General Petraeus: Al Qaida May Be Shifting Focus Back To Afghanistan From Iraq

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - General Petraeus: Al Qaida May Be Shifting Focus Back To Afghanistan From Iraq stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT BURNS | July 20, 2008 07:31 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Gen. David Petraeus, left, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, talks with Brig. Gen. David Perkins, the top spokesman for the U.S., military command in Baghdad, in his office at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad Saturday, July 19, 2008. Senior leaders of al-Qaida may be diverting fighters from the war in Iraq to the Afghan frontier area, Petraeus told The Associated Press on Saturday. (AP Photo/Robert Burns)

BAGHDAD — After intense U.S. assaults, al-Qaida may be considering shifting focus to its original home base in Afghanistan, where American casualties are running higher than in Iraq, the top U.S. commander in Iraq said Saturday.

"We do think that there is some assessment ongoing as to the continued viability of al-Qaida's fight in Iraq," Gen. David Petraeus told The Associated Press in an interview at his office at the U.S. Embassy.

Whatever the result, Petraeus said no one should expect al-Qaida to give up entirely in Iraq.

"They're not going to abandon Iraq. They're not going to write it off. None of that," he said. "But what they certainly may do is start to provide some of those resources that would have come to Iraq to Pakistan, possibly Afghanistan."

He said there are signs that foreign fighters recruited by al-Qaida to do battle in Iraq are being diverted to the largely ungoverned areas in Pakistan from which the fighters can cross into Afghanistan. U.S. officials have pressed Pakistan for more than a year to halt the cross-border infiltration. It remains a major worry not only for the war in Afghanistan but also for Pakistan's stability.

Discussing al-Qaida in cautious terms, Petraeus said he is not certain of the reliability of the intelligence information about the terrorist network's latest thinking. He was adamant, however, that until now al-Qaida has seen Iraq as its best opportunity for establishing a militant Islamic state closer to the Persian Gulf.

"That could be under review," Petraeus said. "We do think they are considering what should be the main effort."

He offered a mostly upbeat assessment of conditions in Iraq just weeks before he is to make a recommendation on whether to further reduce U.S. troop levels. Petraeus said the country is showing fresh signs of promise not only on the security front, where insurgent attacks are down sharply, but also politically.

Story continues below
advertisement

He applauded the latest evidence of movement toward reconciliation by Sunnis and Shiites _ the announcement Saturday that Iraq's largest Sunni Arab political bloc had ended a nearly yearlong boycott of the Shiite-led government.

"It's a very important step forward," Petraeus said after an aide interrupted the AP interview to deliver the news. The general flashed a wide smile and instructed the aide to pass along his congratulations to top government officials, who have come under enormous pressure from U.S. officials to reconcile.

Petraeus declined to say what he might recommend to President Bush regarding further U.S. troops reductions. The assessment, he said, is based on a range of factors, including the prospects for Iraqi government approval of legislation required before provincial elections can be held this fall.

He would not talk about specific troop levels later this year. But the enthusiasm of Petraeus's description of security, political and even economic progress in 2008 gave the impression he may be inclined to tell Bush that fewer than the current 15 combat brigades will be needed by year's end.

Petraeus said he was encouraged at the possibility of al-Qaida reconsidering Iraq as its highest priority war front.

"There is some intelligence that has picked this up," he said, adding, "It's not solid gold intelligence.

This information, while unconfirmed, parallels reports that fewer foreign fighters are joining the insurgency in Iraq.

"We do know the foreign fighter flow into Iraq has been reduced very substantially," he said. From a peak of 80 to 100 foreign fighters entering Iraq each month, the total has dropped as low as 20 per month, he said.

He attributed the decline to a combination of factors. They include the intense U.S. and Iraqi military operations against al-Qaida in Baghdad, Mosul and elsewhere, and stronger actions by neighboring countries to prevent militants from crossing into Iraqi territory. He mentioned Saudi Arabia as an example.

The other main source of violence in Iraq over the past year _ Shiite militia extremists _ also has been curbed. Petraeus said that whether leaders of those Shiite groups, who fled in many cases to Iran, end up returning to fight for control of such Baghdad sections as Sadr City will be a critical bellwether.

"This will be very important because it will be an indicator of whether Iran intends to start a new chapter in its relationship with Iraq, or not," he said.

Petraeus said Iraq's prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, got an encouraging response when he traveled recently to Tehran to express concern about the role of Iranian-supported Shiite extremists in Iraq.

Al-Maliki "received assurances from the highest levels that Tehran wants nothing but constructive relations."

Petraeus is due to leave his post in Baghdad in September to head U.S. Central Command, with responsibility for U.S. military operations in Afghanistan, Pakistan as well as Iraq. He is to be replaced in Baghdad by Gen. Raymond Odierno, who until February had served as the No. 2 commander in Iraq.

BAGHDAD — After intense U.S. assaults, al-Qaida may be considering shifting focus to its original home base in Afghanistan, where American casualties are running higher than in Iraq, the top U.S...
BAGHDAD — After intense U.S. assaults, al-Qaida may be considering shifting focus to its original home base in Afghanistan, where American casualties are running higher than in Iraq, the top U.S...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
233
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

Really General Petraeus, any ahole knows that. Just read the fn newspapers!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 07/21/2008

Everytime I hear "the surge is working" I want to scream! The war in Iraq was wrong...wr­ong...wron­g, and all this "the surge is working" is purely meant to take our minds off the REAL ISSUE that invading Iraq was a mistake.
Look at our military men and women - coming home mamed for life, psychologically wounded for life, horrible health care and benefits upon return, and thousands don't even make it home.
This war was wrong and I will never vote for anyone that supported it. Period.
Ask Bush and Cheney (and their co-horts) how many people they've killed with this war that was screwed up from day one. And John McCain will not even consider ending the war no matter how long he thinks it takes. These people are dangerous - especially John McCain.
Senator Obama is right with his assessment of both wars and he should be listened to.
I urge everyone to Cross political lines and vote for Senator Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 AM on 07/21/2008
photo

Doh!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 AM on 07/21/2008
- Pleidian I'm a Fan of Pleidian 6 fans permalink
photo

That's absolute bollocks....Al Qaeda is not organized that way. Pure propaganda!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 AM on 07/21/2008
- geobushono I'm a Fan of geobushono 15 fans permalink

The Pentagon budget MUST be eviserated.
Our lives and our children's lives depend on it.
These crackhead militarists must be stopped
Bring the ARMIES home.
Let them restore our infrastructure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 AM on 07/21/2008
- kasinca I'm a Fan of kasinca 158 fans permalink
photo

Betrayus is a crime family asshat. He is in it for the glory and the promotions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 07/21/2008
- awcbuddy8 I'm a Fan of awcbuddy8 8 fans permalink

Who you got to replace him, asshat?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 07/21/2008
- strick9 I'm a Fan of strick9 11 fans permalink

Its a shame that Smedley Butler isn't still alive. To paraphrase this famous Marine general, "anything more than 200 miles from our borders is national is not national defense."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 AM on 07/21/2008
- Pleidian I'm a Fan of Pleidian 6 fans permalink
photo

How about Claus von Stauffenberg?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 AM on 07/21/2008
- Candyx I'm a Fan of Candyx 6 fans permalink

The audio tape is now out with Maliki wanting us out...get out

The Times, noting that the interpreter was Maliki's, not Der Spiegel's, gets the tape and offers a very literal translation that backs up the German magazine:

But the interpreter for the interview works for Mr. Maliki’s office, not the magazine. And in an audio recording of Mr. Maliki’s interview that Der Spiegel provided to The New York Times, Mr. Maliki seemed to state a clear affinity for Mr. Obama’s position, bringing it up on his own in an answer to a general question on troop presence.

The following is a direct translation from the Arabic of Mr. Maliki’s comments by The Times:

“Obama’s remarks that — if he takes office — in 16 months he would withdraw the forces, we think that this period could increase or decrease a little, but that it could be suitable to end the presence of the forces in Iraq.”

He continued: “Who wants to exit in a quicker way has a better assessment of the situation in Iraq.”

By Ben Smith 09:52 PM

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/21/us/politics/21obama.html?hp

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 07/20/2008
- fourex I'm a Fan of fourex 14 fans permalink
photo

Gen. Petraeus wants to saturate Afghanistan with Bush Dollars, a bargain at half the value.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 07/20/2008
- PJay1 I'm a Fan of PJay1 42 fans permalink
photo

"Shifting"??? They're "SHIFTING" their focus back to Afghanistan????

They've always been "focused" in Afghanistan. The media just wasn't reporting on it.

The very subjective age old question:
If you didn't hear a noise when the tree fell, did it still fall?

Al Quada was NOT in IRaq until we invaded Iraq, and I still don't think they're in Iraq.
Very convenient that the admin would name them "Al Quida in Iraq" - NOT

More deception and spin to try to lump all Muslims together.
Again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 07/20/2008

Well yeah, alQueda would change their focus.
They would HAVE to change their focus.
They're getting decimated in Iraq.
Decimated by the surge L'il Bama said wouldn't work

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 07/20/2008
- edwarvir I'm a Fan of edwarvir 36 fans permalink

FilthyPerson How are you? Blogging again without your meds. We should have
never been there in the first place. and anything will work when you are paid
to stop but what happens when the contract is over?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 07/20/2008
- Sixtwo I'm a Fan of Sixtwo 2 fans permalink

It is obvious that AlQueda is smarter than McCain and his administration WHO WOULD NOT/DID NOT CHANGE THIER FOCUS until Obama's position, which he has had all along, became the "right" postion of choice by some very influential folks! Now look who is talking about shifting resources (troops) to Afgan!!! Little picture: surge has only reduced violence. Big pcture: In addition, Iraq must use MORE of its resources and resources it has never usd because the US has precluded them from doing so, to achieve stability and self-sufficiency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 07/20/2008


This is insane. There was never any connection between the real Al Qaida, and "Al Qaida in Iraq" which was a group formed AFTER the republican invasion of Iraq.

The republicans never should have cut and run from Afghanistan to begin with. Betrayus is trying to rewrite history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 07/20/2008
- PJay1 I'm a Fan of PJay1 42 fans permalink
photo

Exactly right!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 07/20/2008
- BWonka I'm a Fan of BWonka 115 fans permalink
photo

WE all knew that, why didn't the man in charge?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 07/20/2008
photo

Afganerstan - whoooo'd a'thunk it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 07/20/2008
- Grannysue I'm a Fan of Grannysue 128 fans permalink
photo

Gee do ya think? I mean I'm no General but even I can tell you they all went to Afghanistan, why do you think things have been quiet in Iraq? The insurgents seem to be smarter then the General, the soldiers in Afghanistan have all but been forgotten.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 07/20/2008
- jimdog1954 I'm a Fan of jimdog1954 7 fans permalink
photo

We're playing "whack a mole" over there. They pop up, we whack them, and they pop up someplace else. Bottom line: there are waaaaay too many moles and not enough whackers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 07/20/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect