Pentagon: Afghanistan Military Strategy Unsuccessful

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LOLITA C. BALDOR | September 10, 2008 12:41 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Defense Secretary Robert Gates testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2008, before the House Armed Services Committee hearing on the security and stability in Afghanistan and Iraq. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — Improved security in Iraq will give the U.S. military flexibility to do more in Afghanistan in coming months, Defense Secretary Robert Gates told Congress Wednesday, after years of setting a lower priority for the Afghan fight.

But even as Gates hinted at possible further troop cuts in Iraq, he said a go-slow approach is justified by several worrisome circumstances, including slow progress on the political front.

"I worry that the great progress our troops and the Iraqis have made has the potential to override a measure of caution born of uncertainty," Gates told the House Armed Services Committee. "Our military commanders do not yet believe our gains are necessarily enduring _ and they believe that there are still many challenges and the potential for reversals in the future."

Gates also warned that "we should expect to be involved in Iraq for years to come, although in changing and increasingly limited ways."

The Defense secretary said sectarian tensions still exist in Iraq and have the potential to undo recent security progress.

He was testifying one day after President Bush announced that he has approved a plan to withdraw about 8,000 U.S. troops by February. Some troops will leave this fall, but the number of combat brigades in Iraq will remain at the current 15 until late January or early February.

Both Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described a new emphasis on Afghanistan, included a greater push to improve the Afghan security forces, and increased pressure on Pakistan to work with Kabul to quell insurgents crossing the border.

Mullen told the panel that while he is not convinced the coalition is winning in Afghanistan, "I am convinced we can."

Story continues below
advertisement

Under the Pentagon plan Bush approved, one Marine battalion will be sent to Afghanistan in November to replace two that are scheduled to leave, and an Army brigade will deploy to Afghanistan in January, increasing slightly the troop levels there in the coming months.

Rep. Ike Skelton, a Missouri Democrat who chairs the committee, pressed Gates and Mullen on whether the Pentagon is ready to change its repeated assertion that it does what it can in Afghanistan, and does what it must in Iraq _ to reflect a new priority for the Afghan fight.

Gates responded that the Afghan fight is more complex, because there are more diverse enemies as well as a broader, more complex coalition fighting them.

"I would say we are reducing our commitments in Iraq and we are increasing our commitments in Afghanistan," he said.

Neither Gates nor Mullen would detail how many more troops can be sent to Afghanistan next year beyond the announced Marine battalion and Army brigade, or how quickly. But they acknowledged that those two units will not meet the requirements voiced repeatedly by commanders in Afghanistan _ who have said they need as many as three additional combat brigades, or roughly equal to 10,000 more troops.

"It's going to be a while before we get them there," said Mullen.

Mullen, meanwhile, said it is critical that other federal agencies provide much needed additional civilian support in Afghanistan, including for provincial reconstruction teams. Defense leaders made similar arguments in the past for the teams in Iraq _ urgently pressing for representatives from the Agriculture, Commerce and Justice departments to help with the reconstruction and economic rebuilding.

Without a broad interagency approach, Mullen warned, "No amount of troops in no amount of time can ever achieve all the objectives we seek. And frankly we are running out of time."

Requests for interagency assistance have often proved difficult to fill.

Panel members pressed Gates and Mullen on whether the latest troop changes may tie the hands of the next commander in chief. Both said no.

The next president, said Gates, will have complete flexibility and be "constrained only by his view of our national security interests." He added that he hopes the next administration will listen to the advice of its military leaders.

___

AP Military Writer Robert Burns contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Improved security in Iraq will give the U.S. military flexibility to do more in Afghanistan in coming months, Defense Secretary Robert Gates told Congress Wednesday, after years of ...
WASHINGTON — Improved security in Iraq will give the U.S. military flexibility to do more in Afghanistan in coming months, Defense Secretary Robert Gates told Congress Wednesday, after years of ...
 
Comments
59
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- Mort I'm a Fan of Mort permalink
photo

We're losing the war on terror..... but... but... but the surge......
By the time we get around to giving bin Laden some justice, it'll be his grandkids that get it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 AM on 09/11/2008

Doggone now, wasn't Laura Bush gonna get rid of all those burkhas in Afghanistan? How's that going?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 AM on 09/11/2008
photo

By the time America gets around to getting enough troops into Afghanistan, it will be going it alone because the NATO alliance will have fallen apart by then.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 PM on 09/10/2008

what idio-tic nonsense... Nato countries are more interested in the stability in A-stan than even Americans... But they're wating for more forceful leadership from U.S. in eleminating Musll im miltant threat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 AM on 09/11/2008
photo

You don't have a clue to what your talking about. The NATO alliance is strained, mostly because all the idiotic countries that America bought into NATO are doing nothing or pathetically little to address the issues in Afghanistan.

Iraq and NATO screwed by a single administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 09/11/2008

Dropping million dollar bombs on fifty dollar huts is bound to be a winning strategy.

I recall a presidential candidate warning of distraction on the true front of terrorism. Maybe we should listen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 09/10/2008

shut up and deploy the troops already! 1.Adopt Petraeus model to A-stan,
2.Get some canon fodder lfrom from Poles, Czechs and Baltics....They can't fight. But at least they can can be sent forward to ID Taliban muzzle flashes for the real soldiers to attacko. 3. Increase bounty for Arabs and otehr foreigners.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 09/10/2008

Dropping bombs on children didn't work in Viet Nam either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 09/10/2008

Failure would not be an issue at all if we had not been duped into an unwarranted war in Iraq. I know Bin Laden is somewhere sitting back laughing at the stupidity of America right now. The thought of what W has done to our country disgusts me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 09/10/2008

and we thought we could do better than the russians.

think again.

oh the lessons the afgans will give us

check out their history of sending foreign troops home in defeat

between iraq and afgan and s oon mc war bombing iran for lier er mann will bankrupt this country

that will be the only th ing that will get this c ountry' attention

economic decline will hinder americans ability to shop till they drop

drive by almost any garage in az and it will be filled with stuff usually chinese stuff

the war mongering nation is about to be sent to its knees like it did in vietnam

we americans are like most teens we have to learn the hard way

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 09/10/2008

presciption: hot coco and lamb kebab.. every night for hysteria...
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 09/10/2008

Thanks Bush/Chenny for the fine MESS YOU LEFT IN THIS COUNTRY. America get out there and VOTE it is your PATRIOTIC duty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 09/10/2008

That should read 70% disapproved, 30 % approved

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 09/10/2008

I thought most American citizens(voters)were in the stock market and pension funds were also invested. With the market showing no growth under Bush/Cheney and the on coming fiscal/economic disaster looming ahead--Why would the polls reflect Mr.McCain/Mrs.Palin in the lead. Thirty percent(30%) disapproved of the direction of the country under Bush/Cheney> I understand statistics as well as anyone and the interval estimate of the mean and standard error, but something is wrong with these polls or they may just reflect the preferences of Red State voters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 09/10/2008
photo

Let's Focus on the WAR and the ECONOMY

the more we talk about the ShockingFreakishSarah - the less people think about real issues!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 09/10/2008

amen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 09/10/2008

Afghanistan is where foolish empires break their teeth ask the British and the Russians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 09/10/2008
photo

Republicans = Military Failure

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 09/10/2008

Republicans = Economic Failure.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 PM on 09/10/2008

Carol, give some examples of economic failure. The government is NOT responsble for free market gyrations, so include something other than those. Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 09/11/2008

This is why I don't believe the polls and don't listen to the pundits. We are the American people on these blogs and from what I can see there will be a landslide. The media is trying to throw the race but it is not working this time. The American publlic is not going for it. Even the Republicans are sick of this mess. I know it is hard to imagine someone looking like Obama as the leader of this nation but everytime I look at my check book and the state of the nation I get over it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 09/10/2008

the media's only (one and only) interest is to make news and in this case making news means keeping this race close and exciting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 09/10/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect