Rice Threatens Iran With New Sanctions Following Weekend Talks

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

MATTHEW LEE | July 21, 2008 04:51 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
U.S. Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns arrives for a meeting with Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA Mohamed ElBaradei to discuss Iran's contentious atomic program and moves to open the way for India to import nuclear technology, on Friday, July 18, 2008, at Vienna's International Center. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accused Iran on Monday of not being serious at weekend talks about its disputed nuclear program despite the presence of a senior U.S. diplomat, and warned it may soon face new sanctions.

In her first public comments since Saturday's meeting in Switzerland, Rice said Iran had given the run-around to envoys from the U.S. and five other world powers. She said all six nations were serious about a two-week deadline Iran now has to agree to freeze suspect activities and start negotiations or be hit with new penalties.

Rice was briefed on the meeting by the State Department's No. 3 diplomat, Undersecretary of State William Burns, who attended the session in a shift from Washington's previous insistence that it would not meet with the Iranians unless enrichment of uranium had stopped.

In Abu Dhabi on Monday, Rice got a face-to-face briefing on the talks from Burns. Both then discussed Iran and other issues in closed-door meetings with foreign ministers and senior officials from six Gulf Arab states along with Egypt, Iraq and Jordan.

Along with the United States and Israel, the mainly Sunni Muslim Gulf Arabs are increasingly wary of majority Shiite Iran's muscle-flexing in the region.

After the meetings, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, who attended the talks, said Arab states wanted to avoid any "military conflict" between Iran and the West, according to Egypt's official MENA news agency.

"The Arab position is to work toward a political and diplomatic settlement under which Iran will maintain the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes but at the same time, we don't want to see another military nuclear power in this region," MENA quoted him as saying.

Meanwhile, world oil prices rose above $130 a barrel in part on concerns that the threat of new sanctions against Iran may escalate tensions in the Middle East.

Story continues below
advertisement

At Saturday's meeting, Iran had been expected to respond to a package of incentives offered in exchange for halting enrichment of uranium, which can be used to fuel atomic weapons. The Bush administration broke with long-standing policy to send a top diplomat to support the offer.

However, Rice said that instead of a coherent answer, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili delivered a "meandering" monologue full of irrelevant "small talk about culture" that appeared to annoy many of the others present at the table in Geneva.

"We expected to hear an answer from the Iranians but, as has been the case so many times with the Iranians, what came through was not serious," Rice told reporters aboard her plane as she flew to the United Arab Emirates. "It's time for the Iranians to give a serious answer."

"They can't go and stall and make small talk about culture, they have to make a decision," she said. "People are tired of the Iranians and their stalling tactics."

Rice's remarks about the Iranian presentation were much harsher than those of the host of the meeting, European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, who lamented only that Iran had not provided "all the answers to the questions."

The Iran nuclear question is expected to top the agenda at a gathering of European Union foreign ministers on Tuesday in Brussels, officials said.

On Sunday, Iranian state radio reported that President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad called the talks a "step ahead" and said country's formal assessment would be issued soon.

On Saturday, one member of the Iranian delegation said there was "no chance" Iran would suspend uranium enrichment, again denying assertions that Iran's nuclear program was for anything other than power production. Jalili avoided the suspension issue entirely.

Unless Iran responds positively in the next two weeks, it can expect more sanctions to be imposed by the United States and the European Union as early as late August or September and may then be hit with a fourth sanctions resolution at the U.N. Security Council, Rice said.

"We will see what Iran does in two weeks, but I think the diplomatic process now has a new kind of energy to it," she said. "If they do not decide to suspend then we will be in a situation where we have to return to the Security Council."

High-level contact between the United States and Iran is extremely rare and Burns' presence at the talks may have confused the Iranians, Rice said, acknowledging a tactical change to demonstrate U.S. unity with the other five powers: Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia.

"From time to time, it is important to invigorate the diplomacy," she said. "I think that the fact that we went may have been a bit surprising to the Iranians, and they didn't react in a way that gave anyone any confidence."

The offer envisions a six-week commitment from Iran to stop expanding enrichment, during which time no additional sanctions would be imposed. That is intended to create the framework for formal negotiations that, it is hoped, will lead to a permanent halt of enrichment.

Rice was dismissive when asked if Burns or another U.S. diplomat would be present to hear Iran's response in two weeks.

"I think we've done enough to demonstrate that the United States is serious and to assure our partners that we're serious," she said.

 
 

Comments
6
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- alimostofi See Profile I'm a Fan of alimostofi permalink

Actually a lot of Iranians don't like the cunning Seyyed ploy to use our oil income to make a "Mahdi Bomb" for their own theocratic dogma. They put Iran second or even third after their theocracy. Iranians, true Iranians love Iran, and put Iran first, above politics, religion, and commerce.

Iran can have as much electricity as it wants from gas. The Israelis and the US neocons love to use the Seyyeds' cause to interfere more in the area, support the military industrial program, and peak oil advocates. They want Iran to become a pariah state and not become the a modern economic giant it can be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 07/22/2008
- Hass See Profile I'm a Fan of Hass permalink

Iran can have as much electricity as it wants from gas...

Yeah, if only Iran could tap gas bags like you who don't know what they're talking about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 07/25/2008
- Hass See Profile I'm a Fan of Hass permalink

Iran's nuclear program is massively popular amongst Iranians, and has become a major nationalistic rallying point even among former regime officials.

Iranians remember their history and see the almost exact similarity with the 1951-53 efforts by Iranians to nationalize their own oil industry. At that time, Iran was similarly treated, dragged before the UNSC, presented as a threat, its leaders labelled as fanatics, and subjected to sabre-rattling as British gunships arrived near Abadan.

To this day, Iranians remember, and the politicians who caved in to those threats are reviled.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 07/21/2008
- eden4barack08 See Profile I'm a Fan of eden4barack08 permalink

Do the Bushies all take a 'war mongering' drug or something? They all sound identical!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 07/21/2008
- joebhed See Profile I'm a Fan of joebhed permalink

Well, the thing is that Condi and the rest of the Bushies, not to mention the Republicans in Congress and another TOTALLY culpable group called the Democrats did not get the memo.

Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program.

So says the IAEA.

So says the National Intelligence Estimate.

There has never been one shred of real evidence that Iran ever had a nuclear weapons program.
None.

Having a nuclear weapons program would be cause to actually sanction or do SOMETHING that is called for in either the IAEA Statute or in the NPT.

Instead, with no evidence of a weapons program, what we really have is a political enemy.

We've never been too comfortable with those Persians.

We overthrew their elected government, and when they re-took power they overtook our embassy.

It's been pretty much of a hissy-fit from that time until 911.

After 911 Iran began interdicting AlQaeda faster than any ARAB or Persian groups, that are supposed to be our allies.
Funny 'bout that..

Then, as usual, we again gave them the finger called Axis of Evil.

So, if Iran is not willing to give up its sovereign, inalienable rights under international treaty that we have signed to operate a uranium enrichment facility on their own soil, well, then we have no choice but to keep on sanctioning.

It's what we do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 07/21/2008
- unity08 See Profile I'm a Fan of unity08 permalink

Oh well. We tried, you know we tried really hard. Its hard you know.

Give me a break. What do they really expect from one meeting that was a non-negotiation/listening forum with no real interaction.

Watch the price of oil go back up if this continues.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 07/21/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com