Palin Received Millions In Earmarks, Clouding Reformer Image

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Palin Received Millions In Earmarks, Clouding Reformer Image stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 09- 1-08 05:35 PM   |   Updated: 10- 2-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Reformer

News continues to break regarding vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that could, in the long term, pose serious problems to one of the main thrusts of the McCain campaign: the message of conservative reform.

The presentation of Palin as an anti-earmark, fiscally conscious pol is challenged by a review of recent political records. As mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, she hired the firm of Hoffman Silver Gilman & Blasco to help secure spending projects for her town. The expenditure apparently paid off. From 2000 through 2002, Wasilla received more than $5.5 million in federal cash for transportation and social service projects.

According to the group Citizens Against Government Waste, the city received $1 million for a bus facility in 2000. In 2001, the Wasilla Health Center was granted a half million dollars for a community mental health center. That same year the city's emergency shelter also was granted $500,000 for a transitional living program for homeless youth. A year later, the Wasilla regional dispatch center received $1 million in pork, the city was granted $1.5 million for water and sewer improvements, and received an additional $600,000 for a bus facility.

The use of the earmark system that -- as a vice presidential candidate -- Palin now criticizes continued into her tenure as governor. As the Los Angeles Times reported, the state of Alaska requested 31 earmarks worth $197.8 million for next year's federal budget. And according to Citizens Against Government Waste, Alaska received $379,669,715 in pork during fiscal year 2008, nearly $100 million more than any other state.

There are important caveats to this information: projects funded by federal earmarks are often viewed positively by voters, particularly in Alaska, and analysts argue that many earmarks serve important community functions and end up saving taxpayer funds in the long run.

But John McCain has made earmark bashing a cornerstone of his campaign, calling the spending projects a "gateway to corruption." And since taking on the responsibility of running mate, Palin too has presented herself as a thorn in the side of the earmark culture. When introduced to the public last Friday, McCain said of Palin: she "championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending." Palin herself touted her opposition to the infamous Bridge to Nowhere, the nearly 400 million-dollar project that Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens requested and which became a rallying cry for McCain. As subsequent news reports pointed out, during her gubernatorial run in 2006, Palin backed the project and sympathized with the communities who wanted the Bridge to Nowhere money. Only when it became a national joke did she change her tune.

Making matters worse, on Monday the Washington Post reported that Palin had previously served on Ted Steven's political 527 group. The revelation is a notably thorny one for McCain. The Arizona Republican has butted heads with Stevens over spending matters (Palin, too, has challenged the longtime Senator on the matter). And Stevens was recently indicted on seven counts of corruption. On Sunday, moreover, McCain's chief surrogate and confidante, Sen. Lindsey Graham said of Palin's foreign policy experience, "if she can handle Ted Stevens she can handle Russia."

News continues to break regarding vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that could, in the long term, pose serious problems to one of the main thrusts of the McCain campaign: the message of conserva...
News continues to break regarding vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that could, in the long term, pose serious problems to one of the main thrusts of the McCain campaign: the message of conserva...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
376
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)

If I were a Democrat I would have been arguing that Alaska has been getting up to $1,000 per person per year in earmarks while it turns around and gives thousands of dollars a year to its citizens in cash payments. Essentially the rest of the country is paying for their luxuries so they can get annual cash payments.

There should be a push to end all earmarks and special payments to Alaska while it continues to pay its annual cash payments. The Nation has better things to do with it like support veteran services and support weatherization and other programs that reduce oil and natural gas use.

Remember, when drilling was approved in Alaska all the oil was required to be sent to the US but the law was changed in the Reagan or GHW Bush reigns. Gas prices would drop fast if the requirement was reinstated.

We won't have oil independence unless there is a huge investment in conservation, but Republicans won't support real conservation because it is a source of wealth to too many of their leaders and major funders.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 09/03/2008

If I were a Democrat I would have been arguing that Alaska has been getting up to $1,000 per year in earmarks while it turns around and gives thousands of dollars a year to its citizens in cash payments. Essentially the rest of the country is paying for their luxuries so they can get cash payments.

There should be a push to end all earmarks and special payments to Alaska while it continues to pay its annual cash payments. The Nation has better things to do with it like support veteran services and support weatherization programs that reduce oil and natural gas use.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 09/03/2008

Earmarks, pork, corruption, teen pregnancy, what a good little beauty queen. Just what Mac needed!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 PM on 09/02/2008
- Phineus I'm a Fan of Phineus 2 fans permalink

OK i can see it now

Right wing blogger - Do you think its smart to spent 50 trillion on entitlement and socialized healthcare?

Leftwing blogger - Thats nothing Sarah Palin spent 1.5 million on water and sewer improvement stop the madness..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 09/02/2008
- meta I'm a Fan of meta 3 fans permalink

Despite her recent protestations about refusing "Bridge to Nowhere" funding, the state still kept all $233 million in federal funds and used them for other transportation needs.

Under Gov. Palin, Alaska applied for $197 million of earmarks for the 2009 fiscal year.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/02/eveningnews/main4408870.shtml

These facts are not being reported as the MSM buys lock, stock and barrel into Palin as Maverick and Reformer. A total joke. On you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 09/02/2008
- Phineus I'm a Fan of Phineus 2 fans permalink

wow the left wing slime machine is in fill gear..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 09/02/2008
- OhioJan I'm a Fan of OhioJan 6 fans permalink
photo

OK, let's see if I've got this right:

Since McWorstJud­gementOnEa­rth's intro to his "VP" on Friday last week, Huntin'-Hilda has been caught in FOUR lies:

1) Trooper-Gate and her "full cooperation" - NOT;

2) Her rigorous support for the infamous "bridge to nowhere";

3) She's going to bring "change to Washington" by practicing the SAME tired old G0P ideolgy and corruption;

4) She said she was vehemently against earmarks, but really goes after them with full force.

Did I miss anything? Oh, right; just wait 15 minutes & we'll learn something NEW about this Moose-Eatin'-Mommy of the Unethical & S!nfull Righties!!!

Stay tuned for for breaking news.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 09/02/2008
- SirReal1 I'm a Fan of SirReal1 63 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 09/02/2008
- meta I'm a Fan of meta 3 fans permalink

It would be nice if the MSM questioned for at least a moment her "reformer" credentials, which are non-existent. But that's for you and me to find out on our own. Kinda like McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 09/02/2008
- SFkid I'm a Fan of SFkid 3 fans permalink

Palin's politics are looking better and better everyday...just what America is looking for in a Veep. Hopefully she can be just as great as Dick Cheney.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 09/02/2008
- koolwoman I'm a Fan of koolwoman 4 fans permalink

Gee, do you think so. Gosh I just thought Chaney is irreplacable. How many people do you know that could be the president while convincing the real president that he's just offering advice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 AM on 09/03/2008
- SirReal1 I'm a Fan of SirReal1 63 fans permalink

As with so many stories of the past few weeks, this one has left me wondering if there is a limit to what the "Republican Faithful" would be willing to overlook in the people they WILL vote for.

With W's approval rating inexplicably hovering around 25%, recent polls still showing McCain as "competitive" in the General Election, and now Palin garnering significant support amongst Republican Voters in light of all the recent news, one has to wonder if the ENTIRE PARTY suffers from COPROPHAGIA!

They simply seem to "eat this Sh*t up"!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 09/02/2008

VP pick to nowhere

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 09/02/2008
- naschkatze I'm a Fan of naschkatze 83 fans permalink

Someone on Wonkette yesterday said that they are going to name the new baby Earmark.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 09/02/2008

If you put all the republican VP nominees on paper with all their qualifications but kept names and sex off the list. Then you make your pick. I guarantee that Palin would be last on the list. What on earth does this say about McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 AM on 09/02/2008
- maggienow I'm a Fan of maggienow 2 fans permalink

McCain planned this out brilliantly – he picked a religious conservative pro-life woman who wasn’t vetted then as the scandals come to light and the election gets closer he’ll have to let her go, just when there is no time for vetting another candidate so why not pick one who has already been vetted like Lieberman - who was always McCain’s first choice anyway!! The conservatives may hate it but what choice will they have, it will be too late to fight him on his choice of VP!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 09/02/2008
photo

If she stays, if she goes, the central issue remains: McCain showed POOR JUDGEMENT. McCain showed basic INCOMPETENCY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 09/02/2008

Good point maggienow! However like the other person said, it shows that McCain is an idiot for naming her in the first place. When he would dump Palin, the conservatives would get mad at him since they love Palin despite the fact that she is a Bible "do as I say" dictator. Therefore he would lose support from them and by naming Liberman, he would lose those who supported Mitt Romney that would not accept their choice being passed on 2 times for McCain preferences. Therefore, whatever happens, I think he's toasted already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 09/02/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 127 fans permalink

Pretty interesting isn't it?

Alaska uses the money from FEDERAL oil production to give each citizen a check each year.

Then they expect the Federal taxpayer, those hard working folks in Alabama or Wisconsin, California and Massachusetts, to pay for the infrastructure they are not willing to pay for themselves.

Believe me, they have plenty of oil revenue to pay for state and local transportation centers and mental health care centers but they would rather be on the Federal Dole.

And then they will complain the loudest about Federal interference. Note the secessionist nonsense Palin is involved in.

But health care for all Americans, or help for the poor or infirmed?
That is Socialism. And no rugged Alaska individualist would go for that.

They are too busy sucking on the Federal tit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 09/02/2008
photo

Palin took on Big Oil.

She did it by raising their taxes, then passing out the tax to Alaskans. This is why she is popular.
She hit oil with a windfall profit tax, and gave it to the people.
Just like Obama wants to do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 09/02/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 127 fans permalink

And then expecting the rest of the taxpayers from the Lower 48 to build the infrastructure for them.

Not quite like Obama. He expects accountability.

Is that the Republican ideal. Pass out money to make yourself popular. And then get the Federal taxpayer to build what is necessary?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 09/02/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 127 fans permalink

What does it say about a state that they have to pay people to live there?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 AM on 09/05/2008

Amen Durango. The people of Alaska are a strange bunch. Most of them think of themselves as conservative, small gov., low taxes blah blah blah, yet they're glad to take more money out of the federal treasury, per person, than any other state. As for taking on the oil co.s, all she did was cut a deal that allowed her to raise their taxes a little bit so she can give more money to voters, against the law most places, and agree to fight for their right to drill anywhere and everywhere they want.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 09/02/2008

As a liberal Alaskan who would definitely not vote for McCain or Palin, I'd like to point out that there is plenty to criticize in Palin's policies and experience level without bashing an entire state

The check Alaskans get every year (the "Permanent Fund") comes from State-Owned Land. Oil from Prudhoe Bay is taxed, some goes in the fund, and profits are distributed to every Alaskan every year. It's a former governor's take on the constitution's stipulation that Alaska's resources "belong to all Alaskans", and that oil money won't last forever. Given that the alternative is that the money would have ended up in the hands of our corrupt politicians...

The pork is something else. Alaska's senators (Ted Stevens being the lifelong champion) have set is as their unabashed mission to get as much federal money as they possibly can. This is why "Uncle Ted" always gets reelected, and why the airport is named for him. This is deplorable, and I do hope we can finally kick Stevens and Young out this go round.

Neither has much to do with Palin - aside from this year's "energy rebate" she pushed for. Which is basically an extra tax on the oil companies, distributed to all Alaskans.

Feel free to criticize our governor on her own merits (or lack thereof). She can be freely criticized for what she's had a hand in, but Alaska's long tradition of pork barrel politics can hardly be placed on the shoulders of our very new governor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 09/02/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 127 fans permalink

It's not just Alaska. The whole Republican shtick in the West is the same.

Believe me I know. I have been fighting these SOB's for the better part of my adult life here in Colorado and New Mexico.

The more "conservative" they are. The more they feel entitled to federal handouts.

It is just that Alaska seems to be the winner in all categories when it comes to pork.

And that oil money could/should have been spent for infrastructure, health care, social services. Just like it is done, to one degree or another, in all of the other 49 states.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 09/04/2008
- MsMontana I'm a Fan of MsMontana 7 fans permalink

Let it rain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 09/02/2008
- Speakchic I'm a Fan of Speakchic 4 fans permalink

I love that comment. This Palin pick is the gift that keeps on giving. Notwithstanding her poor personal issues, now there are huge question marks on her actual record of which they get her "experience" from. She seems to be for alot of what she's against. How convenient to run on a record as a maverick after you've set yourself up financially to not rely on what comes with that image,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 09/02/2008
photo

You mean like $20 mil long term debt she left Wasilla?
You mean Mat Maid Milk-gate?

The list goes on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 09/02/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect