iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Palin's ABC Interview: Stumped On Bush Doctrine, Seems To Contradict McCain On Pakistan (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post   |  Seth Colter Walls and Sam Stein
First Posted: 09-11-08 07:13 PM   |   Updated: 10-12-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Pppp

In her first major interview as the Republican vice presidential nominee, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was stumped when asked about the so-called "Bush Doctrine," unable to answer whether she agreed with the six-year-old U.S. policy of military preemption.

Asked by ABC News' Charlie Gibson whether she supported the Bush Doctrine, Palin stared blankly for a moment before turning the question back on Gibson. "In what respect?"

The ABC anchor responded, "Well, what do you interpret it to be?" clearly testing her knowledge of the policy that has been in place since September 2002, before the Iraq war.

Palin couldn't say, offering an answer that didn't even mention preemption. "I believe that what President Bush has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hell-bent in destroying our nation. There have been blunders along the way, though. There have been mistakes made, and with new leadership, and that's the beauty of American elections, of course, and democracy, is with new leadership comes opportunity to do things better."

Gibson, who clearly felt he had not received a sufficient answer to the question he had asked, proceeded to define the Bush Doctrine for the governor. According to Bush's National Security Strategy from September 2002: "While the United States will constantly strive to enlist the support of the international community, we will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise our right of self defense by acting preemptively against such terrorists, to prevent them from doing harm against our people and our country."

Thus, Gibson pressed Palin. "The Bush Doctrine is we have the right to self-defense, pre-emptive strike against any country we think is going to attack us," he noted. "Do you agree with it?"

Finally, Palin came close to offering an opinion on preemption. "Charlie, if there is enough intelligent and legitimate evidence that tells us that a strike is imminent against American people, we have every right to defend our country," she said.

Later in the interview, Palin was asked why exactly being the governor of Alaska made her an expert on Russia -- a claim that the McCain campaign has used to justify her national security bonafides. Her response was to cite geographic proximity, claiming that from some points in her home state, one could actually see the increasingly confrontational nation.

PALIN: We have to keep our eyes on Russia. Under the leadership there.


GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They're our next door neighbors. And you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska.

There were times during her appearance on ABC that Palin seemingly did not have a full grasp of McCain's own foreign policy positions. For example, when pressed by Gibson whether, in efforts to combat terrorism, the United States should target al Qaeda figures in Pakistan without that country's permission, Palin tried to circumvent the question. The ABC host attempted to pin her down with a yes or no answer, to which Palin seemed to suggest that it would be an American imperative to make such an un-sanctioned attack.

"In order to stop Islamic extremists, those terrorists who would seek to destroy America, and our allies, we must do whatever it takes, and we must not blink, Charlie. In making the tough decisions of where we go, and even who we target. she said.

The response, though hardly definitive, seemed to put her at odds with McCain, who has harshly criticized Obama for saying he would target terrorist leaders that are replenishing their ranks in northwest Pakistan.

In her first major interview as the Republican vice presidential nominee, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was stumped when asked about the so-called "Bush Doctrine," unable to answer whether she agreed wi...
In her first major interview as the Republican vice presidential nominee, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was stumped when asked about the so-called "Bush Doctrine," unable to answer whether she agreed wi...
Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,876
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (70 total)
08:44 PM on 10/11/2008
She should play dogdeball; 'If you can dodge a question you can dodge a ball.'
08:05 AM on 09/15/2008
Let's get the record straight folks.

There is one - and only one - version of Bush's preemption doctrine, and it was formally stated for the first time in the 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States. The 2006 National Security Strategy of the United States reaffirmed the Doctrine quite clearly. It is on these ideas that the Administration's actions have been based.

Both the 2002 and 2006 versions are online at the White House's website. Look for yourself and help clear the record on this one:

****The National Security Strategy of 2002****
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2002/index.html

SECTION V:
"Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. The inability to deter a potential attacker, the immediacy of today’s threats, and the magnitude of potential harm that could be caused by our adversaries’ choice of weapons, do not permit that option. We cannot let our enemies strike first…To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively."

****The National Security Strategy of 2006****
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/

SECTION V:
"When the consequences of an attack with WMD are potentially so devastating, we cannot afford to stand idly by as grave dangers materialize. This is the principle and logic of preemption. The place of preemption in our national security strategy remains the same."
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
06:13 PM on 09/15/2008
1i BET GW BUSH DOES'NT KNOW THE ANSWER!!
09:44 PM on 09/14/2008
David Gergen actually defended Palin on the Bush Doctrine question. Having said that, on the next part of the interview, economic policy, he said her answers were "incoherrent". I think it is amusing that people on the Right think she did that well, it's almost like they were watching a different interview.
Obama/Biden '08!
04:47 PM on 09/14/2008
Re: the Bush Doctrine - has been a label used by the press for various positions Bush has used over the years regarding foreign policy/world view issues. I don't think she was wrong in asking Gibson to clarify his question.

Gibson was very condescending in all of the interview - trying to press her to say she didn't think she was ready to serve as Vice President. What is really telling is how everyone is comparing her qualifications to Obama's. Is he running for President of VP?
photo
ojolsen
my micro-bio is empty
11:16 PM on 09/14/2008
Dear Sarah, The Bush Doctrine is the sole reason that you just sent your teenage son off to war in Iraq... any commander of the Alaskan National Guard should know that. For you people who say there are several different versions of the bush doctrine so she was correct to ask Gibson to clarify, listen to what she said when he asked her for her own interpretation. She said and I quote "His world view?." Half question, half statement. So Republican spinners, can you please find me anywhere a definition of the Bush Doctrine that is labeled, "His World View", and no his view of "world" terrorism does not count. She had no clue. Just say no to George W. Palin!
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
09:46 AM on 09/14/2008
The Bush doctrine, anyway the wind blows!
02:15 AM on 09/14/2008
THe Con talking points so far
Who knew there was such a thing as "the Bush doctrine"
Who knew Bush was our president?
Who knew the vice president was supposed to have knowledge of other countries and foreign policy and US history?
12:07 AM on 09/14/2008
Gibson can be forgiven for his minimal comprehension of the Bush Doctrine but not for his condescension and arrogant tone toward Governor Palin. And Walls and Stein, SHAME ON YOU! Inclusion in your article of the link to the National Security Strategy from September 2002 shows that you researched this subject and knew full well that the gaffe was Gibson’s. But mention of that that wouldn’t fit with the kind of ‘hatchet piece’ your semi-literate reader base comes here to drool over, would it? And of course the Huffington Post-Sun-Inquirer is all about the kind of biased liberal drivel you continue to puke forth. Factual information and quality journalism does not soil itself on these foul pages.

Don Putnam
Austin, Texas
02:11 AM on 09/14/2008
dude- its on a computer screen- not a page
And I don't need any liberal commentator to tell me palin's not too bright- I saw her speak
of course you likely voted for Bush twice, so how's that working for you
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:49 AM on 09/14/2008
Palin agreed to let abc's Gibson interview her, no one held a gun to her head and forced her to do this interview against her will. Gibson's demeanor was not arrogant and the questions that were asked were not out of line. The obnoxious self-indulgent jean hannity will be enterviewing Palin, then you can put some of your self-rightious biased rightwing spin on that..............
12:05 AM on 09/14/2008
In his interview with Sarah Palin, Charles Gibson's interpretation/definition of the "Bush Doctrine" is incomplete to say the least. The term “Bush Doctrine” was first coined by Charles Krauthammer in an essay published in The Weekly Standard in June, 2001. The beginnings of an actual Bush Doctrine began to take shape in Bush’s address to Congress nine days after the events of 9/11, and it was outlined in some detail in a 30+ page document released in September, 2002, entitled: The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. This document set forth a policy covering everything from championing human dignity to preemptive military strikes to global economic growth through free markets and free trade (see: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/wh/c7889.htm ).

Further, unlike the Monroe and Truman doctrines, the so called “Bush Doctrine” has continuously evolved over the years. It’s doubtful that anyone could correctly define the ‘Bush Doctrine’ with any real authority. Even Bush’s own definition of it has probably evolved in the last 24 hours.

When asked by Gibson "Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?” Governor Palin was certainly within bounds to ask "In what respect, Charlie?" And her response that she interpreted it to represent Bush's “world view” is certainly more comprehensive and on the mark than Gibson's arrogant paraphrasing of only the preemptive military strike element of the Bush Doctrine.

Don Putnam
Austin, Texas
12:02 AM on 09/14/2008
This woman is pathetic. She sets women back 100 years.
02:30 PM on 09/16/2008
StandUpAmerica08

You are the pathetic person. You are just afraid of an assertive woman.
Shame on you.
09:24 PM on 10/02/2008
Just because a person criticizes a politician who just happens to be a woman does not mean the person is "afriaid," or sexist. All we're saying is that she has virtually none of the experience or knowledge required to be vice president. I mean, come on. She claims to have experience in national security because Russia is close to Alaska.

Yes, we are afraid of her getting into office. But not in the way you're accusing.
11:10 PM on 09/13/2008
She also claimed in the interview that Alaska supplies 20% of our oil supply. LIE! They only supply 3%, according to Factcheck.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SoCalM
Your silence says everything
05:37 PM on 09/13/2008
This woman is a fraud.
05:29 PM on 09/13/2008
My last semester in school I took a class on American Foreign Policy and we had to know the Bush Doctrine--I even wrote a paper on it. The fact is the Doctrine is 4-5 points depending on interpretation, and yes they have been "amended" but the skeleton still remains the same:

1) America is at war with Global Terrorism and thus,
2) America must not be bound by treaties/ordinances dictating how we should behave--we need the ability to act unilaterally because
3) Our bold actions will scare enemies and rally our friends (coalition of willing anyone?)
4) America must "export democracy" so that other nations can be free.

This, as time would have told, was quite an egotistical miscalculation
05:26 PM on 09/13/2008
I watched the interview and Ms. Palin came across as somewhat snarky to me trying to hide the fact that she didn't know some of the answers. I don't care if she is good looking and talks tough - she is not VP material. God, if voters fall for another Republican ticket again after all we have been through in the last eight years I will be absolutely speechless. Why are so many voters simpletons?
05:31 PM on 09/13/2008
Yes, see my post above. SO MUCH HUBRIS. They can't mention the fact they don't know the answer because "it will make them look weak." In making up an answer, they look even more dumb in my opinion. Being overtly macho all the time is not normal. Humility can be a good thing from time to time.
09:58 AM on 09/14/2008
She memorized three lines of thought and used them for every answer.
04:55 PM on 09/13/2008
Re: The Charles Gibson ABC evening news interview with Sarah Palin, besides the obvious: she has never yet been exposed in depth to the world and educated with history and of current Foreign Affairs. But hey, 1st passport ever in 2007. Anyway Gibson asked Palin, Do you think someone with 5 children can do it all? Palin gave a blanket quick answer, Of course! What Gibson should have asked her was, but can you do it well? Anybody can say they are raising 5 children, but are their needs being met? You see poor people with lots of kids; see bad parents with lots of kids...yet they claim they are raising them, because they see them in the house, or in and out of the house. But raising successful and inspired children is another thing. My mother had this quote in the kitchen, it was a quote from Jacqueline Kennedy "If you bungle up raising your children, nothing else matters". Caroline Kennedy is a wonderful example , of a role model, so is Chelsey Clinton. I raised two successful children, inspiring them by example; the hard work ethic, finishing a college education. My husband and I inspired them to travel and get exposure to other cultures around the world. We inspired thought, the Arts and History. ..A curiosity for knowledge outside their bubble. The stupidity of being a high school drop out and getting knocked up, was never a consideration, my daughter tells me now. Thank you sweetheart!
04:06 PM on 09/13/2008
FreeDog is right...'The Bush Doctrine' has been ammended, or updated 4 times since 2002. Not even Charlie Gibson knew of the most recent version (circa June '06). So if you subscribe to Bush's 2002 version, you also wallow in Gibson's ignorance. There you are, so many of you "self proclaimed Bush Doctrine experts"...good grief...get a clue or three...paying attention to 'the papers' or 'the news' would nary get you closer to a meaning of the bush doctrine than watching Larry King Live...don't recall ever seeing 'the doctrine' in a newspaper....not even the NYTimes...
12:04 AM on 09/14/2008
where is the proof of this.
02:21 AM on 09/14/2008
Charles Krauthammer was the first person to ever use this nebulous term "Bush Doctrine". The definition Gibson used was actually an outdated, incorrect version. If you simply "wikipedia'd" the term "Bush Doctrine" you would get a clearer understanding of the actual definition. Therefore, the correct response for any discerning, intelligent person would be: "in what respect?" because it is not clearly defined like the "Monroe Doctrine" for example.

What is most amusing is how you (Huffington Posters) glean your intelligence on the subject from your own liberal inbreeding. You see something on TV and your whole worldview is then shaped. Then you run to your liberal website and your whole worldview is solidified.
10:55 AM on 09/14/2008
Then Ms Palin answer should have been, "over the years this has changed, which of the 4 are you referring to?" Maybe this prove that she didn't know anything about either Bush Doctrine. Call Mr. McCain and tell him you can answer the questions, and select you as his next VP.