Chrysler Getting Out Of Auto Leasing Business

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Chrysler Getting Out Of Auto Leasing Business stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOM KRISHER | July 25, 2008 06:24 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

DETROIT — Chrysler LLC said Friday its financial arm will get out of the auto leasing business by the end of the month because economic conditions have made leasing more expensive than buying, for both consumers and the company.

The move comes as Chrysler Financial is in the process of renewing a $30 billion credit line with banks amid a startling drop in values for leased trucks and sport utility vehicles that are coming back to automakers as leases end.

Chrysler Vice Chairman and President Jim Press said the company wants to allocate its limited resources to retail incentives and financing, which make up 80 percent of the market, instead of leasing, which is 20 percent of the U.S. market.

The move probably won't be followed by Chrysler's competitors, but other automakers are likely to raise prices for leased vehicles because of the added costs, said David Healy, an auto analyst with Burnham Securities.

"I think that the companies may de-emphasize leases by pricing them tougher," Healy said.

General Motors Corp. spokeswoman Susan Garontakos said she was not aware of any discussions at GM about ending its leasing business.

"We don't have any plans for that right now," she said, declining to comment further.

Ford Motor Co. spokesman said Bill Collins said the automaker doesn't publicly discuss its leasing forecast but its business plan "always includes a certain amount of leasing to support Ford sales."

Story continues below
advertisement

Because banks lend money based on the risk, and the risk of leases sold as securities has increased, interest rates to borrow money for leases are higher than those for retail sales, said Tom Gilman, executive vice chairman of Chrysler Financial.

"The cost of that borrowing has increased dramatically," he said.

Press said the dramatic drop in truck and SUV values at the end of their leases also played a role in the company's decision.

"We really reached a point today in this environment where the advantages of leasing, the economic advantages of leasing, have really disappeared," Press said in a conference call Friday afternoon with reporters and industry analysts.

"When you have a certain amount of capital available, you're got to use it in a way that's smart and best for the customers and the company," he said.

Press said dealers will still be able to offer leases through independent sources, but not Chrysler Financial.

Chrysler said it will sweeten incentives on the retail side to make up for any lost lease business. The company on Friday announced that it will expand zero percent financing for 72 months on vehicles from Ram pickup trucks to the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Commander and other SUVs. The offers will run through the end of the month.

The company also plans to enhance its incentives during the next 60 days in an effort to capture more of the retail market, Press said.

Steven Landry, executive vice president of North American sales, said the new incentives will in many cases reduce monthly payments so they are close to or the same as lease payments.

"They really look for the monthly payment when they go to the dealership," he said.

Chrysler's announcement comes a day after Ford's credit arm took a $2.1 billion charge because of the drop in the residual value of leased vehicles, mainly trucks and SUVs.

Press said Chrysler would also have to take a similar write-down, but "it hasn't been a major problem for us at this point in time."

Chrysler, which is 80.1 percent owned by Cerberus Capital Management LP, is a private company and unlike Ford, does not have to report such losses publicly.

Healy said Chrysler Financial probably is getting out of the lease business to satisfy lenders as it renews its credit line.

"There's a lot less risk in standard transactions than there is in leasing these days," he said.

Midsize SUVs, on average, lost 28.7 percent of their value, from $15,577 in March 2005 to $11,096 at the end of June, according to wholesale auction data from the National Automobile Dealers Association. The figures are adjusted for variations in vehicle mileage.

Press also said Chrysler's gasoline subsidy incentive, which keeps the price for customers at $2.99 per gallon for three years, will end this month. The deal is based on 12,000 miles of driving per year and the vehicle's government fuel economy rating.

___

AP Business Writer Dan Strumpf in New York contributed to this report.

DETROIT — Chrysler LLC said Friday its financial arm will get out of the auto leasing business by the end of the month because economic conditions have made leasing more expensive than buying, f...
DETROIT — Chrysler LLC said Friday its financial arm will get out of the auto leasing business by the end of the month because economic conditions have made leasing more expensive than buying, f...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
9
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 125 fans permalink
photo

Im surprised. I remember when leases meant you paid a specific amount to lease a car, and that covered insurance, maintenance, plates and just about everything but car wash, wax, and gas. Then leases became a way to totally screw the consumer, and make them not only liable for any damages, scratches, over mileage, but for insurance, maintenance, plates, even oil changes and more. Doesnt make any sense to lease unless you just dont like your money, or you can use it as a tax write off for a business. I cant see why you should pay for a car, just to give it back and pay for it to be fixed so someone else can buy it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 07/28/2008
- Paul I'm a Fan of Paul 32 fans permalink

The automobile paradigm is obsolete.

The middle class can;'t afford payments on a $25,000 car.

We need mass transit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 07/26/2008
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 33 fans permalink

Yep. We' all benefit greatluy on spending millions on mass transit for that one guy living in downstate Illinois who has to travel 25 miles on backroads to work each day...NOT.

Mass transit is an idiot's fantasy. It only works for cities with heavy population density and no responsible adult with kids can live there. Only 20 somethings and childless couples. So basically, you're asking for a massive subsidy for the conevenience of a tiny proprotion of the population.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 07/27/2008
- Paul I'm a Fan of Paul 32 fans permalink

I guess its better that we use 20% of the world's daily oil production so some guy in downstate Ill can live 25 miles from his job? Maybe he should move closer?

Mass transit and the cities are the future. Driving 25 miles to your job in an SUV is the past.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 07/27/2008
photo

Hmmm... I just leased a brand new Mercedes E350 for $550 a month. I wonder why Mercedes can make this work, but Chrysler can't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 07/26/2008
photo

"Finance" easily became the biggest divisions within companies like GM and General Electric. I am surprised that Chrysler would give up such a lucrative part of their market, especially considering how much inventory they need to move, but maybe decisions like this are indicative of why the Daimler group has fallen out of love with this bunch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 07/26/2008
- Egalitare I'm a Fan of Egalitare 5 fans permalink
photo

My parents were loyal Chrysler purchasers for decades. But like the other so-called Big Three, Chrysler almost always took the path of least resistance. Asian automakers gaining market share with cars, go trucks. Asian automakers gaining market share in trucks? Beef up the financing division.
Now there is no easy door to open.
Daimler-Benz had the correct assessment of US Automakers when they sold Chrysler for pennies on original investment. Back in the 50's some forward thinking people noticed that there really wasn't a lot of innovation happening in the Big Three's engineering divisions. Sure they were putting out larger, more powerful engines, larger cargo space, more drink holders, etc. But were they really designing for 10 years down the road, or the for vehicles that they insisted that we wanted after spending billions in advertising leading the discussion?
I predict that in the next three years, there will only be one US Automaker (probably Ford) GM will be purchased by some Asian firm, and Chrysler will be sold in pieces with the minivan and Jeep divisions being the only parts worth acquiring.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 07/26/2008

They spent all of their money on perfecting marketing and sales. Should have invested in invention. Every time I turn on the tube, I can't help but see auto commercials, one after another. I keep wondering where our auto industry would be if they spent all of that money on perfecting new autos that would earn them a reputation. If Chrysler had a reputation of always turning out the next new car, they wouldn't have to advertise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 07/26/2008
photo

My friends have had a long running joke for years about car commercials. We even invented a drinking game based on them! It seems like every third commercial is a car commercial ,even though you buy a car like what every 5-7 years?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 07/29/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect