Car Bomb Kills 32 North Of Baghdad, Where "Surge" Has Not Stopped Violence

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

SAMEER N. YACOUB | September 12, 2008 06:34 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

A British soldiers is seen on guard, after a roadside bomb explosion in Basra, 550 kilometers (340 miles) southeast of Baghdad, Iraq, Friday, Sept. 12, 2008. The bomb targeted a joint Iraqi and British military patrol. One civilian was wounded in the blast, police said. (AP Photo)

BAGHDAD — A car bomb ripped through a crowded commercial district in a mainly Shiite town on Friday, killing at least 32 people, Iraqi officials said _ the latest attack north of Baghdad where violence has been slower to decline than elsewhere in the country.

The explosion, which wounded 43 others, was apparently targeting a police station in the town of Dujail but instead badly damaged a nearby medical clinic, according to police. Concrete barriers largely protected the police station, the officials said.

The blast took place about 50 yards from the police station in an area packed with shoppers preparing for Iftar, the daily meal at which Muslims break their sunrise-to-sunset fast during the holy month of Ramadan.

Kamil al-Khazraji, the 33-year-old owner of a clothing store, said he was preparing to close when he heard the explosion.

"The ground under me was shaking. I went outside the shop only to see fire and dust all over the place," he said. "The area looked like a battlefield, with wounded people crying for help and scattered dead bodies."

Two police officers and a hospital official gave the casualty toll on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to release the information.

One of the officers said four policemen were among the 32 dead.

The U.S. military confirmed a car bomb exploded about 6:20 p.m. in Dujail, but said 23 Iraqis were killed and 40 others were wounded. Conflicting tolls from explosions in Iraq are common as authorities struggle to recover victims and contain the damage in the aftermath.

Story continues below
advertisement

The death toll reported by Iraqi officials makes Friday's blast the deadliest since July 28, when 32 people were killed by three female suicide bombers who struck Shiite pilgrims in Baghdad.

Dujail, 50 miles north of Baghdad, was the site of a 1982 assassination attempt against Saddam Hussein. The ousted Iraqi leader was hanged on Dec. 30, 2006 after being convicted of ordering the killings of more than 140 Shiites from Dujail in retaliation for the attempt on his life.

More recently, Dujail has escaped major attacks and rigorous security measures common elsewhere in Iraq.

Resident Hussein al-Dujaili, 24, said he and the family were preparing food at home when they heard a big explosion.

"The smoke filled my house and the shrapnel broke some of the house's windows. I went outside the house and saw two dead bodies at the gate after they had been thrown by the explosion," al-Dujaili said. "Some people were in panic and others were crying. ... We are astonished by today's explosion because we thought our town was safe."

Earlier Friday, a suicide bomber blew himself up in front of a Shiite mosque farther north in Sinjar as worshippers left prayers at midday, killing two civilians and wounding 15, police chief Col. Awad Kahlil said.

Sinjar is near Mosul, which is the target of an ongoing U.S.-Iraqi operation against Sunni insurgents.

In political developments, Shiite followers of anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr demonstrated in Baghdad and the southern city of Kufa against plans for a U.S.-Iraqi security agreement that will determine the status of the U.S. military in Iraq after the current U.N. mandate expires at the end of the year.

In Baghdad's Sadr City neighborhood, Sheik Abdul Hadi al-Mohammadawi, an al-Sadr aide, told worshippers during prayers that it is a "suspicious agreement" that would bring "humiliation and degradation to the Iraqi people."

After the prayers, worshippers burned American and Israeli flags and chanted: "No, America, no! No, agreement, no!"

U.S.-Iraqi talks on the security agreement have slowed over Washington's insistence on retaining sole legal jurisdiction over American troops in Iraq and differences over a schedule for the departure of the U.S. military.

Iraqi officials want all foreign troops out by the end of 2011. President Bush has resisted a firm timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq.

___

Associated Press writer Saad Abdul-Kadir in Baghdad and AP researcher Julie Reed in New York contributed to this report.

BAGHDAD — A car bomb ripped through a crowded commercial district in a mainly Shiite town on Friday, killing at least 32 people, Iraqi officials said _ the latest attack north of Baghdad where v...
BAGHDAD — A car bomb ripped through a crowded commercial district in a mainly Shiite town on Friday, killing at least 32 people, Iraqi officials said _ the latest attack north of Baghdad where v...
 
Comments
127
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

No people, however traditional, appreciate invasion and captivity. Compounding this obvious fact, Bush selected ignorant, incompetent and arrogant leaders to spearhead the occupation. The arrogance was expressed in both verbal and non-verbal behavior. The Iraqis quickly formed resistence groups which were infiltrated with Alquadi who seemed to enjoy mayhem and the slaughter of the innocent more than any clear strategy---except to exturpate the American invaders.
Now there is an uneasy truce among the three major factions. Sooner or later the Iraqis will figure a way to get out from under the yolk of the American occupier, so they can settle the differences among themselves or through the intervention of another foreign occupier thirsty for black gold.
It is still not too late for us to declare victory for democracy, pull our troops and support apparatus out to to the periphery of the Arab world and levy a tax on their oil exports for our military protection. Without American military presence, there is a powerful possibility of all out conflagration between and among emerging powers for the energy that fuels domineering and developing organizations.
If our presence requires continued sacrifice of our human or material wealth, then we should abandoned the venture altogether, retreat, withdraw, isolate and rebuild our crumbling democracy before all is lost.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 09/13/2008
- punk I'm a Fan of punk permalink
photo

An "American victory" in Iraq (if it was possible) would be a disaster for we, the taxpayers. A "victory" will look like Israel, who has literally PURCHASED a fragile peace with our U.S. taxpayer dollars. American taxpaying suckers are spending BILLIONS every year to babysit the Egypt and Israeli border so that both nations won't wage war (this is the Camp David Accords). Our government is angling for the same kind of expensive project in Iraq with an expensive, U.S.-taxpayer funded BOGUS peace between Sunni and Shia. We've already started bribing the Sunni insurgents. If you support this lunacy, then you're a sucker waving the flag to your own economic demise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 09/13/2008

They are playing war games, The regional enemies want us to stay there longer so they can drain our resources slowly by dragging on at the current situation.

The Best policy is re-deployment. Generals P did not know their TACTS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 09/13/2008

Do you read or follow the news? The surge is working, we are redeploying our troops! Try and keep up instead of following failed liberal talking points!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 09/13/2008

The surge is working in part because we are paying them not to attack us. The US Army is buying sheep and toys and footballs and who knows what else just to make friends
with them. How can anyone claim that is called victory when you have to dish out money? If your family members would have been killed would you not be angry too
I sure would, I have empathy for those Iraqis. Besides, we will never have enough troops
there to prevent everything. There will be hot spots forever,like everywhere in the
Middle East. Now since we destroyed everything, we can pull out our troops and even
have the nerve to call it a victory.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 09/13/2008

No serious person disputes that the surge of troops has helped to reduce the violence in Iraq. However, to call it a success is premature, at best. The purpose of the surge was to create space for political reconciliation - which has yet to be attained in any meaningful way. That's not a "liberal talking point" it's simply a fact. There is no oil sharing revenue agreement - which is the lynchpin of any possible political solution in Iraq. There is no agreement on the structure of a government - how strong or weak the Iraqi central government will be. Those who question the effectiveness of the surge wonder if, in fact, if the presence of US troops are making it EASIER for the Iraqis NOT to meet these basic standards. That's what Senator Obama means when he says "Iraqis have yet to take responsibility" in Iraq.

As for the redeployment of troops, after the 8,000 troops leave Iraq at the first of the year, there will still be some 10,000 more troops in Iraq than there were BEFORE the surge was announced.

As for following the news, did you notice that General Patraeus says we'll never be able to claim "victory" in Iraq?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 09/13/2008
photo

The surge was only a stop-gap in a war that should not have been started. The bottom line is that GWB lied to the nation and the world and invaded a smaller, less powerful country who had done us no harm and wasn't a threat. Wasn't Sarah Pee just speaking of that in her shrill interview with Gibson? I think she was referring to Russia's invasion of Georgia. Iraq has been a desolation for the Iraqi people, American and allied troops and our economy ever since.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 09/13/2008

What lies?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 09/13/2008
- punk I'm a Fan of punk permalink
photo

In Feb. 2003, Bush said: "Iraq has sent bomb-making and document-forgery experts to work with al Qaeda. Iraq has also provided al Qaeda with chemical and biological weapons training. An al Qaeda operative was sent to Iraq several times in the late 1990s for help in acquiring poisons and gases. We also know that Iraq is harboring a terrorist network headed by a senior al Qaeda terrorist planner. This network runs a poison and explosive training camp in northeast Iraq, and many of its leaders are known to be in Baghdad."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030208.html

In Feb. 2003, British intelligence said Saddam had no ties to al-Qaeda. The BBC reported: "There are no current links between the Iraqi regime and the al-Qaeda network, according to an official British intelligence report seen by BBC News."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2727471.stm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 09/13/2008

Since most of the policing of Irag is done with mercenary Iranians This will only end in civil unrest when we pull out any time soon. It will take years to convert over. War of the mind or ideology.

Americans are tired of the long drawn out affair.

For those of us from Viet Nam know that terroists are never ending affair. Snipers were terroists in a different form in that war.

Closing terroist fund accounts, conventional warfare limited to direct hits on the cell. Of course some nations will not like the idea that we will cross their sovereignty to eliminate these cells. Screw them if they will not do it. Then we will put an end to there disrespect of human life in other parts of the world.

Above all, education, not in jobs, but in ideology of individual freedom and respecting each others rights.

Some want to say America is defying their rights. Only if you wants to start their argument where America enters the scene. When one looks at the beginning of where the terroists ideology of Al-Qaeda started it was long before we came on the horizon and other Nations appealed to Clinton to take care of it. I wished he would have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 09/13/2008

You may be a bit confused. The Clinton administrations had daily briefings on the Al Qaeda problem and also OBL. Richard Clarke was working very hard on it. They did airstrikes to try to kill them in their camps. The country did not support the Clinton administration efforts because they were too stupid when the media called it "wag the dog."
When the new "administration" was given the election and came in to meet with Bill Clinton and Al Gore they brushed off the advice that they tried to give Shrub, Cheney and Rice that Islamic terrorism would be what they would spend most of their time working on the next four years. But as we all know, they knew better and went on with worrying about starting another cold war, going golfing and vacationing. The PDB's that told them what was about to happen were ignored, meanwhile Richard Clarkes exclamations about what needed to be done were scoffed at.
9/11 happened under Shrub, he could have stopped it and didn't. Don't even try to blame these endless wars that we are stuck in now on Clinton.
Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11, Shrub has admitted it now after his failures to get OBL and Caribou Barbie just stated again Thursday that the soldiers going to Iraq are fighting against the people who caused 9/11! Seriously. These people do not listen, do not learn and do not know how to govern. They are failures.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 AM on 09/13/2008

The debate over Iraq is moot because we will come to the point where we realize we have exhausted our resources
Sure mansions will spring up in Boca Raton, built by private contractor ceos, and the Swiss bank and offshore bank accounts will grow for many in the Pentagon, but a pall will descend on the Heartland of America until War is no more even possible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 AM on 09/13/2008

War is always possible and sometimes neccessary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 AM on 09/13/2008

Yeah but it sure wasn't necessary in Iraq. And now we're there, we're screwed. Thanks a pantload, GWB, our resources and the lives of our young people will continue to be lost for years to come, for nothing. Absolutely nothing will have been gained at this war's end, except dead American soldiers and very rich American war profiteers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 AM on 09/13/2008

I think you're mistaken. While war may sometimes be necessary - it may not always possible. For example, if we deemed it in our best interest to go to war with Russia over Georgia (probably not the case, but just for the sake of argument) we simply do not have the military resources right now to stand up to the Russians. Putin knows this - it's why he acted. He may decide to act again and there's not much we'll be able to do about because we've committed our dwindling resources to an unending 'war on terror.'

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 09/13/2008

But Palin has trumpeted the coming victory in Iraq.
Bush and McCain will settle for nothing less.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 AM on 09/13/2008
photo

And remember that a mission from God... :-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 AM on 09/13/2008

For all of you being appauled by the lipstick thing you sure like to jump on the repub stuff being taken out of context. The 100 years thing, mission from go,...etc. Dems play that game like no other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 09/13/2008

My nephew's a marine, been to Iraq twice, getting ready to deploy in Afghanistan in the spring.

He says we kicked butt in Iraq, that the reason for the Anbar Awakening was that the Sunnis realized we were staying the course and knew they could join us or keep dying, that the Sunnis realized it was easier to get rid of al-Qaeda than us.

He says that al Sadr stood down because we gave him an ultimatum -- keep the cease fire or have your Mahdi Army wiped out. Sader stood down.

Our boys are brave as hell and have faced down the enemy and the enemy blinked.

If we'd listened to Obama, we'd be the laughing stock of the world.

Right now, the world looks at our army in amazement.

Hats off to the men and women in uniform.

Whether your a Republican or Democrat, you should feel safe knowing that our military is the finest in the world -- hands down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 AM on 09/13/2008

Whose brilliant idea was it to go to war in Iraq and whose brilliant idea is it that we need to stay in Iraq?

Our enemy is hiding in the mountains on the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

It is time we face reality, admit our mistakes, change our course and do what needs to be done to secure America"s future.

bush/mccain/palin 2008

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 AM on 09/13/2008

Yep, Bush did it with the full support of both McCain and Palin. Uggg. what a thrill to look forward to 4 more years of this Iraq debacle, eh? By then Iraq will have cost us a fortune, all financed by China. China will not need to bomb heck out of the US. If the horror of electing McCain comes to pass, alas China will own us outright, having paid for the entire Iraq debacle, All with the idea of bankrupting our country and calling in their debt. God help our country if these two Republican wackos get elected and continue the Bush insanity. Both of these guys are first class liars. McCain even lied about belonging to North Phoenix Baptist Church. If one lies about Church membership, they will lie about anything as we have observed. Palin continues to lie about the Bridge to Nowhere. Then when confronted by irrefutable evidence that they are telling a lie, McCain and Palin continues to obfuscate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 AM on 09/13/2008

The Iraq war was started in 1991 after Saddam invaded Kuwait, for their oil/energy/power. We were only doing what the UN said we could do and drove him out. Then, after 8 years of Clinton (a former Governor of a small state) doing nothing and letting the UN inspectors get treated like dirt, we finally got a president with some balls to take the fight to Saddam who had ALREADY used WMD's on the Kurds...so he had them. But Bush spent many many months getting UN approval and the Congress' approval to go after Saddam and he got it. He was MORE than patient and let the diplomats work much longer than he should have. He has NEVER wavered in his plan and we all know what he is going to do, he doesn't mince words. I believe Palin will do the same, but I can't figure out what Obama will do, can you? If this was a war about oil, why is gasoline so expensive? What oil have we taken? It is about stability in a region that controls vast amounts of energy which equates to world stability!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 09/13/2008
photo

Delusional much? Seeing mushroom clouds in your dreams? Sarah's brand?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 09/13/2008
photo

Hmmmm ..what BS...


Congressional Record: September 20, 2002 (Senate)
Page S8987-S8998



HOW SADDAM HAPPENED


http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2002_cr/s092002.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 09/13/2008

Do you honestly believe this all started in 1991? Are you forgetting the USSR fighting in Afghanistan in the 80's? Do you understand that we armed Osama Bin Laden and his cohorts in the first place to fight the Soviets there? Are you aware that, also in the 80's, we armed Saddam Hussein to help fight the dreaded Iranians? And why are the Iranians so dreaded? Do you know what happened in 1953 in Iran when the CIA helped depose the democratically elected leader, Mohammed Mossadeq, and installed the Shah? Do you know why we did that? Because Mossadeq decided to nationalize their oil supply. And when we added insult to injury by giving the Shah - a terrible tyrant - safe haven in the 70's after the Iranian revolution, that was more fuel to the fire.

The mess we made in the middle east is a fully bipartisan disaster, but goes well beyond what the U.S. has done. At its basest, it is an example of the follies of empire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 09/13/2008

Yours is a very limited and selective view of the problems in Iraq, of which there are many - some of our own making, some having to do with other western incursions into the middle east and some with their own cultural identities.

You yourself admit that, for our part, it is mostly about oil when you speak of needing stability in the region because of the energy supply there. I happen to believe President Bush would have been better off with the "security over energy supplies" argument than the "spreading democracy" argument that he fed us - as do many old school conservatives. While I may not have agreed with the strategy, it would have been more honest and, therefore, probably more sustainable.

The fact that we armed Saddam Hussein in the 1980's cannot be ignored in the context of the Gulf War or the present war in Iraq. Nor can our situation be easily divorced from the part we've played in Iranian affairs - or the arming of Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan in the 1980's. This web is wide and complicated.

You can blame President Clinton if you like, but our problems in the middle east, like the present war in Iraq, are a bipartisan failure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 09/13/2008

It would have been nice if GW studied history, or at least installed an advisor that had instead of all these neo-con cronies who talk tough, but have no experience fighting wars.

Then maybe GW would realize that Sunni and Shia had a great religious schzim in 624 A.D. over who was the rightful religious heir to Mohammad and no matter what the US does, we can not resolve this split. The willingness of an individual to kill him/herself on behalf of their religious beliefs should be a strong indicator to GW that we may be on an impossible mission in reuniting the Sunni and Shia.

I would like the following question to be asked during the debate. What is "victory" and how does the US resolve the Sunni and Shia long festering religious differences satifactorily so that these two groups can share democracy. Obama is smart enough to recognize the problem; McCain will say "Surge" and move on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 09/13/2008

and fewer die, on average, each day in Detroit. Should we declare that Michigan is no longer feasible?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 AM on 09/13/2008
photo

Thank you, Mr. Yacoub. This is what it is all about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 09/13/2008
photo

on the orders of osama bin laden..the insurgents have now enlisted with the iraqi army or have joined the iraqi police departments. thats what the attacks on recruiting facilitys was all about. any recruit that did not swear allegiance to bin laden was executed.osama has won. the caliphate is being formulated as we type.
our stupid generals are now training and providing support and backup to the very people that were killing american soldiers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 AM on 09/13/2008

No it isn't at all. All this is, a report of a single bombing of innocents by insurgents who could care less about innocents. In the scheme of things all it is for you is a self affirmation party for you and your ideological brothers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 AM on 09/13/2008
photo

Wrong again, once innocents are attacked the attackers are no longer insurgents but are terrorist . Try to keep the players straight!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 AM on 09/13/2008

I guess you do not keep up with the actual reports from Iraq. Hmmm, I thought the stated surge was to get Iraq politicians to comply with Mr. Bush's 16 point demands. Seems like Bush has even flunked out on his own benchmarks. Poor thing. Still he orders the blood shed of our best and brightest kids on the battle fields. And, no letup in sight if McCain is elected. HOW SAD!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 AM on 09/13/2008

If we do not leave Iraqi now, sooner than later, we will be run out by a covert conspiracy of emerging great powers, that is Russia, China and others, who are tired of our misuse of power and arrogance. We have forgotten that we only make up about 3% of the world's population. Exceptionality is a dangerous illusion by which to be making military decisions half way around the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 09/13/2008

uh-oh, democrats are going to call for a retreat again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 09/12/2008
photo

The Iraqis have told us to leave, you boob.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 09/13/2008

Not quite yet, you should have mentioned that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 AM on 09/13/2008
photo

And what branch of the service are you in?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 AM on 09/13/2008

And you ? Or are you just throwing out criticism because of your arrogance?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 AM on 09/13/2008

Do you spit on soldiers when they walk by?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 AM on 09/13/2008
photo

Name yours.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 09/13/2008

No, sweetie, I am a Republican and I say Bush has failed miserably. At one time, I thought McCain would fix stuff, but alas, McCain has sold his very soul to the Bush junta and he only thinks in that little peewee ridge of his brain that is given over to sucking up to Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 AM on 09/13/2008

Gay, pro-abortion, liberal, anti-de@th penalty, bush hating socialist, war protester for McCain in 08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 09/13/2008

yeah so much for mcsame surge

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 09/12/2008

Really? I didn't realize McCain had been president for the last 8 years. Silly me. At least Obama admits the surge worked far better than planned. Perhaps you can explain that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 AM on 09/13/2008

Actually he said it worked beyond anyone wildest dreams.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 AM on 09/13/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect