Merrill Lynch Posts Massive Second Quarter Loss

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOE BEL BRUNO | July 17, 2008 09:19 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »


NEW YORK — Merrill Lynch & Co. on Thursday issued its latest assessment of the damage it has suffered from the credit crisis: its fourth straight quarterly loss and write-downs from failed investments approaching $40 billion.

The world's biggest brokerage announced a wider-than-expected $4.89 billion second-quarter loss and said it was selling assets _ its stake in media company Bloomberg LP for $4.4 billion and its Financial Data Services Inc. subsidiary for $3.5 billion.

After Wells Fargo & Co. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. announced stronger-than-expected earnings this week, Merrill's results served as a reminder that the credit crisis isn't fading. Global banks and brokerages have been forced to take some $300 billion of write-downs in the past year, an amount that some believe could grow to $1 trillion before the turmoil has passed.

"This was a difficult and disappointing quarter in terms of the bottom line," Chief Executive John Thain told analysts on a conference call. "But, in spite of this loss, we likely have in our last two quarters more than replaced the capital that we lost."

Merrill's quarterly loss came to $4.97 per share, after accounting for the payment of dividends for the three months ended June 30. That compares to a year-ago profit of $2.01 billion, or $2.24 per share. The broker reported negative revenue of $2.11 billion versus revenue of $9.46 billion a year earlier.

Analysts had expected that the New York-based brokerage would lose $1.91 per share, according to Thomson Financial.

Story continues below
advertisement

Merrill, which had already taken $29 billion of write-downs, racked up a sizable amount in the latest quarter. The brokerage took $9.4 billion of charges and write-downs from mortgage-backed securities, unprofitable hedge positions, and residential mortgage exposure.

The company reported $3.5 billion of losses from its exposure to collateralized debt obligations, which are financial instruments tied to mortgages. In addition, it lost $2.9 billion from wrong-way hedges it bought from bond insurers.

It also took another $1.7 billion in losses from its investment portfolio of its U.S. banks, and $1.3 billion in write-downs from exposure to residential mortgages.

Though the firm's core business held up better than expected, revenue from banking, trading and wealth management fell 21 percent from a year earlier. The company also said it cut its risk exposure across all of its businesses, and that its capital base now stands at $92 billion.

Merrill's report was clearly disappointing to investors. The stock, which closed up 9.8 percent at $20.73 in regular trading amid a general stock market rally, plunged in after-hours trading after the results were announced.

The debt-rating agency Moody's downgraded Merrill Lynch's debt within minutes after the results were released. Standard & Poor's affirmed the broker's ratings, though it had downgraded them just a few weeks ago.

Peter Nerby, an analyst at Moody's, said Merrill's options for selling assets or raising equity capital to offset losses "are now reduced given the difficult industry and capital markets environment."

Indeed, Thain said the company's $1 trillion balance sheet gives him a number of ways to raise capital before issuing more shares or finding another investor. Merrill has already raised more than $15 billion of new capital since December from sovereign wealth funds and other institutional investors.

The deal to sell the Bloomberg stake had been expected for weeks, and the agreement calls for Merrill's shares to be sold back to the media company. The sale of First Data is still in negotiations, and Merrill has so far signed a "letter of intent" to an undisclosed buyer.

Thain abandoned an effort to sell Merrill's 49.8 percent stake in money manager BlackRock Inc., and in fact said Merrill was broadening the partnership. Both BlackRock and Merrill cooperate in sending business to one another, and in some cases share the same offices around the world.

The investment is valued at about $13 billion, though Thain said there's no immediate need to unravel Merrill's position.

"We would look at all of our options and decide what makes the most sense for the long-term interest of our shareholders," he said. "Right now we think we are in a good position, are well capitalized, and will continue to shrink our risk-weighted assets."

With Merrill's results out of the way, investors next turn their attention to Citigroup Inc. The nation's biggest bank by assets is expected to post its third straight quarterly loss before the opening bell on Wall Street Friday.

 
Comments
38
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG permalink
photo

Merrill Lynch Is Charged With Fraud by the S. E. C. June 23, 1973 New York Times
By MICHAEL C. JENSEN

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20811FC3B551A7493C1AB178DD85F478785F9

Look thru google news archive and just see numerous actions and fines taken against Merrill Lynch over the years, it goes on and on

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 07/18/2008

In a time of the Iraq-Afghanstan Wars, consumer economic uncertainty, and the U. S. National Debt reaching $10 trillion, MICHAEL W. HODGES' detailed '"ECONOMIC REPORT" is a must read by all free thinking Americans looking for financial trends facing the United States. The complete report can be found at:

http://mwhodges.home.att.net/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 07/19/2008
photo

Where's the FBI investigation??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 07/18/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG permalink
photo

"Merrill Lynch Censured" - Time Magazine Friday, Dec. 06, 1968

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,844665,00.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 07/18/2008
photo

People think their deposits up to $100,000 will be insured by the FDIC ( one of those horrible FDR programs the neo cons are trying their damnedest to do away with). Unfortunately, the debt in America combining both government and personal = about 50 trillion bucks. The FDIC can handle how much of that when the chips are called in? It will be like FEMA and Katrina; or worse. And when banks close, they ARE CLOSED. You can't go in and access your "safety deposit boxes" OK?

Business has exited stage left with the free trade deals and taken our manufacturing sector with it. The government does not fund science, so all the scientists have left. We have no educational system so we have no thinkers. Our medical system is collapsing so we'll all be sick even if we get the flu. And we can't drive our cars as the oil companies take even more profit at the pump before their boy, Bush, leaves for Paraguay and one of the last freshwater aquifers his family so prudently invested our stolen wealth in. Our governments; local, state and national have sold everything they possibly can to foreign companies.

There's not much left, and they can and are getting cheap labor to come in and take the rest of our jobs.

"Put not thy trust in the princes of this world, for they will frig thee up, even to the ends of the earth" - Woody Guthrie

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 07/18/2008

Merrill's quarterly loss came to $4.97 per share,

Analysts had expected that the New York-based brokerage would lose $1.91 per share....

Boy those analysts are really sharp eh?

Wall St. is so corrupt it stinks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 AM on 07/18/2008

Wall st corrupt, Washington corrupt, many state gov'ts corrupt. Time to throw out the tea!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 07/18/2008

Just remember...
THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 07/18/2008

Merrill Lynch DID get a government bailout 9 months ago.

The governments that bailed them out were Kuwait and Singapore using their "sovereign wealth funds." These countries have made a fortune in petrodollars and loans to the US for the Iraq war.

The good part about bailouts from SWFs (good for the SWFs) is that they get a piece of these companies. In the future, they'll have a return on their investment for keeping these companies afloat.

A bailout from U.S. taxpayers is FREE money, and after the example of Bear Stearns, Wall Street will continue crying, "if you don't bail us out, the entire economy will collapse."

Nice try ... but NO, it won't.

They can always borrow from abroad.
Some statistics on SWFs:

"The largest funds today are ADIA in the UAE, with estimated assets of $350 billion to $850 billion; Singapore's Government Investment Corp., with assets of $250 billion to $350 billion; Norway's Government Pension Fund, with $383 billion; Kuwait, with $243 billion, and China's Government Investment Corp., with $200 billion. There are 32 active funds in 29 countries."

http://www.nysun.com/business/sovereign-wealth-funds-saviors-or-saboteurs/69515/

Now, this data comes from the conservative NY Sun, so their headline reads "Sovereign Wealth Funds: Saviors or Saboteurs?" but it never questions why bailout money from the US should have no-strings-attached, or why there should be no profit-sharing to go along with the sharing of risk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 07/18/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG permalink
photo

At least workout a repayment program?

With interest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 AM on 07/18/2008
photo

You forget that we lose our country with each bailout from abroad. And that THEY will now own our government as well as our houses in foreclosure and everything else Bush has given away to play soldier.

Oh well, why worry now, we should have started doing that 40 years ago when Reagan started using Friedman's economics. Pay off your house if you can at least you'll have a place to freeze and starve in. Get some oil lamps too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 07/18/2008

Sure, Merrill Lynch and others will all have us bail them out, while they take the money and run!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 07/18/2008

I do not feel a grain of sorrow for them. Take big risks, no exit strategy, getting burned. Capitalism at work.

I hope the Feds do not bail this one out. Investment companies are not the responsibility of the Feds to bail out (still upset about Bear Stearns).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 AM on 07/18/2008

No surprise to me in 1997 I put monet in a T Towe Price IRA within a year I list 1/2 of what I put in it.
My wifes company started a Merrill Lynch account so i rolled over mt T Rowe to Merrill in 1999, In 2000 when bush/chenny stole the election the market dropped and I lost half of what I moved to merrill.
So here I am today I have no put any money into my IRA since 2000, I moved it to bonds and haven;t lost any more. But looking at the upcomming stock market crash last week I went to my local bank and filled out the paper work ti get my Ira rolled over to my bank and put into CDs. At least it's insured.
Look out people we are in for a very rough ride, if you have any money out on credit cards you better pay it off now once the interset rates start up the credit card companies will eat you alive!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 AM on 07/18/2008

I suppose its too much to hope for that some of these Wall Street firms go belly up?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 AM on 07/18/2008

Yeah Marijam, wouldnt that be great? lets wish for companies that employ tens of thousands of people in good, high paying jobs to go out of business. and we get the added bonus of systemic risk to the global financial system

schedenfreude much?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 07/18/2008

And, if you watched the C-Span banking hearings just this week you would have heard that genius of a secty treasury Hank Paulson asking Congress for a cart blanche fund of trillions (yes, trillions) to eventually "stabilize" Freddie and Fannie.....
That man has some nerve!!! WE have to remember he is a very wealthy individual who came out of the same system he is trying to bail out.
Our kind of capitalism is:
Socialize the cost (the taxpayer eventually bails out everybody) and privatize the profits....
This is an excellent example of what is happening now.
We need to pink slip more CEO's (and throw some in Jail) and politicians.
Abolish the PRIVATE Federal Reserve and return the responsibility of our financial system to Congress (right to print money) where the Constitution puts it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 07/18/2008

The war economy don't look pretty good. I for myself am not dependent on massive amounts of oil. Let the SUV owners pay for the crisis for being so irresponsible. It's just a matter of choosing a coherent lifestyle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 AM on 07/18/2008

There goes the "I"-Factor again. As long as I am alright, I assume the rest is too and to hell with
the rest of the people eh? Can we get over this selfish thinking. The SUV Owner is not responsible for what is happening but our dear government, who allowed the Enron Loophole.
They were briefed on the results and they decided not to address it. That is the issue.
No peak oil scare, no lack of oil, no lack of refineries. Ever wondered why all of a sudden, if we
have a hurricane or someone in Nigeria lets a fart, oil goes up. Never happened before.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 AM on 07/18/2008

There's the G word again. Blame the gov't for everything. No one is responsible for themselves. I will spend more than I make because I have a credit card and a home equity loan. It's the gov'ts fault I can't spend within my means.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 07/18/2008
- dm92 I'm a Fan of dm92 permalink

As an SUV owner (my third Ford Expedition since 1996 - last one purchased 3.5 years ago), I don't consider it an irresponsible choice. It is functional for my family - we drive them sensibly - I lost a close family member (10-year old child) in an auto accident in 1991 so I prefer my children to ride in something bigger and we only drive it about 15,000 miles a year or less (including vacation) because neither of us commutes in either of our cars - we live in New Jersey near public transportation to NYC where we work. Having said that, it now costs a little more than $100 to fill it up - it is not pleasant. I am not yet considering a new car because we do not trade cars often. Our sedan is 10 years old (has 70,000 miles on it) and we would still have our second Expedition had it not beenn destroyed in an accident.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 AM on 07/18/2008
- Kong I'm a Fan of Kong permalink

Socialism for the rich, capitalism for the rest.

Don't got no captial to be a capitalist with? Too bad poor boy. You shoulda been born rich (aka "Let them eat cake").

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 07/18/2008

Yes my friend. Capitalism is a complete failure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 AM on 07/18/2008

Capitalism is also what made guys like Putin the richest around. Lets ask Vladimir how much revolution is he in for?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 AM on 07/18/2008

And what economic system have you come up with that will work better. Communism, ummm that one failed, can't have socialism in country where there are so many different societies. White Society, Black Society, Italian Society, Jewish Society, Irish Society, African Society, Carribean Society, Latino Society, Mexican Society, etc... Socialism may be working in a place like Norway or Iceland where they have 8 or 9 million people, we have 300 million here. No sense in complaining about what you have, it is just a waste of time, come up with some ideas, use that grey matter in your head a little.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 07/18/2008

I smell a Bailout.
I wonder how much this one will cost US ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 07/18/2008

First Rabobank of the Benelux takes over Sarasin and now this.

What is the world coming too?

Manuel

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 AM on 07/18/2008
photo

So when is America going to bail them out?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 AM on 07/18/2008

A bailout by America's TAXPAYERS is SOCIALISM FOR THE RICH--that's OK!
Because it's for the "nanny state for the rich".

But if middle income Americans need help, it's unacceptable socialism.
Heck, it's downright "communist' to expect our tax dollars to be spent on--us!
We apparently don't deserve it. Only the rich deserve bailouts.

Wow. That sure is a stinking DOUBLE-STANDARD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 AM on 07/18/2008
photo

Ssshh! Pipe down, people aren't supposed to get wind of that. Go turn on Rush Limbaugh and lapse back into a stupor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 07/18/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 

Related Tags