Brinkley Trial Day 3: Christie Maintains She Was Faithful, Doesn't Want To Date Now

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Brinkley Trial Day 3: Christie Maintains She Was Faithful, Doesn't Want To Date Now stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

FRANK ELTMAN | July 7, 2008 07:45 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Christie Brinkley is escorted by court officers as she arrives at New York State Supreme Court for the beginning of her divorce trial against Peter Cook Wednesday, July 2, 2008 in Central Islip, N.Y. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

NEW YORK — Christie Brinkley had everything she wanted: a family and an old Hamptons farmhouse brimming with children's music and art and beloved pets. But Brinkley testified at her divorce trial Monday that her lifelong dream of a "big, happy family" in a quaint setting was cruelly ripped away when her husband had an affair with a teenager.

"Anyone who would run the risk of destroying this wonderful life, anybody that would chase a teenager _ I mean, a young girl _ where is his judgment?" she said.

The former Sports Illustrated swimsuit model and architect Peter Cook are arguing over custody of their two children and other issues in a divorce trial that has produced a series of salacious revelations. Brinkley's trip to the witness stand Monday was not as explosive as some of last week's testimony, but it did contain some juicy details.

Brinkley portrayed Cook as inflexible about the children, saying he once refused to change his visitation schedule to let their son, now 13, attend a Billy Joel concert last year at the boy's private East Hampton school. Joel and Brinkley were married in the 1980s and had a daughter together.

But before Cook's affair burst into the tabloids and sank their marriage, Brinkley described him to an interviewer as "just the greatest father."

Cook's lawyer, Norman Sheresky, asked whether she'd meant it.

"Partially," Brinkley said, explaining that her admiration waned in the latter years of their marriage.

Brinkley emphasized her own hands-on parenting in her testimony Monday. She had a range of household helpers, at times including a nanny, a cook, a groundskeeper and a laundress (because Cook insisted on having his underwear ironed, she said). But Brinkley said she "put in a very full, busy day in an active, wonderful life."

Story continues below
advertisement

Her lawyers even introduced some physical evidence: an elaborate dinosaur diorama _ complete with a volcano and flying raptors _ she said she had helped her son make for a science class.

Last week, Brinkley testified that her world "was completely shattered" by news of the affair. "My life as I knew it had vanished," she said.

She told the court Monday that after finding out her husband had had an affair with the 18-year-old woman, the model put on a brave face and threw a birthday party with 30 kids.

"That's the most important thing _ to have a big, happy family," she said.

The court heard testimony last week from Cook, 49, and his former mistress, Diana Bianchi. Cook said he gave Bianchi a $300,000 payoff, had trysts with her in his office and Brinkley's Hamptons homes and spent thousands of dollars on online pornography.

Brinkley said Monday she tried to spare her two young children the messy details of the breakup, including her discovery of Cook's Internet porn habits. She told the children: "I think Daddy has fallen out of love with me," while assuring them they would always be loved.

As the scandal became public, she took the children on a private plane for a vacation in Colorado.

"I took them to the top of a mountain, and we camped out under the stars," without TV or Internet access, she said.

While they were away, she said, "Ms. Bianchi spilled the beans. She went on TV to get her 15 minutes of fame."

Under questioning from her lawyer, Brinkley said she had remained faithful to Cook. And, though she's divorcing, she's not interested in dating.

"I think the kids have been through a lot of changes," she said. "I just don't think this is the time for that."

NEW YORK — Christie Brinkley had everything she wanted: a family and an old Hamptons farmhouse brimming with children's music and art and beloved pets. But Brinkley testified at her divorce tria...
NEW YORK — Christie Brinkley had everything she wanted: a family and an old Hamptons farmhouse brimming with children's music and art and beloved pets. But Brinkley testified at her divorce tria...
Filed by Anya Strzemien  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
33
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- BassMent I'm a Fan of BassMent 31 fans permalink
photo

Well whenever she IS ready for dating, I'd be happy to take her out!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 07/08/2008

Read again "except Billy Joel"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 07/08/2008

Re "While they were away, she said, "Ms. Bianchi spilled the beans. She went on TV to get her 15 minutes of fame.""

No, Christie:

Because you were going to compel her testimony ANYWAY, you wide-foreheaded narcissistic twit!

And you're irked because Bianchi's public statement took away another courtroom bombshell tear-jerker scene (that you were looking forward to while enjoying the solace of a mountaintop).

Did you hike this time, or take another chopper?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 07/08/2008
- Halsey I'm a Fan of Halsey 33 fans permalink
photo

hmmmm....okay....I HAVE to ask (can't believe I'm reading this story..it's so.."E".)...how much did Christie get when she divorced Billy Joel?....I imagine...it was HUGE...much bigger than cook could ever hope for....

having said that...she should have allowed it to go to mediation...the sordid life this guy led...would have been sufficient for any judge to give her full custody...and cook...visitiing privileges...

Nope...Christie lost a few points by wanting a public divorce...this makes Heather/Pa­ul..look..­well...civ­ilized...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 07/08/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

She deserved better...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 07/08/2008

Ironic, that Christie's main role in society was to stoke the mental fantasies of teenage boys, young men, middle aged men, senior men, whose mental pleasures slightly inhibited by a few shards of fabric that can fit into the palm of my hand; all because of the genetics of her parents.

Further to the aspect in society, she and other individuals as Brooke Shields, were pioneers in the cult of beautiful young teen adults (well hot girls, as everybody watches 'The Hills' for the sordid lives of the girls, not the guys) promoting the image and ideal of having a young nublie precocious teen girl in your dreams, perhaps in your life, or even to those lucky-an affair. To a market consisting of men of all ages and looks, inspiring a hope in futile imaginations in such men,to have the good fortune in having an affair with a teen age girl.

As such, Christie prompted (unwittedly), benefited (become rich) and seduced the public (fame). All because of talents given to her by a right combination of genetics thru no fault of her own, and possessing enough skill set to follow the photographers' instructions, For which her reward today is: the fact her husband has indulged in the lifestyle, she and other hot young teen girls (models, actresses) of her time, promoted in glossy magazines all over the world; a predilection to engage in a tryst with an 18 yr old girl (depending when the affair actually started).

Indeed ironic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 07/07/2008

Very ironic-IMO it is the reason she is raging like a middle eastern suicide bomber. I don't think she would be this upset if Cook's cookie was 54 years old.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 07/08/2008
- rzan I'm a Fan of rzan 6 fans permalink

Three kids by three different men. Years ago, we used to describe this kind of person as "cheap." I think she should stay unmarried and focus on her kids.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 07/07/2008
- MizJ I'm a Fan of MizJ 8 fans permalink

They are both idiots. Protecting your children is not subjecting them to this salacious testimony being played out on the web and the media. What is wrong with this woman as well? Married 4 times and has 3 kids by different husbands and she is talking about "normal". At her age she has still not learned to grow up. He may be a cad but she is nothing but a spoiled beauty whose priorities, especially with regard to these children, is screwed up. Washing your dirty laundry in public will only cause these kids greater harm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 07/07/2008
- lisakaz2 I'm a Fan of lisakaz2 76 fans permalink
photo

I happen to think lying to kids is worse. I think she wanted to go public for strategic reasons and had a point in doing so. He was the cad and he wants more from her. She wants to ensure he is not leeching off her for the rest of her life. Nothing wrong with that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 07/08/2008

New York has no-fault divorce. Nominally.
This was her work-around.
Feh.

What does lying to the kids have to do with a public divorce? Hogwash.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 07/08/2008

I don't believe she had a choice because of her celebrity. Like her numerous marriges or not, the tabloid press (Actually aren't they all this now) would print whatever gossip (true or not) was whispered, emailed or told to them. There is no way to protect your children from that. So, might as well let the truth come out in court ad do what you have to do at home to ease their discomfort and shame. And, if it's true that he his broke and really wants big bucks, Why shouldn't she use whatever advantage she has to give him the minimal amount based on his whacked out behavior?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 AM on 07/08/2008

Huzzah.

Christie has been, and will remain, married to her first and one true love -- PUBLICITY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 07/08/2008

Its so sad, it must have been devastating for her to find this all out, and I'm sure it must make a huge dent in her self confidence; I hope for the kids sake especially that this can at least look like its being settled amicably.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 07/07/2008
photo

Personally, when I divorced I didn't feel the need to tell my child anything disparaging about her father. He cheated, he lied and Lord knows I wanted to but I didn't because I didn't want my child to know this about her father. I felt that she is a part of him and I didn't want her to feel bad about herself.

I am really wondering what Christies' real motivations are here. I also believe a father has a right to see his kids. No matter what that son of a b#($* has done to his wife. I completely separated our marriage from our relationship with our kids. I never used my kids, and I never said he couldn't see our daughter. To me, we were done. His relationship with his child is forever. Why use a child like a pawn?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 07/07/2008

The difference is that Christie's soon to be ex wants custody of her two youngest children (one of whom by the way is not his biological child) and he wants custody so she will have to pay him major bucks in terms of child support. She is a very wealthy woman and he has no rights to her money except or unless he has custody. Custody is a serious issue and it certainly is not the same as fighting over visitation rights. She did not want to tell the children anything but she has to fight for custody of her own children..­.when....a­nd this is important....he ruined the marriage by his embarassing behavior and now their private life has been made public because of it. Divorce is different for the very wealthy especially when the wealth belongs to the one who earned it and not the one who wants it by default.
This is all about the fact that he was living off Christies millions for a long time and he would like to continue living that way! She knows he has rights and that the children are entitled to spend quality time with their father. It's all about him wanting (and needing) her money! If he gets custody, he gets her money because the children (his lawyer will argue) have to continue the lifestyle they have enjoyed thanks to Christies earnings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 PM on 07/07/2008
- drjay79 I'm a Fan of drjay79 3 fans permalink

I have to wonder if you would feel the same way if the man had (earned) all the money? It is always considered tacky when the man goes after the wife's money but when the poor deserving wife chases the bucks it is OK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 07/08/2008
- dora rice I'm a Fan of dora rice 10 fans permalink
photo

forget this crap. You may love your daddy but in my eyes he is a pig. That makes street smart kids. No fantasies about a person who is a pig .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 07/07/2008
- GQTaste I'm a Fan of GQTaste 7 fans permalink

Yes he cheated but what she's doing to their kids and her other kids are guaranteeing they'll be in therapy for the rest of their lives. She desperately wants this to all be made public show she can get sympathy but who is going to suffer in the long run?

Of course it's her kids she says she cares so much about. If she really did she wouldn't have made a power play and made the judge make this a public circus. I realize she's hurt but this isn't new to her and she hasn't always been mother theresa herself.

Look it, the guy has already admitted to cheating and the other allegations. So why was she so adamant about having the trail in the public forum? It's obvious she wants vindication and she doesn't care who it will do long term damage to. And of course this is her way of getting even w/ the father of her children. And don't forget she has other kids too. And they'll be affected by this too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 07/07/2008
- andvoodoo2 I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 119 fans permalink
photo

HE is the one who is causing all of this to be made public. He is trying to invalidate the pre-nup they had and is going after HER assets that she had before she ever met him! Also, he is suing her for child custody after he had an affair with a girl barely 18 years old! He wants her to have to pay him child support. And, he's apparently addicted to porn! Do you think she should just let him have her assets AND her kids?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 07/07/2008
- GQTaste I'm a Fan of GQTaste 7 fans permalink

He is not seeking money. All he wants is equal time w/ his kids. I don't know where you're getting this money angle. Because it's been written about the only thing they're fighting over is cusdoy of the kids.

Did you imagine that? Show me some proof then. How bout a link to that he's fighting over her money?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 07/07/2008
- andvoodoo2 I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 119 fans permalink
photo

Imagine being a multi-millionaire. And, imagine being a famous sex symbol and one of the most famous models who ever lived. Now, how hard do you think it would be to find someone who loved you for YOU and not just for the trophy you represented and the money and other assets you held?

I don't fault her for having had four marriages. The only thing I would say (judging from the little I know about her) is that she was incredibly foolish to marry anyone she'd only known 5 months.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 07/07/2008

birds of a feather,,,­,,,,,,,,bo­th of them have a screw loose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 07/07/2008
photo

This woman is out of her mind.
She's divorcing her *fourth* husband and she wants the details publicized?
It must be what she lives for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 07/07/2008

Yes --must be her, not the creeps who married her and treated her poorly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 07/07/2008

Wolves in sheeps clothing...that's what they are (except Billy Joel). All these men wanted to marry a rich, gorgeous, sweet supermodel. Then we they got her, they didn't want her. I suppose they didn't get to spend all the money they thought they would. I suppose they didn't get the public attention they hoped marrying her would bring. I suppose they thought she would put up with their bullshit. Wrong! Christie's a tough lady...she can take care of herself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 07/07/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect