Airline Employees To Stand Trial For 2000 Concorde Crash

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

INGRID ROUSSEAU | July 3, 2008 01:51 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
In this July 25, 2000, file photo, Air France Concorde flight 4590 takes off with fire trailing from its engine on the left wing from Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris. The plane crashed shortly after take-off, killing all the 109 people aboard and four others on the ground. A French judge ordered, Wednesday, July 2, 2008, Continental Airlines and five people to stand trial for manslaughter in connection with the 2000 crash of a Concorde jet that killed 113 people. (AP Photo/Toshihiko Sato, File)

PARIS — A French judge ordered Continental Airlines and five people to stand trial on charges of manslaughter for the 2000 crash of a Concorde jet that killed 113 people, a prosecutor said Thursday.

French investigators say the crash was caused in part by a titanium strip from a Continental Airlines DC-10 that was lying on the runway when the supersonic jet took off. The judge's order outlines eight years of painstaking efforts to try to pin down who exactly could be tried in court.

Two of the individuals to stand trial are employees of the U.S. carrier, said a statement from the office of Marie-Therese de Givry, prosecutor in the Paris suburb of Pontoise.

Two others were employed by Aerospatiale, the maker of Concorde and the precursor of plane-maker Airbus. The fifth is an employee of the French civilian aviation authority.

The Air France Concorde crashed shortly after takeoff from Paris' Charles de Gaulle airport in July 2000, killing all 109 people on board _ mostly German tourists _ and four on the ground when it slammed into a hotel.

French investigators have said a metal strip from the Continental airplane caused one of the Concorde's tires to burst. Debris from the force of the explosion punctured the jet's fuel tanks. The French judicial inquiry also determined the tanks lacked sufficient protection from shock _ and that Concorde's makers had been aware of the problem since 1979.

The tragedy forced modifications to the aircraft before it was taken out of service in 2003.

The flight, which was headed to New York, was the only fatal crash for the Concorde.

Houston-based Continental Airlines Inc. lashed out at the French courts Thursday.

"These indictments are outrageous and completely unjustified," said spokeswoman Julie King. "Continental remains firmly convinced that neither it nor its employees were the cause of the Concorde tragedy, and we will defend ourselves vigorously against these charges."

Thierry Dalmasso, lawyer for the former Aerospatiale employees, said the trial would likely take place in 2009. He insisted that the Concorde crash was impossible to predict, and he said the court did not listen to his clients' testimony arguing the case should be dropped.

"No negligence could be proved," he said.

The prosecutor's office said Continental employee John Taylor had built and installed the metal strip "without respecting the instructions then in effect." Maintenance chief Stanley Ford must stand trial for validating the installation of the strip, the statement said.

Henri Perrier, ex-chief of the Concorde program; Jacques Herubel, a top Aerospatiale engineer; and Claude Frantzen, who handled the Concorde program for the French civil aviation authority, are accused of ignoring a host of problems, including "neglecting the risk of fires" on the supersonic jet, the prosecutor's statement said.

They should also have reinforced sections of the aircraft that were vulnerable to projectiles, it said.

The five defendants could face up to three years in prison and 45,000 euros ($71,400) in fines if convicted on the manslaughter charges, while Continental could be ordered to pay heavy fines, damages and interest.

The case comes at a bad time for the aviation industry.

Continental is cutting 3,000 jobs and grounding 67 jets to offset record fuel prices. The price for a barrel of oil neared $146 for the first time ever on Thursday.

Almost all American carriers have announced major cutbacks.

 
 

Comments
125
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- Riemann See Profile I'm a Fan of Riemann permalink

French people know nothing but to sue US companies to rob them. Bunch of idiots. Guess what french courts do to companies who get sued? They fine them a "symbolic euro" like the call it, but if its microsoft they want millions and the patents. I am myself french so you can take my word for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 07/05/2008
- Riemann See Profile I'm a Fan of Riemann permalink

I meant "Guess what french courts do to french companies who get sued? they get fined a symbolic euro"*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 07/05/2008
- Idytme See Profile I'm a Fan of Idytme permalink

I enjoy watching "Seconds from Disaster" on national geographic. Many times in these accidents in Europe, individuals are held responsible. Although it first shocked me and I thought it was unfair, as I thought it through it does promote personal responsibility - something that we Americans talk a lot about but do not really have, just look at how many people sue for insane things like slipping on a sidewalk because they weren't looking where they were walking.
So, if you are responsible for public safety and you fail to do your personal job, you can be held criminally liable for your inactions, unlike in the US where the company is held always responsible and not the individual. I do not think it happens very often, but only in the most egregious situations. Not being a lawyer, nor knowing European law, I do not know where the line is drawn, but there is a logic to it all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 07/04/2008
- iamvalid See Profile I'm a Fan of iamvalid permalink

Come on folks. We all know that Caca flows downhill. It's only a matter of time before they hang it all on the janitors. Horrible tragedy with the loss of life. Why is high level management not mentioned? I would rather see any money from a lawsuit go to the families who lost loved one on the flight. Not the damn lawyers again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 AM on 07/04/2008
- andvoodoo2 See Profile I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 permalink

Without "the damn lawyers", "the families" would never see a dime.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 07/04/2008
- 3Ons See Profile I'm a Fan of 3Ons permalink

I think it's gone 'sue-happy.'

Next, they'll bring auto-makers to trial for the 'manslaughter' of the hundreds-of-thousands killed in car-crashes, annually.

Along with the licensing staff at the license bureau, for 'negligence' in the assignment of licenses to obviously incompetent 'drivers.'

Followed by road maintenance crews, for all the 'hazards' litterring roadways.

And steel workers for 'sub-standard' metals; oil-companies for 'sub-standard' plastics; tire-manufacturers for having the 'gall' to supply crash-prone drivers with the 'means' to transport 'innocent victims.'

There's no end to it -- so let's not lose sight of the fact that anybody that travels takes RISK, it says so right on the ticket.

That's called, "personal-responsibility."

Kind Regards,
3Ons

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 AM on 07/04/2008
- DemonicLaughterInc See Profile I'm a Fan of DemonicLaughterInc permalink

Many years ago,when I was learning to fly I went out to the Cessna I had rented to do the usual pre-flight walkaround. On close inspection I found a bolt on the ground which I assumed had fallen from the aircraft. When the instructor arrived, I pointed this out to him. He smiled and said, "come with me' and we walked up and down the tie-down area checking under all the parked planes.
He started picking up rivets, cotter pins and various pieces of metal until he had two handfuls and walked back to the rental office and dumped the pieces on the managers desk. "There you go," he said "you've got enough parts there to start building another airplane."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 AM on 07/04/2008
- Destin See Profile I'm a Fan of Destin permalink

I'm glad I'm no longer an aircraft mechanic, lol. Even when working for the govt, I could have faced prison time for negligence. And that's not something that's easy to prove, one way or another. Just will boil down to someone's opinion most likely. Especially considering, that honest mistakes often happen. The plane crash that killed Senator John Tower, was due to a mistake by someone inspecting the propeller. Missed seeing a tiny hairline crack had formed, which later led to the propeller tearing itself apart shortly after takeoff.

And with all the pressure to keep the planes flying, on schedule, etc, it can lead to alot of mental breakdowns over time. All the stress and pressure involved, knowing that one mistake by someone having a bad day, could down a plane and cost many lives. And that's quite alot of stress just fearing that something might go unnoticed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 AM on 07/04/2008
- Pinkmarbles See Profile I'm a Fan of Pinkmarbles permalink

How about putting a little blame where it ACTUALLY lies, at the feet of the airport maintenance crew. If they would check the runway for debris every now and then this kind of thing would not happen. Once again the FRENCH prove that even though it is their fault they find a way to blame someone else. Sounds kind of like a Democrat!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 07/03/2008
- Liberal2 See Profile I'm a Fan of Liberal2 permalink

Duh? Sorry....that's rethug behavior. Think "invasion of Iraq" & "Abu Ghraib" as just two examples. Plus, as MajorKong points out, runways aren't checked because it would impact profits. But on aircraft carriers, the deck *IS* periodically inspected. Gee, I wonder why the difference.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 07/05/2008
- MajorKong See Profile I'm a Fan of MajorKong permalink

Nobody regularly checks the runways for debris at an airport like CDG, or JFK, or O'Hare or Heathrow because it would slow the rate of arrivals/departures too much. They would only do a runway sweep if they suspected that a plane lost a part or blew a tire on the runway. It's not a French thing. It's the same at every major airport I've ever flown out of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 07/03/2008
- PigsOnSoma See Profile I'm a Fan of PigsOnSoma permalink

Maybe you should write them and explain the best way of checking a 6000+ ft runway every minute and a half between take-offs.

And the next time the guy in front of you drops a ladder on the highway and you crash - be sure to sue the highway department for not checking the road in time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 07/03/2008
- Eric8869 See Profile I'm a Fan of Eric8869 permalink

What are you talking about??? All Republicans do is place blame - blame the gays for bad marriages, blame the environmentalists for higher prices, blame the immigrants ro lack of jobs, blame the black people for high crime rates etc etc etc.

You don't ever place blame where it should be. You are a mindless sheep who just wants to protect your tax dollars from helping a poor family when your stupid Bush Administration LOSES 23 Billion in IRAQ.

Go watch Fox news you mindless Republican sheep.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 07/03/2008
- CaseyBabes See Profile I'm a Fan of CaseyBabes permalink

All those charged are FRENCH.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 07/03/2008
- Destin See Profile I'm a Fan of Destin permalink

They might be, but John Taylor and Stanley Ford don't exactly sound like typical French names. Heck, now there will be a boycott of all Ford products led by Toby Keith, including a big freedom concert to rename them Freedom Mustangs and Freedom F100's. They'll disown all the Ford family from the company. Just wait and see.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 07/04/2008
- hopeless277 See Profile I'm a Fan of hopeless277 permalink

No worries, Bush has pre-emptivly pardoned all Americans for all crimes abroad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 07/03/2008
- CaseyBabes See Profile I'm a Fan of CaseyBabes permalink

All those charged are FRENCH, idiot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 07/03/2008
- Liberal2 See Profile I'm a Fan of Liberal2 permalink

"...Continental employee John Taylor..." isn't a french name, *IDIOT*! His name would be something like "Jean Tailleur" if he were french.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 07/05/2008
- Blaheleven See Profile I'm a Fan of Blaheleven permalink

Why have I not seen this Law & Order?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 07/03/2008
- DMHopper See Profile I'm a Fan of DMHopper permalink

Don't worry. I'm sure they're ripping the script from the headlines right now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 07/03/2008
- kellygrrrl See Profile I'm a Fan of kellygrrrl permalink

at least they are a more accurate information source than Faux News

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 07/04/2008
- Economike See Profile I'm a Fan of Economike permalink

losers in the meat lottery

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 07/03/2008
- budalla See Profile I'm a Fan of budalla permalink

I see that the concept of the scapegoat is alive and well in France.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 07/03/2008
- piperson See Profile I'm a Fan of piperson permalink

I thought that this was what the R's called taking personal responsibility.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 07/03/2008
- mathme See Profile I'm a Fan of mathme permalink

This is the opposite of a scapegoat! What on earth are you talking about?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 07/03/2008
- imajoebob See Profile I'm a Fan of imajoebob permalink

Simple, but ruthless politics. The French Justice couldn't lay all the blame at the feet of Aerospatiale for having deficient design, so it indicted Continental as an "imbecilic foreigner" strawman. Unless there's a disparity in the number of rivets in the strip of metal - highly unlikely, there's no way to prove incorrect installation, considering it fell off in excess of 100mph, was run over by a few hundred ton jet also going over 100mph, mangled in the tires, and possibly burned by jet fuel and crashed into a hotel.

This is very similar to indicting the idiot paparazzi for manslaughter in the crash that killed Diana Spencer, when a drunk driver decided to fly through a narrow tunnel at nearly 100mph, and his doomed passengers eschewed seat belts.

Gaulling, non?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 07/03/2008
- Paralogos See Profile I'm a Fan of Paralogos permalink

Actually, it was easy to prove incorrect installation, because the FAA-approved version of the part is made of a soft alloy that could reasonably be expected to bend on contact with a tire, rather than pierce it. For some reason - and I'm sure there was a reason - the Continental mechanic fitted a piece of very rigid and tough titanium instead. It's a very minor infringement of safety rules, but it IS an infringement, and one which had improbably tragic consequences.

Had the piece that pierced the tire been a standard, factor component from an FAA-approved design, Continental and its personnel would not have been indicted here - it would have to be put 100% at the feet of the Aerospatiale designers and the French civil aviation authorities for having put a vulnerable design into service. Instead, they get nailed for putting a marginal design into service, and Continental gets nailed for eliminating the remaining margin of error.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 07/03/2008
- CaseyBabes See Profile I'm a Fan of CaseyBabes permalink

Oui, parfait repond..........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 07/03/2008
- ReasonIsMyReligion See Profile I'm a Fan of ReasonIsMyReligion permalink

This article is worth a read:

"Long History of Concorde Tire Failures Revealed"
Air Safety Week, Jan 15, 2001
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0UBT/is_3_15/ai_69259216

Here's the money quote:
"Officials with the French Bureau Enquetes-Accidents (BEA), the Bureau of Accident Investigations, have amassed an exhaustive history of tire problems on the Concorde fleet dating back to 1976. A total of 57 cases of burst/deflated tires were identified. Including the crash last July, BEA experts conclude that the record of one occurrence per 1,500 flight cycles for Concorde is markedly higher than the one event per 100,000 cycles for the A340."

That's a factor of 60x+.

I'm surprised the French didn't go after the tire manufacturer(s).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 07/03/2008
- AES See Profile I'm a Fan of AES permalink

I believe the simple statistics are that if you use the commensense measure of deaths/per passenger mile, at the time it was retired the Concorde had by far the worst safety record of any commercial passenger jet ever to enter regular airline service.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 07/03/2008
- Robed See Profile I'm a Fan of Robed permalink

The DeHavilland DH 106 Comet would hold that record.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 07/05/2008
- RTIII See Profile I'm a Fan of RTIII permalink


And imeediately before the accident it had the best.

All this says is that the sample size is too small for statistical analysis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 07/03/2008
- CaseyBabes See Profile I'm a Fan of CaseyBabes permalink

On Michelin tires....

    Favorite