iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Paulson: No Bailout For Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

TIM PARADIS | July 11, 2008 10:52 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A sign above a San Francisco sidewalk shows the Dow Jones industrial average Friday, July 11, 2008. Wall Street's angst over the ongoing fallout from the credit crisis made for a turbulent end to a volatile week Friday _ stocks tumbled, soared and then turned south again as investors tried to assess the dangers faced by the country's biggest mortgage financiers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

NEW YORK — Wall Street's angst over the ongoing fallout from the credit crisis made for a turbulent end to a volatile week Friday _ stocks tumbled, soared and then turned south again as investors tried to assess the dangers faced by the country's biggest mortgage financiers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The Dow Jones industrial average, which traded down more than 250 points in the session, briefly moved into positive territory Friday before ending down more than 128 points. The blue chips also traded below 11,000 for the first time in two years. And all the major indexes ended with another losing week.

A new high for oil prices above $147 a barrel also weighed on stocks.

The fate of the government-chartered companies was a focus of trading Friday as it had been earlier in the week. Shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fell sharply over several sessions on concerns about their stability. Wall Street is worried that a collapse of the two financiers would cause further shock to the financial system, and trigger more losses to banks and brokerages with significant holdings of mortgage-backed securities.

The well-being of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is crucial because they hold or guarantee about $5 trillion worth of mortgages, or about half the outstanding mortgages in the United States. Their troubles are just the latest depressing turn in a year-old credit crisis that shows no sign of ending, disappointing some stock traders who thought just months ago that the worst was perhaps over.

Stocks fluctuated late in the session amid varying reports that the Federal Reserve could aid Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., the Senate Banking Committee chairman, raised the prospect that the companies could be given access to emergency Federal Reserve lending. Dodd, who spoke Friday to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, said the two are "looking at various options" for propping up the firms if they ultimately need help. Those include giving them access to the Fed's emergency lending "discount window," Dodd said.

But a Fed spokeswoman said later the central bank had not talked with Fannie and Freddie about the emergency lending program. She declined to discuss any other options being considered.

Earlier this year, the Federal Reserve took the unprecedented step of offering direct loans to investment banks from its discount window.

Some observers noted that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae weren't short of cash, but of access to capital.

"The issue is who is going to make good on the long-term debt, not who is going to provide them with short-term cash," said Jerry Webman, chief economist at Oppenheimer Funds Inc. in New York.

"It started with housing but it's now turning into this issue of availability of capital," he said of the overall problems in the financial sector.

The concerns left the Dow down 128.48, or 1.14 percent, to end at 11,100.54 after having fallen to 10,977.68. It last traded below 11,000 on July 25, 2006.

Broader stock indicators also logged declines. The Standard & Poor's 500 index fell 13.90, or 1.11 percent, to 1,239.49, and the Nasdaq composite index fell 18.77, or 0.83 percent, to 2,239.08.

Friday's drop meant Wall Street moved squarely into a bear market, which is defined as a 20 percent drop from a recent peak. The Dow is down 21.6 percent from the record closing high of 14,164.53 it reached in October. The S&P 500 is down 20.8 percent and the Nasdaq is off 21.7 percent.

For the week, the Dow fell 1.67 percent, the S&P 500 lost 1.85 percnet and the Nasdaq declined 0.28 percent. It was the fourth straight weekly decline for the Dow and the sixth consecutive weekly decline for the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq.

The market's other trouble spot, oil, continued its ascent, rising to a trading record of $147.27 amid tensions between the West and Iran. Light, sweet crude for August delivery settled up $3.43 at $145.08, slightly below a record close of $145.29 a barrel set more than a week earlier.

Bond prices fell sharply as investors worried a bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could dent the government's credit rating. Ordinarily, bonds are seen as a safe haven during stock market pullbacks. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, which moves opposite its price, rose to 3.96 percent from 3.80 percent late Thursday. The dollar was mixed against other major currencies, while gold prices rose.

Worries about financials dominated trading. Freddie Mac fell 25 cents, or 3.1 percent, at $7.75, after trading as low as $3.89 in the session. Fannie Mae tumbled $2.95, or 22 percent, to $10.25 after trading as low as $6.68.

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. fell $2.87, or 16.6 percent, to $14.43 as traders fretted that the No. 4 investment bank will succumb to soured debt.

Citigroup Inc., also struggling with the consequences of failed mortgages, announced it will sell its German retail banking operation to France's Credit Mutuel for $7.7 billion. Global banks and brokerages have scrambled to sell assets and raise capital in an effort to offset nearly $300 billion of write-downs linked to the credit crisis. Citi slipped 9 cents to $16.19.

Investors remain cautious about the entire financial sector, especially ahead of second-quarter reports due next week from major names like JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Merrill Lynch & Co. JPMorgan declined $1.35, or 3.9 percent, to $33.16 and Merrill fell $1.10, or 3.8 percent, to $27.61.

"I'm almost not worried about what they report," said Bill Stone, chief investment strategist for PNC Wealth Management, referring to Wall Street's already low expectations for the companies. "How much can they punish these things?"

Friday's confluence of negative news offset a mostly positive quarterly report from General Electric Co. The industrial and financial conglomerate reported second-quarter profits that met analysts' expectations. The company said the forecast across its business lines was mixed. The stock rose 2 cents to $27.66.

In economic news, the United States' trade deficit narrowed in May as exports _ including industrial supplies and consumer goods _ climbed to all-time highs. The Commerce Department said growing exports drove the trade gap down to $58.8 billion, a 1.2 percent decrease from April and the best showing since March.

The good news did little to buoy investors' moods.

"I don't know if it can get much worse," Stone said of investor sentiment. "Usually you get this horrible sentiment and you're due for at least a bounce out of it."

Beyond earnings reports, economic figures are due next week on inflation, retail sales and the housing market.

Declining issues outnumbered advancers in Friday's session by about 2 to 1 on the New York Stock Exchange, where consolidated volume came to a heavy 6.57 billion shares compared with 5.71 billion shares traded Thursday.

The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies rose 4.51, or 0.67 percent, to 674.95.

Overseas, Japan's Nikkei stock average fell 0.21 percent. Britain's FTSE 100 fell 2.69 percent, Germany's DAX index declined 2.41 percent, and France's CAC-40 fell 3.09 percent.

___

The Dow Jones industrial average ended the week down 188.00, or 1.67 percent, at 11,100.54. The Standard & Poor's 500 index finished down 23.41, or 1.85 percent, at 1,239.49. The Nasdaq composite index ended the week down 6.30, or 0.28 percent, at 2,239.08.

The Russell 2000 index finished the week up 9.17, or 1.38 percent, at 674.95.

The Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index _ a free-float weighted index that measures 5,000 U.S. based companies _ ended Friday at 12,635.43, down 180.04 points, or 1.40 percent, for the week. A year ago, the index was at 15,382.73.

___

On the Net:

New York Stock Exchange: http://www.nyse.com

Nasdaq Stock Market: http://www.nasdaq.com

NEW YORK — Wall Street's angst over the ongoing fallout from the credit crisis made for a turbulent end to a volatile week Friday _ stocks tumbled, soared and then turned south again as investor...
NEW YORK — Wall Street's angst over the ongoing fallout from the credit crisis made for a turbulent end to a volatile week Friday _ stocks tumbled, soared and then turned south again as investor...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 225
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
11:36 AM on 07/12/2008
re too big to let fail, suspect global fortunes pegged to Fannie Mae and Mac - for years the USA was lauded as the one good engine on the sputtering global economic aeroplane, unfortunately the fuel increasingly sub-prime

$64 questions seems now whether other country engines have good fuel, sufficient power to keep plane airborne, who pays for USA engine repair job
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
07:17 AM on 07/12/2008
Bnaks and Republicans have been trying to destory Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for years. Look like the did it!
08:17 AM on 07/12/2008
How?
02:46 AM on 07/12/2008
The numbers are mind boggling.
01:09 AM on 07/12/2008
The republicans scream free market economy but bail out IndyMacBank - a bank that lots of republicans have a vested interest in; IndyMac another Wall Street disaster.
On the other hand the republicans refuse to help FannieMae and FreddyMac institutions that help folks on Main Street.
The republicans are full of crap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VivaZapata
11:38 PM on 07/11/2008
if they crash and burn, are the people still under obligation to pay their mortgages? to whom? why?
02:48 AM on 07/12/2008
If those two crash and burn......there will be no more USA just as there is no more USSR.
12:17 PM on 07/12/2008
liabilities owed to a company are not extinguished in bankruptcy. so yes you owe.
10:55 PM on 07/11/2008
Sure, that's what you said the night before Bear Sterns. But I suppose the combined 5 trillion dollar plus liabilities of Fred and Fran give you pause, eh? Bail them out and people will have homes to live in, but with gas at $10 a gallon, they'll have to walk the 30 miles to and from work every day.
02:56 AM on 07/12/2008
How can they be bailed out...they are out equivalent of half the total national debt. They have to be allowed to operate....or the country folds. If the people loose confidence in their ability to operate...they "crash and burn" and the country goes bankrupt....the country can't possibly back that amount.
10:45 PM on 07/11/2008
Here’s a look into who was involved in setting up the Federal Reserve in 1913.

Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin (Rothschild and world economy)
Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris
Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy
Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Lehman Brothers Bank of New York
Goldman Sachs Bank of New York
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Controlled By the Rockefeller Family Tree)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VivaZapata
11:40 PM on 07/11/2008
what happened to the warburg bank during the third reich?
11:41 PM on 07/11/2008
Jump to 2008 - Freddie and Fannie who own 3 $Trillion in lucrative debt THAT is not owned by the Fed....

- Monday, July 7th - some Lehman Brothers analyst releases report that doubts the solvency two companies with highly performing loan portfolios...both of which have been so financially audited during the past 3 years that it makes a colonoscopy look non-invasive...

- Media goes crazy...every headline on CNN, Fortune, etc...slam the GSE's - Bernake publicly claims his doubts...sheeples eat it up.

- By Friday - July 11th both companies combined lose $12 Billion due to stock losses... which really sucks for many retirement funds that hold Freddie and Fannie as they have always been seen as low risk...

- For now...there is no gov't take over - but now the FED will provide capital to Freddie/Fannie ...which means the Fed - a private, unregulated banking institution (Mr. Sarbanes and Mr. Oxley where are you?) gets paid cash for the worthless chits they issue...btw - just where is the gold in Fort Knox.????

The Federal Banks have always wanted a piece of the GSE action as it was debt they didn't control...they're trying their best to steal it - especially since they're hemorrhaging from all of the subprime debt they hold...
07:37 PM on 07/11/2008
Change their names to Fannie Mac and Freddie Mae and all will be just fine just like Arthur Anderson to Accenture.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
07:27 PM on 07/11/2008
The Indian stock market has dropped some 35% this year, and to date the Chinese market is down just under 48%. Does this look like a global market crash happening like a slo-mo train wreck ?
07:13 PM on 07/11/2008
let em go
07:40 PM on 07/11/2008
I agree. But why is Paulson saying this about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac when the Fed has decided to bail out financial houses hooked on sub-primes and goddamit, even car loans the Fed is going to bail out, that is, we pay for? Perhaps Bernanke will bail out Fannie and Freddie.

This securitization of mortgages was a bad idea. All these securitizations seem bad. Then foreign governments invest in them and influence our government to bail them out, it's just a mess.
03:04 AM on 07/12/2008
And just think......there are still people who want to keep this corrupt party in power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torus34
A poor old country mouse.
07:10 PM on 07/11/2008
I have just heard statements from the heads of Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac noting that they are fully solvent and in no danger whatever.

I've put copies of those statements in a folder on my 'puter along with the comments from the CEO's of Bear Stearns and Enron.

[Disclaimer: I got out of stocks years ago and no longer trade. I have nothing to gain or lose if the above comment is widely circulated and affects the market in any way.]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GhostOfSchlesinger
06:59 PM on 07/11/2008
This is a REALLY tough tightrope walk for Secretary Paulson, and it might be even tougher for his successor. Market discipline is hard enough to sustain without offering the potential for risk-free investment via taxpayer dollars. Simultaneously, money's gonna be WAY too tight for Fannie and Freddie if there isn't a sense that these companies - which happen to represent a whopping 50 percent of th US mortgage market - will remain solvent. They get better deals as a result of their government charters.

The fixes currently being offered via discussions between Paulson and Bernanke seem workable and wise. In general, more oversight is required. Yet, there must be - ala the FDIC - a definitive structure that guarantees orderly flows that prevent (to the greatest extent possible) an economic cataclysm.

I'm a Barack Obama supporter.

I'm also a capitalist.
06:26 PM on 07/11/2008
My beliefs are much more cynical. Let all loans transfer to the government, then the gov’t stops foreclosing, all debtholders are held to their debt and if you don’t pay it accrues like unpaid taxes ad infinitum and can be put upon your heirs. No losses as you have an offsetting accrual account and the gov’t has all debtholders now as indentured servants for life. Any loss remains with the property purchaser (where honestly it belongs anyway) 8 years ago I wouldn’t have even dreamed of this scenario.
06:46 PM on 07/11/2008
I accidentally typed debtholders are held whereas I meant borrowers...
07:36 PM on 07/11/2008
of course the lenders had absolutely nothing to do with it....they are only in the business of lending money to high risk borrowers because it is profitable to do so. So bailing them out is a-ok with the so-called world travellers of the world
researcher
researcher
06:21 PM on 07/11/2008
aint capitalism great?

americans still have not figured out that capitalism must self destruct

even the liberals talk up the greatest of capitalism

that is how effective brainwashing is

creates paradigm paralysis ie impossible to see outside of one's paradigm

we borrow from communists, socialialists and kings and stole all of social security money and still americans talk about how great capitalism is

now we print money and borrow money to bail out our banks and mortage companies

amazing truly amazing an entire nation can be so blind

that is the power of a mass paradigm
11:50 AM on 07/12/2008
It seems that Capitalism must have something to feed on ..like that great white shark in the other news story.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:04 PM on 07/11/2008
Face it, people gambled that they could afford the payments, and if they couldn't the value of their home would have gone up enough that they could sell at a profit. I knew quite a few people who did that. It was not just the greed of the lenders it was the greed of the buyers. Their gamble failed and real people got hurt. I didn't buy into it, and now I'm supposed to pay for their gamble. I couldn't afford a house, but I'm supposed to bail out people richer than me who got greedy? Yes the Fed left rates too low, too long (Partisan Republican Greenspan-to help W's election in 2004). maybe some of those folks will have to move into apartments. Welcome to my world.
06:24 PM on 07/11/2008
Yeah,
You left out all the people who was like a friend of mine who kept having appraisers over so that they could keep hitting the HELOC machine, I remember them buying a really really nice new 85 k SUV, TV, vacations... now you get to pay for that , but hey isn't that a Democrat thing anyway, to share, so you should be happy for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:54 PM on 07/11/2008
No, welfare for the wealthy is a Republican thing.
11:53 AM on 07/12/2008
There is plenty of blame and greed to go around and there are many reasons why the mess is what it is.