Obama Shifts, Says He May Back Offshore Drilling

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Shifts, Says He May Back Offshore Drilling stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MIKE GLOVER | August 1, 2008 10:57 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. answers an audience member's question, Friday, Aug. 1, 2008, during a town hall meeting in St. Petersburg, Fla. (AP Photo/Mike Carlson)

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a comprehensive policy to foster fuel-efficient autos and develop alternate energy sources.

Shifting from his previous opposition to expanded offshore drilling, the Illinois senator told a Florida newspaper he could get behind a compromise with Republicans and oil companies to prevent gridlock over energy.

Republican rival John McCain, who earlier dropped his opposition to offshore drilling, has been criticizing Obama on the stump and in broadcast ads for clinging to his opposition as gasoline prices topped $4 a gallon. Polls indicate these attacks have helped McCain gain ground on Obama.

"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama said in an interview with The Palm Beach Post.

"If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage _ I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done."

Asked about Obama's comment, McCain said, "We need oil drilling and we need it now offshore. He has consistently opposed it. He has opposed nuclear power. He has opposed reprocessing. He has opposed storage." The GOP candidate said Obama doesn't have a plan equal to the nation's energy challenges.

In Congress, both parties have fought bitterly over energy policy for weeks, with Republicans pressing for more domestic oil drilling and Democrats railing about oil company profits. Despite hundreds of hours of House and Senate floor debate, lawmakers will leave Washington for their five-week summer hiatus this week with an empty tank.

"The Republicans and the oil companies have been really beating the drums on drilling," Obama said in the Post interview. "And so we don't want gridlock. We want to get something done."

Story continues below
advertisement

Later, Obama issued a written statement warmly welcoming a proposal sent to Senate leaders Friday by 10 senators _ five from each party. Their proposal seeks to break the impasse over offshore oil development and is expected to be examined more closely in September after Congress returns from its summer recess.

The so-called Gang of 10 plan would lift drilling bans in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, but retain an environmental buffer zone extending 50 miles off Florida's beaches and in the South Atlantic off Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia, but only if a state agrees to the oil and gas development along its coast. The states would share in revenues from oil and gas development.

Drilling bans along the Pacific coast and the Northeast would remain in place under this compromise.

The plan also includes energy initiatives Obama has endorsed. "It would repeal tax breaks for oil companies so that we can invest billions in fuel-efficient cars, help our automakers re-tool, and make a genuine commitment to renewable sources of energy like wind power, solar power, and the next generation of clean, affordable biofuels," Obama noted.

"Like all compromises, it also includes steps that I haven't always supported," Obama conceded. "I remain skeptical that new offshore drilling will bring down gas prices in the short-term or significantly reduce our oil dependence in the long-term, though I do welcome the establishment of a process that will allow us to make future drilling decisions based on science and fact."

Nevertheless, Obama said the plan, put forward by mostly moderates and conservatives led by Sens. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., "represents a good faith effort at a new bipartisan beginning."

Earlier in the day, Obama pushed for a windfall profits tax to fund $1,000 emergency rebate checks for consumers besieged by high energy costs, a counter to McCain's call for more offshore drilling.

The pitch for putting some of the economic burden of $4-a-gallon gasoline on the oil industry served a dual purpose for Obama: It allowed him to talk up an economic issue, seen by many as a strength for Democrats and a weakness for Republicans, and at the same time respond to criticism from McCain that Obama's opposition to offshore drilling leads to higher prices at the pump.

In linking McCain to the unpopular President Bush, Obama struck a theme from Ronald Reagan's successful 1980 campaign against President Jimmy Carter by asking a town-hall audience in St. Petersburg: "Do you think you are better off than you were four years ago or eight years ago? If you aren't better off, can you afford another four years?"

Obama primed the crowd by noting new government figures showing 51,000 jobs lost last month and citing 460,000 jobs lost over the last seven months. He tied other bad economic news from the Bush administration to McCain and offered his energy program as one route to relief.

"This rebate will be enough to offset the increased cost of gas for a working family over the next four months," Obama said during a two-day campaign swing in Florida. "It will be enough to cover the entire increase in your heating bills. Or you could use the rebate for any of your other bills, or even to pay down your own debt."

(This version CORRECTS paragraph 10 that compromise would retain a buffer zone of 50 miles off Florida Gulf beaches, instead of allow drilling within 50 miles.)

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a compr...
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a compr...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
4616
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (62 pages total)

I dont even know what to say anymore, I thought I knew Obama's stance on issues. I am getting ready to hear him say, "You know in Europe, they got it right! In France 80% of there Electricity is Nuclear. That is what we need to do!"
I keep hearing that he has not committed to one position or the other, therefore can not be flip-flopping...But then again, I ask exactly what does Obama support and does not?
He voted for the bill that gave the oil companies the tax subsidies, McCain voted against it. And still wants to repeal it.
Obama please clarify clearly what it is you stand for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 08/05/2008
- jrterrier I'm a Fan of jrterrier 5 fans permalink

oh, no. move-on is going to run an ad against obama calling him unprincipled, right? that's what they did when mcc supported diggin for oil here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 08/07/2008

DOES NO ONE UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING???? Any oil that is drilled off our coasts does NOT go directly to the US!!! It goes into the global world oil market and would not even be a drop in that ocean. It will do NOTHING to lower the cost of fuel in this country. They are BOTH trying to pull the wool over us and I am very, very disappointed in this form of politcal bullshit from Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 08/05/2008
- deanfv I'm a Fan of deanfv 12 fans permalink

Do you not understand supply and demand? Drill more, increase supply more than demand, price drops. Simple concept.
And before you pull out the drilling is not the answer, we need to conserve, need alternatives meme. You are right. We need all of the above.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 08/08/2008
- Tags I'm a Fan of Tags 11 fans permalink

McCain's slogan this week...

Vote for me - I reversed first!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 08/05/2008

I was laughing about this yesterday, now they are proud to be the first fliper,
still waiting for the other flipflop to fall,

Mit was on cnn a few minutes ago, says he is for free enterprise, we shouldn't tax
windfall profits of big oil, well if this is such an emergency "GOT TO DRILL NOW RIGHT NOW"
the oil companies are taking advantage of people in a time of emergency ,

hurricane Andrew hit years ago, a couple of guys I know rented a truck, bought generators,
plywood, took 2 weeks off work , sure they wanted to charge double but they had lots invested,
and even at double they wouldn't have made as much as they could have at work, well
they were not allowed to to make a profit, it would have been taking advantage of crises ,

free enterprise drug company's, oil company's , they can screw us one at a time thats free intercourse ,,,I mean enterprise

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 08/05/2008

Obama Proposes ‘Tire’ Gauge to Monitor McCain’s Consciousness
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=2464

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 08/05/2008
photo

Obama 'shifts' is the headline. As far as I'm concerned, he never took a firm stance against it. He proposes an energy plan that will deflate the record profits of oil corporations by giving it back, and says he might okay SOME offshore drilling,

"If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage _ I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done."

All that does is leave the possibility open. It wasn't some sort of grand flip-flop...

And on nuclear power, Obama HAS said in a CNN debate that he would leave options open, so McCain's wrong there too. It's a good idea to continue to research safe and healthy ways to pursue nuclear power anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 08/05/2008

I'm so glad that Obama took this stance! It shows me that he knows how to work with people to get things done! Obama is a true leader! And for all of you that want to call him a flip flopper- remember McCain was 1st against drilling for oil! Also McCain was against bush tax cuts but he has fully embraced them! McCain also said he was going to run an honourable campaign but we all know that went right out the window! OBAMA IS A GREAT LEADER! OBAMA WILL BE GREAT FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! OBAMA IS A UNITER! OBAMA ALL THE WAY!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 08/04/2008

I don't think that drilling offshore is the answer, but the prospect of it may put downward pressure on the price of crude for a time. I no longer care about energy policy as it pertains to the campaign. Neither candidate is being straightforward about it. If Obama does something positive and far reaching , great. But pocketbook issues are all that matter to many, many Americans, and the Dems should proceed accordingly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 08/04/2008
photo

Energy policy is a pocket book issue: Climate change is affecting our entire economy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 08/05/2008
- foxbat I'm a Fan of foxbat 95 fans permalink
photo

Smart long-term move on Obama's part. Read what he's advocating and see several things that hold relatively true to original positions and allow him to stay post-partisan after conventions.
He still calls for the roughly 70m acres that are "dry leased" (that oil companies own leases on but AREN'T drilling on) to be used BEFORE they could touch anything new offshore. This forces oil-co and advocates to step up to the plate and start producing the "excess" they claim is needed. This exposes the con that extra drilling will significantly change prices. In 2010, Dems say, “You've been drilling for two years and prices haven't gone down like you claimed” and use this in 2010 House/Senate campaigns and re-install the offshore moratorium.
In light of Gof10, it'll allow Obama to continue post-partisan action/mesage. Post-convention, he'll start rolling out various Republicans who talk about working with him in past/future. This blunts next Republican scare attack, “Do you want Dems in charge of EVERYTHING?” as 60 Dem senators loom.
Like the trip overseas, it's going at McCain’s strong points, and ironically, he's doing a military maneuver: take out air force to control the ground. Even though everything says that the offshore drilling will have no real impact on prices, voters PERCEIVE that it will, so he’s taking out this issue, but it'll require figuring out how to present it in terms that emotional voters can absorb without having to read policy papers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 PM on 08/03/2008

As a personal note. People who try and urinate backwards overthemselves usually get wet anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 AM on 08/04/2008
photo

This doesn't expose anything other than that Obama will shift his position this way or that depending on the polls.

Obama's trip overseas cost him 9 points in the polls, not a gain.

As to your last paragraph..,. there's no need for average Americans to read a policy paper or for Obama to explain it to them. It's transparently obvious that Obama is pandering and you folks will "emotionally" follow him whichever way he goes, regardless if he betrays every single principal you say you stand for. Your problem on the left? You folks think others are dumb and unprincipled as yourselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 08/04/2008

My problem is that when Obama flip flops, he can't even explain why he changed nor can he explain his previous position.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 08/04/2008
photo

Except that Obama lost 9 points in the polls. Don't have time to go through the rest..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 08/04/2008
photo

The poll shifted only because the "low information," otherwise known as the "undecided" voter exists.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 AM on 08/05/2008

Cannot wait until Obama says: I did not leave the Democratic Party. The Democartic Party left me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 PM on 08/03/2008

Obama - on the fast track to becoming my kind of Republican!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 08/03/2008

I don't know if it is just me but democrats must get past this idea that positive politics wins. It doesn't. It seems that Obama thinks it will just like Kerry did. If Obama does not get negative ads out there now about McCain then Obama is going to be defined by the McCain campaign and we will lose when we should win in a landslide. Obama must attack now and attack hard. How about an add that talks about the struggling economy and then talk about the Keating 5 and the disaster of savings and loans and then at the end state banks are already closing do you want this man with a picture of McCain running the economy when he has a terrible past with this man and show McCain and Keating together followed by a picture of McCain and Bush together and then follow with the quote from McCain about how he really doesn't know much about the economy. The attacks on McCain must begin now and we must define McCain on the economy and regain defining the campain in democrats strengths not allow McCain to define the campaign. Or we will lose as we have the past 2 elections to the man who doesn't know squat...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

There's a fatal error in your proposal, big27. Doing what you describe is called a "strategy" and requires intelligence and testicular fortitude. Regrettably for our country, democratic political operatives have demonstrated neither over the past decade or so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 08/03/2008

As a suggestion maybe Paris and Brittany could help with some testicular fortitude. Or a new video for the convention. That would sure show McSame not to mess with them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 AM on 08/04/2008
- jrterrier I'm a Fan of jrterrier 5 fans permalink

first of all, obama knows how to run negative ads. he ran them against hillary and was the first to run negative ads agaisnt mcc. they just didn't work as well.

and frankly, the ads that mcc is running and scoring with are barely negative. they aren't willie horton ads, for example. they are kind of funny -- like the celebrity ad. that's why they are working. because they are not nasty negative and they are hitting a nerve.

the huge crowds, the fainting fans, the "we are whom we've been waiting for" and "today is the day the oceans will stop rising" overblown rhetoric for a guy who has not even served a single term as US senator fits right in with the paris hilton phenomenon -- what the hell has either accomplished?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 08/07/2008

Republicans confuse me. I think it takes a strong leader to bring two opposing sides together to follow through on a comprehensive initiative for great change, rather than a my-way-or-­the-highwa­y approach we've seen from the right. This is not just a flip-flop. I oppose offshore drilling, but under strict regulations it may appease one side of the argument, while other routes are pursued to help solve our problems of energy dependence.

So, even though Obama is beginning to talk about agreeing with a Republican issue, they will turn it around and employ even more divisive tactics to confuse and scare voters. It goes to show that this particular group is much more concerned with power than ideas and virtue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 08/03/2008

They confuse a lot of people. Lately, even themselves on a few issues. But gasoline prices are a issue of all the people not just one party. I like reasonable gas prices. 'O" says so too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 AM on 08/04/2008
- jrterrier I'm a Fan of jrterrier 5 fans permalink

the problem is that three weeks ago when mcc came out in support of off-shore drilling, O hit him hard on it; they even ran an ad showing that he got a bunch of oil money after he came out in support of drilling. and O reiterated that he opposed off-shore drilling and it was no solution.

when the polls started showing that people supported drilling, O suddenly changed his tune.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 08/07/2008
- harveyr2 I'm a Fan of harveyr2 17 fans permalink

SHIFTS. I guess that's the PC way of writing "flip flop."

Senator Obama would rather we send money to the Saudi's for "their" oil and rather we raise our summer and lower our winter thermostats.

Now that's judgment!!!

Tell me, the manner in which he fights oil drilling you'd think he thought the OIL companies had somewhere else to invest THEIR earnings. They don't, they are OIL companies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 08/03/2008
- DaveC19 I'm a Fan of DaveC19 11 fans permalink

We always will have to "send money to the Saudi's for "their" oil " as the US only sits on like 4% of world supply. We could drill every inch and still have to import oil.

The only way to make any difference is to look for alternate ways to fuel cars etc such as electric etc.

O understands it and tries to explain these things. He is right but Americans are too ignorant and always tend to think in simple terms made worse be Rep talking points and slogans.

There is no shortage of oil. Shortage is the only reason to drill everywhere. Corporate greed and speculation is why prices are high.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 08/04/2008
photo

After reading your comment, I have to agree, Americans are ignorant.

Just curious. The electric power to fuel our cars, how were you planning on making it? Remember, you smart Americans don't want us to do it with coal, oil or nuclear. Therefore, as one of the smart Americans, could you estimate approximately how many thousands of square miles of farm land and forest you figure will need to be stripped and converted to solar arrays. In fact, that's too much to ask. How about, say, Detroit? Course, it's overcast about 40% of the year.

Please though, as one of the ignorant Americans, I'm just dying to learn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 08/04/2008

ahhh...harveyr2, you got to say "flip flop" cool! Smart people change their mind from time to time when new evidence presents itself. Stupid people do not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 08/04/2008


During the 70s gas crunch there really was a shortage of gas. Many gas stations had no gas to sell. This gas hike is not due to a shortage. The proof is the availability of gas for all gas stations. Insiders are getting rich and they include oil companies and especially the oil speculators. If you follow that money you find why the government does not force oil down by dumping 50 million barrells on the market. A sudden dumping of federal reserve oil would make the government billions of dollars and burn the speculators who are betting on highly leveraged futures. The administration wants to burn the speculators because their personal symbiotic relationships with the oil manipulators.

The big three spend many billions to get better mileage. They all lost efficiency due to EPA rules that forced them to lower compression ratios. The big three were simply obeying the EPA laws while making what made them the most money, SUVs that most people wanted.

Big three bankruptcy is from corrupt administration that was in bed with the oil people and even outright refused to meet with the auto makers when they asked. GM can switch to efficient cars but needs two years advance warning that gas prices will be jacked up to 3 or 4 dollars a gallon. They follow market desire for efficient cars but are getting killed financially because the oil men running the administration have arranged for the oil prices to quickly quadruple without a shortage

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 08/03/2008
- theMightyT I'm a Fan of theMightyT 167 fans permalink

Why are the car companies suing California to overturn their emissions regulations? In other words, they are NOT spending many billions to get better mileage. They are trying to change the law so that they don't have to change their manufacturing standards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 08/03/2008
photo

Speaking of feeble bleating. Don't worry, next week Obama will be ion the other side of this issue too. And you'll call it "nuanced" and "thoughtful" as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 PM on 08/03/2008

So probably they’re going to give away the store anyway but since it belongs to us let’s ask our Democratic Congress to pass legislation that makes it law that every drop of domestically drilled oil stays in the U.S., can be sold at no more than $30.00 per barrel, and must be refined into gasoline? Keep smiling everyone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 08/03/2008

I suppose heating oil would be out for those who live in cold areas ? And products made from oil products like plastics would be excluded.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 08/03/2008

My comment addresses gasoline prices only as that seems all either candidate is willing to do. We could rely on the Pickens Plan for everything else since it'll free up so much of the foreign oil. Also, T. Boone can buy a windmill for every back yard, solar panels for every roof, and Trombe walls for every south facing back porch. How about plastics from hemp oil?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 08/03/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (62 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect