Pakistani ruling coalition moves to oust Musharraf

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MATTHEW PENNINGTON | August 7, 2008 05:04 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

In this photo taken on Sunday, July 6, 2008, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf gestures during a ceremony in Karachi, Pakistan. Pakistan's ruling coalition will ask President Pervez Musharraf to seek a confidence vote in Parliament or face impeachment, senior party officials told The Associated Press on Thursday, Aug. 7, 2008. (AP Photo/Shakil Adil)

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — After months of internal bickering, Pakistan's governing coalition announced Thursday it will seek to impeach President Pervez Musharraf, cranking up pressure on the U.S.-backed former general to resign.

With his popularity at rock bottom and civilian political forces arrayed against him, the outlook is gloomy for the leader who pushed Pakistan into the U.S.-led war on extremist groups after the Sept. 11 attack on America.

But Musharraf, who is still seen as close to the armed forces he once commanded, appears in no mood to give up without a fight eight years after rising to power in a military coup.

Analysts said the coalition, which swept to power in February elections but has struggled with the pressing economic and security problems they inherited, is not assured of victory.

Stripping Musharraf of the presidency will require a two-thirds majority of lawmakers voting in a joint session of both houses of Parliament.

Parties in the coalition control 236 of the National Assembly's 339 seats and as many as 51 of the Senate's 100 seats. That is at least six seats short, so the coalition will need support from some of the 29 independent lawmakers or defectors from pro-Musharraf parties.

"It won't be smooth-sailing," said political analyst Mehdi Hasan.

Asif Ali Zardari, leader of the coalition's biggest party, expressed confidence it will succeed. He called the move to seek impeachment "good news for democracy" in Pakistan.

Story continues below
advertisement

The decision followed two days of marathon negotiations between Zardari and Nawaz Sharif, who was ousted as prime minister in Musharraf's 1999 coup and now leads the second-largest party in the coalition.

Their alliance _ forged after the February election victory _ has been at risk of collapse over differences over how to restore judges fired by Musharraf last year and whether to seek his ouster.

While fears of the coalition splitting up have eased, the impeachment drive will heighten political tensions and set up a confrontation with Musharraf that many analysts thought Zardari wanted to avoid. Musharraf immediately canceled a planned trip to Beijing for the Olympics' opening ceremony.

Reading out a joint statement alongside Sharif, Zardari proclaimed it was "imperative" for them to move for Musharraf's impeachment.

He said the president's policies the past eight years "have brought Pakistan to a critical economic impasse" and claimed Musharraf "conspired" against Pakistan's democratic transition.

Zardari said Musharraf had given a "clear commitment" to resign if his party lost in the February elections. He also said the president failed to honor a pledge made by his lawyer to the Supreme Court to seek a vote of confidence from the new Parliament.

Sharif said the impeachment process would start "in the next few days."

Provincial assemblies will first be called on to demand that Musharraf face a vote of confidence from lawmakers.

"If the president does not get the vote of confidence, then immediately with it, impeachment proceedings will start," said Zardari's party spokesman, Fahartullah Babar.

Musharraf supporters accused the coalition of trying to deflect attention from its failure to address Pakistan's mounting economic problems and calm militant violence in the restless tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan.

Inflation in Pakistan is running above 20 percent, and the country suffers hours of power outages daily. Food prices have soared.

Worries over Islamic extremism are deepening _ a concern that led the State Department on Thursday to renew its warning to U.S. citizens to avoid nonessential travel to Pakistan because of terrorist activity.

"These impeachment proceedings will only complicate matters and bring a new dimension to our problems, which is the last thing we need at the moment," said Tariq Azeem, a spokesman for the main pro-Musharraf party.

Pakistan is still reeling from a turbulent 2007.

After months of mounting opposition to continued military rule, Musharraf imposed emergency rule in November seeking to cling to power. Weeks later, Pakistan's most famous politician, two-time prime minister Benazir Bhutto, was killed by a suicide attack blamed on a Taliban militant leader.

Under pressure at home and abroad to restore democracy, Musharraf ceded control of the army before lifting emergency rule in December, losing the main source of his power. Since the new civilian administration took office, he has been sidelined from the workings of government.

While Western officials privately express disappointment with the performance of the new government _ and its strategy of seeking peace with Taliban militants _ there is also recognition that the once-dominant Musharraf has become a divisive figure in Pakistan.

The Bush administration offered a measured response to the coalition's impeachment plan.

State Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos said the U.S. wanted any action to be consistent with Pakistan's constitution and the rule of law. "It is the responsibility of Pakistanis' leaders to decide on a way forward to succeed as a modern and democratic country," he said.

Patrick Cronin, director of the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense University in Washington, said Western governments probably would quietly caution the coalition not to act rashly against Musharraf, but ultimately would see his removal as a domestic issue.

"Officials might be quietly encouraging them to think through the implications of this and not act in a convulsive and emotional way, but at the end of the day, nobody is surprised," he said.

Still, impeachment proceedings against a president are a voyage into the unknown for Pakistan, which has been ruled by its military for more than half its 61-year history. Its politics are confrontational and many of its leaders have suffered a violent end.

Bhutto died in a suicide bombing on the campaign trail. Her father, ex-premier Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, perhaps Pakistan's most accomplished politician, was hanged in 1979 on charges widely seen as politically motivated. His rival, dictator Zia ul-Haq, died in an air crash in 1988.

Hamid Nasir Chatta, a lawmaker who met with Musharraf on Wednesday, said the president would not resign and would fight impeachment both "legally and politically."

"There is no chance of his quitting," Chatta said.

While Musharraf has little support among the public or political parties, he still retains an ace up his sleeve: The president has the constitutional power to dissolve Parliament.

Yet doing so would be hugely controversial, and would require the backing of a military trying to distance itself from politics. The generals have lost public support because of their association with Musharraf and their U.S.-backed military operations against Islamic militants.

___

Associated Press writers Sadaqat Jan and Zarar Khan contributed to this report.

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — After months of internal bickering, Pakistan's governing coalition announced Thursday it will seek to impeach President Pervez Musharraf, cranking up pressure on the U.S.-b...
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — After months of internal bickering, Pakistan's governing coalition announced Thursday it will seek to impeach President Pervez Musharraf, cranking up pressure on the U.S.-b...
 
Comments
62
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

I'm happy for the Pakistani citizens that they have a Parliament that still feels it's their duty to represent the citizens.

As an American citizen, I can only wish I knew how that felt - To have a Congress that felt it is their duty to represent it's citizens.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

Sheesh! Even a coalition of opposition leaders in Pakistan can get it together to impeach!!!

What is wrong with Congress?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

hey nancy! pay attention! take notes! there's going to be a test. i'll bet you don't pass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 08/07/2008

Bush's best man in Pakistan is not liked by his own people. That's democracy in action. Isn't that what we are fighting for? We also helped Pakistan with F-16 that are readily adaptable for carrying a payload. We helped India with their program. We helped Iran with their program. Isn't today the anniversary of Nagasaki? "Or was it yesterday," as Camus asked in the Stranger. We helped Iraq with its program. Does anyone really believe that the big boys know what the hell they are doing? A big profit was made. That's the most important thing of all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 PM on 08/07/2008

If the US government is feeling generous this guy will end up with a dry cleaning store in Alabama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 PM on 08/07/2008

Everything else aside. America has to help Musharaff in his time of need. America helped to install him in power against the will of the Pakistani people. The true president was out of the country....with the help of CIA, Musharaff and the CIA planted evidence against Bhutto, took over government against the will of the Pakistani public. As time went on......the people of pakistan hated America more and wanted their elected leader back. Musharraf's and America's lies against her became just that "American Lies". Finally.....he aggreed to hold elections....got rid of his main opponent [Bhutto].....created massif election fraud......still he was voted out......nobody in the whole country voted for him. Now he will not release power....even though the only other person on earth that wants to see him as President is President Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 PM on 08/07/2008

He (we) have a tiger by the tail. We (he) can't let go or the tiger will turn around and bite. No militaqry aid should be given to any religious country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 08/07/2008

Oh you poor naive lad (?)...Don't you realize that just like blown apart troops this guy has out lasted his service to this country and is now baggage?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

Yesterday,
All my troubles seemed so far away,
Now it looks as though they're here to stay,
Oh, I believe in yesterday.

Suddenly,
I'm not half the man I used to be,
There's a shadow hanging over me,
Oh, yesterday came suddenly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 08/07/2008

Mushy did so much to gain power [with the aid of a special friendly country] . He conveniently took power when Pakistan's elected Prime Minister was out of the country. He fabricated the usual crap [crap he will do to the country himsef] against her. When he allowed elections...he did away with her and thought that with massive vote fraud....he'd be elected......turns out that it was only he and his Friend bush that were on his side. The whole country wants him out. They voted him out...he won't leave and his friend Bush thinks he should stay on as President. What happened to democratic voting?.....Well...it dosn't apply to Bush's appointees.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

America needs to take a hint from Pakistan big time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

If I could read his mind, I think he would be saying something like "Where is Nancy Pelosi when you need her?".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 08/07/2008

Aunt Nancy is thinking up new reasons for not impeaching the Bush/Cheney Mafia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

Pakistanis are showing more balls than we are. They are willing to dump their piece of crap while our politicians will not act against our criminals because then they would not be able to get away with the same things the repugs did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

..... meanwhile, with the United States distracted and sullied in Iraq, the most volatile spot on the planet just gets a little more volatile......... the plot thickens.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 08/07/2008

Hey....what about George Bush! Maybe a double impeachment party!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 08/07/2008
photo

I am really having a hard time conceptualizing this one:

So impeachment is still on the table in Pakistan, but not in the U.S., no matter what Administration officials do?

FYI to U.S. Congress: The impeachment process is part of the Constitution you swore to uphold as a required condition of holding your public office, and you don't get to pick and choose the parts of the Constitution you will and will not enforce based on political concerns.

How much clearer could it be?

Several members of the Bush Administration have knowingly committed crimes and impeachable offenses.

Either impeach them or resign yourself for willful neglect of duty.

You don't get to remain in an office of public trust under our Constitution if you will not honor and enforce the Constitution you swore to uphold, all of it, and political considerations are not an exceptable excuse for dereliction of duty.

This is not a trivial matter, and it is not a victimless crime: If high government officials are allowed to commitecrimes and other impeachable offenses without consequence or any public accountability, the new low in government corruption and abuse of power then becomes the new "normal" in the operations of our government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 08/07/2008

Why is that so hard to conceptualize? Surely you've seen Nightmare on Elm street or a zombie movie

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 PM on 08/07/2008

NURREDIN

They wont allow the people to vote for whom they chose , it wont happen because ALL people in the Arab and muslim world will vote for Anyone who is not a US puppet . Bush used to bash our ears with Democracy before but after People voted for Hamas , and more islamists won seats in Bahrain , Kuwait and Jordan parliaments , he has now changed his mind and does not mind the dictators .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 08/07/2008

Just remember what bush said before he was President....I don't mind dictators....as long as I'm a dictator myself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 08/07/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect