Sam Stein
RSS

The Anatomy Of The Edwards Affair

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

August 8, 2008 07:30 PM



Sometime in the winter of 2006, John Edwards, then not in public office, had a meeting at a hotel bar in midtown New York. Sitting in that same restaurant at the same time was Rielle Hunter, a former yoga instructor who had become actively involved in somewhat fringy spiritual escapades. The two did not meet then and there, though Hunter noticed Edwards from across the room. Rather, their initial interaction occurred outside the hotel, when Hunter approached the former Senator on the sidewalk and showered him with flattery.

And, as fate would have it, an affair was started. Edwards would see Hunter for at least a year. How much of that time they were romantically engaged remains a mystery. But from then until this Friday, the-Senator-turned-presidential candidate kept it a secret. Not from his family, which, he admitted, became aware of the issue the same year that it started; but from the public, the media, and by all indications his own campaign staff.

The secret has now officially come to an end. Edwards copped to the extramarital affair during an interview on ABC this Friday - the nadir of a political career that, at one point in time, seemed pointed towards the White House. By then, the peculiarities of his relationship with Hunter had been much discussed. While mainstream press attention was scant, the National Enquirer and a select number of online sites - most prominently Mickey Kaus at Slate - had been poring over the issue for months.

The Huffington Post had too. Back in September 2007, we reported that the videos, which Hunter had been paid to produce for Edwards' One America Committee, had gone mysteriously missing. Perhaps even more curious: no one seemed to claim ownership. Staffers for Edwards, who by then was in the throes of the primary, said they had no access to the film: four shorts on the Senator's efforts to promote the eradication of poverty. Meanwhile, the film company, Midline Groove Productions, said the videos were the product of the campaign. Not only that, they were for some reason prohibited from even discussing the content.

The videos, it turned out, told a bit more than it first seemed. On several occasions one could detect flirting between Hunter and Edwards, including blatant shots of his crotch and rear end. In one exchange the Senator admits to having gone shoe shopping with Hunter as he smiles at the camera (held by her).

Each several minutes in length, the political films were hardly traditional; perhaps because Hunter had zero history in the industry. In a follow up story, the Huffington Post unearthed Hunter's website - erased from the web shortly after Edwards launched his presidential campaign - in which it was revealed that she had never made films before. Moreover, she had no current Internet presence, a curious anonymity from someone who had just recently scored a great gig following around a prominent presidential candidate.

It turned out Hunter's documentaries were a sham. Months after she met the Senator at that midtown hotel, the two needed an excuse to continue being around each other. The suggestion was made -- by whom, it's not known -- to make documentaries of the Senator's work for the One America Committee. Hunter would get paid and Edwards would have an excuse for keeping her around. Six months and $114,000 later, the deed was done.

By the time the last check was written to Hunter, in early April 2007, Edwards' wife Elizabeth already knew. According to a source (completely unconfirmed) there was one evening in which she called up a staffer working on the films in an effort to get Hunter's phone number.

Story continues below
advertisement

John Edwards, meanwhile, launched his presidential campaign on January 3, 2007. His candidacy was based largely on the same tenets of the One America Committee: championing in the causes of the poor and the working class. But the Senator did not shy away from addressing his own story. And, in a March 27 interview with Katie Couric he clearly let it be known that one's personal life was fair game in a presidential run.

"I think every single candidate for president, Republican and Democratic have lives, personal lives, that indicate something about what kind of human being they are. And I think it is a fair evaluation for America to engage in, to look at, what kind of human beings each of us are, and what kind of president we'd make."

The quote came four days after Elizabeth Edwards announced that her cancer had returned and that it was treatable but not curable.

Sometime in May, Hunter was impregnated, though who the father is remains subject of debate. Edwards, in his interview with ABC News this Friday, said the child was not his and was willing to take a paternity test to prove it. And indeed, during the contemporary reporting of the story a loyalist to the Senator, Andrew Young, took responsibility.

But allegations of Young's involvement seemed dubious both when they first surfaced and now. Soon after the National Enquirer published its story on Hunter's pregnancy, rumors began spreading from North Carolina - where Young continued to live with his wife and three children - that Mrs. Young was non-too-pleased that her husband had to fall on the sword. Moreover, she was talking about her displeasure to her friends in the local hair salon.

Nothing ever came of that. But aspects of the Hunter-Edwards affair were, well before then, slowly leaking out in the media. On August 27, 2007, the New York Post's "Page Six" ran the following blind item: "WHICH political candidate enjoys visiting New York because he has a girlfriend who lives downtown? The pol tells her he'll marry her when his current wife is out of the picture."

A month later the Huffington Post reported its first story. And a week after that the National Enquirer first publicly asserted that something untoward had taken place. On October 11, 2007, with his bid for the Democratic nomination still very much a possibility, Edwards denied vociferously any involvement in an affair. In December, the National Enquirer followed up with a story about Hunter's pregnancy.

When the national media did not take the bait on the report (the Huffington Post pursued it but couldn't confirm) little was heard about the matter. Until this past week when stories surfaced that Edwards had rendezvoused with Hunter in a hotel in Beverly Hills. On Friday, he released the following statement:

"I made a serious error in judgment and conducted myself in a way that was disloyal to my family and to my core beliefs. I recognized my mistake and I told my wife that I had a liaison with another woman, and I asked for her forgiveness. Although I was honest in every painful detail with my family, I did not tell the public. When a supermarket tabloid told a version of the story, I used the fact that the story contained many falsities to deny it. But being 99% honest is no longer enough."

Sometime in the winter of 2006, John Edwards, then not in public office, had a meeting at a hotel bar in midtown New York. Sitting in that same restaurant at the same time was Rielle Hunter, a former ...
Sometime in the winter of 2006, John Edwards, then not in public office, had a meeting at a hotel bar in midtown New York. Sitting in that same restaurant at the same time was Rielle Hunter, a former ...
 
Comments
2531
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (40 pages total)

It is unbelievable that americans have used presidentials's private life for judging acts of a president. Do you remember Monica !
Even best Secret Agents could have a beautifull and wonderfull love affaire, ok EK ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 08/12/2008

JE's words: I think every single candidate for president, Republican and Democratic have lives, personal lives, that indicate something about what kind of human being they are...." This is why it matters.

*It's not the infidelity - it's the DISHONESTY*

Haven't we had enough of politicians pissing on our leg & swearing it's raining outside?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 08/11/2008

How much longer is this non-story going to dominate the news? I'd almost rather hear about Anna Nicole Smith again...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 08/11/2008
- Bub I'm a Fan of Bub permalink

A lot of people don't realize, that the National Enquirer is a cut above the other trash tabloids.

Almost every thing like this they report on turns out to be true. They actually have some journalistic standards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 08/10/2008

"Anatomy of the Affair" - Married man has affair with younger/ better looking woman this his wife.

I know this is just unbelievable an should be broken down, discussed, and punditized.

Forget about 2 wars & The economy- Let's talk about an also-ran's 2 year old affair.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 08/10/2008
- Ndw I'm a Fan of Ndw permalink
photo

Some guy thinks this woman was better looking than his wife. Maybe that guy's taste should be inspected, because in my view, she looks older and decidedly harder, and is, to be brutal, one homely woman.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 08/10/2008
photo

You'd think Edwards could have found a prettier woman to have an affair with.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 08/10/2008

A dog!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 08/11/2008

I think the affair may still be going on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 08/11/2008
photo

I do too. Why else would he show up at that hotel with her and the baby?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 08/11/2008

An amazing and simple little fact is becoming prettttty evident: Even when people have a whole bright future at stake (prez of the US for god's sake) and they full well know it and work to realize the dream of their lifetime or are already in the oval office, they (we) WILL still happily unzip and drool over the next piece of skin knowing that most likely it will sink our life dream and hurt our beloved.

Just stating a simple fact we all share, and none is immune to, to go bragging and judging others with...

Regards - Not guilty yet, but check again w/ me next year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 AM on 08/10/2008

Actually, the scenario you present is much rarer than you think.

Men and women cheating on their wives? A run of the mill event. Usually just about someone getting horny.

However, a man or woman putting at risk everything they have worked for, including the dreams of thousands of supporters, is not "just about sex." It's a self-destructive pathology.

Consider what JE knew heading into the affair. That his wife was his biggest supporter, a passionately involved political wife. That she had a high profile among voters who regarded her very favorably. That voters would look disfavorably on him cheating on her. And that, meanwhile, he had dedicated himself and his followers to a campaign of extraordinarily high idealism.

This affair wasn't about sex. It was about self-sabotage.

It only seems familiar because of Spitzer, Clinton and Hart. But in your own lives, how many people do you know who are so self-destructive?

I hardly know anyone like that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 08/10/2008

When the brain is behind the zipper, it forgets all the facts, all the promises. It has ever been thus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 08/11/2008

Just checking in to witness the spectacle... all these perfect human beings, gathering in one place to pass judgement on an imperfect human being who stumbled onto the target range.

Someone get a mop. There's hypocrisy all over the floor, and it's slippery. There could be injuries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 PM on 08/09/2008

But you're not passing "judgement" on them, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 AM on 08/10/2008

Touche'. However, they (media and a big bunch of gawkers) count in the hundreds (if not thousands & much more) biting in his flesh and judging the crap out of his personal family life & screwup, while StillAmused (and people like me) have barely - if at all - open their mouths and here you are stifling such voices. Fairness?????????? Hello!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 08/10/2008

See that? You slipped and fell.

Interesting moral equivalency, clown.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 08/10/2008

that's pretty funny......and too true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 08/11/2008

One thing is very very clear from all of this. Edwards was indeed using his charity org money to campaign for the presidency in 2006. Travelling to Iowa in July of 06 with his "film maker" in tow, talking about "the campaign" and about his candidacy and his image. Remember the denials?

I'm afraid that's one for the Times, Sam.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 PM on 08/09/2008
photo

What's so sad is that there's a child involved and no one seems to care how this will affect her life. America is hooked on the salacious details of the story. Really, if things keep going the way they are, there will be no one left to run the country.On the other hand, what's up with these political guys? Jeez!

Halli Casser-Jayne
http://www.thecjpoliticalreport.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 08/09/2008

Let me assure you, the child will be fine. This child will be a lot better off than many children in this God-forsaken world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 08/11/2008

These sexual political scandals are getting tedious and self-righteous media blather . We need to pass a law making it illegal for shapely, attractive women to make themselves sexually available to politicians with wealth, power, and influence, and mandate that only extremely homely, or overweight women are allowed to find those traits an aphrodisiac. That'll put a bigtime crimp in political infidelity, and deter the TMZ and MSM media from reporting the story due to the unpleasant visuals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 PM on 08/09/2008

How would that mandate help?! That would not have kept Monica Lewinsky from becoming an issue - the girl was more than a little overweight -- and talk about homely...what about Paula?? And as for Rielle Hunter -- she looks like a younger Camilla Parker Bowles who is hard a looker...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 08/09/2008

Oh come on, Monica was a beautiful young woman when she and Bill had their liaison. Slightly chubby later, to be sure, but still very pretty.

Camilla and Rielle - well, I'll have to agree there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 08/09/2008

I thought Edwards' interview with Bob Woodruff (who looks great!) was tacky and Clintonian. He blamed everybody but himself, especially the "paparazzi." The most embarrassing thing, however, was when he brought up McCain's affair to say "he did it too". How childish and classless is that?

I am so sick of politicians and sex scandals. It's their business. Just don't let me hear about it. The only reason this one needs to be investigated are the money irregularities.

Oh, well, I'm voting for Barack. I think he's okay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 PM on 08/09/2008
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV permalink

......let's hope.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 08/10/2008

How many people on this site have ever had an extramarital affair or affairs which required them to lie to their mate? That should be real easy to admit since nobody on the site is running for office. If I don't get any affirmative responses would I be remiss in thinking that Huffpo is either a suburb of heaven, or that some of you are lying?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 08/09/2008

I've had two affairs w/ married women before I turned thirty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 08/09/2008

You cad. Let me know when you run for office. I'm not voting for you, and there's nothing you can do, no matter how noble to change that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 08/09/2008

Well, I certainly wasn't one of them!

Of course, some people will have affairs, always will.....look at JFK, Eisenhower and FDR. Then the press took it for granted and participated in the coverups.

The problem is that nowadays, politicians KNOW that they are under scrutiny, and that their sexual indiscretions will be plastered all over the MSM. They KNOW and some still do it. What kind of respect does that show for the people who support them with votes and money?

McCain fooled around 30-plus years ago when the rules weren't as clear, but he still fooled around, AND he dumped the seriously injured and handicapped wife for the woman he fooled around with. Edwards, as far as we know, is still with his wife.

People who give McCaom support and money now do so with full knowledge of his extra-marital hanky-panky (except maybe the recent one that is still unclear), and by giving him support and money, they are saying that such things don't matter as much to them as whatever they see in McCain as a possible president.

Same as with the Hillary Clinton supporters who strenuously deny that they are racists, even after "hardworking Americans, white Americans" was said by her. Okay, but all this means is that HER racist behavior is not a strong enough issue FOR THEM to have dissuaded them from supporting her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 AM on 08/10/2008

So what - its no longer private when you make a run for the presidency , knowing full well the cost of being found out., not to only to your supporters and donors but to the country as a whole when the backlash hits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 08/09/2008

Maybe it's time for Americans to grow up when it comes to the absurd unrealistic pedestal we want to put politicians on. It's a job--an important job, but a job nevertheless. I don't care who they screw as long as they don't screw the country. Clinton screwed around, and left the country at peace, with 2 trillion in the bank. Bush and Cheney have supposedly been totally faithful, and we're in a military quagmire, with diminished civil liberties, and the financial system of the country near collapse. I could dig it if our straight-arrow presidents did a good job. FDR, Eisenhower, JFK, all messed around, and did very good jobs governing and leading the country Today we'd be saying they don't have the "character" to do the job. We laugh at the European attitudes to sex and affairs but I thiink they've got the priorities straight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 08/09/2008

this is rich i was corrected by the church ladies;redst8r;pollpingurl;serenity450 and, cheshrecat831. i love it .- yur all a bunch of moterfochingsohnsasabatchis- farenheit451.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 08/09/2008

Ben Smith: A key owner of the National Enquirer, which published a story this week alleging an affair by John Edwards, is a prominent New York investment banker who is one of Hillary Clinton's key backers. Roger Altman was an official in the first Clinton administration, mentioned as a potential Treasury Secretary

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 08/09/2008

Were either of them running a campaign based around fidelity to a cancer-stricken wife, while all the while hiding a mistress on the campaign payroll?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 08/09/2008

Was he also a key backer of Jesse Jackson? OJ Simpson? Bill Clinton? Et al and then some?

When you've got nothing to say other than "blame Hillary" it's really time to go home. JE did it, he admitted it, while still lying, so what are you looking for? JE was on the VP short list and maybe on the AG list as well. Why can't you leave HRC out of this for a change.....? Who's the baby daddy? Certainly, not Hil!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:02 PM on 08/09/2008
- Ndw I'm a Fan of Ndw permalink
photo

Sigh, as I said when you posted this same thing somewhere else, assuming Hillary has that much power (and given our current nominee, apparently she doesn't) - how did she manage to lure Edwards into this predicament in the first place, ie, to drop his pants for the haggard blond?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 08/09/2008
photo

Actually, this story works against Hillary, because it reminds everyone of Bill and Monica. In fact, if Hillary was on the short list for VP, you can be sure that she's at the bottom, now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 08/09/2008

I wondered if the Clintons were behind this mess. It's something they would be involved in. They are slimey.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 08/11/2008

ENOUGH... FAK FAK FAK

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 08/09/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (40 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect