More

McCain Visits Nuclear Power Plant That Had Meltdown In 1960s

GLEN JOHNSON | August 5, 2008 05:46 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and his wife Cindy arrive at the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally at the Buffalo Chip campground, Monday, Aug. 4, 2008, in Sturgis, S.D. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

RAPID CITY, S.D. — John McCain conceded in a new television commercial on Tuesday that "we're worse off than we were four years ago," and said he is the candidate best positioned to usher in an era of change.

"Washington's broken. John McCain knows it," says the commercial, which is implicitly critical of both President Bush and Barack Obama.

It is unusual for a presidential candidate to part company with an administration of the same party, but McCain has little choice, with public opinion polls showing the public is eager for change after eight years of the Bush administration.

Just seven months ago, McCain said in a debate that "Americans overall are better off" than eight years ago "because we have had a pretty good prosperous time with low unemployment and low inflation." Even so, he added that "things are tough right now."

Set to run in battleground states, the new commercial does not mention Obama but it suggests the first-term Illinois senator is unprepared to be president by saying McCain is the one "ready to lead." It also tries to seize Obama's message of change and cast McCain, a four-term Arizona senator, as a change agent.

"Only McCain has taken on big tobacco, drug companies, fought corruption in both parties," the ad says. "He'll reform Wall Street, battle big oil, make America prosper again."

It does not mention areas where McCain and Bush agree, like tax cuts, the Iraq war and free-market economics, a point the Obama campaign highlighted in its response to the ad.

"Being a maverick isn't practicing the same kind of politics we have seen from Washington for decades," said Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton, "it isn't having a campaign run by Washington lobbyists, and it's certainly not promoting the same policies that have led America down the wrong path these past eight years."

McCain aides unveiled the ad as the candidate was set to tour a nuclear power plant, the first such visit in recent history by a presidential candidate. The visit highlights the promise and peril of a technology that is a key component of his plan to help the country overcome its energy crisis.

The Enrico Fermi Nuclear Plant outside Detroit, named for the first physicist to split the atom, is home to both an operating power plant and another reactor that had a partial meltdown in the 1960s. It was decommissioned in 1972, while its successor continues to operate.

McCain is placing great stock in modern-day nuclear technology by calling for the construction of 45 nuclear power plants by 2030. The Republican argues that its carbon-free power generation is necessary to reduce the country's reliance on oil imports. He says exposing its expanded use, as Democratic rival Barack Obama has suggested, shows naivete.

"I am going to lead our nation to energy independence, and I'm going to do it with a realistic and comprehensive 'all-of-the-above' approach that uses every resource available to finally solve this crisis," the Arizona senator said Monday.

To buttress the point, McCain regularly cites the example of France, which gets about 80 percent of its electricity from nuclear sources. He also highlights the U.S. Navy, in which he served as a fighter pilot and which he boasts has safely operated nuclear power plants in aircraft carriers and submarines without an accident in 60 years.

Yet events have undercut that message, as well.

Last week, the Navy announced that one of its nuclear-powered submarines, the USS Houston, had leaked minimally radioactive water earlier this year. An investigation showed water may have been slowly leaking from the valve since March as the Los Angeles-class submarine traveled around the Pacific.

The total amount of radioactivity released into the environment at each stop was less than one-half a microcurie, equivalent to the radioactivity of a 50-pound bag of fertilizer, but it threatened to damage relations with Japan, where the presence of U.S. nuclear vessels has long been controversial.

McCain is trumpeting his energy proposals throughout this week as anxious Americans grow increasingly frustrated by record-high gasoline prices.

Besides expanded nuclear power generation, the senator has proposed expanded drilling off the U.S. coast and a $300 million prize for developing a revolutionary automobile battery.

Obama has described nuclear power as "not optimal" and labeled himself "not a nuclear energy proponent." But he has said he would not rule out more nuclear power "only so far as it is clean and safe."

In recent days, Obama has made two significant reversals as he added to his own energy policy by outlining a plan to end U.S. reliance on foreign oil within 10 years. He said he could support limited new offshore drilling as part of a compromise to develop alternate energy sources, and he proposed tapping some of the nation's emergency oil stockpile to relieve pump prices.

"Breaking our oil addiction is one of the greatest challenges our generation will ever face," the Illinois senator said.

McCain yielded no ground Monday night as he addressed thousands of motorcyclists at the nearby Sturgis Motorcycle Rally in Sturgis, S.D.

"My opponent doesn't want to drill. He doesn't want nuclear power. He wants you to inflate your tires," McCain said of Obama, who last week endorsed that fuel-saving tip recommended by nearly all energy experts.

The senator also criticized his colleagues in Congress for adjourning for a five-week recess without approving a new energy plan.

"Tell 'em to come back and get to work," McCain said, yelling into the microphone. "When I'm president of the United States, I'm not going to let them go on vacation. They're gonna become energy independent."

McCain's own voting record on energy issues has been questioned as well.

In 2007, McCain missed all 11 energy-related Senate votes considered key by the League of Conservation Voters, including votes related to automobile fuel economy, offshore Virginia drilling, refinery construction, renewable electricity mandates, energy efficiency, liquefied coal and support for biofuels. The absences prompted the League to give McCain a "zero" rating for the year.

McCain was accompanied during his stay in South Dakota by Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., who has been mentioned as a potential running mate.

___

On the Net:

McCain: http://www.johnmccain.com

Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:50 AM on 08/06/2008
I'm an independent and I agree with democrats when it comes to the war and healthcare. But in energy I tend to lean to the right. Nuclear energy is part of the solution, and it should be expanded. Countries that have the best environmental record rely heavily on nuclear power, like France, Finland and sweden among others. Renewable are an intermittent sources of energy that would actually complement the baseload power of nuclear and will replace dirty coal and other fossil fuels. If democrats really believed Global Warming to be a serious treat they would support every source that doesn't spew CO2 into the atmosphere.
Senator Obama realizes this, from Obama's website "Nuclear power represents more than 70 percent of our non- carbon generated electricity. It is unlikely that we can meet our aggressive climate goals if we eliminate nuclear power from the table" He is the senator of Illinois the state with the most nuclear power plant in the USA.
Also to the comments regarding uranium resources:"Current economic uranium resources will last for over 100 years at current consumption rates, while it is expected there is twice that amount awaiting discovery. With reprocessing and recycling, the reserves are good for thousands of years." This was from a joint report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency. I recommend you all read it.
03:52 PM on 08/07/2008
BS. 13 years of the Worlds energy and then the uranium wars start.

All these lies about 1000's of years of nuke fuel are based on science fiction.

The only commercial nukes available in the next 20 years need fresh uranium every 2 years. Breeders reactors have all been shut down because they were a practical nightmare, with liquid sodium coolant that catches fire on contact with air, and much high power density and dangers.
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2006/uranium_resources.html

Nukes are not "renewable." Breeder reactor don't work. Reprocessing technology is the gateway to nuke bombs, for instance India.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reprocessing

reprocessing the fuel rods is not worth it. Ask the French.
http://www.ieer.org/sdafiles/vol_9/9-2/charpin.html

Reprocessing multiplies the deadly radioactive waste stream over 100 times, just to get 25% more energy.

wind and nanosolar are already cheaper than nukes and the fuel is free forever.

read my comment below on the economic loss of storing all that waste, assuming meteorites, volcanoes and earthquakes don't spew it all over the planet in the million years needed to safely store it.

see my profile for more links on solar wind nukes and batteries.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
StillAmused
Some mayo on that troll, please...
07:32 AM on 08/06/2008
Another embarrassing swing, miss and pratfall. The doddering jerk just can't help himself, even with Steve Schmidt brewing that cauldron of juvenile vitriol.

Unfortunately, give or take a few hundred thousand births and deaths, it's the same dull-normal electorate that thought Junior's stumbling ignorance was endearing, and it remains to be seen if his turning out to be a war criminal and stupendous, unrivaled failure has taught them anything at all.
05:24 AM on 08/06/2008
Arizona should be embarrassed !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SugarMan
03:48 AM on 08/06/2008
What a sorry excuse for a senator.
How long has he been in office. No one else must want the job.
SAD
12:41 AM on 08/06/2008
seriously, this goes to show that the GOP including McWhatever haven't got a lick of creativity in them... where is the common sense or intelligent decision making... this is 100% indicative of their incapability to lead this nation... imagine how absurd that is... a photo op prompting a viable source of energy in a closed down plant? huh?
07:12 PM on 08/05/2008
Ha Ha.......it's simply marvelous that this guy doesn't catch a break:)
He does not deserve one. I wish the cover photo was the one of
him holding his head "yikes, another big mistake"!!!! There are good
days and bad days for all of these candidates, for sure. But today, I'm
just happy with my McCain sideshow moments! And I just loved Paris
Hilton's comeback. She has a good spirit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
luvangelHussein330
03:06 PM on 08/05/2008
Ammature hour al la McCain never fails
02:51 PM on 08/05/2008
What is the economic value of 150,000 acres of Nevada for Yucca for 1 million years?

The value of the solar energy on that land: 750 square kilometers. 750 million square meters. about 200w average sunlight, at a pessimistic 25% efficiency. 50 watts per meter average. 37 GW average solar power. worth 16 Billion dollars per year.

For a million years = 16,000 trillion dollars wasted storing "clean" nuclear waste.

What would the value of the property be for farms, industry and homes?

All lost for 13 years of easy uranium fuel till the resource wars start all over again.

what a boondoggle!

http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ym_repository/index.shtml
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:40 PM on 08/05/2008
Isn't that eerily similar to his plans to speak at an oil rig the same day that there was a spill in the general vicinity?
02:37 PM on 08/05/2008
he never mentions that france had 3 separate incidents at their nuclear facilities last month alone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeawoodKansas
01:27 PM on 08/05/2008
Wow. From one meltdown to another.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
pattio66
I'm here!!!
01:24 PM on 08/05/2008
John McCain = Montgomery Burns

Toby Keith = Smithers
layman
Live and Let Live !
12:23 PM on 08/05/2008
Let's build a couple of those that will meltdown in McPiss' backyard.

His evil campaign will soon meltdown.
11:47 AM on 08/05/2008
McCain is older than man made nuclear fission.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DaOne
11:37 AM on 08/05/2008
Mc Cheese has been away so long he wouldn't know where to go if they were called back.