Afghanistan Draws Foreign Al-Qaida Recruits

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

KATHY GANNON | July 17, 2008 07:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

In this Nov 25, 2004 file photo, captured Central Asians alleged to be Islamic militants, Abdul Qahar, 26, Mohammad Khalid, 16, and Hussain 14, from left, are presented before the media as an officer of Pakistan army looks on, in Peshawar, Pakistan. Afghanistan has been drawing a fresh influx of foreign jihadi fighters from Turkey, Central Asia, Chechnya and the Middle East, in one more sign that al-Qaida is regrouping on what is fast becoming the most active front of the war on terror. (AP Photo/M. Sajjad, File)

PESHAWAR, Pakistan — Afghanistan has been drawing a fresh influx of jihadi fighters from Turkey, Central Asia, Chechnya and the Middle East, one more sign that al-Qaida is regrouping on what is fast becoming the most active front of the war on terror groups.

More foreigners are infiltrating Afghanistan because of a recruitment drive by al-Qaida as well as a burgeoning insurgency that has made movement easier across the border from Pakistan, U.S. officials, militants and experts say. For the past two months, Afghanistan has overtaken Iraq in deaths of U.S. and allied troops, and nine American soldiers were killed at a remote base in Kunar province Sunday in the deadliest attack in years.

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned during a visit to Kabul this month about an increase in foreign fighters crossing into Afghanistan from Pakistan, where a new government is trying to negotiate with militants.

Two U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information, told The Associated Press that the U.S. is closely monitoring the flow of foreign fighters into both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Jihadist Web sites from Chechnya to Turkey to the Arab world featured recruitment ads as early as 2007 calling on the "Lions of Islam" to fight in Afghanistan, said Brian Glyn Williams, associate professor of Islamic history at the University of Massachusetts. Williams has tracked the movement of jihadis for the U.S. military's Combating Terrorism Center at West Point.

Local Afghans in the border regions are increasingly concerned about the return of the "Araban" or "Ikhwanis," as Arab fighters are known in the Pashtun language, Williams wrote in a CTC paper. He said there were rumors of hardened Arab fighters from Iraq training Afghan Pashtuns in the previously taboo tactic of suicide bombing.

Story continues below
advertisement

Turkey also appears to have emerged as a source of recruits. Williams estimated as many as 100 Turks had made their way to Pakistan to join the fight in Afghanistan.

"The story of Turkish involvement in transnational jihadism is one of the best kept stories of the war on terror," said Williams, who noted that al-Qaida videos posted on YouTube mention Turks engaging in the insurgency. "The local Afghans whom I talked to claim that the Turks and other foreigners are more prone to suicidal assaults than the local Taliban."

Dozens of Turkish Islamic militants have trained in al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan and taken part in attacks there, said Emin Demirel, an anti-terrorism expert in Turkey. He said images of attacks on mosques or Muslim villages provide propaganda for recruiting young Turkish Muslims.

"Nowadays, they are effectively using the Internet to communicate with fellow militants, and police have difficulty in keeping tabs on several of the jihadist sites," said Demirel, author of several books on Turkish Islamic militant groups. "Turkish courts sometimes locally block access to one particular site, but it is still accessed outside Turkey. Those Web sites eulogize fallen fighters as martyrs in order to recruit among radical Muslim youths."

One example was Cuneyt Ciftci, the German-born son of Turkish immigrants, who took the Arabic nom de guerre of Saad Abu Furqan. In a video obtained last March by the AP, the 28-year-old was shown giving a final hug goodbye to some friends before blowing himself up outside a U.S. military base in eastern Afghanistan.

A Turkish news Web site, Uslanmam, said an Uzbek militant group called Islamic Jihad Union claimed responsibility and eulogized Ciftci as "the brave Turk who has left his luxury life in Germany and came here to go to paradise."

Just a couple of weeks later, newspapers in Pakistan reported that four Turkish nationals with suspected links to al-Qaida had been arrested by authorities on a bus. They were found with explosives, ammunition and jihadi sites on their laptop computers.

A senior official in Turkey's Interior Ministry said it has no information to corroborate claims of an increase in the number of Turks fighting in Afghanistan. The official asked not to be identified because Turkish rules bar civil servants from making statements to the press.

Al-Qaida's recruitment drive stems from a slow and steady resurgence that started in 2002, according to Taliban sources.

"They are awake," said Qari Mohammed Yusuf, who Afghan authorities confirm is a senior Taliban. "They have people going by different names to other countries. They are coming and going easily. In the last year, they have been organizing more day by day."

Al-Qaida has financed the Taliban in both Pakistan and Afghanistan, Yusuf told the AP. In the chaos created by the Taliban groups, al-Qaida has been able to steadily recruit, re-establish its public relations wing, plot new attacks and re-establish areas of operation on both sides of the border.

Some new recruits cross into Afghanistan's northern Balkh province or through Iran into Herat province in western Afghanistan, said Nangyal Khosti, a commander loyal to Jalaluddin Haqqani, a wanted terrorist. Those from Iran have often trained in Iraq and are hardened insurgents. The recruits, Yusuf said, head to Afghanistan's Paktika province, where there are roughly 150 Arab militants.

In Pakistan, al-Qaida recruits are sent to Waziristan and the lawless regions of the northwest along Afghanistan's eastern border, Yusuf said.

Afghan and Western officials say a key route for al-Qaida recruits is from Central Asia into northeastern Kunar and Nuristan provinces, where former U.S. intelligence officials suspect Osama bin Laden is hiding. Both provinces border Pakistan's Bajaur tribal area, where the Taliban hold sway and where the U.S. has targeted al-Qaida's No. 2, Ayman al-Zawahri.

The hulking mountains of Kunar and Nuristan soar thousands of feet and are heavily forested, giving militants good cover. Kunar was the location of the war's two deadliest attacks on U.S. soldiers _ on Sunday, with the killing of the nine Americans, and in June 2005, when militants shot down a helicopter and killed 16 soldiers.

Kunar and Nuristan are also the only areas in South Asia where the Wahhabi or Salafi strain of Islam dominates. Wahhabism is the main sect in Saudi Arabia and is followed by al-Qaida, while Afghanistan's Islamic traditions are more Sufi and mystical in nature.

Naseer Ahmed al-Bahri, who was bin Laden's bodybuard until 2000, told the AP in Yemen last year that al-Qaida has field commanders in countries from Indonesia to Senegal.

While al-Qaida may be sending most of its trainees to Afghanistan and Pakistan, it is probably also creating cells with the mission of attacking Western countries, including the United States, warned Erich Marquardt, senior editor with the Combating Terrorism Center.

"I think we have to accept the fact that al-Qaida has not taken its sights off the far enemy," he said. "Al-Qaida recognizes that it is fighting in multiple theaters and is therefore likely training fighters for different areas of operation."

___

Associated Press writers Selcan Hacaoglu and Suzan Fraser in Turkey and Pamela Hess in Washington contributed to this report.

 
Comments
45
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

"The story of Turkish involvement in transnational jihadism is one of the best kept stories of the war on terror,"

Hmmmm, now why might this be?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibel_Edmonds

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 07/22/2008
photo

Dear "surge " fans, this illustrates the fact that there will be an unlimited supply of Taliban and others like them as long as we pursue our crazy Mideast policy.

There were a few million Vietnamese. There are a billion Muslims.

As long as we continue with our unconditional support of anything Israel does and keep invading Muslim countries that haven't attacked us (Iran supported our retaliation against the Taliban) we're going to be playing a deadly game of global whack-a-mole. We make some deals with Sunni tribesmen in Iraq, put more boots on the ground, and they shift forces to our faltering defense of Afghanistan.

This is not some centrally controlled strategy run by Osama in the mountains, it's mostly spontaneous actions taken by people reacting to our actions.

The solutions here are primarily diplomatic and political, not military. The more we strike out, the more opponents we inspire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 07/20/2008
photo

Dear "surge" fans, this illustrates the fact that there will be an unlimited supply of Taliban and others like them as long as we pursue our crazy Mideast policy.

There were a few million Vietnamese. There are a billion Muslims.

As long as we continue with our unconditional support of anything Israel does and keep invading Muslim countries that haven't attacked us (Iran supported our retaliation against the Taliban) we're going to be playing a deadly game of global whack-a-mole. We make some deals with Sunni tribesmen in Iraq, put more boots on the ground, and they shift forces to our faltering defense of Afghanistan.

This is not some centrally controlled strategy run by Osama in the mountains, it's mostly spontaneous actions taken by people reacting to our actions.

The solutions here are primarily diplomatic and political, not military. The more we strike out, the more opponents we inspire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 07/20/2008
- loki I'm a Fan of loki permalink
photo

PNAC, NEO CONS , MIC and Bush must be loving all of this. Just look at the war, killings, and most of all, the money they are all making right now. This is republican heaven .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 07/18/2008

MagisterLudi - I agree with your points, basically. David Koresh called his "holy" enforcers "The Mighty Men" and Al Queda has put out the call for "Lions of Islam" to wage their twisted idea of what would please Allah. They don't have a clue, that much I know.

"Calling all asswipes...Calling all asswipes.... time to wage "Jihad" because it's my perverted idea of what "Islam" is meant to be. That's bin laden and Al Queda' call. No different from the crazed Catholic Church who waged crusades to "please their Lord Jesus Christ" by burning people at the stake and stretching them on the rack during the Spanish Inquisition.

Now, it's the lunatic fringe followers of "Islam" to get their freak on. Disgusting!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 07/18/2008

That's because we chased them out of Iraq. I'm just glad they're not here in America, except for San Francisco.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 07/18/2008
photo

What would anyone expect after the Iraqis (with the hlep of the U.S. ) ran them out of Iraq?

Once Afghanistan becomes the major battle ground against al qaeda (instead of IRaq), more and more jihadists will die at the hands of our military forces, as part of NATO.

If we can win in Iraq, we can win in Afghanistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 07/18/2008

Let's see...Jihadists flocking to Afghanistan...where have I heard that before?
Would it be way back in 1982? Could that be it? Could it be that the Mujahideen, backed by the CIA via the ISI, have reappeared in Afghanistan to engage the foreign occupier? Are these the valiant "freedom fighters" who helped defeat the evil empire?

Afghanistan 101:

1. Foreign forces secure Kabul and install puppet government.

2. Countryside remains in hands of rebels/Jihadists/terrorists/Taliban/Freedom Fighters (please pick one).

3. One of above eventually drives out occupiers and retakes Kabul.

4. Cycle starts all over again.

3.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 PM on 07/18/2008

Might as well have made that 1842 or so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 07/18/2008
photo

The Flypaper Theory in action.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 07/18/2008
photo

Here we go again...........................

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 07/18/2008

So what exactly is the strategy for victory in Afghanistan?

Is it to kill all the Taliban and their allies? If that is the case I can tell you flat out, it won't work.

Is it to destroy al Qaida and their allies? If that is the case why are more Western troops needed. I would think Afghani's would be much better suited to fighting in Afghanistan.

One thing needs to be recognized, and it almost never is: The Taliban are not the same as al Qaida.

And Afghani's don't care for foreigners. That would apply equally to Afghan/Arabs and to Western troops.

The situation should be ripe for treachery. But the Bush fools will never figure out an end game.

I can only hope that Osama has the intelligence and flexibility to find an end to this increasing mess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 07/18/2008

"an increase in the number of Turks fighting in Afghanistan."

Wait a minute ... first we were fighting WITH the Kurds ... then ... weren't we fighting WITH the Turks, and AGAINST the Kurds ... now ... we'll have to fight AGAINST the Turks ... and WITH ... WHO?

And what percentage of these "terrorists" are "Al Qaeda"?

I'm sure if we ask McCain...he'll know WHO we're fighting ... and WHY! ...
Just as he knows WHO we're fighting in IRAQ ... and WHY! ...
and WHO we'll be fighting in IRAN ... and WHY!

(But hands-off PAKISTAN! ... safe haven and HEAVEN for our #1 terrorist and his band of merry men!)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 07/18/2008

"one more sign that al-Qaida is regrouping on what is fast becoming the most active front of the war on terror groups."

Well duhhh! Bush=McCain have been doing their BEST to see that their every need is met in PAKISTAN!

You're doin' a great job, Bushie! (Don't worry... we won't accuse you of "appeasement"!)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 07/18/2008

Haven't we just seen this movie in Iraq?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 07/18/2008

No, we' have seen this movie in Bali, Philippines, Jordan, Russia, Germany, Bosnia, England, Spain, Morocco,Saudi Arabia, France, Pakistan etc.

Anyone who hates Bush MUST be good-- no matter how oppressive their agenda is---so thinks every primitive.

We must defend the "weak" Jihadists against "strong" West. Right?
So what happens when we, Democrats are back in power and Jihadists keep on murdering people all over the world?
Consider trying to think.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 07/18/2008

We invaded and occupied Bali?

We invaded and occupied The Phillipines?

We invaded and occupied Jordan?

We invaded and occupied Russia?

We invaded and occupied Germany (since WWII)?

We invaded and occupied Bosnia?

We invaded and occupied England?

We invaded and occupied Spain?

We invaded and occupied Morocco?

We invaded and occupied Saudi Arabia?

We invaded and occupied France?

We invaded and occupied Pakistan?

We invaded and occupied "etc."?

"So what happens when we, Democrats, are back in power"... and murderers keep on murdering people all over the world? Or does an as-yet-unpublished provision of your Master Plan eliminate all violence and evil on Planet Earth and implant universal virtue in the hearts of humankind?

Never feel reluctant to seek adult assistance when the challenge of basic critical thinking proves insurmountable, MasterLoopy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 07/19/2008

You mean this?:

http://www.nysun.com/editorials/victory-in-iraq/82194/

Back the McCain Surge for Afghanistan - Let's go for two victories in a row!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 07/18/2008

Kinda like the "victory" achieved when you conduct a 'surge' with all your fire extinguishers in your flaming kitchen and completely knock down the fire there... while the rest of the house is reduced to ashes.

Easy to please, aren't ya'...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 07/19/2008

Foreign Jihadists are fighting the cooalition troops in A-stan?
Nonsense. You mean alleged Jihadists.They're there to explore the caves and gather daffodils.

They are innocent until proven guilty.if captured must be read MIranda rights prior to arrest and given community service option and full access to Al Qaeda lawyers.

Just like their pals at Gitmo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 07/18/2008

As always, about as funny as an aneurism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 07/18/2008


Click your ruby slippers dude and keep on repeating to yourself : "There are no foreign Jihadists in Afghanistan...There are no foreign Jihadists in Afghanistan..."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 07/18/2008
photo

It's funny because it's true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 07/18/2008

Ahhh, errr, Hmmm,

If they are captured on the battlefield they are entitled to rights as prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention.

What part of that is difficult to understand?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 07/18/2008

"If they are captured on the battlefield they are entitled to rights as prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention."

ABSOLUTELY. Geneva and Hague Conventions are THE war conduct rules.

And these Jihadists ARE entitled to ALL protections of the Geneva as POWs.
Especially the provision against torture.

BUt if actually read Geneva and Hague Conventions,...khem... instead of just echoing other people's opinions you may find them a double-edged sword.

According to Hague and Geneva:
1. POWs can be held in detention for the duration of the hostilities.
2.They are NOT entitled to attorney representation.
3.They CANNOT to be prosecuted under the criminal laws of the capturing country.
4. They can be tried and executed if involved in espionage or sabotage even if captured in the occupied territories.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 07/18/2008
photo

Article 4 defines prisoners of war to include:

4.1.1 Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict and members of militias of such armed forces

4.1.2 Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, provided that they fulfill all of the following conditions:
that of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;
that of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance (there are limited exceptions to this among countries who observe the 1977 Protocol I);
that of carrying arms openly;
that of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.

4.1.3 Members of regular armed forces who profess allegiance to a government or an authority not recognized by the Detaining Power.

4.1.4 Civilians who have non-combat support roles with the military and who carry a valid identity card issued by the military they support.

4.1.5 Merchant marine and the crews of civil aircraft of the Parties to the conflict, who do not benefit by more favourable treatment under any other provisions of international law.

4.1.6 Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 07/18/2008
photo

Maybe we could just let the Afghan "government" take control of the criminals in their own country.
Why are they our problem?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 07/18/2008
photo

Because they want to kill us where we live?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 07/18/2008

And, to think... all these thousands of 'enemy combatants' didn't exist as such until we invaded and occupied Iraq for no coherent reason. Then -- Bingo! -- just like some colonists a long time ago in North America, overnight they turned into insurgents.

All your horsedroppings and splitting of hairs amount to nothing... you just can't wrap your small mind around the glaring cause that produced the effect.

Check in with the McSame campaign. They could use another fogmaster with a knowledge of the Ministry Of Silly Walk's talking points.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 AM on 07/19/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect