iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bush Asking For $700 Billion Bailout

TOM RAUM and JEANNINE AVERSA | September 19, 2008 11:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, flanked by, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, delivers a statement about the economy and government efforts to remedy the crisis, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars or more in worthless mortgages and other bad debt held by tottering institutions.

Relieved investors sent stocks soaring on Wall Street and around the globe. The Dow-Jones industrials average rose 368 points after surging 410 points the day before on rumors the federal action was afoot.

A grim-faced President Bush acknowledged risks to taxpayers in what would be the most sweeping government intervention to rescue failing financial institutions since the Great Depression. But he declared, "The risk of not acting would be far higher."

The administration is asking Congress for far-reaching new powers to take over troubled mortgages from banks and other companies, including purchasing sour mortgage-backed securities. Administration officials and congressional leaders are to work out details over the weekend.

Congressional officials said they expected a request for legal authority to buy up the bad loans, at a cost in excess of $500 billion to the government. Democrats were discussing whether to try to attach middle class assistance to the legislation, despite a request from Bush to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

In other major steps, the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve moved to give money-market mutual funds the same kind of federal protection, at least temporarily, that now applies to savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit at banks. Money-market accounts sold through retail banks are already FDIC insured.

The spreading global selling panic had started to threaten some money-market funds, usually thought of as rock-solid investments. Administration officials feared a run on these funds, held by millions of Americans.

"Every American should know that the federal government continues to enforce laws and regulations protecting your money," Bush said at the White House. The 75-year-old Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation now insures savings and checking accounts and certificates of deposit up to $100,000.

Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission acted to block short-selling in financial securities. That is a trading method that bets the value of stocks will go down. It has been blamed for accelerating the plunge in stock prices of banks and other financial institutions.

"This is a pivotal moment for America's economy," Bush said. "In our nation's history, there have been moments that require us to come together across party lines to address major challenges. This is such a moment."

Congressional leaders of both parties welcomed the administration's bold moves, after a series of ad hoc rescues.

The talk on the presidential campaign trail, barely six weeks before the election, was of bipartisanship, too.

Democrat Barack Obama said it was critical that leaders in both parties work in concert. "Truly, we are all in this together," he said.

GOP presidential nominee John McCain said leaders should put aside partisan differences and "any action should be designed to keep people in their homes and safeguard the life savings of all Americans."

The federal government already has pledged more than $600 billion in the past year to bail out, or help bail out, some of the biggest names in American finance. That includes the rescue of investment bank Bear Stearns in March, the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac earlier this month and the takeover of the world's largest insurance company, American International Group, just this week.

But the contagion continued to spread, bringing political consensus that drastic and comprehensive federal action was needed.

There are precedents for such a federal takeover.

In the late 1980s, the government created the Resolution Trust Corporation to tackle the savings and loan crisis. It acquired the defaulted mortgages, foreclosed real estate and other assets of nearly a thousand failed S&Ls, restoring order and stability to the system. Resolving that crisis took six years and $125 billion in taxpayer money _ roughly equal to $200 billion in today's dollars.

And there was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a Depression-era relief program formed in 1932 by President Hoover that tried to revive the market by giving loans to banks and other businesses.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gave few details about the structure of the new program. Asked about an overall price tag, he said, "hundreds of billions" of dollars.

Congressional leaders said they were ready to move quickly but still needed details of the administration plan. For instance, there was no indication of what the government would get in return from financial companies for the federal assistance.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke briefed lawmakers in both parties on the idea by conference call Friday.

In a session with House Democrats, they described a plan where the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets _ such as loans that are delinquent but not in default _ and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept for the investments, said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who participated in the call.

"You give them good cash; they give you the worst of the worst," Sherman said of the plan, which he complained that Bush and his economic advisers were trying to panic lawmakers into rubber-stamping.

Paulson rejected Democrats' calls to include tighter regulations, corporate reforms or limits on executive compensation as part of the measure, Sherman said. "He's doing his best to paint a picture of the sky falling, and then he says, because the sky's falling, you have to do it my way."

Paulson said the new troubled-asset relief program that he wants Congress to enact must be large enough to have the necessary impact while protecting taxpayers as much as possible.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative _ a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," Paulson. "The financial security of all Americans ... depends on our ability to restore our financial institutions to a sound footing."

Bush said simply, "We must act now."

"America's economy is facing unprecedented challenges. We're responding with unprecedented measures," Bush declared, standing in the White House Rose Garden with Paulson, Bernanke and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shortly after his remarks, Bush called congressional leaders with whom the administration will be working on the final plan. He spoke to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio.

The administration wants to see a package emerge from the weekend, to lend calm to Monday morning's market openings, said Keith Hennessey, the director of the president's economic council. The goal is to have something passed by Congress by the end of next week, when lawmakers recess for the elections.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will step up their purchases of mortgage-backed securities to help provide support to the crippled housing market. He also said the Treasury Department will expand a program, announced earlier this month, to buy mortgage-backed securities, which have been badly hurt by the housing and credit crises.

"As we all know, lax lending practices earlier this decade led to irresponsible lending and irresponsible borrowing. This simply put too many families into mortgages they could not afford," Paulson said.

Bush authorized Treasury to tap up to $50 billion from a Depression-era fund to insure the holdings of eligible money-market mutual funds. And the Federal Reserve announced it would expand its emergency lending program to help support the $3.4 trillion in total assets of the funds.

On Wednesday alone, investors had pulled more than $89 billion from money-market funds, according to iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report.

The government's actions could help alleviate the uncertainty that has been sending the markets into tumult over the past week. Lending has come to a virtual standstill in the wake of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Bank of England also offered up more cash Friday. The three banks put a combined $90 billion into money markets.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Martin Crutsinger, Andrew Taylor, Marcy Gordon, David Espo and Jim Abrams in Washington and Joe Bel Bruno in New York contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
WASHINGTON — Struggling to stave off financial catastrophe, the Bush administration on Friday laid out a radical bailout plan with a jawdropping price tag _ a takeover of a half-trillion dollars...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,081
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (61 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Britishdemocrat
08:05 PM on 10/14/2008
Where do you start with somebody like Bush? After seeing Moore's film about him before the last election I was disturbed about how corrupt and close to Bin Laden Bush really is. This should be enough to prevent Americans voting for him, especially after 9/11. I was also distrubed like everyone was about how and his administration dealt with Katrina. Also, his lack of self respect means how can you respect others when you don't respect yourself. The 2000 Election was the time when I first heard of him. Seeing videos of him and his party knocking blacks off the electoral rolls was awful. And still to this day I and most people believe he stole that election. Thank God, though, that he hasn't long left in office.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissingAmerica
08:44 AM on 10/03/2008
I can't help thinking of Stephen Colbert's joke at the Press Club: "There are those who say he is rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, but he is not. He is soaring! He is rearranging the deck chairs on the Hindenberg." This was prophetic and we are now watching him crash and burn. Too bad we couldn't have sunk him before he actually had a chance to soar! I was brought up to believe that this is exactly what impeachment was meant to do! I guess Congress and I didn't have the same classes in Federal Government 101.
01:31 AM on 10/01/2008
Me personally, I think it's just a bunch of crap the government allowed us to get into this mess. it's unfortunate it's come to this, but it sucks. I got an email from a buddy today and it talked about a pretty cool site where you can vote whether or not you agree with the bailout plan. the website is www.700billionbailoutpoll.com
02:34 PM on 09/30/2008
Timeout .Time to restore confidence in the markets. The skittish markets need to be robust again.

It is pathectic when certain people can seek to politicize the market collapse for a few more political points. The blame game ain't going to help the economy.

Partisan Politics has to be put aside for the good of all Americans.

It is hoped that either Senator McCain or Senator Obama or both of them can step forward to the cameras and make a public request to their congressional party members to put country first and vote positively so that the skittish market may become robust again.

The question of assigning blame has been adequately addressed and is now filed in the history chapters. It is time to turn on the light and not curse the darkness. Do the right thing for all America.

Who will make the first public call and get the votes?
10:50 PM on 09/29/2008
I am an, Ambassador, (http://push.pickensplan.com/group/delegates), for the Pickens Plan, (http://www.pickensplan.com) online.

Searching google.com just a few before bush announced the banking failure and crisis, Pickens Plan owned top google SERP for the phrase:

700 Billion

Media organs of the banking failures have hijacked Boone Picken’s 700 Billion keyword phrase. It’s arbitrarily important.

A google search for “700 Billion” no longer returns top SERP pointing to Pickens Plan documents.

The U.S. government has orchestrated an online campaign to Co-opt Pickens Plan SEO.

700 Billion dollars leaves this nation to pay for foreign oil imports this year and for the next 10 years. A TRILLION dollars leaves America over the course of 10 years while Iran retools transportation to run on natural gas.

1.4 trillion dollars leaving our economy this year, the budget, the war.

Developing a domestic energy economy based on domestic resources to reduce the crippling dependence on foreign oil, (the cycle of war and terror for resources), is a heroic.

The U.S. Automakers will want their $700 Billion bailout.

1.4 Billion in bailouts, plus the 700 Billion for oil imports this year.

I will throw soup and bread at them with you.

Join me at http://www.pickensplan.com

Pat Jack
Pickens Plan Ambassador
01:45 PM on 10/12/2008
Listen our whole economy is in Debt not just some rich folks if we dont do something to bail the economy out then we're all screwed. The dollars is dropping and that effects everyone that means you too. We need to secure our finacial status and get back to being on a successful path instead of driving ourselfs down deeper in debt
01:46 PM on 10/12/2008
My appologies this is refering to jondowns' statements
11:18 AM on 09/29/2008
The $700 billion bailout is a joke and a horrible nightmare thrown upon the American taxpayer. While the wealthy corporate typpes are shuttled around in limos and looking down on us from their helicopters, we are called "buffoons" and "the unwashed". Now they want to keep their millionaire status AT OUR EXPENSE!

Their inept leadership and ruinous, devious plans to gouge Americans has backfired and they want us to pay for it. Don't let them get away with it! Call your congressman and senator! Protest and raise hell!

If you can't make ends meet who comes to help you? If you can't afford to make the car payment who helps you? Why should we come to the aid of millionaires who are unable to pay their bills! And what difference doesit make to us if AIG goes paws up anyway. Unless you have stock in the company I don't know anyone who cares if it shutters.

This is a disaster and a scam of huge proportions being played out on the American taxpayer, I say NO BAILOUT! If the stock market takes a dive...so be it!
12:14 PM on 09/30/2008
You are so right!
700 Billion WHERE IS THE HEALTH CARE BILL--------------

-TO heck with the big rich people and their company's.

What about the families losing their homes and little American kids on the street!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bail them out and let them pay off the mortgage with lower payments, lower interest, let them keep the home and pay it it off. and make the big guys wait it out.

Even if the government does have to put money in on a bail out.

Let it be to the people and make them pay it back to us. we all pay taxes . let us have some say about this.
make the big company's lower the interest and not make so much money .
They need to suffer just like the rest of us, struggling to make it day to day..

THIS IS their fault---- loaning credit to people knowing if interest goes up they can't pay it. oh well, good old uncle SAM will bail us out.

let the big company's go under .another will step up and go on, maybe with a little more insight on losses and no bail outs. they would make better choices if they knew it was THEIR LOSS.

If we continue to let our government to spend like there is no tomorrow
We will ALL be eating out of the trash can
and living under the bridge!!
While the big guys eat caviar and drink champagne on us!
03:41 AM on 09/29/2008
The $ 700 Billion bail out is a good move to restore confidence in the volatile investment market.The money will ensure that the market stabilises and when the dust has settled stock values will appreciate. It goes without saying in that in general when property values decline, they then flatline, before bouncing back to incline to previous levels or beyond.

The US Government with this bailout will stop the market skittishness and investors and speculators will pour back capital into the markets .
02:06 PM on 10/02/2008
700 Billion from the pockets of the U.S. government? So it's the U.S. government that is going to save the day for all the wealthy stockholders? You don't sound like an American to me.

38% of the people in the United States of America live at or near poverty level, why are you shoveling money from their needs to the needs of the wealthy? The screwed up, the people trusted their plan and they got SUCKERED.

I am an, Ambassador, (http://push.pickensplan.com/group/delegates), for the Pickens Plan, (http://www.pickensplan.com) online.

Join U.S. at http://www.pickensplan.com

Pat Jack
12:21 AM on 10/03/2008
I agree something has to be done. BUT why am I as an American tax payer taking it in the teeth? This is my money the government is using to back the people that have proved to be incompetent once already. Where's the talk about using this as a LOAN to banks and financial institutions. Everyone should be forced to pay back any of the 700 billion they get. Where's the accountability for creating this mess in the first place?
12:04 PM on 09/26/2008
Isn't there a rock song, with the words, "we won't get fooled again"? For some reason, that's playing in my mind. Sounds like it should be our new anthem.
11:00 PM on 09/27/2008
The real reason "WHY" this bailout is a crisis.

Paying off mortgages is a nightmare for the mortgage backed securities (MBS) sector. Early payoff of a loan underlying a mortgage backed bond, is the biggest risk factor that lowers the dividends paid to the bondholder on an assset backed bond. It is not easy to calculate, when you know 1 million mortgages have gone into default and you never tracked what mortgages made up your bonds.

On average, 30 year mortgages last about 12 years. Once that mortgage is paid off, it provides no dividends to the bond it was securitized in. That means the investor (sucker) holding the bond can only collect the face value, without any more interest.

BUT, since the investor is typically an institution, that bond was probably used as collateral to get into an even riskier position by buying highly leveraged fixed income derivatives (essentially the bond world equivalent of commodity futures). Margin calls will be made, meaning the investors will have to pump more money in to support their positions, but they are now broke, so they can't. They can't sell their positions since there are no buyers.

Since all the typical FOOLS (banks, insurers, hedge funds, private investors) are now not FOOLISH enough to buy or sell this crap, there is only one even Greater Fool who is racing hard to do so. Can you guess? And they have to. We are FROZEN.
11:57 AM on 09/26/2008
I thought capitalism was about financing with capital, not with credit. If, as prez indicated in his address, this $700bil is about freeing up credit - just let the credit freeze. We, the general public, would obviously be better off spending some time reducing current debt before racking up more. And if the banks and their executives didn't get their multi-million dollar salaries because they weren't able to charge so much interest every month - who cares (other than the handful of people in DC saying this is the only way out)? Leave your money in stocks so companies can function and cut the banks out of the middle - they obviously aren't up to the responsibility, anyway.
08:22 PM on 09/25/2008
$700,000,000 is a drop in the bucket. And, it will further deflate the dollar. Let the markets work! That is what they are for. The hit to the dollar will have further devastating effects, and the real number is probably three trillion. I can't write that many zeros. Let the markets work!!!!!
http://bobbyvassallo.org
10:53 PM on 09/24/2008
I have a serious problem with this 700 Billion Dollar Bailout if any of the money is going to go and fund CEO's/COO's/CFO's etc. Multi-Million dollar Salaries. That is complete inexcusable. The actions of the these top executives is partially responsible for the problems we are having. I don't want any of my tax money going towards their lavish payments and lifestyles. The rest of us common folk will NEVER even attain one year of their salaries over a lifetime. THAT's what really needs to be answered. Where is this money going? Who is getting paid? And those that are responsible should be punished atleast monetarily if not even worse! Just my two cents.
10:06 PM on 09/24/2008
Why hasn't anyone asked Secretary Paulson how he arrived at the $700 billion bailout amount? Why not $600 billion or $800 billion? Also, maybe it would have been easier to swallow if he asked for $699 billion.
12:35 PM on 09/24/2008
Say brother, can you loan me a billion? I've had some hard times lately. I went and put up my cash and my mortgage payment on a sure thing. I got 100 to 1 leverage on the FX market! It was wonderful, till it started going against me. Shoot, now my bank accounts as empty as a lawyers heart. The good news is it was personal money. Cause if it was corporate money I would have to file for reorganization and have a trustee take it all over to sort it out. Oh wait a minute, you say I don't have to do that anymore. I can just get a chunk from Sir Paulson and he doesn't even have to tell anybody about it! How cool. D*mn shame i didn't do it in a financial corp then. Think maybe i can make that corporation retroactive since nobody gonna be looking over your shoulders anyway? Well brother, can you make up your mind real quick about that billion. Don't worry about the details, we'll sort that out later. I'll pay you back real soon. I know you wouldn't bet against the American Public and Hey, I'm one of them! I got a sure thing on some depressed real estate. Ought to be at least 30 to 1 leverage. I ought to be able to pay you back just as soon as prices come back.

Your Fellow American
IndyMark
700billionscam com
02:07 AM on 09/22/2008
If Bush came up with that figure in a day...the Congress had better NOT panic and sign the bill...if he came up with it and wants it so badly...it is worthy of much scrutiny. This is how we got permission to go to Iraq, how we got the Patriot Act, how we got Torture, how we got FISA...etc. THIS time Congress needs to study the bill, ask questions, have a counter proposal. Re-Regulate. Gads.
11:36 PM on 09/21/2008
Time for a reality check. If you would bother to read the Congressional record, the Republicans introduced a bill in 2002 requesting a regulator be placed in charge of Fannie and Freddie. They were concerned that too many bad and marginal loans wre being insured and that this could cause a collapse. It got nowhere because of a threatened Demorcatic fillibuster. They tried again in 2003, 2004, and 2005. Same result. They were shouted down by the Democrats because it would make mortgages inaccessible to low income families.

We all know what happened in 2006. Prior to the do-nothing Democratic Conressional takeover (with its 9% approval rating) they were somehow able to get a Regulator position placed into law. The vote was very narrow, but it was determined the Regulator would start in 2008. Note, both Obama and Biden objected, they wanted the position to start in 2010. This regulator is the one who identified the problem. In other words, the Democratic Presidentia/Vice Presidential nominees initally blocked and then voted against attempts to rein in Freddie and Fannie.

You should also note that both of them voted against re-allocating the "Bridge to Nowhere" funds to Katrina reconstruction after Governor Palin reconsidered and determined the funds were not needed and suggested they should go elsewhere. Essentially, the Democrats in Congress told her to take the money, use it anyway she felt necessary, and to shut up.
12:58 AM on 09/22/2008
The Republicans, with their religious worship of the false god of "deregulation" are 90% responsible for this debacle, and the Democrats are 10% responsible. Clever wordsmiths like jingles01 focus on the 10% while ignoring the 90%. Nice try, but it is all nothing but 21st century idolatry. Go get a job at an advertising agency and write jingles to peddle soap. You can't convince the voters that Governor Palin will get us out of this mess. Your day is over.
- Jim Heaphy
09:55 AM on 09/23/2008
Thanks Jingles01, nice to see at least one voice of reason on here. I posted this yesterday in our local paper's blog section and thought you might be interested: http://blogs.record-eagle.com/?p=1192

Keep up the good work