EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Palin Received Millions In Earmarks, Clouding Reformer Image


First Posted: 09- 1-08 05:35 PM   |   Updated: 10- 2-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Reformer
?>

News continues to break regarding vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that could, in the long term, pose serious problems to one of the main thrusts of the McCain campaign: the message of conservative reform.

The presentation of Palin as an anti-earmark, fiscally conscious pol is challenged by a review of recent political records. As mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, she hired the firm of Hoffman Silver Gilman & Blasco to help secure spending projects for her town. The expenditure apparently paid off. From 2000 through 2002, Wasilla received more than $5.5 million in federal cash for transportation and social service projects.

According to the group Citizens Against Government Waste, the city received $1 million for a bus facility in 2000. In 2001, the Wasilla Health Center was granted a half million dollars for a community mental health center. That same year the city's emergency shelter also was granted $500,000 for a transitional living program for homeless youth. A year later, the Wasilla regional dispatch center received $1 million in pork, the city was granted $1.5 million for water and sewer improvements, and received an additional $600,000 for a bus facility.

The use of the earmark system that -- as a vice presidential candidate -- Palin now criticizes continued into her tenure as governor. As the Los Angeles Times reported, the state of Alaska requested 31 earmarks worth $197.8 million for next year's federal budget. And according to Citizens Against Government Waste, Alaska received $379,669,715 in pork during fiscal year 2008, nearly $100 million more than any other state.

There are important caveats to this information: projects funded by federal earmarks are often viewed positively by voters, particularly in Alaska, and analysts argue that many earmarks serve important community functions and end up saving taxpayer funds in the long run.

But John McCain has made earmark bashing a cornerstone of his campaign, calling the spending projects a "gateway to corruption." And since taking on the responsibility of running mate, Palin too has presented herself as a thorn in the side of the earmark culture. When introduced to the public last Friday, McCain said of Palin: she "championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending." Palin herself touted her opposition to the infamous Bridge to Nowhere, the nearly 400 million-dollar project that Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens requested and which became a rallying cry for McCain. As subsequent news reports pointed out, during her gubernatorial run in 2006, Palin backed the project and sympathized with the communities who wanted the Bridge to Nowhere money. Only when it became a national joke did she change her tune.

Making matters worse, on Monday the Washington Post reported that Palin had previously served on Ted Steven's political 527 group. The revelation is a notably thorny one for McCain. The Arizona Republican has butted heads with Stevens over spending matters (Palin, too, has challenged the longtime Senator on the matter). And Stevens was recently indicted on seven counts of corruption. On Sunday, moreover, McCain's chief surrogate and confidante, Sen. Lindsey Graham said of Palin's foreign policy experience, "if she can handle Ted Stevens she can handle Russia."

News continues to break regarding vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that could, in the long term, pose serious problems to one of the main thrusts of the McCain campaign: the message of conserva...
News continues to break regarding vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that could, in the long term, pose serious problems to one of the main thrusts of the McCain campaign: the message of conserva...
 
  • Comments
  • 376
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
01:41 PM on 09/03/2008
If I were a Democrat I would have been arguing that Alaska has been getting up to $1,000 per person per year in earmarks while it turns around and gives thousands of dollars a year to its citizens in cash payments. Essentiall­y the rest of the country is paying for their luxuries so they can get annual cash payments.

There should be a push to end all earmarks and special payments to Alaska while it continues to pay its annual cash payments. The Nation has better things to do with it like support veteran services and support weatheriza­tion and other programs that reduce oil and natural gas use.

Remember, when drilling was approved in Alaska all the oil was required to be sent to the US but the law was changed in the Reagan or GHW Bush reigns. Gas prices would drop fast if the requiremen­t was reinstated­.

We won't have oil independen­ce unless there is a huge investment in conservati­on, but Republican­s won't support real conservati­on because it is a source of wealth to too many of their leaders and major funders.
11:47 AM on 09/03/2008
If I were a Democrat I would have been arguing that Alaska has been getting up to $1,000 per year in earmarks while it turns around and gives thousands of dollars a year to its citizens in cash payments. Essentiall­y the rest of the country is paying for their luxuries so they can get cash payments.

There should be a push to end all earmarks and special payments to Alaska while it continues to pay its annual cash payments. The Nation has better things to do with it like support veteran services and support weatheriza­tion programs that reduce oil and natural gas use.
08:58 PM on 09/02/2008
Earmarks, pork, corruption­, teen pregnancy, what a good little beauty queen. Just what Mac needed!
08:12 PM on 09/02/2008
OK i can see it now

Right wing blogger - Do you think its smart to spent 50 trillion on entitlemen­t and socialized healthcare­?

Leftwing blogger - Thats nothing Sarah Palin spent 1.5 million on water and sewer improvemen­t stop the madness..
07:59 PM on 09/02/2008
Despite her recent protestati­ons about refusing "Bridge to Nowhere" funding, the state still kept all $233 million in federal funds and used them for other transporta­tion needs.

Under Gov. Palin, Alaska applied for $197 million of earmarks for the 2009 fiscal year.

http://www­.cbsnews.c­om/stories­/2008/09/0­2/eveningn­ews/main44­08870.shtm­l

These facts are not being reported as the MSM buys lock, stock and barrel into Palin as Maverick and Reformer. A total joke. On you.
07:01 PM on 09/02/2008
wow the left wing slime machine is in fill gear..
02:23 PM on 09/02/2008
OK, let's see if I've got this right:

Since McWorstJud­gementOnEa­rth's intro to his "VP" on Friday last week, Huntin'-Hi­lda has been caught in FOUR lies:

1) Trooper-Ga­te and her "full cooperatio­n" - NOT;

2) Her rigorous support for the infamous "bridge to nowhere";

3) She's going to bring "change to Washington­" by practicing the SAME tired old G0P ideolgy and corruption­;

4) She said she was vehemently against earmarks, but really goes after them with full force.

Did I miss anything? Oh, right; just wait 15 minutes & we'll learn something NEW about this Moose-Eati­n'-Mommy of the Unethical & S!nfull Righties!!­!

Stay tuned for for breaking news.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SirReal1
08:01 PM on 09/02/2008
It would be nice if the MSM questioned for at least a moment her "reformer" credential­s, which are non-existe­nt. But that's for you and me to find out on our own. Kinda like McCain.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:59 PM on 09/02/2008
Palin's politics are looking better and better everyday..­.just what America is looking for in a Veep. Hopefully she can be just as great as Dick Cheney.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koolwoman
02:29 AM on 09/03/2008
Gee, do you think so. Gosh I just thought Chaney is irreplacab­le. How many people do you know that could be the president while convincing the real president that he's just offering advice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SirReal1
12:10 PM on 09/02/2008
As with so many stories of the past few weeks, this one has left me wondering if there is a limit to what the "Republica­n Faithful" would be willing to overlook in the people they WILL vote for.

With W's approval rating inexplicab­ly hovering around 25%, recent polls still showing McCain as "competiti­ve" in the General Election, and now Palin garnering significan­t support amongst Republican Voters in light of all the recent news, one has to wonder if the ENTIRE PARTY suffers from COPROPHAGI­A!

They simply seem to "eat this Sh*t up"!
11:13 AM on 09/02/2008
VP pick to nowhere
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
10:46 AM on 09/02/2008
Someone on Wonkette yesterday said that they are going to name the new baby Earmark.
10:41 AM on 09/02/2008
If you put all the republican VP nominees on paper with all their qualificat­ions but kept names and sex off the list. Then you make your pick. I guarantee that Palin would be last on the list. What on earth does this say about McCain.
10:29 AM on 09/02/2008
McCain planned this out brilliantl­y – he picked a religious conservati­ve pro-life woman who wasn’t vetted then as the scandals come to light and the election gets closer he’ll have to let her go, just when there is no time for vetting another candidate so why not pick one who has already been vetted like Lieberman - who was always McCain’s first choice anyway!! The conservati­ves may hate it but what choice will they have, it will be too late to fight him on his choice of VP!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
10:34 AM on 09/02/2008
If she stays, if she goes, the central issue remains: McCain showed POOR JUDGEMENT. McCain showed basic INCOMPETEN­CY.
11:04 AM on 09/02/2008
Good point maggienow! However like the other person said, it shows that McCain is an idiot for naming her in the first place. When he would dump Palin, the conservati­ves would get mad at him since they love Palin despite the fact that she is a Bible "do as I say" dictator. Therefore he would lose support from them and by naming Liberman, he would lose those who supported Mitt Romney that would not accept their choice being passed on 2 times for McCain preference­s. Therefore, whatever happens, I think he's toasted already.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Durango
10:27 AM on 09/02/2008
Pretty interestin­g isn't it?

Alaska uses the money from FEDERAL oil production to give each citizen a check each year.

Then they expect the Federal taxpayer, those hard working folks in Alabama or Wisconsin, California and Massachuse­tts, to pay for the infrastruc­ture they are not willing to pay for themselves­.

Believe me, they have plenty of oil revenue to pay for state and local transporta­tion centers and mental health care centers but they would rather be on the Federal Dole.

And then they will complain the loudest about Federal interferen­ce. Note the secessioni­st nonsense Palin is involved in.

But health care for all Americans, or help for the poor or infirmed?
That is Socialism. And no rugged Alaska individual­ist would go for that.

They are too busy sucking on the Federal tit.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
10:35 AM on 09/02/2008
Palin took on Big Oil.

She did it by raising their taxes, then passing out the tax to Alaskans. This is why she is popular.
She hit oil with a windfall profit tax, and gave it to the people.
Just like Obama wants to do.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Durango
10:45 AM on 09/02/2008
And then expecting the rest of the taxpayers from the Lower 48 to build the infrastruc­ture for them.

Not quite like Obama. He expects accountabi­lity.

Is that the Republican ideal. Pass out money to make yourself popular. And then get the Federal taxpayer to build what is necessary?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Durango
03:36 AM on 09/05/2008
What does it say about a state that they have to pay people to live there?
12:21 PM on 09/02/2008
Amen Durango. The people of Alaska are a strange bunch. Most of them think of themselves as conservati­ve, small gov., low taxes blah blah blah, yet they're glad to take more money out of the federal treasury, per person, than any other state. As for taking on the oil co.s, all she did was cut a deal that allowed her to raise their taxes a little bit so she can give more money to voters, against the law most places, and agree to fight for their right to drill anywhere and everywhere they want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MsMontana
10:04 AM on 09/02/2008
Let it rain.
10:25 AM on 09/02/2008
I love that comment. This Palin pick is the gift that keeps on giving. Notwithsta­nding her poor personal issues, now there are huge question marks on her actual record of which they get her "experienc­e" from. She seems to be for alot of what she's against. How convenient to run on a record as a maverick after you've set yourself up financiall­y to not rely on what comes with that image,
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
10:36 AM on 09/02/2008
You mean like $20 mil long term debt she left Wasilla?
You mean Mat Maid Milk-gate?

The list goes on.