More

Colorado Considers Large-Scale Solar

First Posted: 08- 7-08 10:35 AM   |   Updated: 09- 7-08 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Solar Panel

Electricity produced from Colorado's bright, hot sun could supply half the state's peak demand during summer, helping 1.7 million homes crank up their air conditioners and coolers.

By the numbers

270 gigawatts: Colorado's total potential for solar power generation.

11 gigawatts: Colorado's peak power demand in summer.

1.7 million: Number of homes in Colorado that could be served if even half the state's peak demand, or 5.5 gigawatts, is met with solar power.

1.9 million: Number of cars and their emissions equivalent that could be reduced with the generation of 5.5 gigawatts of solar power.

Read the full story here

-OR-

Read more at the Huffington Post green energy big news page

Electricity produced from Colorado's bright, hot sun could supply half the state's peak demand during summer, helping 1.7 million homes crank up their air conditioners and coolers. By the numbers 27...
Electricity produced from Colorado's bright, hot sun could supply half the state's peak demand during summer, helping 1.7 million homes crank up their air conditioners and coolers. By the numbers 27...
Filed by Barbara Fenig  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
07:03 PM on 08/07/2008
PASADENA, Calif.--In the dreams of Harry Gray, Beckman Professor of Chemistry at the California Institute of Technology, the future energy needs of the world are met with solar-fuel power plants. Now, a $20 million award from the Chemical Bonding Center (CBC), a National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of Chemistry program, will fund the development of a nanoscale water-splitting device that will bring this dream one step closer to reality.

http://mr.caltech.edu/media/Press_Releases/PR13172.html
03:04 PM on 08/07/2008
yippeeee! YAY COLORADO.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
02:33 PM on 08/07/2008
Not for much longer if T BOONE gets his legislation pushed the way he wants it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:21 PM on 08/07/2008
BOO! Totally the wrong direction. DECENTRALIZING, not recentralizing, is the only solution for a sustainable energy policy that does not hold all ratepayers hostage, as Big Energy are currently doing.

Local, point of use solutions are available IN EVERY STATE OF THE USA, don't believe the baloney propaganda that only certain regions are good for solar or wind - that is all just to trick us into paying for monopolistic infrastructure!! sure, the mojave has a 10% better "solar resource" than LA proper, but once you account for massive wilderness death, transmission losses (roughly 10%), increased, rather than decreased grid congestion - so new powerlines are required, and the huge water waste of CSP, all of a sudden PV on LA's endless sunny rooftops is not only "do-able," it is 20 times better!

We can't let Big Energy frame this as "Big Fossils or Big Renewables!!" The real choice in a renewable energy era is Big Energy vs. Ratepayers and the Planet. Which side are you on? If you are on the side of the angels, you will DEMAND a level playing field for individuals in the form of a generous Feed In Tariff (see Germany, Spain, Japan and 35 other nations for existing, wildly successful model), and let us get into the game...
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
06:22 PM on 08/07/2008
You are of course right, sheila. Nevertheless, Kudos to Colorado for making the Texas oil crews blink.
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
07:30 PM on 08/07/2008
Sheila:

Please post links to articles which discuss decentralizing. I am interested.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:20 PM on 08/07/2008
Here is a simple one from Renewable Energy World - ALL of America is a good solar resource, not just the Southwest:

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/ate/story?id=53203

Here is one from a pro-utility journal, showing the incredible waste of money, land, and natural resources CSP creates, compared to smaller localized PV - it is a link within the blog:

http://www.dpcinc.org/blog/2008/07/30/think-globally-generate-locally/

Here's one showing the crucial impact of fair "Feed In Tariffs" to property owners who want to install PV and participate in the Renewable Revolution as more than dim-witted consumers:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jun/16/renewableenergy.energy

The Big Energy wind and CSP solar plants destroy an average of 10,000 acres apiece for several hundred feet above the ground for small (50 - 400 mW output), plus roads and massive powerlines (which are then run through our homes!). 1.25 million + acres is under the gun so far in the SW desert area, with more projects coming online every day and several thousand miles of new transmission is being sited right now within CA - ALL WASTED FINANCIAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES!

If it was the ONLY solution, we might have to hold our noses and agree, but since there is a clean, harmless option that also BENEFITS RATEPAYERS AND TAXPAYERS, there is no way we should kill off wilderness for these Big Energy Goldmines...
11:55 AM on 08/07/2008
What is wrong with the picture?

The "help to crank up" part. The point of solar is NOT to cool somebody's poorly insulated McMansion but to replace dirty coal. Which means we need to aim at that 270GW total potential, not just at 11GW peak demand.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BearsLeft
They were just here a minute ago...
02:05 PM on 08/07/2008
Agreed. They don't build small houses anymore, even in the Colorado Rockies where we have roughly 5-6 months of winter. 3000 square feet is tiny these days.
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
06:24 PM on 08/07/2008
Those McMansions will be rezoned condo soon enuf, eh?
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
07:38 PM on 08/07/2008
No matter how well we insulate we are not going to be able to get rid of all of our AC needs. And the sun is shining for solar plants conveniently at the same time as our peak electrical requirements.

Improved insulation is important too (as is properly inflating your tires). If you are aware of any good articles discussing how to improve insulation to reduce AC needs, please post the links. Thanks
10:25 AM on 08/08/2008
Well,, Mildmannered,

Insulation is not really difficult with a vast improvement over standard attic and wall installed Rock Wools.

In many countries, roof shades, patio covers of canvas and awnings. In America, planting deciduas trees to shade the roof from the South. Exposures open to sunlight and warming during winter,, cooling shade for summer.

Further,, next re-roof you do, consider adding a stand-off second roof with ventilating eve inlets. Closed in winter open in summer to let breeze flow through the spacing between the old roof and new roof and cool.

Air-conditioning costs are simple to reduce. Use an Earth-Gain system. Ummm? You know that big compressor fan and evaporator section, found at the side of homes? Well, disconnect that and throw it away. Instead, burry the evaporator line-sets, just slightly below soils. Driveways and patios are even better, because concretes attract moisture.

Now install a smaller compressor run on Solar DC power, and a reversing valve common to Heat-Pump,, Hot and Cold,, production refrigerant systems.

That old compressor and evaporator is inversely proportional efficiencies. The hotter it gets, the harder the compressor works. Earth-Gain systems, evaporator lines are temperature middle-zone, both cooling needs and warming demands in winter. Constant 56` to 58` F year round.

Oh,, go in and rip out the burner of that poisonous Natural Gas heater, Only keep the fan to move the air.

All the best

Knute Neo-Hilton.