Taliban Turns Lethal: 101 US Deaths In Afghanistan This Year

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JASON STRAZIUSO | August 24, 2008 10:44 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »


KABUL, Afghanistan — Taliban insurgents once derided as a ragtag rabble unable to match U.S. troops have transformed into a fighting force _ one advanced enough to mount massive conventional attacks and claim American lives at a record pace.

The U.S. military suffered its 101st death of the year in Afghanistan last week when Sgt. 1st Class David J. Todd Jr., a 36-year-old from Marrero, La., died of gunfire wounds while helping train Afghan police in the northwest. The total number of U.S. dead last year _ 111 _ was a record itself and is likely to be surpassed.

Top U.S. generals, European presidents and analysts say the blame lies to the east, in militant sanctuaries in neighboring Pakistan. As long as those areas remain havens where fighters arm, train, recruit and plot increasingly sophisticated ambushes, the Afghan war will continue to sour.

"The U.S. is now losing the war against the Taliban," Anthony Cordesman, of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, wrote in a report Thursday. A resurgent al-Qaida, which was harbored by the Taliban in the years before the Sept. 11 attacks, could soon follow, Cordesman warned.

Cordesman called for the U.S. to treat Pakistani territory as a combat zone if Pakistan does not act. "Pakistan may officially be an ally, but much of its conduct has effectively made it a major threat to U.S. strategic interests."

An influx of Chechen, Turkish, Uzbek and Arab fighters have helped increased the Taliban's military precision, including an ambush by 100 fighters last week that killed 10 French soldiers, and a rush on a U.S. outpost last month by 200 militants that killed nine Americans.

Multi-direction attacks, flawlessly executed ambushes and increasingly powerful roadside and suicide bombs mean the U.S. and 40-nation NATO-led force will in all likelihood suffer its deadliest year in Afghanistan since the 2001 invasion.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on a visit to Kabul last week, said he knows that something must "be raised with Pakistan's government, and I will continue to do so." French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who rushed to Afghanistan after the French attack, warned Thursday that "terrorism is winning."

Story continues below
advertisement

"Military sanctuaries are expanding in the (Pakistani) tribal areas," Gen. David McKiernan, the American four-star general in charge of the 50,000-strong NATO-led force here, told The Associated Press last week. McKiernan has called for another three brigades of U.S. forces _ roughly 10,000 troops _ to bolster the 33,000 strong U.S. force here.

Complicating relations between the Afghan government and the U.S., last week a joint Afghan-U.S. military operation in Herat province killed around 90 civilians, President Hamid Karzai's office says. The U.S. said it was investigating.

Some 188 international soldiers have died in Afghanistan this year, including the 101 Americans, according to an Associated Press count. This year's toll is easily on track to surpass the record 222 international troop deaths in 2007.

According to Defense Department statistics released Sunday, at least 508 members of the U.S. military have died in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan as a result of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in late 2001. Of those, the military reports 362 were killed by hostile action.

U.S. critics of the Afghan government are becoming increasingly vocal. Rep. Jim Marshall, a Georgia Democrat who is a member of the House Armed Services Committee, said last week that Karzai's government "is not nearly where it should be."

"I'm not willing to have a long-term U.S. commitment, a substantial U.S. commitment to Afghanistan without seeing substantial reform and improvement in the government," Marshall said on a visit to Kabul.

Karzai's influence barely extends outside the capital. The Interior Ministry is seen as uniformly corrupt, and opium poppy cultivation has soared in recent years.

McKiernan said that "there is a sense of real frustration with the government of President Karzai. People were expecting gains over time but they aren't feeling much."

Karzai admitted in an AP interview last week that Afghanistan still lacks a properly functioning government and that corruption is rampant. He said he will run for a second term next year in hopes of addressing those problems.

The president also blamed the rise in Afghan violence directly on Afghanistan's and NATO's neglect of the sanctuaries, training grounds and financial center of the Taliban _ a clear reference to Pakistan.

The U.S. is believed to have launched several missile strikes into Pakistan's tribal areas this year in an attempt to take out militant leaders. Missiles destroyed a suspected hide-out in South Waziristan, near the Afghan border, on Wednesday, killing at least five people.

Seth Jones, a RAND Corp. analyst who has studied Afghanistan for years, said Taliban militants have simply become better at war after seven years of practice against U.S. and NATO forces. Fighters, particularly militant commanders, are also using their sanctuary in Pakistan to devastating effect, he said.

"I think there's got to be a strike on the leadership structure, including Mullah Omar, Siraj Haqqani, and (Gulbuddin) Hekmatyar," who reside in Pakistan, said Jones. "As the insurgency has become more sophisticated, many of the senior leaders continue to exist, and they are one of the reasons the insurgency is getting better."

Marshall, the Democratic congressman, said Pakistan itself is feeling threatened by the increase in militancy on its soil and wants to see insurgent leaders taken out.

"You've seen the progression here," Marshall told AP. "Initially we wouldn't even fire back across the (Pakistan) border. We changed that. We're firing back. We're pursuing, and now acting on intelligence we are prepared to use discreet weaponry to take out high value targets" in Pakistan.

"They want the minimal American presence to help them do that," he said.

Rep. Chris Shays, a Republican member of the House Homeland Security committee, said it appears the United States is making some of the same mistakes in Afghanistan that it did in Iraq, such as underfunding the training of the Afghan army. He also called for an increase in the use of "soft power" like aid work and "some sort of effort in reconciliation."

"I don't pretend to know enough about how that would be involved," he said in a visit to Kabul last week, "but the bottom line is that as I look at this issue, I don't see how we can succeed on our present track."

___

Associated Press reporters Kathy Gannon and Rahim Faiez contributed to this report from Kabul.

KABUL, Afghanistan — Taliban insurgents once derided as a ragtag rabble unable to match U.S. troops have transformed into a fighting force _ one advanced enough to mount massive conventional att...
KABUL, Afghanistan — Taliban insurgents once derided as a ragtag rabble unable to match U.S. troops have transformed into a fighting force _ one advanced enough to mount massive conventional att...
 
Comments
96
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

History has proven that no one invades Iraq or Afghanistan successfully. The history of this truth goes back to the Crusades and beyond. Of course, given that the United States is now easily the most ignorant nation on Earth - we just had to give it a shot right? After all, we're better than everyone else right?

This is what happens when we elect a president because he seems to be somebody we'd like to 'have a beer with'. I heard someone say, "If you're in a bar right now, look around, do you see any presidents?" It's laughable isn't it. Yet - somehow - not so funny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 08/25/2008
photo

But... but... but... We won?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 08/25/2008
photo

The press is badly misinterpreting the relationship between Iraq and Afghanistan.

The idea that we've "won" anything in Iraq is absurd.

Militants are pulling out of Iraq and going to Afghanistan, not only because of the temporary success of our bribe-a-tribe, anti al Quaeda effort, but because they know that in reality we've lost the war there. Maliki has defied us and has gotten a withdrawal schedule. We're not getting a friendly, pro-Western ally, we're getting fortified bases in an essentially hostile nation. And he's beginning to crack down on the Sunnis, including our "allies" among them.

Iraq is becoming a close ally of Iran, joined by both religion and common interests, including suppression of restive Kurds and Sunnis. One possibility: Iraq, Turkey and Iran join forces to squash Kurdistan. Will we re-invade? Together, Iran and Iraq will control a hefty slice of the world's oil supply, our re-involvement will send oil prices soaring.

Iran should declare a national holiday to honor George W. Bush, who eliminated Saddam and made all this possible.

Meanwhile, our insane Mideast policy will continue to motivate large numbers of young, vigorous men to fight us, for decades, as long as it takes to expel "Crusaders" from Muslim lands. Right now, the main front has shifted to Afghanistan, where under-staffed American forces and their unenthusiastic NATO allies are being hit constantly. The militants' sophistication is evident in their recent attacks on Polish and French troops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 AM on 08/25/2008
photo

After exposing LBJ's lies, and Nixon's lies, I thought things would improve over my lifetime. They didn't. Things got worse. Our old folks can't afford to buy the meds they need, tens of thousands are unemployed, gasoline is so expensive that many workers have to choose between paying their mortgage or loosing their jobs, Obama's views are characterized as radical by the press, and the Republican administration claims we've succeeded.

Meanwhile, the Republican candidate says he'd rather loose an election than loose a war, the audience claps and cheers, and we continue to waste our blood and treasure in order to project our military might over the entire globe - while our society hangs on a cliff of economic ruin.

You are right, we will leave Iraq, and there will likely be a bloodbath when we do. It doesn't matter. We got to watch China put on a show of wealth and optimism like has never been seen before. Isn't it odd how they can do that without controlling the rest of the world?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 08/25/2008
photo

The Chinese government, its authoritarian nature aside, seems to be extraordinarily intelligent and well-run in its decisions and policies -- unlike our foolish "leaders."

It's an embarrassing to contrast their highly efficient response to disastrous earthquakes and our government's fumbling response to Katrina, for example. You can go down a long list of domestic and foreign policy decisions and see the same sad comparison.

You're right -- they don't have the illusion that they or anyone else can run the world. We're in for a long season of very panful lessons until we elect leaders who also understand that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 08/25/2008
photo

Now long will it be before troops now in Iraq will be diverted to Afghanistan?

Iraq withdrawal is all about freeing up troops to fight on a different front!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 AM on 08/25/2008
photo


This maladministration has committed treason in it's use of the GWOT to steal resources in

Iraq and ignoring the problems and all the terrorists that reside in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 08/25/2008

Bush suffers from attention-deficit disorder. He took his eye off Afghanistan to fight an unnecessary war in Iraq and now Afghanistan is heating up again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 08/24/2008

How long before the US under this kind of inept "leadership" gets handed its butt? Nice job George, and old 95% agreement John would like to give us more of the same. Thanks a bunch Republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 08/25/2008

Isn't that amazing?

A government made up of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people. A military full of well educated intelligent soldiers.

And the government of the United States can only do one thing at a time. Unbelievable.

Of course the republicans have been busy stealing everything that is not nailed down while our attention has been diverted.

But still.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 08/25/2008
photo

This is the fault of the Bush/Cheney/McCain administration. They all three in persuit of Black Gold, turned their back on the real war against Terror. In doing so they left a token force behind to try and deal with the Taliban and Al-Queida. While in Iraq the Taliban, and Al-Queida have been training in the mountains and now with an effective force have returned to mount an offensive against the US and NATO. Bush, Cheney and McCain a staunch supporter who loves war should go on trial for being just plain greedy, stupid and most of all the complete waste of lives both Military and civilian. Their actions will go down in history as being the worst administrations in US History. If it were up to me they would be run out of Washington on a rail, in fact both Bush and Cheney should loose their pensions and all benefits for they lack luster efforts and obvious greed for Oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 PM on 08/24/2008

We trained them for years to repel foreign invaders...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 08/24/2008

Thanks to Bush and the Neocons Afganistan is still hot!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 08/24/2008
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV permalink

Mission Accomplished because the heroin is flowing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 PM on 08/24/2008

But the oil isn't...........

They FAILED in the primary mission - conquering enough oil in Iraq and Iran to secure the US for the next 50 years.

only the peripheral black ops CIA funding drug operations are doing well........ remember Iran -CONTRA? Yeah.... and Noriega was ousted for supporting drug dealing....... bwahaaaaaaaa............

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 08/24/2008

To play in the Big Leagues you have to keep your eye on the ball. The ball has been in Afghanistan all along, but we keep looking in Iraq and are getting ready to look for it in Iran. By the time we figure out the ball really is in Afghanistan, we will have struck out.

Somewhere someone is laughing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 08/24/2008
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV permalink

Yep - thank Bush for that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 08/24/2008

The five stupidest words:

"Hey Ivan, let's invade Afghanistan!"

The only ones who ever made it work were Alexander the Great and Sir Charles Napier. Alex married into every tribal chief's family. Sir Charles was called "Satan's Nephew" by the Afghans and combined utter brutality on the field with generosity to those who surrendered.

We don't have either man in charge today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 08/24/2008
photo

More importantly, both Al and Charlie got the flock OUT of Afghanistan in a big hurry. It's trying to stick around that causes the trouble.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 08/24/2008
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV permalink

...we don't have a man in charge today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 08/24/2008

binLaden WANTED the US in Afghanistan - to do to the US what the jihadists did to the Russians.....

Only Bush gave binLaden MORE than he ever expected - we went into Iraq, removed a dictator who ruthlessly opposed Islamic extremists, destabilized that country and created millions of people who now hate the US..... thousands of very real ARMED opponents now trying to kill Americans who had welcomed us as liberators.....

Must be sad to be THAT stupid - to walk willingly into the trap set specifically for you.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 PM on 08/24/2008
photo

Oh, right. Let's go and invade the unstable nuclear-armed nation. It'll be a piece of cake! What could possibly go wrong?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 08/24/2008

no, let's just wait until the government is completely overthrown and the weapons are in the hands of taliban-sympathizing, irrational militants. why is it that people in my party are always trying to put their heads in the sand and ignore problems? like, if we just don't invade.... everything will be fine! iraq is a circus. never should have happened. i opposed it from the beginning. but pakistan is not iraq. pakistan is where the people who hit us on 9/11/01 are staying. common sense: go get them!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 08/24/2008
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV permalink

Bush's henchmen are in Pakistan?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 08/24/2008

Nothing is working correctly and nothing will work correctly in Afghanistan or Iraq as long as the US population and Government do not recognize that we are the invaders and occupiers of these countries and that we are the criminals in both of these wars. We need to leave both countries and pay reparation to reconstruct both countries and hang the war criminals who have directed and participated this fiasco!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 08/24/2008

The Taliban have many intrinsic advantages: Pashtun 'alignment.' The inherent appeal to MALES of harsh, orthodox Islam social ordering. A sea of external, attrition-willing, recruits (mentioned in the piece). A seeming LACK of corruption....

Karzai(sp?) doesn't seem to be able to muster much.....except occasional episodes of civilian casualties......

The U.S. has NEVER been much good at "guerilla warfare"--even from the days of the accession of the Phillipines. It's poss. that if the Taliban shift to more conventional modes of combat, the Western troops will actually fare better; they have superior firepower....?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 08/24/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect