Judge: White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Judge: White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07-31-08 11:08 AM   |   Updated: 08- 8-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Miers

WASHINGTON — President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in a long-running dispute between the two political branches.

Congressional Democrats called the ruling a ringing endorsement of the principle that nobody is above the law. They swiftly announced that the Bush officials who have defied their subpoenas, including Bush's former top adviser Karl Rove, must appear as part of a probe of whether the White House directed the firings of nine federal prosecutors. Democrats announced plans to open hearings at the height of election season.

The Bush administration was expected to appeal.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge John Bates said there's no legal basis for Bush's argument and that his former legal counsel, Harriet Miers, must appear before Congress. If she wants to refuse to testify, he said, she must do so in person. The committee also has sought to force testimony from White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten.

"Harriet Miers is not immune from compelled congressional process; she is legally required to testify pursuant to a duly issued congressional subpoena," Bates wrote. He said that both Bolten and Miers must give Congress all nonprivileged documents related to the firings.

Bates, who was appointed to the bench by Bush, issued a 93-page opinion that strongly rejected the administration's legal arguments. He noted that the executive branch could not point to a single case in which courts held that White House aides were immune from congressional subpoenas.

"That simple yet critical fact bears repeating: the asserted absolute immunity claim here is entirely unsupported by existing case law," Bates wrote.

The ruling is a blow to the Bush administration's efforts to bolster the power of the executive branch at the expense of the legislative branch. Disputes over congressional subpoenas are normally resolved through political compromise, not through the court system. Had Bush prevailed, it would have dramatically weakened congressional authority in oversight investigations.

Story continues below
advertisement

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., left open the prospect of a full House vote on a contempt citation against Rove, who defied his subpoena to appear before the Judiciary Committee on July 10.

"It certainly strengthens our hand," she said of Bates' ruling. "This decision should send a clear signal to the Bush administration that it must cooperate fully with Congress and that former administration officials Harriet Miers and Karl Rove must testify before Congress."

That wasn't clear at all to the White House or Rove's attorney.

Bush administration lawyers were still considering whether to appeal, but there was no doubt what they thought of the ruling.

"We disagree with the district court's decision," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said.

With only a few months left in Bush's presidency, there appeared to be no sense of urgency to come to a decision.

"I have not yet talked with anyone at the White House ... and don't expect that this matter will be finally resolved in the very near future," Rove attorney Robert Luskin said in an e-mail.

The House Judiciary Committee's senior Republican, Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, said he was pleased the court ruled in Congress' favor, but he cautioned that an ongoing showdown in federal court could ultimately curtail Congress' powers, and he urged Democrats and the White House to strike an agreement.

"Unfortunately, today's victory may be short-lived," Smith said in a statement. "If the administration appeals the ruling, our congressional prerogatives will once again be put at risk."

The chairmen of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees quickly demanded that the White House officials subpoenaed appear before their panels.

Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, signaled that hearings would commence in September on the controversy that scandalized the Justice Department and led to the resignation of a longtime presidential confidant, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

"We look forward to the White House complying with this ruling and to scheduling future hearings with Ms. Miers and other witnesses who have relied on such claims," Conyers said in a statement. "We hope that the defendants will accept this decision and expect that we will receive relevant documents and call Ms. Miers to testify in September."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said, "I look forward to working with the White House and the Justice Department to coordinate the long overdue appearances."

___

Associated Press reporters Laurie Kellman and Ben Evans contributed to this story.

WASHINGTON — President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in a long-running dispute between the two political branches. Congressiona...
WASHINGTON — President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in a long-running dispute between the two political branches. Congressiona...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
243
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
- DonKrieger I'm a Fan of DonKrieger 3 fans permalink
photo

Opinion in Convenient Form:

We have posted the opinion (not PDF). Loading is very fast. Copy/Paste the highlighted link shown on each page for online citation. Here is the link to the opinion:
http://www.evendon.net/PublicService/cgi-bin/HandOff-1_0.cgi?DCfc2008+Congress_v_Meiers+0001

Here is the link to the original complain:
http://publicservice.evendon.com/MyersContemptM.htm

Both documents and many many others may be found from the front page of our site:
http://publicservice.evendon.com

Everything on our site is free and permanent.

Don

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 PM on 08/01/2008
- lthuedk 1 I'm a Fan of lthuedk 1 64 fans permalink
photo

Pinky would squeal like a stuck pig. He should be put on a suicide watch if he's indicted.

http://www.light-to-dark.com/pinkys_load.html

Luskin knows this will likely be appealed and his client will have to begin sincerely worrying around the first of the year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 08/01/2008
- Mark701 I'm a Fan of Mark701 20 fans permalink
photo

The Bush Administation cannot win this argument, and they know it. The whole appeal business is to drag this out until they leave office which is fine. Whether these folks are tried and convicted during or after this Administration makes no difference to me. Just as long as they are dragged into a court of law at some point and held accountable for their crimes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 08/01/2008

Doesn't matter - Bush will pardon them

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 AM on 08/01/2008
- Korinthe I'm a Fan of Korinthe 2 fans permalink

Which is a major reason impeachment hearings should start: He cannot pardon anyone while undergoing those hearings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 08/01/2008

Until I see Rove, Miers and Bolton have their behinds at least picked up for breaking the law, I see no reason to believe that they will be punished for their crimes. I have this very troublesome picture that Bush and his criminals are somewhere laughing their asses off at Congress and the American people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 08/01/2008
- layman I'm a Fan of layman 23 fans permalink

There really isn't anything to write home about for something that should have been in the first place, if not for a demented administration..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 08/01/2008
- AnnieinOR I'm a Fan of AnnieinOR 24 fans permalink

now, can we please have them testify, and if they refuse - throw them in jail!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 07/31/2008
- osage I'm a Fan of osage 297 fans permalink
photo

The Buah adminstration has to believe there is political value in delaying the inevitable because their only chance of avoiding exposure and legal accountability lies in the hope, however remote, that John McCain will be elected president. The big fish will play this out to the very end, but the little fish are going to get more and more afraid of being left twisting in the wind as the prospect of McCain getting elected becomes dimmer. It's going to be fun to watch the little fish squirm trying to decide if they should rely on the big fish to save them or if they'll decide to go it alone and try to save themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 07/31/2008

Given the time, I have no belief in the need for nor the efficacy of Impeachment.

Hearings, evidence gathering and vetting, and indictments. Bring 'em on.

BUT HEAR THIS, be sure we can keep these perps IN COUNTRY.

There are all kinds of destinations, Eastern Europe, Paraguay, The Middle East and countries where our legal hands may not reach.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 07/31/2008
- Korinthe I'm a Fan of Korinthe 2 fans permalink

Umm...Impeachment HEARINGS do lead to evidence gatherings, and indictments and/or resignations. Nixon quit because his impending impeachment led to the discovery of the "smoking gun" tape, and the ensuing pressure. Impeachment also neuters the powers of officials undergoing them, preventing them from using such tools as...PARDONS, or AUTHORIZING AN ATTACK ON IRAN. For example.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 07/31/2008
- Ozarks I'm a Fan of Ozarks 49 fans permalink
photo

Maybe they can go live in those countries you have listed, but all countries that have adopted the Geneva Convention on torture can pick them up for war crimes if they successfully flee U.S.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 08/01/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 281 fans permalink
photo

Only if Mc Cain is elected/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 07/31/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 281 fans permalink
photo

I would love to see Meirs questioned about her coverup of Bush's DESERTION from duty in the National Guard. Adter 90 days AWOL you are considered a Deserter.

I would like to see all the Military Officers who defiled every veteran when they covered up his past in the Military!!!!!!

This come very close to treason to coverup military desertion so the deserter can get elected President!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 07/31/2008
- sacrebleu I'm a Fan of sacrebleu 11 fans permalink
photo

This is all very well and good, but you know that empty dress N@nsee Pulohsee is going to immediately take enforcement of this ruling "off the table." I'd frankly like to see HER charged with Contempt for obstruction of justice under the color of office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 07/31/2008
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 88 fans permalink

We agree...

Here's something YOU can do about it: Help San Francisco REMOVE Nancy in November by supporting her competitor, Cindy Sheehan - donate Generously at CindyForCongress.org.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 08/02/2008
- Bobleblah1 I'm a Fan of Bobleblah1 21 fans permalink

One thing is certain

The fact that Nancy Pelosi has to make the decision as to whether this will go to a full house vote, means that this is going nowhere. You can count on Nancy Pelosi doing her part to keep this nation in a state of total lawlessness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 07/31/2008
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 88 fans permalink

The only two times she has moved at all on impeachment were on the two occasions where her competitor (for her Seat in November) made very positive announcements - regarding money and getting on the ballot (no easy task in CA). Cindy Sheehan is now assured with being on the ballot - a formality that doesn't officially occur until August 28th - as the signatures are now in.

This suggests that if Nancy is running scared that she'll lose, she MIGHT actually do something.

I say we threaten her seat, and if she actually loses it, so much the better. Please support Cindy by donating generously at CindyForCongress.org.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 08/02/2008
- lincat I'm a Fan of lincat 2 fans permalink

Rove is gonna keep on lying and getting away with everything while he helps McCain try to be the nex t
president. It is so wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 07/31/2008
- esquire07 I'm a Fan of esquire07 25 fans permalink

Lol... As if it matters what the court rules. BushCo. is above the law.

Rove knows very well that the spineless Democrats will never pursue the issue.

Under the law of Bush and the cowardice of Democrats, Congress has become an impotent, irrelevant, irrelevant branch of government.

Congress is simply a place for corrupt people to make lots of money. The Constituion is dead.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 07/31/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect