wednesday was intended to address such concerns.

Story continues below
advertisement

"By continuing to accept and process new applications for solar energy projects, we will aggressively help meet growing interest in renewable energy sources, while ensuring environmental protections," he said in a statement.

Just this week, while officiating at the opening of a solar manufacturing plant in his home state of Nevada, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had vowed to get BLM to overturn the moratorium.

Nevada is more than 85 percent federal land and is a prime destination for solar because of its climate and terrain.

"Nevada is the Saudi Arabia of solar energy and is poised to lead a global clean energy revolution, and we need to do all we can to encourage public and private investment in projects to develop this amazing potential," Reid, a Democrat, said in a statement praising BLM's decision.

The BLM's environmental review is taking place in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah, the states deemed to contain public lands with solar resources.

BLM's decision to reverse the solar application moratorium comes as the alternative energy industry remains jittery about another issue: a $6 billion package of alternative energy tax credits, including about $1.3 billion for solar, that's gotten stalled in Congress. Reid wants to get that resolved after lawmakers return from the July 4 holiday.

There are currently nine utility-scale solar plants in the U.S. capable of producing a combined 425 megawatts of solar power, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association.

Solar industry officials and environmental groups agreed that BLM, which has granted numerous leases to the oil and gas industry, needs to move faster on the solar proposals.

"The real problem here is that the Bush administration is starving key government agencies of the resources they need to effectively do their jobs," said Carl Pope, Sierra Club executive director.

WASHINGTON — The government said Wednesday it is calling off a recently announced moratorium on applications to build solar plants on public lands. The Bureau of Land Management made the announ...
WASHINGTON — The government said Wednesday it is calling off a recently announced moratorium on applications to build solar plants on public lands. The Bureau of Land Management made the announ...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
22
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Oldtimer I'm a Fan of Oldtimer 16 fans permalink
photo

Obama needs to make this an election issue. Bush and Republicans = Oil and Insurance Lobbies

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 07/06/2008
photo

The people must stop being complacent and give this Administration hell to end the obvious favoritism it gives the oil and gas industries and tell it to stop stalling the process of developing alternatives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 07/06/2008
- sheila I'm a Fan of sheila 41 fans permalink

These solar plants are unnecessary, except to Big Energy, which is panicking because more and more people are realizing how incredibly stupid it would be to allow them to take OUR public lands, bottle up OUR sun and OUR wind, steal OUR houses for their powerlines, then sell it back to us at a ridiculous profit. It's the traditional colonization model, and it socializes all the enormous environmental and financial costs of their monopolies onto US, while privatizing their profits.

This moratorium was important so they could view the devastation of our beautiful desert ecosystems on a cumulative basis, rather than pretending that each 10,000 acre killing field was being built in a vacuum. Big Energy, NOT "the public," forced them to reverse the moratorium, because they want to force as many giant, centralized monopolistic power plants and powerlines down our throats as possible before the public stands up and demands the proper solution:

Local, point of use renewables, feed-in tariffs, serious tax breaks for residentia­l/commerci­al power producers (us), and guaranteed financing. Big Energy enjoys all these benefits and more (including the right to force us from our homes, and the right to permanently obliterate our public spaces), so we all need to start asking why we don't.

THE MOMENT FOR PERSONAL ENERGY INDEPENDENCE IS HERE, NOW. LET'S NOT SQUANDER OUR RESOURCES ON RE-ENTRENCHING BIG ENERGY MONOPOLIES! LET'S USE OUR TAX DOLLARS ON GETTING OUR OWN POWER SYSTEMS AND PRESERVING OUR NATURE HABITATS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 07/05/2008

So here's the choice: We all slowly bake to death in rising greenhouse heat, or we put ugly solar panels on our butt-ugly suburban crackerboxes and give our kids a chance at making it to middle age.

Duh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 07/03/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

It's an election year and this played bad for them or they'd have killed it for years...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 AM on 07/03/2008

Now these experimental plants that are highly inefficient will put a lot of bad environmental news on solar. Good rush job. One of the best ways to damage the ecology and the technology of the future. And please note that I am a great supporter of solar. But I am not a great supporter of having it get killed for all the wrong reasons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 07/03/2008

Divert a few BILLIONS from Iraq to crash develop single home units with enough efficiency to damn near take the house off the grid . . . THEN cover the deserts and export the technology . . . would make the developing world even LESS dependent on Big Oil . . . what a concept . . .

"supporter"?? Your other posts sound strangely "negative" . . . are you cashing Cheney Checks????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 AM on 07/05/2008
- mergina I'm a Fan of mergina 82 fans permalink
photo

Whoever is responsible for scraping any alternative clean source of energy, should be tried, and sent to pay a visit to Madame Guillotine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 PM on 07/02/2008

Without environmental impact studies we are likely going to kill a few more native species. How's that supposed to help solar? Especially since it happens for an insignificant amount of energy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 07/03/2008
- neocon666 I'm a Fan of neocon666 63 fans permalink

But the republicans think that drilling for oil in protected areas won't harm anything, and the oil will hit the market tomorrow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 07/03/2008
- openhand I'm a Fan of openhand 27 fans permalink
photo

look at the examples before you apologize for bush's criminal behavior. This thing is the size of a small farm.

300MW.

http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/21/sevilles-solar-power-tower/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 07/03/2008

"insignificant amount"??? There you go again, not sounding like the "supporter of solar" you claim to be . . . don't you think we could "push" a few billions away from Iraq toward more "efficient energy resource development" program???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 07/05/2008
- TheShadow I'm a Fan of TheShadow 10 fans permalink

I'd like to persoally see bigger tax cuts, and incentive progarms both on the federal and state level to allow citizens to purchase solar technology for their private use. The same goes for wind, hydro, and geo-thermal.

This is an obvious "No Brainer", except to those who occupy the halls of government these days.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 07/02/2008
- blueshield I'm a Fan of blueshield 79 fans permalink

Federal tax incentives for solar and alternative energy are going to expire at the end of this year, as Republicons continue to block their renewal. But subsidies to oil companies, safe and sound.

Everyone should hound Congress to renew these incredibly modest incentives before they're gone forever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 07/02/2008
- ccpostman I'm a Fan of ccpostman 22 fans permalink
photo

Put solar panels on houses and commercial buildings first. Put them where it is already developed.

Don't put these huge solar furnace farms on the public lands. Destroys to much wildlife habitat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 07/02/2008
Moderator's Pick

HuffPost's Pick

Divert a few BILLIONS from Iraq to crash develop single home units with enough efficiency to damn near take the house off the grid . . . THEN cover the deserts and export the technology . . . would make the developing world even LESS dependent on Big Oil . . . what a concept . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 AM on 07/05/2008
- blueshield I'm a Fan of blueshield 79 fans permalink

Dang. Good news for a change. Added to the 10 million roof program, could actually affect things.

Remember - the cost of solar energy has already topped out, and is now FALLING.

The cost of oil will keep RISING, forever.

Sooner or later we'll get somebody in the WH who can do this tricky math stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 07/02/2008

This isn't good news at all. Now you will see environmental damage claims and solar is not going to look good. It's just another short sighted decision. Just why can't I get used to it that the US always does the wrong thing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 07/03/2008
- neocon666 I'm a Fan of neocon666 63 fans permalink

Oh yeah -oil and nuclear are our saviors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 07/03/2008
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 124 fans permalink

If true, this is a very, very important decision. I certainly hope that it is true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 07/02/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect