Gore Makes "Moon Shot" Environmental Challenge

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Gore Makes "Moon Shot" Environmental Challenge stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07-17-08 10:17 AM   |   Updated: 07-25-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Gore

**UPDATE** Seth Colter Walls was on the scene for HuffPost. Read his story here, including mentions of Gore's shout-outs to Bob Barr, will.i.am and more.

FULL TEXT of the Gore environment speech is available here.

AP copy below:

WASHINGTON -- Just as John F. Kennedy set his sights on the moon, Al Gore is challenging the nation to produce every kilowatt of electricity through wind, sun and other Earth-friendly energy sources within 10 years, an audacious goal he hopes the next president will embrace.

The Nobel Prize-winning former vice president said fellow Democrat Barack Obama and Republican rival John McCain are "way ahead" of most politicians in the fight against global climate change.

Rising fuel costs, climate change and the national security threats posed by U.S. dependence on foreign oil are conspiring to create "a new political environment" that Gore said will sustain bold and expensive steps to wean the nation off fossil fuels.

"I have never seen an opportunity for the country like the one that's emerging now," Gore told The Associated Press in an interview previewing a speech on global warming he planned to give Thursday in Washington.

In his speech, Gore said some of the nation's biggest success stories have come from making commitments to goals well beyond the next election, citing the Marshall plan for rebuilding Europe, Social Security and the interstate highway system, in addition to putting a man on the moon.

Story continues below
advertisement

"A political promise to do something 40 years from now is universally ignored because everyone knows that's meaningless," he said. "Ten years is about the maximum time that we as a nation can hold a steady aim and hit the target."

He said it also coincides with experts' predictions that unless dramatic changes to reduce global warming pollution are made within the next decade, "our ability to ever recover from this environmental crisis" may be lost.

Gore said the single most important policy change would be placing a carbon tax on burning oil and coal.

The Alliance for Climate Protection, a bipartisan group he leads, estimates the cost of transforming the U.S. to clean electricity sources at $1.5 trillion to $3 trillion over 30 years in public and private money. But he says it would cost about as much to build greenhouse gas-polluting coal plants to satisfy current demand.

"This is an investment that will pay itself back many times over," Gore said. "It's an expensive investment but not compared to the rising cost of continuing to invest in fossil fuels."

Called an alarmist by conservatives, Gore has made global warming his signature issue. He portrayed Thursday's speech as the latest and most important phase in his effort to build public opinion in favor of alternative fuels.

Gore knows politicians fear action unless voters are willing to sacrifice _ and demand new fuels.

"I hope to contribute to a new political environment in this country that will allow the next president to do what I think the next president is going to think is the right thing to do," Gore said. "But the people have to play a part." He compared his challenge to Kennedy's pledge in May 1961 to land a man on the moon by the end of the decade.

Gore narrowly lost the presidential race in 2000 to then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush after a campaign in which his prescient views on climate change took a back seat to other issues. In the 2008 presidential race, both the Republican and Democrat candidates support action to curb the gases blamed for global warming.

While dismissing a suggestion that he pulled his punches eight years ago, Gore said his goal now is to "enlarge the political space" within which politicians can "deal with the climate challenge."

To meet his 10-year goal, Gore said nuclear energy output would continue at current levels while the U.S. dramatically increases its use of solar, wind, geothermal and clean coal energy. Huge investments must also be made in technologies that reduce energy waste and link existing power grids, he said.

Gore's proposal would represent a significant shift in where the U.S. gets its power. In 2005, the United States produced nearly 3.7 billion kilowatt hours of electricity, with coal providing slightly more than half of that energy, according to government statistics. Nuclear power accounted for 21 percent, natural gas 15 percent and renewable sources, including wind and solar, about 8.6 percent.

Coal's share of electricity generation is only expected to grow come 2030, according to Energy Department forecasts, while renewable energy would still only provide 11 percent of the nation's power.

Without action, the cost of oil will continue to rise as fast-growing China and India increase demand, Gore said. Sustained addiction to oil also will place the U.S. at the mercy of oil-producing governments, he said, and the globe would suffer irreparable harm.

Government experts recently predicted that, at the current rate and without an international treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, world energy demand will grow 50 percent over the next two decades. The Energy Information Administration also said in its long-range forecast to 2030 that the world is not close to abandoning fossil fuels despite their role in global warming.

While electricity production is only part of the nation's energy and climate change problem, Gore said, "If we meet this challenge we will solve the rest of it."

Rising fuel costs, climate change and the national security threats posed by U.S. dependence on foreign oil are conspiring to create "a new political environment" that Gore said will sustain bold and expensive steps to wean the nation off fossil fuels.

"I have never seen an opportunity for the country like the one that's emerging now," Gore told The Associated Press in an interview previewing a speech on global warming he planned to give Thursday in Washington.

In his speech, Gore said some of the nation's biggest success stories have come from making commitments to goals well beyond the next election, citing the Marshall plan for rebuilding Europe, Social Security and the interstate highway system, in addition to putting a man on the moon.

"A political promise to do something 40 years from now is universally ignored because everyone knows that's meaningless," he said. "Ten years is about the maximum time that we as a nation can hold a steady aim and hit the target."

He said it also coincides with experts' predictions that unless dramatic changes to reduce global warming pollution are made within the next decade, "our ability to ever recover from this environmental crisis" may be lost.

Gore said the single most important policy change would be placing a carbon tax on burning oil and coal.

The Alliance for Climate Protection, a bipartisan group he leads, estimates the cost of transforming the U.S. to clean electricity sources at $1.5 trillion to $3 trillion over 30 years in public and private money. But he says it would cost about as much to build greenhouse gas-polluting coal plants to satisfy current demand.

"This is an investment that will pay itself back many times over," Gore said. "It's an expensive investment but not compared to the rising cost of continuing to invest in fossil fuels."

Called an alarmist by conservatives, Gore has made global warming his signature issue. He portrayed Thursday's speech as the latest and most important phase in his effort to build public opinion in favor of alternative fuels.

Gore knows politicians fear action unless voters are willing to sacrifice _ and demand new fuels.

"I hope to contribute to a new political environment in this country that will allow the next president to do what I think the next president is going to think is the right thing to do," Gore said. "But the people have to play a part." He compared his challenge to Kennedy's pledge in May 1961 to land a man on the moon by the end of the decade.

Gore narrowly lost the presidential race in 2000 to then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush after a campaign in which his prescient views on climate change took a back seat to other issues. In the 2008 presidential race, both the Republican and Democrat candidates support action to curb the gases blamed for global warming.

While dismissing a suggestion that he pulled his punches eight years ago, Gore said his goal now is to "enlarge the political space" within which politicians can "deal with the climate challenge."

To meet his 10-year goal, Gore said nuclear energy output would continue at current levels while the U.S. dramatically increases its use of solar, wind, geothermal and clean coal energy. Huge investments must also be made in technologies that reduce energy waste and link existing power grids, he said.

Gore's proposal would represent a significant shift in where the U.S. gets its power. In 2005, the United States produced nearly 3.7 billion kilowatt hours of electricity, with coal providing slightly more than half of that energy, according to government statistics. Nuclear power accounted for 21 percent, natural gas 15 percent and renewable sources, including wind and solar, about 8.6 percent.

Coal's share of electricity generation is only expected to grow come 2030, according to Energy Department forecasts, while renewable energy would still only provide 11 percent of the nation's power.

Without action, the cost of oil will continue to rise as fast-growing China and India increase demand, Gore said. Sustained addiction to oil also will place the U.S. at the mercy of oil-producing governments, he said, and the globe would suffer irreparable harm.

Government experts recently predicted that, at the current rate and without an international treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, world energy demand will grow 50 percent over the next two decades. The Energy Information Administration also said in its long-range forecast to 2030 that the world is not close to abandoning fossil fuels despite their role in global warming.

While electricity production is only part of the nation's energy and climate change problem, Gore said, "If we meet this challenge we will solve the rest of it."

___

On the Net:

Al Gore: http://www.algore.com/

**UPDATE** Seth Colter Walls was on the scene for HuffPost. Read his story here, including mentions of Gore's shout-outs to Bob Barr, will.i.am and more. FULL TEXT of the Gore environment speech is ...
**UPDATE** Seth Colter Walls was on the scene for HuffPost. Read his story here, including mentions of Gore's shout-outs to Bob Barr, will.i.am and more. FULL TEXT of the Gore environment speech is ...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
229
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- Confused1 I'm a Fan of Confused1 3 fans permalink

Columbia University just came out with a press release that they have developed machine that is actually a carbon scrubber that will remove something like a tone of carbon from the air per day. Yet the enviornmentalists are against it. WHY? Maybe carbon isn't the issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 07/24/2008
- Confused1 I'm a Fan of Confused1 3 fans permalink

Gore is a hypocrite. Why would ANYONE even bother to listen to him? He violates every energy policy he proposes WE should all follow. He uses more electricity in one month than the average household uses in a year. He jets all over the world in a private jet (that really reduces his carbon footprint.­)

Oh, but I forget. He "buys" carbon credits. So he basically takes money out of one pocket and puts it in the other as he pays HIS company for the carbon credits. Nice gig if you can get it. Where do you think his $100 million income comes from? It comes from all the morons who actually "buy" these carbon credits to get rid of the guilt they feel for "destroying" the planet. Good grief!

Last point on this one. Why won't Gore debate scientists who have done studies that do not definitively point to humans as the cause of climate change (that is the new terminology for Global Warming since the planet is actually starting to cool down now)? Why, I'll tell you. He could not defend his assumptions.

I don't know a single person who willfully polutes and doesn't want cleaner air, cleaner energy and water. But Gore is out of touch with reality. He wants everyone else to bow to the carbon God--everyone but him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 07/24/2008
- yngcelt I'm a Fan of yngcelt 2 fans permalink

Another example of his hypocrisy is the Pigeon River in North Carolina and east Tennesee. The Champion International paper mill has pumped tons of chemicals and byproducts into it for years, turning it the color of cofee and adding a sulfurish smell. Gore campaigned hard against this pollution and lobbied the EPA to crack down. But in 1987, as Gore started running for president the first time, he was pressured by 2 politicians whose support he craved for the North Carolina Super Tuesday primary. Terry Sanford (then a Senator) and Jamie Clarke (North Carolina congressmen) lobbied him hard to ease up on Champion. Gore did, writing to the EPA again and now asking for a more permissive water pollution standard. Sanford and Clarke endorsed him, and Gore won the state handily.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 07/20/2008

Your crack me up and you're probably right about Al. I hear he's profiting considerably through his green activities, but I do not know. He doesn't know about http://TheGreenEngine.com yet, even though JFK's Nephew Steve is on our company's Board. DARPA and the US Navy in Panama City know exactly what we are doing; what's coming in September for Americans. The ramifications of this alternative energy source are absolutely staggering, and absolutely dangerous for the owners - The inventor and a few shareholders. It will be SO much fun derailing and dethroning the "oil powerful" while America flourishes once again. Someone out there will accuse me of dreaming and I understand why. But this is real, and we have less that 2 months before we show the prototype video on YouTube and Google video.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 AM on 07/22/2008
- yngcelt I'm a Fan of yngcelt 2 fans permalink

Public records reveal that as Gore lectures Americans on excessive consumption, he and his wife Tipper live in two properties: a 10,000-square-foot, 20-room, eight-bathroom home in Nashville, and a 4,000-square-foot home in Arlington, Va. He also has a third home in Carthage, Tenn.
In the Washington, D.C., area, utility companies offer wind energy as an alternative to traditional energy, and similar programs exist in Nashville. Utility customers who pay a few extra pennies per kilowatt hour can take a big step toward a carbon-neutral lifestyle.

But according to public records, there is no evidence that Gore has signed up to use wind energy in either of his large residences.

Talk about an inconvenient truth!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 07/20/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1568 fans permalink
photo

Gore makes Nashville home more 'green'

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/13/gore.home.ap/index.html

---------------

But, of course, if your goal is to just smear Gore, you would never be interested in finding the above evidence. It took me 30 seconds to Google and find it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 07/21/2008
- yngcelt I'm a Fan of yngcelt 2 fans permalink

Gore receives $20,000 a year in royalties from Pasminco Zinc, which operates a zinc concession on his property. Tennessee has cited the company for contaminating the nearby Caney Fork River with quantities of barium, iron and zinc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 07/20/2008
- yngcelt I'm a Fan of yngcelt 2 fans permalink

Gore claims to be environmentally friendly, but he hasn’t dumped his family's large stock holdings in Occidental (Oxy) Petroleum. As executor of his family's trust, over the years Gore has controlled hundreds of thousands of dollars in Oxy stock, while Oxy has been beset by controversy over oil drilling in ecologically sensitive areas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 07/20/2008
- yngcelt I'm a Fan of yngcelt 2 fans permalink

Al gore loves to criticize his fellow Amiercans about their "carbon footprints" and encourages everyone else to drive hybrid cars, recycle, blah, blah, blah.
And yet he flies around the country in a fuel-burning, carbon spewing private jet, then drives to his events in motor pools made up of SUVs and Town Cars which sit idling with the AC on throughout these hours long events and then he hops back on his private jet to return to his sprawling mansion in Tennessee where he consumes enough electricy to power a small village.

Al Gore = World's Biggest Hypocrite!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 07/20/2008

Give Pepto Bismol a try, yngcelt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 07/20/2008
- yngcelt I'm a Fan of yngcelt 2 fans permalink

Why? Will that make Al Gore stop being a hypocrite?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 AM on 07/21/2008
- sculptor I'm a Fan of sculptor 7 fans permalink

There was a really dumb idea presented here in simplistic terms as "tax what you burn and not what you earn." That is a recipe for disaster. The rich could laugh off a tax like that at the same time it would crush those at the other end of the economic spectrum. I say "tax what you burn times what you earn." This would make taxing carbon emissions much fairer and additional would make it more generally acceptable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 07/20/2008
- leduck I'm a Fan of leduck 44 fans permalink
photo

i want to draft al gore for prez

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 07/19/2008

Al Gore is forgetting the other half of the moon shot challenge: getting Americans to conserve more.

http://lamarguerite.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/c-word-absent-from-gores-moon-shot-challenge/

This, people, may not be as dazzling as just claiming 100% reliance on Earth-friendly energy sources, and yet is essential to our survival in the so distant future. The real courage is in confronting Americans with that most inconvenient truth. That we are going to have to change our lifestyle, and consume less, drive less, use less electricity and gas. It is a matter of simple maths.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 07/19/2008
photo

Really disappointed that Mr. Gore did not do more regarding Kyoto when he was VP.

It was clear then what was happening.
And he was just ineffective.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 07/19/2008
- Mogamboguru I'm a Fan of Mogamboguru 316 fans permalink
photo

It didn't pay off for him, then...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 07/19/2008
- rivrgrrl I'm a Fan of rivrgrrl 123 fans permalink
photo

I don't hold that against him; Clinton should have been the one on top of that and done more. In his capacity as VP, Gore had neither the power not the time to adequately address it, which he since has done with enough effort to more than make up for what little had been done in the past.

With Repub control in DC under Clinton, can you imagine the stink they would have raised had Gore even tried to do more for that cause back then. Granted, they would have had to split the sliming of the Clintons to include the Gores, but something tells me they would have been up (down?) to the task.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 07/19/2008
photo

Gore could have presented an economic arguement.

1- Petroleum based energy is not infinitely sustainable.
2- Better to do something now than later.
3- Even if you DON'T believe in global climate change, almost everyone else does.
4- Work on technologies that address the climate change. AND provide extra incentives for educational opportunies involving this NEW technology.
5- Sell the technology to those who believe in global climate change.

Spain did this. And is selling the techology to us, among others.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 07/20/2008
- Mogamboguru I'm a Fan of Mogamboguru 316 fans permalink
photo

BR AKI NG NEWS!

Today's actual mid-day temperature in western Europe: +16 degrees Celsius.

Long-term Average daytime-temperature in Western Europe in Mid-July: +26 degrees Celsius.

"Sli ck Al's" Gl obal Wa rming at work...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 07/19/2008
- rivrgrrl I'm a Fan of rivrgrrl 123 fans permalink
photo

You don't really understand this issue too well, do you.

Go read a book or two, sonny. Then come back and at least try to post something resembling a sign of intellect and critical thinking skills.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 07/19/2008
- MGhamma I'm a Fan of MGhamma 15 fans permalink

One days temperature does not a long-term average make.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 PM on 07/21/2008

So Gore believes McCain and Obama are WAY AHEAD OF OTHER POLITICIANS IN THE FIGHT AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE. Just how are these two pandering politicians going to affect any change. Does anyone really believe the the 'maverick' or the 'change agent' will really have any power over the special interests. Highly unlikely. The only ones that can bring about any substantive change are the people of amerika, and I just don't believe that they have the guts or will-power to change their gas guzzling, trashing making, air polluting ways (at least not until they are forces to make life changes). Gore is looking to be the first 'Environmental Czar', and is putting his bid in now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 AM on 07/19/2008
photo

You have it in your power to heal your world technologically, but there is no task more important for you as a species than to heal yourselves. The universe is waiting, but your species as it exists now will never become a welcome part of it, never receive aid from it, until you change. There is more life in your own galaxy alone than you can possibly imagine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 07/18/2008
- 1rewd1 I'm a Fan of 1rewd1 3 fans permalink
photo

The HuffPo Mods are out in full force protecting this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 07/18/2008
- Mogamboguru I'm a Fan of Mogamboguru 316 fans permalink
photo

Agreed. They are ki cki ng the First Amendment's bu tt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 07/19/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect