Lawmakers report progress on financial rescue deal

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Lawmakers report progress on financial rescue deal stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHARLES BABINGTON | September 27, 2008 11:27 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson, left, and Kevin Fromer, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, arrive at the Capitol for a meeting in Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office regarding legislation on the financial crisis Saturday, Sept. 27, 2008, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)

WASHINGTON — Nervously eyeing the markets' next trading session, key lawmakers in both parties and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson worked late into the night Saturday trying to close an agreement on a multibillion-dollar government bailout of distressed financial companies.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters "quite a bit" of progress was being made on a deal that Congress could send to President Bush as early as Monday after votes in both houses.

A key sticking point was how to include a new government-sponsored insurance program demanded by House Republicans as an alternative to devoting the entire $700 billion buying up devalued mortgage-backed securities and other toxic debt from banks and investors.

"We're making a lot of headway; I think it's possible to get this thing done tonight," said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont. "I can't guarantee it," Baucus quickly added.

The House was scheduled to convene at 1 p.m. EDT Sunday and members there were hoping they could vote on a bill by that evening and go home to campaign for re-election. The Senate isn't scheduled to go back into session until Monday.

Presidential politics again played a role in the bargaining. Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama called key negotiators and portrayed themselves as helping without getting directly involved in the talks.

Bush expressed confidence earlier Saturday that lawmakers soon would approve a rescue plan while acknowledging that many Americans are frustrated and angry at the amount of money taxpayers are being asked to put up for covering Wall Street firms' mistakes.

The president spoke with Paulson, McCain and other Republican lawmakers during the day, said White House spokesman Tony Fratto.

Story continues below

Under the plan being considered, the Treasury Department would buy deeply distressed mortgage-backed securities. The money should help troubled lenders make new loans. The government would later try to sell the discounted loan packages at the best possible price.

House Republicans were insisting that some of the money be available to insure, rather than buy, distressed mortgage-backed securities. Banks and investment firms holding such packages would pay the government for insurance against losses if the mortgages default.

Proponents say their idea would require less taxpayer spending. But the Treasury Department has said it would not pump enough money into the financial sector to make credit sufficiently available.

Another proposal would have the government receive stock warrants in return for the bailout relief, ensuring that proceeds from eventual sales of the discounted packages would return to the Treasury.

Negotiators were trying to settle on a means of limiting severance packages for executives of companies that benefit from the rescue plan.

They also discussed phasing in the program's costs. For example, after the first $350 billion or so is made available, Congress could try to block later amounts if it believed the program was not working. The president presumably could veto such a move, however, requiring extra large margins in the House and Senate to override.

House Republicans insisted on several changes to the administration's original proposal.

"We should not be bailing out Wall Street on the backs of American taxpayers," House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters at midafternoon, when Paulson and key House and Senate members took over the negotiations from their aides.

Senate Majority leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said earlier that the goal was to come up with a final agreement before the Asian markets open Sunday night. "Everybody is waiting for this thing to tip a little bit too far," he said, so "we may not have another day." Whatever emerges "is not the proposal that we got from Secretary Paulson," Reid said. But lawmakers said it would be much closer to Paulson's original plan than to the alternative offered by House Republicans several days ago.

McCain, who flew to Washington after Friday night's presidential debate in Mississippi, spent part of Saturday working the phones and "helping out as he can," aide Mark Salter said. But McCain did not enter the Capitol, where his colleagues were voting on a $634 billion spending bill that ended a ban on drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, and sent billions of dollars to the military.

McCain supports such measures. But the vote would have been difficult for him because the bill also included more than 2,000 pet spending projects worth more than $6 billion. That is the kind of pork-barrel spending that McCain has pledged to end.

Obama campaigned in North Carolina and Virginia. Aides said he placed calls to Paulson, Reid and a key House member to keep tabs on the finance negotiations.

Both presidential candidates are trying to position themselves to take at least partial credit if an accord is reached. Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor offered new details from Thursday's contentious White House meeting that underscored the divisions among lawmakers trying to reach an agreement.

He said Obama encouraged Paulson to work with House Republicans. Since then, Vietor said, Obama has urged negotiators to find a compromise with enough options so the treasury secretary has the flexibility "to act in an effective manner to stem this crisis."

WASHINGTON — Nervously eyeing the markets' next trading session, key lawmakers in both parties and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson worked late into the night Saturday trying to close an agreeme...
WASHINGTON — Nervously eyeing the markets' next trading session, key lawmakers in both parties and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson worked late into the night Saturday trying to close an agreeme...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
80
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- Gould123 I'm a Fan of Gould123 11 fans permalink

People, you do't know what your talking about! You all could study forever and not know the right thing to do in this! Simply put the smartest people we have doesn't know if this is good or not! Let them do/best they can!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 09/28/2008

The "smartest people we have" are not in office, and they certainly are not the 'financial wizards'. We have the dumbest people in office, and the most greedy and coniving running the financial sector. These losers have lost at their own crooked game. Putting trust in these people is the last thing we should do. They need to be impeached, fired, and return the money they have taken from the American people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 09/28/2008

So Warren Buffett thinks we need the bailout to avoid a major meltdown, not a surprise. His lfe is invested in the stock market. If he thinks the bailout is necessary and urgent perhaps he should return the money he has made from the stock market back to the stock market. Let him foot the bill with his money. There is NO reason for the majority to put money in to save this crooked game. Let this house of cards fall, or let the rich put their ill gotten gains back in the game if they want to keep playing. If the casino is about to close due to poor bets by the owners/gamblers, then they need to pony up their own money to save their casino. Don't tell the majority that we need to support this scam. Don't bleed the majority to maintain the coffers of the elite few.

Where have these oracles and financial wizards been while our children go without food, school supplies, and medical care? Where have these great investors been while Social Security goes broke? Where have these grand thinkers and representatives been while our senior citizens have gone without medication and heat in the winter? Bail out this 'fixed' game while unemployment benefits run out, wages are kept too low, illegal wars are being fought? This would be a joke if it weren't really about to happen. This economy needs to be restructured to provide for the citizens, and not the wealthy elite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 09/28/2008
- NicoloM I'm a Fan of NicoloM 24 fans permalink
photo

Let's suppose that democracy has some merits. Wouldn't it be best to hash this out in the open and let the American people get involved? Secret deals seem to be one facet of how this mess happened in the first place.
Let Congress go home and talk to their constitutents. Let all sides lay out the specifics and mechanisms of their plans. Let the administration explain how and why this snuck up on them and the specifics of what went wrong and how their plan will fix it. If this is Hoover in '31 all over again, rash actions could be more disasterous than no action.
Let the people who will be paying for this-- us-- weigh in. Its called a democracy and it is important to find out who believes in deomcracy and who doesn't (and in this regard it doesn't make any difference what label one applies to themselves.)
For a trillion dollars I think we should be heard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 AM on 09/28/2008
- Danny I'm a Fan of Danny 5 fans permalink

I hope the Democrats manage to allow time to "study" the situation. Because either way they will lose if they vote to go through with the "bailout" (we're already in a recession/depression), but if they cave in to Bush's demands ONE MORE TIME, and are left holding the bag, they will be objects of ridicule. The people don't want this deal, and neither do conservative republicans. So vote NO, for now, and let the supposed liberal conservative members of Congress take the blame. There'll be plenty of time for the Obama administration to figure out what to do, presidential elections talking points set aside.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 09/28/2008
- KarenHurtz I'm a Fan of KarenHurtz 40 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, remember when public hearings were part of democratic legislation?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 AM on 09/28/2008

If all the Democrats get is a provision for "no Golden Parachutes for ex-CEOs", this would be total failure for the Democrats, complete victory for Bush. Every Democrat must then oppose the Bush bailout.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 09/28/2008

Ah Yes, the Democrats sell out - again - in

1

2

3

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 AM on 09/28/2008

"When will we be free of this sick, warped ideology of false Conservatism...?"

answer: when they get your last dime and you are on your knees.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 09/28/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

This ideological zealotry by these so called would be Conservative Republican Congressmen that caused them to urge and push recklessly for deregulation as an obsession, which caused this debacle and disaster now propels them to object to the bail-out and hopefully cure to what could result in a gobal economic collapse...!

When will we be free of this sick, warped ideology of false Conservatism...?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 09/28/2008

"When will we be free of this sick, warped ideology of false Conservatism...?"

answer: when they get your last dime and you are on your knees.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 AM on 09/28/2008
- robeson I'm a Fan of robeson 30 fans permalink
photo

Barney, why is your picture on every Wall Street Bailout Story? Can't you let the Republicans get some of the glory?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 09/28/2008

There is no 'free market' and there is no 'democracy' in the U.S. This is a debtor nation. The American people are being fleeced once again. Did you hear the one about the crooked politicians, the crooked bankers, and the passive citizens? The U.S. economy is a house of cards that survives on illusion perpetuated by credit. Let's take the USA out of usary. The answer to this economic problem is to stop living in an illusion, hold accountable those who have fleeced, and who continue to fleece Americans: our own government and bankers. This seemingly sudden economic crisis is business as usual, and the bailout, while not only unnecessary, is just the final fleecing of the American people by the Bush Administration and the elite cronies who have sucked the lifeblood out of the American people for too long. We were lied to about Iraq, and we are being lied to about this sudden economic crisis. The answer is to impeach Bush and Cheney, vote out any Senator or House Representative who signs on to this bailout of the elite at the expense of the rest of Americans, and don't bail out the vampires in financial institutions who have been so cruel to so many Americans for so long. Let the chips fall where they may, better now than later, let's not punish our children with any more cruelty or debt. Enough already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 09/28/2008
- lechatnoir I'm a Fan of lechatnoir 7 fans permalink
photo

If Congress goes ahead with something the public is overwhelmingly against, it will prove once and for all that it answers to industry, not to the taxpayers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 09/27/2008
photo

Just curious... what would those same taxpayers say if Congress did nothing and the entire economy collapsed a few weeks from now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 09/28/2008
- KarenHurtz I'm a Fan of KarenHurtz 40 fans permalink
photo

Again, I don't buy the meltdown scenario. People's deposits are insured. The real deal is that foreign banks wouldn't invest anymore and the dollar would collapse on the world market. If that happened, the exchange rate would be so crazy that imports would go through the roof.

Once the American dollar drops through the floor nobody in the U.S. will be able to afford ANYTHING that's imported. THAT would mean millions and millions of jobs coming back home.

One downside, depending on how you look at things, is that oil would be like $1000 a barrel. On the bright side, I'm pretty sure that development of domestic energy would be a TOP priority and that would put renewable energy development into high gear.

Not all that scary if you ask me.

That's way I see it - what EXACTLY do YOU mean by "economy collapsed" or is that just what you heard on TV?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 AM on 09/28/2008
- KarenHurtz I'm a Fan of KarenHurtz 40 fans permalink
photo

Consider that 65% of Americans polled don't think the bailout will resolve the financial crisis. Only one out every one hundred letters, calls and emails to Washington are opposed to the bailout. So who are these people representing when they continue down this path?

Welcome to BailoutGate.

U.S. senators had a median net worth of approximately $1.7 million in 2006, the most recent year for which their financial data is available, and 58 percent of the Senate's members could be considered millionaires. In the House of Representatives, the median net worth was about $675,000, with 44 percent of members having a net worth estimated to be at least $1 million. By contrast, only about 1 percent (that's 1%) of all American adults had a net worth greater than $1 million during the same time. In other words, they are representing their selves.

Why would 300 million Americans choose people to represent them that have nothing in common with them? What do they expect? The larger question is how do you change that behavior? How do you get through to people? When an established consumer advocate like Nader is shut out from media coverage, how can the message be delivered? Any hope for a return to governance by The People must address these questions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 PM on 09/27/2008
- KarenHurtz I'm a Fan of KarenHurtz 40 fans permalink
photo

CORRECTION TO POST:

Only one out every one hundred letters, calls and emails to Washington SUPPORT the bailout.

ALSO...

Did anybody notice that we've ALREADY been lied to about how things would be handled? Remember the part where shareholders get nothing? Well surprise! Turns out Fannie Mae announced that "the company has received the consent of the conservator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), and the United States Department of the Treasury to pay the previously declared but unpaid dividends on all of its outstanding preferred stock series, on September 30, 2008, as scheduled."

http://www.fanniemae.com/newsreleases/2008/4473.jhtml?p=Media&s=News+Releases

The ink's not even dry on those bailout dollars and we're already getting screwed. Lie after lie, after lie, after lie. When will it end?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 09/27/2008

Just say NO to the bailout. The market will backfill itself just like it did with Washington Mutual. That deal cost the tax payers of this country $0.00. If we are going to spend $7 Billion as a country lets do it to expand education, healthcare and supporting small business where most the jobs reside. To bail out the greedy SOBs is absolutely crazy and if you have not called your US Representative or Senator fo it NOW and just say NO to any bail out plan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 09/27/2008

I am loving the part where the pols are nervous.
I saw one unknown congresswoman complaining that
she has lost a couple nights sleep over the bail out plan!

Geesh, if these pols lived a real life then they would
see that many of us lose sleep every night about how
are we going to pay for the kids' college, get health insurance,
will we have a job next month, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 PM on 09/27/2008
photo

Let me get this straight, Republicans will spend Billions of TAXPAYER $$$ to Insure the health of WALL STREET but won't spend TAXPAYER $$$ TO INSURE THE HEALTH OF TAXPAYERS?!?!?!?

What kind of Family Values must a person have, that they would seek to destroy Social Security but dance on the edge of another economic depression for Corporate Security? Country First? HA! More like Company First.

Bring back Glass-Steagell!

Bring back Anti-Trust suits!

Bring back regulation and prosecute offenders.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 09/27/2008

And let me get this straight...the democrats will help the republicans bail out wall street...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 AM on 09/28/2008
- DLB I'm a Fan of DLB 41 fans permalink
photo

You thought the democrats did the "will of the people?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 AM on 09/28/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect