Qantas Jet Lands With Gaping Hole: "It Was Absolutely Terrifying," Emergency Landing Footage (VIDEO)

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

AP   |  PAUL ALEXANDER   |   July 25, 2008 at 08:48 AM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

A Qantas jumbo jet carrying 345 passengers made an emergency landing Friday with a gaping hole in its fuselage after a mysterious "explosive decompression," officials said.

There were no injuries, but some passengers vomited after disembarking the Boeing 747-400, said Octavio Lina, Manila International Airport Authority deputy manager for operations.

Watch video of the emergency landing:

The cabin's floor gave way, he said, exposing some of the cargo beneath and part of the ceiling collapsed.

"There is a big hole on the right side near the wing," he said, adding it was 7 1/2 feet to 9 feet in diameter.

Flight QF 30, from London to Melbourne, had just made a stopover in Hong Kong. Passengers who talked to the media at the airport described hearing an explosion, and then oxygen masks were released.

"One hour into the flight there was a big bang, then the plane started going down," passenger Marina Scaffidi, 39, from Melbourne, told The Associated Press by phone from Manila airport. "There was wind swirling around the plane and some condensation."

Story continues below
advertisement

She said the hole extended from the cargo hold into the passenger cabin.

"No one was very hysterical," she said.

June Kane of Melbourne described how parts of the plane's interior broke apart in the depressurized cabin.

"There was a terrific boom and bits of wood and debris just flew forward into first (class) and the oxygen masks dropped down," she told Australia's ABC Radio. "It was absolutely terrifying, but I have to say everyone was very calm."

Video shot by a passenger showed people sitting with their oxygen masks on _ just-served meals on their tray tables _ as the plane descended quickly to 10,000 feet en route to an emergency landing at Manila's international airport. Cabin crew continued to work, walking down the aisles and showing no sign of panic.

Applause erupted as the plane touched down safely.

Geoff Dixon, the chief executive officer of Qantas, praised the pilots and the rest of the 19-person crew for how they handled the incident.

"This was a highly unusual situation and our crew responded with the professionalism that Qantas is known for," he said.

Qantas _ Australia's largest domestic and international airline _ boasts a strong safety record and has never lost a jet to an accident, although there were crashes of smaller planes, the last in 1951.

However, the airline has had a few scares in recent years. In February 2008, a Qantas 717 with 84 passengers on board sustained substantial damage in a heavy landing in Darwin, Australia.

In addition, union engineers _ who have held several strikes this year to demand pay raises _ say that safety is being compromised by low wages and overtime work.

A report by the Manila International Airport Authority, quoting pilot John Francis Bartels, said the plane on Friday suffered an "explosive decompression." Australia's air-safety investigator said an initial investigation suggested "a section of the fuselage separated."

The passengers were taken to several hotels while waiting for another plane to Melbourne late Friday, Wantas said. The plane was towed to a hangar in Manila.

Chief Superintendent Atilano Morada, head of the police Aviation Security Group, said his officers, including explosives experts, may assist in the airline's investigation.

"So far, they don't want us to touch it, so we will respect the aircraft owner. But we will make our personnel available if they need assistance in the investigation," he said.

Qantas touts itself as the world's second-oldest airline, founded in 1920. As of December 2007, Qantas was operating 216 aircraft flying to 140 destinations in 37 countries, though in recent months it has announced it will retire some aircraft and cancel some routes _ as well as cutting 1,500 jobs worldwide _ due to skyrocketing fuel prices.

___

Associated Press writers Oliver Teves and Teresa Cerojano contributed to this report.

A Qantas jumbo jet carrying 345 passengers made an emergency landing Friday with a gaping hole in its fuselage after a mysterious "explosive decompression," officials said. There were no injuries, bu...
A Qantas jumbo jet carrying 345 passengers made an emergency landing Friday with a gaping hole in its fuselage after a mysterious "explosive decompression," officials said. There were no injuries, bu...
 
 

Comments
79
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- several See Profile I'm a Fan of several permalink

"Quantas. Never Crashed. Quantas Never Crashed."

http://youtube.com/watch?v=KeYf-rhMQIQ

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 AM on 07/26/2008
- danoj See Profile I'm a Fan of danoj permalink

I see some airlines going bankrupt in the near future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 07/26/2008
- toochie See Profile I'm a Fan of toochie permalink

Larry Craig was at airport and was excited when he thought he heard something about a jet with a large gloryhohe. His foot was tapping so bad, the other passengers thought he had restless leg syndrome.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 07/25/2008
- Destin See Profile I'm a Fan of Destin permalink

LMAO!! Great one!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 07/26/2008
- Ares1 See Profile I'm a Fan of Ares1 permalink

The 747-400 involved in the incident was seventeen years old similar incidents has happened with
an Aloha Airlines 737-200 in 1988 and a United Airlines 747-100 in 1989, all of these incidents involved metal fatigue. It is rather suprising with the safety record of Qantas and it's presumed top
notch maintenance standards that this was allowed to happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 07/25/2008
- zippywpinhead See Profile I'm a Fan of zippywpinhead permalink

who was the pilot, Mc.Cain?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 07/25/2008
- andvoodoo2 See Profile I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 permalink

LOL! No, the plane landed SUCCESSFULLY, silly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 07/25/2008
- knowwhatimsayin See Profile I'm a Fan of knowwhatimsayin permalink

Anybody remember Twilight Zone the movie? The airplane episode with John Lithgow..it was the first thing I thought of. I'm just sayin.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 07/25/2008
- VolvoBirkenstock See Profile I'm a Fan of VolvoBirkenstock permalink

porkbarrel
Quantas is the American spelling of Qantus.
Posted 03:50 PM on 07/25/2008

No. QANTAS is an acronym for Queensland And Northern Territory Air Service.

The spelling of an acronym does not vary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 07/25/2008
- avenger See Profile I'm a Fan of avenger permalink

Calls to mind the cargo door failure on a United Airlines Boeing 747-200 over the Pacific about 20 years ago, which (I believe) was due to a damaged latch mechanism. Lost the forward cargo door, part of the fuselage, and I believe a couple of passengers in the process, but the '47 kept flying. A very tough bird. Says a lot about the design that the plane stayed in the air (not so much about the door latch though). I wonder if an Airbus would have shared the same fate given the same circumstances.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 07/25/2008
- tinakori See Profile I'm a Fan of tinakori permalink

If you believe the FAA (I don't ), at least three items had to fail before the latches would open in flight like that.

The US navy recovered half of the cargo door. Unfortunately, it was only the upper half while the main latches are on the bottom half.

The door was broken in two above the mid-span latches which seems to me that the failure started from above, otherwise it would have been broken below the mid-span latches. Like I mentioned in my previous post about the flat section 41, there was a huge rework project in this area. Then, if you look at the area between the number 1 right hand entry door ( always had repairs there which makes it stiff in that local area) and the upper level window belt (another stiff area ), you have two stiff areas in what is essentially a flat pressure bulkhead. Good place for a crack to start and propagate, rip down to the main cabin floor where out the forward cargo door hinge is at and then rotate the cargo door itself and off the latch spools. There is a lot of structure around the lower latches spools and the crack stopped there.

Main thing is that after all that, the aircraft kept flying. The 747's, are they perfect - no. Are they tough - yes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 07/25/2008
- tinakori See Profile I'm a Fan of tinakori permalink

The Aloha Airline pop-top was directly related to a too cozy relationship between the FAA and the airline. They were allowed to do their heavy maintenance in nightly checks instead of doing in depth inspections that cannot be done in one night before you have to put the aircraft back together before the morning flight.

The 737 does not have any shear ties that connect the skin to the frames in the upper half of the fuselage.

Even though the FAA called for a revamp of the rudder actuator, they suspect that rolling vortices off the mountains threw the aircraft down into the ground of the 737 crash at Colorado Springs. The rudder actuator from that crashed aircraft was recovered, taken apart, one part replaced - the bent piston rod- and then put back together with the same used o-rings (normal practice is to replace o-ring with new). That actuator passed all overhaul specs and tests on the test bench.

ALL aircraft have their problems. Boeing aircraft are for the most part very reliable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 07/25/2008
- tinakori See Profile I'm a Fan of tinakori permalink

I forgot to add that there was also a homing pigeon owner who lost over one hundred birds, slammed into the ground about a mile and a half from the 737 accident that same day. Because he had bulldozed them into the ground to bury them, the FAA would not accept his story when he connected the two accidents and reported his bird accident to the FAA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 07/25/2008
- Forester See Profile I'm a Fan of Forester permalink

"Of course when they bring the maple syrup after the pancakes, it'll definitely be too late."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 07/25/2008
- PatrickWalker See Profile I'm a Fan of PatrickWalker permalink

Surprise surprise, it's a Boeing.

You'll NEVER catch me getting on a 737.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 07/25/2008
- andvoodoo2 See Profile I'm a Fan of andvoodoo2 permalink

Yet, you travel the road every day I'll bet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 07/25/2008
- MajorKong See Profile I'm a Fan of MajorKong permalink

There's nothing wrong with the 737. It's the most numerous airliner out there, with some 5700 in service. There was a design flaw in the rudder that was fixed years ago but that's the only real problem I know of.

Any aircraft can have a structural failure if it's not maintained properly or flown past the number of "cycles" it was designed for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 07/25/2008
- JBS See Profile I'm a Fan of JBS permalink

Didn't some early versions have a problem where the nose gear wouldn't extend or lock down? Or was that the 727?

I remember there was a procedure worked out where fuel could be transferred into the outboard wing tanks & it would move the CG far enough aft the nose (sans gear) could be held off until the aircraft was almost to a dead stop, and that procedure was used several time while Boeing was getting a fix ready.

It's hard to find anything about it, probably because, as I remember, there were no fatalities or injuries attributable to the problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 07/25/2008
- 11Bush See Profile I'm a Fan of 11Bush permalink

That was Aloha Airlines.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 07/25/2008
- ICanHasDemocracy See Profile I'm a Fan of ICanHasDemocracy permalink

Aloha, yes- corrected ty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 07/25/2008
- PaulUK See Profile I'm a Fan of PaulUK permalink

You know what the joke in the ailine buis that QANTAS stands for? Quite A Nice Takeoff Any Survivours!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 07/25/2008
- LiberalBuzz See Profile I'm a Fan of LiberalBuzz permalink

That's kind of a dumb statement by whomever came up with it.

Did you notice the last time they had a crash..... NINETEEN FIFTY ONE!

Any other airline able to make that claim?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 07/25/2008
- secretarybird See Profile I'm a Fan of secretarybird permalink

Whatever the cause of the blow-out, all praise to Boeing's engineers, to the QANTAS crew, and to the calm and resilient passengers (I assume a large number of them are Australians, so I'm not suprised about their cool behaviour in adversity).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 07/25/2008
- tinakori See Profile I'm a Fan of tinakori permalink

I have worked structural repairs for twenty years on 747's before I retired from United Airlines. I NEVER saw any structural problems in that area just forward of the forward spar. Condensed water doesn't sit there, waste water doesn't flow by there from leaking toilet service panels, the fairing that use to be there keeps cargo loaders from driving into it. It is in the round tube part of the fuselage. It is in the flat part of section 41 , forward of this hole, that saw all the rework on the frames.

The straight area at the bottom of the hole makes it look like the three rivet lap joint let go or perhaps the area just above the lap joint. Could be metal fatigue. 747's are built tougher than 737's, so big uh-oh's are self-limiting to smaller areas. They have thicker skins and more shear ties connecting the skin to the frames.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 07/25/2008
- Totto See Profile I'm a Fan of Totto permalink

In the Hawaiian Airlines structural failure, it was possibly the length of exposure to salt air, wasn't it? Might that have caused this? Still scary. See "No Highway In The Sky" with James Stewart, Marlene Dietrich and Glynis Johns.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 07/25/2008
- poomplet See Profile I'm a Fan of poomplet permalink

This is a 747-400...the newest model made. They were launched in 1990, and Qantas now mostly flies the 747-400ER (extended range) variant, which came off the line starting in 2000.

Given this, along with the fact that given the sheer distance they cover, Qantas planes have much fewer pressurization 'cycles' (the things that determine airplane age...not milage) than short-hop planes, and, of course, the amazing safety/durability record of these planes in general....all combine to shoot down any 'metal fatigue' theories.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 07/25/2008
- ICanHasDemocracy See Profile I'm a Fan of ICanHasDemocracy permalink

Yeah if you notice the breakaway looks like it ran right across the seam-outline.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 07/25/2008
- JBS See Profile I'm a Fan of JBS permalink

Looks like the fairing at the leading edge of the wing root tore away. That's the large green oval shaped area. The hole in the fuselage is smaller than the area where the fairing is missing.

I wonder if the fairing coming off damaged the plane's skin or some failure in the skin tore the fairing off?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 07/25/2008
- Rastamannn See Profile I'm a Fan of Rastamannn permalink

ok....now in language for the lay person

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 07/25/2008
- tinakori See Profile I'm a Fan of tinakori permalink

Sorry but somebody has to understand technical things in a technical world. This isn't dress making.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 07/25/2008
- scornflakes See Profile I'm a Fan of scornflakes permalink

Big jet plane no go boom.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 07/25/2008
- Sparky123 See Profile I'm a Fan of Sparky123 permalink

One more reason to carefully consider flying again. Horrific.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 07/25/2008