Seth Colter Walls
RSS

McCain Camp Responds To False Palin 'Banned-Books' List

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

September 9, 2008 12:29 AM



In a page right out of the Obama playbook, John McCain's campaign is responding directly and forcefully to a smear email campaign currently making the rounds. Betting against the conventional wisdom -- which, until this cycle, held that scurrilous rumors were not worth drawing attention to via a rebuttal -- the Republican nominee is disputing the charge that Sarah Palin supposedly banned a list of books when she was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska.

Introducing the comprehensive memo to reporters in an email that recalls the Obama camp's "Fight the Smears" missives, McCain spokesman Brian Rogers decried "the latest false smear spreading from liberal blogs to the mainstream press - that Governor Palin banned books as Mayor of Wasilla. This is categorically false. The fact is that as Mayor, Palin never asked anyone to ban a book and not one book was ever banned, period."

That is true, though not a comprehensive account of the matter. The librarian in question has admitted that she only ever heard from Palin in the abstract on the issue of whether books could be pulled from library stacks. After the librarian responded that she would oppose such a move, no further discussions were held with Palin. Certainly, there was no official list drawn up. However, in a fact the McCain email leaves out, Palin approached the librarian three times to ask about the possibility, which could legitimately appear to some as something of a pressure campaign (especially considering that Palin attempted to have the librarian removed afterward).

Still, the list of books supposedly banned under Palin's tenure is transparently fake. What's interesting, however, is the fact that the McCain campaign responded to this issue with the same force Obama has used to combat rumors about his religion or alleged support for "infanticide." Was there a sense in McCain's universe that the banned books trope was potentially similar in terms of its crippling ability?

Democratic pollster Mark Mellman noted that it's not terribly surprising that McCain would choose to fight this smear, since "book-banners have had a bad reputation in America for a long time," adding that he's never done polling on it because "it's pretty extreme." Still, Mellman can see why the McCain-Palin ticket would have additional cause to fight against this particular lie, since other legitimate knocks against Palin could combine to paint an anti-education picture in the minds of some swing voters. Palin has, for example, declared herself open to teaching creationism alongside evolution in public schools. "That's already a problem for them," Mellman said, "since creationism is a real issue. Americans are very religious, but they also believe science ought to be taught in public schools. This issue [of banned books] seems to be in a different category in addition to being false, but it's related."

But Republican strategist Alex Castellanos took a different view, suggesting that continued media scrutiny on even the legitimate facts of the Wasilla library episode could move moderate voters in Palin's direction. "I think if the media keeps attacking Palin for things like this, her favorable ratings will climb to over 80 percent like they did in Alaska," Castellanos told the Huffington Post. "A mom being concerned about what kind of books our kids read and asking rhetorical questions about what can legally be done to protect them? What's wrong with that? ... This kind of foolishness is making her a hero to more than the evangelical right. It will make her a hero to working class women."

Regardless of how the issue (and its attendant coverage) shakes out with hard-to-predict swing voters, it's clear that the McCain campaign isn't taking any chances with the false charge of banning a particular list of books. (The fake list can be viewed here.) One other aspect of the GOP's response is worth noting, as well. It took the McCain campaign the whole weekend to issue a response to the emerging smear after its first appearance late last week -- a lifetime in rapid response years. Beyond the question of the fake banned book list, the question of Palin's role in the Wasilla library scene was first raised by Wasilla resident Anne Kilkenny in an August 31 email that has been widely distributed online. One explanation for the McCain camp's comparatively laggard pace of response is hinted at in their own research. Several articles cited by the McCain campaign in today's rebuttal email come from Wasilla's local newspaper, the Frontiersman. As the Huffington Post reported last week, GOP operatives lagged behind Democrats in requesting the paper's full archives for research.

In a page right out of the Obama playbook, John McCain's campaign is responding directly and forcefully to a smear email campaign currently making the rounds. Betting against the conventional wisdom -...
In a page right out of the Obama playbook, John McCain's campaign is responding directly and forcefully to a smear email campaign currently making the rounds. Betting against the conventional wisdom -...
 
Comments
545
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
photo

This link covers Palin's library issue very well.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=5768427

Clearly she tried to intimidate the librarian regarding censoring books and then fired her. The Librarian is still traumatized by Palin after many years and says it makes her ill to talk about it.

It is hard to imagine a "1984" scenario in the US but Palin as President may begin that era.

A concerned citizen of a free USA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 09/10/2008

Not hard to imagine since Bush has been in office...perhaps Bush is prologue to an even more virulent morality police however.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 09/10/2008

that's ok.........bring judgment back to society not a bad idea

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 09/12/2008

Palin is a book burning, right wing fanatical, facist Theocrat. And I could go on if you can believe it...this woman is an utter whacko.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 09/10/2008
photo

It is no secret that the Christian Right wants to ban books from libraries and I have seen that list before, so I guess it could be considered a "hypothetical list". She asked a thinly veiled "hypothetical" question, testing the water, seeing if the librarian would cave under her fascist pseudo-christian attempt to censor a publically funded library. Spin however you want, she asked a question that should NEVER be asked. I would not be opposed to an adult section of the library where adult themed books are kept, but Harry Potter and other material they find objectionable because of religious dogma is their problem, not mine, and an attempt to keep these books from people who do not share their views is pure fascism.

They are trying like hell to hide who she is and what she represents because it is so ugly. To quote them "Country First", and this country does not censor libraries!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 09/10/2008
photo

How often have we heard the right-wing pundits refuse to answer questions that they deem
"hypothetical?" It appears that it's O.K. for them to ask hypotheticals, but don't you dare do it.

I only wish the Librarian had had the presence of mind to respond, " Sarah, since you asked
hypothetically, I'll answer you with a hypothetical, NO!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 09/13/2008

Castellanos is an utter dirtbag. He is a lying sack of you know what, and his claim that middle America will jump to Palin after understanding she tried to get books banned is just batshit.

Call him on this bluff. He's the lowest form of human.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 AM on 09/10/2008

I just read that Sarah Palin burned books in her backyard about contraceptives. Oops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 AM on 09/10/2008

I don't care if it has been refuted... as long as millions believe she is a book banner...then she is. Afterall... she was for the bridge before she stole the money for other projects, then she says she was never for the bridge to nowhere...she lies...as the bible says...you will know them by their acts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 09/10/2008

well i'm not religious so that means nothing

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 AM on 09/10/2008

Oh yes you are...you are religiously republican which equals brainwashed. C'mon just admit it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 09/10/2008
photo

Jeez! With that bent back hand salute she reminds me of Hitler!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 09/09/2008

What I have read from the Alaska sources is that she asked that the books be removed from the shelves. NOW, thats a matter of semantics. They claim that is not actually 'banning' them, but it's darn near the same thing! The librarian refused to remove the books and so she was fired. She ended up getting her job back. The facts are there for anyone wanting to do the research.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 09/09/2008

Facts, facts? What the hell do facts have to do with anything in this surrealistic, kafkaesque electoral circus?

" To treat your facts with imagination is one thing, but to imagine your facts is another. "

John Burroughs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 09/09/2008

what are the book names?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 09/10/2008

I have a book name she banned: "How to keep your daughter pure as the virgin Snow"
By Mydotta issa wit child.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 09/10/2008
photo

Oh, I see! A "semantics" problem! "removing" is not the same as "banning", just like waterboarding isn't torture and eavesdropping isn't spying. Got it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 09/10/2008
photo

Under SP - RapeVictims had to pay for their own forensic exam
http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2000/05/23/news.txt

"While the Alaska State Troopers and most municipal police agencies have covered the cost of exams, which cost between $300 to $1,200 apiece, the Wasilla police department does charge the victims of sexual assault for the tests."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 09/09/2008

I don't know what was more shocking - the fact that the victims had to pay or the sheer volume of sex assault victims in that tiny town per year at that time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 09/09/2008
photo

Whooo, Whooo?

Whooo ..... published this story? And WHyyyyyyy?

Sorry, that's my best spotted owl impression. :-} HOWEVER the question I think is a good one. Is the source of this a well meaning Progressive, trying in error to get out information they believe, or....

.....did KARL have something to do with it????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 09/09/2008

all book banning is not bad. my community got the book "why johnny has two dads" removed from the library in the elementary school....I don't have any problem with that....it was directed towards 2nd to 3rd grade reading

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 09/09/2008

What community do you live in so I can make sure I don't go to Deliverence. When do you think 7and 8 year old children need to learn tolerance, understanding, and diversity? Do you let them read the bible which talks about fathers killing their sons, stoning whores, and incest among other nice things?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 09/09/2008

"When do you think 7and 8 year old children need to learn tolerance" i don't think they need to at all at that age............what does the bible have to do with anything in my posts

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 09/09/2008

But it was all in the abstract, you see. It was just a rhetorical sort of "what if" kind of question. You know sort of like the rhetorical lie about the bridge to nowhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 09/09/2008

I heard an interview on the radio with the Librarian, and she said that there was a list which was forwarded to her along with Gov. Palin's query as to whether she would agree to have those books banned. The Librarian said no, as those books were considered by a national library group or association to be acceptable reading material. The next thing she knew, the Librarian received a "Notice of Intent to Terminate" her position from Gov. Palin. Later, the governor said the "Notice of Intent" was "rhetorical," whatever that means!
Alex Castellanos' response to this is ridiculous. Yes, maybe most mothers care what material their children read, and that's fine. But she was the governor making a decision for the whole state - not her 4 or 5 children.
I think as more comes out about Gov. Palin, more will be brought to light about her extreme views.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 09/09/2008

The incident in question happened while Palin was Mayor of Wallisa, not Governor of Alaska. I find the idea that any American would explore the use of censorship as public policy offensive, but addressing it with the use of absolute lies is equally offensive! If you haven't the time to collect any knowledge, please don't waste the time of others with this drivel!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 09/09/2008

the governor also must fire local garbage men...but only as needed......wow

was Wallisa's street workers fired by the governor too.......how does she have the time?.......it must be good time management another good VP quality

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 09/09/2008

I'm impressed that Palin wanted to ban the Harry Potter books before they were written? Impressive insights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 09/09/2008

she was exercising forethought.....and these liberals say she has bad judgment......if she can know she wants to ban a book before it is even written......I am very impressed.......what else will she be able to use her powers on.....just imagine

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 09/09/2008
photo

Obviously u are not aware of the facts concerning the pre-emptive censorship.

There was no list of books to be banned.
3 enquiries to Emmons the librarian asking how she felt about some books being banned.
Emmon's flatly refused any form of censorship, 3 times.
Emmon's receives a letter of termination (resignation), same intent.
Palin offers an inane excuse of loyalty difference.
Local uproar ensues.
Emmon's reinstated.
Palin almost recalled as Mayor.
Palin pushed to hire an Administrator to run her small town.

Palin's municiple experience appears to be less than capable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 09/11/2008

When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross. " Sinclair Lewis

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 09/09/2008
photo

And apparently, wearing high heels.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 09/09/2008

AND lipstick!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 09/09/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect