More

Todd Palin Refusing To Testify In Troopergate

MATT VOLZ | September 18, 2008 09:41 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., applauds as vice presidential running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's, husband, Todd, waves to supporters during a rally, Thursday, Sept. 18, 2008, in Green Bay, Wis.. (AP Photo/Mike Roemer)

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's husband has refused to testify in the investigation of his wife's alleged abuse of power, and key lawmakers said Thursday that uncooperative witnesses are effectively sidetracking the probe until after Election Day.

Todd Palin, who participates in state business in person or by e-mail, was among 13 people subpoenaed by the Alaska Legislature. Palin's lawyer sent a letter to the lead investigator saying Palin objected to the probe and would not appear to testify on Friday.

"The objections boil down to the fact that the Legislative Council investigation is no longer a legitimate investigation because it has been subjected to complete partisanship and does not operate with the authority that it had at the time of its initial authorization," McCain-Palin presidential campaign spokesman Ed O'Callaghan said.

Sarah Palin initially welcomed the bipartisan investigation into accusations that she dismissed the state's public safety commissioner because he refused to fire her ex-brother-in-law, a state trooper. "Hold me accountable," she said.

But she has increasingly opposed it since Republican presidential candidate John McCain tapped her as his running mate. The McCain campaign dispatched a legal team to Alaska including O'Callaghan, a former top U.S. terrorism prosecutor from New York to bolster Palin's local lawyer.

In the letter, Palin attorney Thomas Van Flein lists nine objections to the Legislature's investigation into Gov. Palin. Van Flein also argues the subpoena is "unduly burdensome" because Palin has travel plans that require him to be out of the state.

Earlier this week, Alaska Attorney General Talis Colberg said the governor, who was not subpoenaed, declined to participate in the investigation and said Palin administration employees who have been subpoenaed would not appear.

State Sen. Bill Wielechowski, a Democrat, said the McCain campaign is doing all it can to prevent the Legislature from completing a report on whether the GOP's vice presidential nominee abused her power as governor.

Wielechowski and another member of the panel that summoned the witnesses, told The Associated Press that the witnesses can avoid testifying for months without penalty and that court action to force them to appear sooner is unlikely.

Republican Sen. Gene Therriault agreed with Wielechowski's analysis.

"If we had turned the rhetoric down and turned the pressure down to do some things we might have gotten voluntary cooperation," said Therriault, who opposed the subpoenas.

The McCain-Palin campaign said Thursday that Gov. Palin is cooperating with a separate Alaska State Personnel Board investigation into Troopergate. Palin initiated that investigation after she joined McCain's ticket. The three-member board is appointed by the governor.

"I can't say it enough, the governor is an open book on this matter," McCain spokeswoman Meg Stapleton said. "She is fully cooperating with the unbiased, legally appropriate and independent investigation of the State Personnel Board."

Palin fired Walt Monegan in July. It later emerged that Palin, her husband, Todd, and several high-level staffers had contacted Monegan about state trooper Mike Wooten. Palin maintains she fired Monegan over budget disagreements, not because he wouldn't dismiss her former brother-in-law.

Wooten had gone through a nasty divorce from Palin's sister before Palin became governor. While Monegan says no one from the administration ever told him directly to fire Wooten, he says their repeated contacts made it clear they wanted Wooten gone.

Alaska Senate President Lyda Green, a Republican foe of Palin, said Wednesday that the investigation is still on track.

"The original purpose of the investigation was to bring out the truth. Nothing has changed," she said.

Without the testimony, the retired prosecutor hired to head the investigation could still release a report in October as scheduled, based on the evidence he's already gathered. As of Thursday, Steven Branchflower had interviewed or deposed 17 of the 33 people he had identified as potential witnesses in the probe.

The Legislature does not have the leverage to compel any witness to testify before Nov. 4, said Wielechowski, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Wielechowski said he did not know whether Branchflower has enough material for a complete and fair report with so few witnesses. But he said delaying the probe would only politicize the matter more.

"It would be to appease the McCain camp," Wielechowski said. "They're doing everything they can to delay."

Ignoring a legislative subpoena is punishable by a fine up to $500 and up to six months in jail under Alaska law. But courts are reluctant to intervene in legislative matters and the full Legislature must be in session to bring contempt charges, Wielechowski said. The Legislature is not scheduled to convene until January.

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's husband has refused to testify in the investigation of his wife's alleged abuse of power, and key lawmakers said Thursday that uncooperative witness...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's husband has refused to testify in the investigation of his wife's alleged abuse of power, and key lawmakers said Thursday that uncooperative witness...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,084
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (42 total)
08:07 PM on 09/20/2008
After the elecdtion they can both get used to losing since she will have only one term as governor. The people of Alaska are not stupid enough to buy her BS a second time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jymfrancais
Judge a Man by his questions, not by his answers
05:05 PM on 09/20/2008
I don't like this man at all, something weird about him
Why was he so involved in the governor office?
How many votes did he receive?
Why is he on the campaign trail?
not working?..small town values are not like they used to be..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lois37
11:37 AM on 09/20/2008
Todd the sod.....
11:09 AM on 09/20/2008
Switch him to a Dem and they could send him to Guantanamo for some answers
11:03 AM on 09/20/2008
Has anyone done some fact checking about Todd Palin's overall role in his wife's mayoral or governor's decisions? There was some talk about why he sat in on so many meetings of hers. Add that to the copies of government emails she sent him. Is there a connection to their religious beliefs? Does their religion only accept decisions made by the man in the family? If Sarah Palin abides by this belief, will White House decisions actually be made by Todd Palin, should she inherit the job of President? Then we would have a man who has a high school education advising a woman with a B.S. in journalism. Take a good hard look at McCain lately. This man is failing physically and mentally. There is a good chance the Palins would be taking over the running of this country. Is that what you really want for America?
10:33 AM on 09/20/2008
Don't they get access to email in jail? In any case, he can bunk-bed with Karl "Purdy Mouth" Rove.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rangem
07:15 AM on 09/20/2008
lock him up
01:18 AM on 09/20/2008
Obstruction of Justice, gee, start to prosecute those that refuse to cooperate... The world is watching Alaska, of what kind of justice you administer..
11:48 PM on 09/19/2008
So will he be sent to jail like anyone else for not cooperating with the law? I doubt it, ...isn't he a Republican? They all think they are above the law.

I bet there's more dirty laundry on her.

Her husband gives us the creeps.
11:05 PM on 09/19/2008
Up until now, our presidents and other elected officials USUALLY were fairly innocent of any major wrong doing BEFORE they took office. Lots have gotten into trouble once elected.

So now we reach an all-time low: we are on the verge of electing a person with legal action against her before she's even in office.

What's wrong with this picture?

What the heck is wrong with this country?

Huh???
01:14 AM on 09/20/2008
we have zerobama as a democrat candidate? so McCain is my only candidate to choose from.....

great..........McCain has my vote by default
08:53 AM on 09/20/2008
Nice comment, short and to no-point. You have the intelligence of most McCain supporters.
11:06 AM on 09/20/2008
Nothing new. You just want leaders who share your values, and we are quite aware of the value system of McPalin. Crim inals elected by crim inals for crim inals to benefit. Like the deep calls to the deep, the shallow finds its own.
11:04 PM on 09/19/2008
I'm a little confused. Is Tod Palin claiming Excutive Privelage? He is actually nothing, just a simpleton, right?
01:15 AM on 09/20/2008
spousal privilege
11:03 PM on 09/19/2008
Rove, Cheney, Libby, Feith, Bush, Gonzales, Yoo, Goodling, Republicans; now Sarah Palin, Todd Palin, Alaskan Republicans.

A ruling class, above the law.
BIG JOHN
I'm not concerned with poor people?
10:10 PM on 09/19/2008
AND THESE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE THAT TELL YOU THEY FOLLOW THE LETTER OF THE LAW..
YEA RIGHT.
10:55 PM on 09/19/2008
Yes, wowie.
We can look forward to ROVIAN ARROGANCE from Palin & Company.
NO WAY should Palin be in the WHITE HOUSE.

NO MORE YEARS FOR REPUBLICAN CORRUPTION.

ALL REPUBLICANS now put AMERICA last and want to DESTROY THE MIDDLE INCOME AMERICANS by handing them the bill for Republican FAILURES.

NO MORE YEARS. REPUBLICANS need to lose BIG.
09:43 PM on 09/19/2008
The more they try to stall on this investigation, the guiltier Sarah and her husband look about this. First they try this, and that doesn't work; then they head this other route, and THAT doesn't work. Now they're just having Todd (and by association, Sarah) flip the bird to an entire legislative body. Before, I was kind of "these people are dumb," but now I'm just disgusted. I'm cool with the logical fallacies and the attack ads and all that--it's just part of the getting elected process, and it's been that way since the Constitution was ratified and presidential elections got under way.

What I'm NOT cool with is when it becomes more and more clear with each passing attempt to stall and/or stop an investigation. It makes you look like you're hiding something when you won't come clean. If you're worried about trying to get a d*ck your sister married fired, and then getting pissed off when the head dude in charge of firing d*ckhead troopers won't cooperate, what kind of reaction will you have if you try to overstretch your powers while in Federal office?? I'm so sick of "executive privilege" arguments. It's presumptuous and arrogant, not to mention borderline despotic. 3 branches of government were created for a reason; it's called Checks & Balances. Read a history book, McCain campaign managers.

John, seriously. Get it together. Tell your people to check themselves.
09:14 PM on 09/19/2008
This is more of the same ol' Bush administration. The law is nothing but a suggestion to them. Palin cannot be elected, it will be more corruption, lies and further down the fascist tunnel.