Celebrity Medical Records In Massive UCLA Breach

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Celebrity Medical Records In Massive UCLA Breach stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

August 5, 2008 11:52 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

LOS ANGELES — More than 120 workers at a Los Angeles hospital looked at celebrities' medical records and other personal information without permission between January 2004 and June 2006 _ nearly double the number initially reported earlier this year, according to a state report.

The report, released Monday by the California Department of Public Health, also said three staffers at the UCLA Medical Center continued to look at the confidential records of a "well-known individual" after a crackdown of record-peeking in April. The state report didn't release the name of that celebrity.

State regulators blame the hospital for not taking adequate steps to maintain patient confidentiality.

"What's startling to us is, as we get to a point where we feel we've addressed a specific complaint and a specific issue, we identify additional issues," said Kathleen Billingsley, director of the health department's Center for Healthcare Quality. "It's very disturbing to see this."

State public health officials have released five reports since the Los Angeles Times first reported UCLA employees pried into the medical records of prominent patients, including Britney Spears, Farrah Fawcett and California first lady Maria Shriver.

The latest report said 127 workers peeked into celebrities' medical records without permission, leading to several firings, suspensions and warnings. The report also detailed the case of one employee who looked at the records of about 900 patients "without any legitimate reason" and viewed Social Security numbers, health insurance information and addresses, from April 2003 to May 2007.

Previous state reports had said the woman, Lawanda Jackson, viewed about 60 patient records. The former administrative specialist faces federal criminal charges for violating Fawcett's privacy.

The report said Jackson used her supervisor's password to view the records, which officials determined by examining her workstation.

After the April violations, one nurse was fired and the two other employees received warnings, the report said.

Hospital officials said computer systems have been updated to block complete Social Security numbers and that staff is being trained on privacy and security. The hospital also said it has notified all patients whose privacy was breached by Jackson.

"We have no excuses," said Dr. David Feinberg, chief executive of the UCLA Health System, in a statement. "UCLA should have detected the violations by Ms. Jackson years ago and should have immediately initiated the process to dismiss her."

Feinberg said the medical center continues to investigate and all employees found to have breached patient confidentiality were disciplined or fired.

___

Information from: Los Angeles Times, http://www.latimes.com

LOS ANGELES — More than 120 workers at a Los Angeles hospital looked at celebrities' medical records and other personal information without permission between January 2004 and June 2006 _ nearly...
LOS ANGELES — More than 120 workers at a Los Angeles hospital looked at celebrities' medical records and other personal information without permission between January 2004 and June 2006 _ nearly...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Harrier I'm a Fan of Harrier 10 fans permalink

I live in LA and this is nothing new. This has been going on for at least 30 years. There have been at least two major uncoverings like this and generally a few people get fired, but there is never an ethical leader that ca take the time to put the necessary controls in place. Some of the problem is due to a lack of equipment, but certainly a lot of it is due to a lot of people who shouldn't be looking doing do. The problem is, more of the people looking and giving out the information are doctors themselves who pulled the file, but have no association with treating the patients. It's always the same doctors and they rarely, if at all, get disciplined.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 08/05/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect