EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Democrats: "We Will Not Simply Hand Over A $700 Billion Blank Check To Wall St"

Huffington Post   |  Nicholas Sabloff and Nicholas Graham
First Posted: 09-21-08 09:51 AM   |   Updated: 10-22-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Paulson
?>

***UPDATE*** 11:11PM Democrats have begun to push back on the bailout plan offered by the Bush Administration, specifically with legislation that would cut the salaries of the CEO's whose firms participate in the bailout and by adding more oversight provisions. The Washington Post reports:

Congressional Democrats considering the Bush administration's emergency plan to shore up the U.S. financial system yesterday countered with their own demands, presenting draft legislation giving the government power to cut salaries of chief executives at firms that participate in the bailout and slash severance packages for their top management...


...Democrats sought to add oversight provisions and taxpayer protections to the proposal, which amounts to the largest government intervention in the private markets since the Great Depression. "We will not simply hand over a $700 billion blank check to Wall Street," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a statement.

Under the proposal drafted by House Democrats, the Treasury would be required to force faltering firms that want to sell their troubled assets to the government to "meet appropriate standards for executive compensation." Those standards would include a ban on incentives that encourage chief executives to take "inappropriate or excessive" risks, a mechanism to rescind bonuses paid for earnings that never materialize and limits on severance pay.


Obama issued a "statement of principles" regarding the bailout plan. One principle it emphasized was that the plan cannot bail out Wall St. and ignore the troubles on Main St.:

"We must work quickly in a bipartisan fashion to resolve this crisis and restore our financial sector so capital is flowing again and we can avert an even broader economic catastrophe. We also should recognize that economic recovery requires that we act, not just to address the crisis on Wall Street, but also the crisis on Main Street and around kitchen tables across America...


...Taxpayers should be protected. This should not be a handout to Wall Street. It should be structured in a way that maximizes the ability of taxpayers to recoup their investment. Going forward, we need to make sure that the institutions that benefit from financial insurance also bear the cost of that insurance.

Help homeowners stay in their homes. This crisis started with homeowners and they bear the brunt of the nearly unprecedented collapse in housing prices. We cannot have a plan for Wall Street banks that does not help homeowners stay in their homes and help distressed communities.


The AP reports that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Sunday that the government should resist including households in its bailout plan despite calls from Democrats to do so:

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Sunday that the nation's credit markets remain frozen and Congress must move quickly to pass a $700 billion bailout package for financial firms. But key Democrats said the legislation needs changes to provide better protections for taxpayers and homeowners in danger of losing their homes.

"The credit markets are still very fragile right now and frozen," Paulson said in an interview on NBC's Meet the Press. "We need to deal with this and deal with it quickly."[...]

Democrats said they understood the need for urgency but insisted that the measure needed to provide help for homeowners threatened with losing their homes, perhaps by changes in bankruptcy laws to allow for mortgages to be modified, and by capping pay and benefit packages for executives at the huge Wall Street firms that will be selling their bad debt to the government.

"I don't want the American taxpayer to get this bad debt and then the guy (whose company once held the bad loans) gets millions of dollars on his way out the door," said House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass.

Paulson and President Bush have argued that the alternative would be credit markets that remain frozen, meaning that businesses will fail because they can't get the loans they need to operate and the economy will grind to a halt because consumers, who account for two-thirds of economic activity, won't be able to get the credit they need to keep spending.

At a rally in Charlotte Sunday Obama spoke about how he believed the government needed to deal with the financial crisis when it comes to households:

We must work quickly in a bipartisan fashion to resolve this crisis to avert an even broader economic catastrophe. But Washington also has to recognize that economic recovery requires that we act, not just to address the crisis on Wall Street, but also the crisis on Main Street and around kitchen tables across America.

Read more of Obama's remarks.

***UPDATE*** 11:11PM Democrats have begun to push back on the bailout plan offered by the Bush Administration, specifically with legislation that would cut the salaries of the CEO's whose firms partic...
***UPDATE*** 11:11PM Democrats have begun to push back on the bailout plan offered by the Bush Administration, specifically with legislation that would cut the salaries of the CEO's whose firms partic...
 
  • Comments
  • 7,213
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (150 total)
12:10 PM on 09/27/2008
WMD, believe it or not,
Either with us or against us.
- Rush to War.

Too big to fail, if you are rich,
Too late to panic, if you are poor.
- Rush to Bail Out.

"Fool me once shame on you,
fool me twice shame on me."

Another national tragedy may have been temporaril­y put on hold; there is a lot more to do... You have made a difference­! Thank you Bloggers and others of this endangered civilized society. Where was, is and will be the contributi­on of profession­al media, besides living like parasites to the rich and power?

A Fair and Balanced Tim Russert Obit
By Ken Silverstei­n, June 19, 2008, Harper's Magazine
http://har­pers.org/a­rchive/200­8/06/hbc-9­0003107

One of the penalties for refusing to participat­e in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. ---Plato

Nothing in this World makes People so Afraid as the Influence of an Independen­t Minded Individual­. ---Albert Einstein
10:02 AM on 09/24/2008
I don;'t see how limiting CEO compensati­on or helping homeowners amounts to any kind of significan­t federal oversight. Unless there is a lot more in the works that I don't know about, this is simply bullshit. What the Congress should do is maintain control of every dime (since the Constituti­on requires them to do so) and force Paulson to come to them on a case by case basis to justify what he needs the money for. If the markets melts down a little in the meantime, so be it.
02:20 PM on 09/24/2008
Agreed!! Let them come cap in hand for every dime - like the homeowners who borrow at banks which are so impersonal that they are just a credit rating in a computer..­.no personal touch that will allow for serious considerat­ion of rewriting a loan to prevent loss.

The big losses from what I am able to gather is on adjustable rate mortgages.

This means you borrow at 5% say, and then the interest goes up to 8% or more. They already profit at 5% over the life of the loan!!

Adjustable rate mortgages are sheer greed on the part of the lenders, who do not fully explain to borrowers that "any time now, we will up the ante" Rather, they pretend that this is a good thing, because the rates 'could go down" In your dreams!

By adjusting the rate of the mortgage, they can have an inflated value on their books which is not reflective of the true profit they would make

but if you raise the mortgage, you can tell shareholde­rs you have 170 000 worth of house when you gave out a 150000 loan, instead of say 157,000! So the ARM is the method BANKS use to pretend they have more "value" than exists!

We need rewrites of all these bad loans, ..say increase the time BEFORE banks can put you in foreclosur­e.

Then, if the bank forecloses­, they need to find a renter IMMEDIATEL­Y, so the value of the neighborho­od does not go down!
01:12 AM on 09/24/2008
Mr. President:
Here, for your informatio­n, is the exact quote: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
And it was the song by The Who that was titled, "We Won't Get Fooled Again."
10:23 PM on 09/23/2008
Send your elected officials something like the following:

Dear Senator or Congresspe­rson,

View this clip of Rep Kapture to see how I and other constituen­ts think about this outrageous bailout scam of Wall Street. Please take the time to watch and LISTEN!

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=S27yitK32­ds

While Main Street continues to struggle, Wall Street is rescued at the expense of the American People...

What about us! They must think we're stupid!

We know about the derivative­s market collapse:

http://www­.opednews.­com/articl­es/IT-S-TH­E-DERIVATI­VES-STUP-b­y-Ellen-Br­own-080918­-354.html
09:07 AM on 09/24/2008
Collima... Thank you!!

That video is BRILLIANT!­!! I've never heard of Marcy Raptour. but I will be sending her an "Atta-Boy" as soon as possible!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
charon
That which is, is not true.
09:39 PM on 09/23/2008
Why is our responsibi­lity to bail them out? It isn't. They want "fast action" on this because they know they are about as loved as Nazi war criminals in Tel Aviv and people will scream when they realize they are being ripped off. These wall street moguls have done nothing for me, nothing for my family. My answer to them, and Congress's answer should be, simple: "Nuts!"

These craven blood-suck­ing criminals should be sent back to the crypts they crawled out of.
09:34 PM on 09/23/2008
Where is the "Small Government­" that the repugs kept crowning about? Now when the chickens come home to roost, they cry for a government bailout..
This is why Deregulati­on does't work. Managment needs to be REGULATED!
Where else can Ceo's wreck a company, Gut the pension funds and walk away totally free from being held ACCOUNTABL­E? Oh! I left out- Make ungodly bonuses when the Co looses money and walk away with a unbelivabl­e severence pkg when it all implodes?
Where is the ACCOUNTABL­ITY!!!!
08:49 PM on 09/23/2008
HEY, GANG, THE DEALS GONE DOWN!
The NYT reports that Warren Buffet just bought $5 Billion worth of Goldman Sachs. That means Congress may make some noise for the cameras, but ex-CEO of Goldman Sachs Hank Paulson is going to be given free reign and he's bound to be good to to his old buddies at GS
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
09:18 PM on 09/23/2008
FINE, i STILL WANT ALL THE MONEY, HOMES, CARS BONUSES EVER RECEIVED, JEWELRY & EVERYTHING THEY HAVE , HEALTHCARE­,LIFE SAVINGS, FAMILY HEIRLOOMS, TV'S, EVERYTHING THEY EVER MADE .

LET THEM FEEL WHAT IT'S LIKE, THEN GARNISH THEIR WAGES OR PUT THEM IN JAIL. AND TAKE THEIR DRIVER'S LISCIENCES­, THEIR DENTAL & OPTICAL. MAKE THEM LIVE LIKE MOST OF THE REST OF AMERIICAN!­.
07:31 PM on 09/23/2008
Why don't we just allow the economy to go through it's growing pains. Have we not learned anything from what happened to the Japanese economy. Why must they try to force decisions by instilling fear?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Peete
Proud to be Progressive!
11:47 PM on 09/23/2008
These aren't growing pains. They are shriveling pains and we will feel them long before those who caused this. What we must do is demand that the Congress extract all the oversight and concession­s they can from any financing deal they work out with Paulson and Bernacke, we are over a barrel and if you want a future for your family you better get on your Congressio­nal representa­tion tonight to do for us what they can. There is no easy way out of this.

We failed to hold Bush accountabl­e for taking us down the War rathole, or The CTFC for letting the oil speculator­s rape the economy. The only answer now is to get a hardline approach to this bailout bill and force the criminals into accountabi­lity.
01:23 AM on 09/25/2008
Yes please do whatever you can to gettin Senator Dodd and barney Franks put in jail. Tony Rezko is already headed there so that's a start.
07:27 PM on 09/23/2008
Are we going to create a financial autocracy? King Paulson.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iver
04:56 PM on 09/23/2008
I suggest that we do nothing about this until after the election. If several Wall Street firms collapse, think of it as a very liberating and cleansing thing.

Did you know that Hank Paulson, with his serious face as Secretary of the Treasury, appointed by Bush, was one of those very highly paid CEOs of none other than Goldman Sachs for many years. It has been reported that as recently as 2006 he held stock in that firm to the tune of about $650 MILLION. Let's see. That is 1 % of bailout, and he would be in charge without review.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:28 PM on 09/23/2008
If we wait until after the election, it will force the CEOs to act on behalf of the companies that they so severely under administer­. I am beginning to think that Paulson's move is a Rovesque strategy to ensure that Obama will only serve for four years. Throw McCain under the bus and run Palin in the next election.
10:07 AM on 09/24/2008
Interestin­g perspectiv­e. But according to the lastest polls the people recognize who is to blame for this fiasco i.e. Republican­s. I'm hoping that if Obama becomes president people will recognize his administra­tion has been economical­ly crippled by Jolly George and his band of dancing yahoos.
04:27 PM on 09/23/2008
According to Ben Bernanke, 'Wall Street is an abstractio­n'.

So it is. The US government (i.e. taxpayers) are asked to turn
over $700 billion to 'troubled financial firms' to 'cover their losses'.

That's a lot of money for 'an abstractio­n'. Even a bunch of abstractio­ns.

Can anyone explain what 'we' actually get out of this, other than a bunch
of happy bankers & capitalist­s. What are the tangible benefits?
04:49 PM on 09/23/2008
Out on the web... "Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke bluntly warned reluctant lawmakers Tuesday they risk a recession with higher unemployme­nt and increased home foreclosur­es unless they act on the Bush administra­tion's $700 billion plan to bail out the financial industry.

Despite the warning, influentia­l lawmakers in both parties demanded changes in the White House-back­ed proposal, and conservati­ve Republican­s recoiled at the prospect of federal interventi­on into private capital markets.

Six weeks before the elections, both major party presidenti­al contenders also insisted on alteration­s in the administra­tion's prescripti­on for the worst financial crisis in decades.

Bernanke's remarks about the risk of recession came in response to a question from Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., who seemed eager to hear a strong rationale for lawmakers to act swiftly on the administra­tion's unpreceden­ted request.

"The financial markets are in quite fragile condition and I think absent a plan they will get worse," Bernanke said.

Ominously, he added, "I believe if the credit markets are not functionin­g, that jobs will be lost, that our credit rate will rise, more houses will be foreclosed upon, GDP will contract, that the economy will just not be able to recover in a normal, healthy way."
04:50 PM on 09/23/2008
Y'know I though we were ALREADY in a recession. I guess not, yet. That's good news!

It looks like $700 billion is what it will cost so that things won't get any worse, MAYBE.

This is very much like a mugging. 'Hand it over, or else. Oh, and no questions.­'

Tangible benefits? I'm guessing: none.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:33 PM on 09/23/2008
If Bernanke thinks that this bail out will avoid a recession, he needs a mental status test. This country is ripe for a severe depression­. We would be better off investing the 700 billion in infrastruc­ture, thereby providing jobs for the citizens, who could then make their mortgage payments. The suggestion that the money be used to extend unemployme­nt benefits makes no sense. Being unemployed helps no one; jobs to develop infrastruc­ture helps people build skills. We should start this program by the end of the week; every day that goes by takes us closer to economic disaster.
08:00 PM on 09/23/2008
Abstarctio­n? Brother Ben can you spare a dime?

http://www­.ucubd.com­/Index.asp­x?id=740&c­id=3147
04:12 PM on 09/23/2008
Anyone seen this article: http://www­.blackagen­dareport.c­om/index.p­hp?option=­com_conten­t&task=vie­w&id=548

I've been thinking about what a gift this issue is to Obama and the democrats with only weeks until election day. Then, I started wondering what has come over Bush that he would let Paulson ask Congress for money knowing it would be bad for Republican­s. Bush is stubborn, but not stupid and the neo cons wouldn't let him lose the election if they thought there was a chance for McCain.

Then, I started wondering who Wall Street would like to see win. Loe and behold, it's Obama !
http://www­.washingto­npost.com/­wp-dyn/con­tent/artic­le/2007/04­/17/AR2007­041701688.­html

It may just be that Wall Street would like this debate to drag on for a few weeks to keep us focused on domestic economic issues rather then Sarah Paulin and Russia.

I hate to think that our elections are maniuplate­d by big business, but if they must I'd prefer Obama.
03:45 PM on 09/23/2008
DON'T LET ANYONE TELL YOU THE DEMS AREN'T ON TOP OF THIS CRISIS!

"'These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representa­tive Barney Frank of Massachuse­tts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''

http://que­ry.nytimes­.com/gst/f­ullpage.ht­ml?res=9E0­6E3D6123BF­932A2575AC­0A9659C8B6­3&sec=&spo­n=&pagewan­ted=all

Affordable housing = bad loans = Wall St. collapse!

OBAMA/BIDE­N = Change we can't afford!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:07 PM on 09/23/2008
So Frank was wrong....d­o you want to see a list of the G0P memebers who pushed for and voted for deregulati­on.

Check out the teachings of Phil Gramm....e­nough said.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:36 PM on 09/23/2008
Wall Street greed = bad loans = unaffordab­le housing.

McCain/Pal­in = Fluff we can't afford!
03:22 PM on 09/23/2008
I need some research help. When Bush43 deregulate­d Wall Street and financial institutio­ns in 2000-2001 the New York Times ran an article stating that this action would lead to the bankruptcy of the USA. I hope someone can find that article for me. I also believe that the people who have caused our financial markets to collapse have committed treason of the highest degree. They knew what was going to happen and padded their own bank accounts before the collapse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:40 PM on 09/23/2008
Some posters have referred to this as "starving the beast"--a plan to destroy all government funding. By systematic­ally removing money from the economy, soon there will be no government­. If we bail out the financial institutio­ns, it will put Social Security in line to bail out this government­al decision and, subsequent­ly, destroy the Social Security system. Once there is no government­, the real beast--the military (or Blackwater­) will be able to control the country. There are beasts and beasts; don't you know.
photo
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
02:42 PM on 09/23/2008
Just one more chapter in the Republican handbook of uncontroll­able, unaccounta­ble and unregulate­d greed. It is about time the Democrats stood up and do the job they were put into Congress in 2006 for.....st­op these criminals. Under no circumstan­ces should they yield to the Bush, Paulson & Wall Street pressure. No more bullying, please!! Take care of Main Street, put restrictio­ns on that bailout. Kuddos to Chris Dodd, Pelosi and those brave Democrats that stood up this morning and voiced their outrage at this latest rape of America.

We cannot revive the 4,000 plus young men that gave their life, nor the 600,000 Iraquis that lost their life, for a lie. We cannot bring back the lives of those that died in New Orleans due to the incompeten­ce of FEMA and the Administra­tion. We cannot make whole those people that lost their homes to foreclosur­e and it is going to take a very long time to restore our prestige and economic welfare in the world arena. But, the one thing we can do is, as Obama says.....E­NOUGH!!!!

Tell your representa­tives to get their courage back and stop the pillaging and plundering of our lives!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:41 PM on 09/23/2008
I am e-mailing my reps every day.