iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House rejects $700B bailout in stunning defeat


First Posted: 09-28-08 12:52 AM   |   Updated: 10-28-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Pelosi And Frank

WASHINGTON — In a vote that shook the government, Wall Street and markets around the world, the House on Monday defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue for the nation's financial system, leaving both parties' lawmakers and the Bush administration scrambling to pick up the pieces. Dismayed investors sent the Dow Jones industrials plunging 777 points, the most ever for a single day.

"We need to put something back together that works," a grim-faced Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said after he and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke joined in an emergency strategy session at the White House. On Capitol Hill, Democratic leaders said the House would reconvene Thursday, leaving open the possibility that it could salvage a reworked version.

Senate leaders showed no inclination to try to bring the measure to a vote before they could determine its fate in the House. President Bush, meanwhile, was scheduled to make a statement on the rescue plan Tuesday morning, the White House said.

All sides agreed the effort to bolster beleaguered financial markets, potentially the biggest government intervention since the Great Depression, could not be abandoned.

But in a remarkable display on Monday, a majority of House members slapped aside the best version their leaders and the administration had been able to come up with, bucking presidential speeches, pleading visits from Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and urgent warnings that the economy could nosedive without the legislation.

In the face of thousands of phone calls and e-mails fiercely opposing the measure, many lawmakers were not willing to take the political risk of voting for it just five weeks before the elections.

The bill went down, 228-205.

The House Web site was overwhelmed as millions of people sought information about the measure through the day.

The legislation the administration promoted would have allowed the government to buy bad mortgages and other sour assets held by troubled banks and other financial institutions. Getting those debts off their books should bolster those companies' balance sheets, making them more inclined to lend and ease one of the biggest choke points in a national credit crisis. If the plan worked, the thinking went, it would help lift a major weight off the national economy, which is already sputtering.

Hoping to pick up enough GOP votes for the next try, Republicans floated several ideas. One would double the $100,000 ceiling on federal deposit insurance. Another would end rules that require companies to devalue assets on their books to reflect the price they could get in the market.

In the meantime, Paulson said he would work with other regulators "to use all the tools available to protect our financial system and our economy."

"Our tool kit is substantial but insufficient," he said, indicating the government intended to continue piecemeal fixes while pressing Congress for broader action.

Stocks started plummeting on Wall Street even before Monday's vote was over, as traders watched the rescue measure going down on television. Meanwhile, lawmakers were watching them back.

As a digital screen in the House chamber recorded a cascade of "no" votes against the bailout, Democratic Rep. Joe Crowley of New York shouted news of the falling Dow Jones industrials. "Six hundred points!" he yelled, jabbing his thumb downward.

The final stock carnage far surpassed the 684-point drop on the first trading day after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

In the House, "no" votes came from both the Democratic and Republican sides of the aisle. More than two-thirds of Republicans and 40 percent of Democrats opposed the bill. Several Democrats in close election fights waited until the last moment, then went against the bill as it became clear the vast majority of Republicans were opposing it.

Thirteen of the 19 most vulnerable Republicans and Democrats in an Associated Press analysis voted against the bill despite the pleas from Bush and their party leaders to pass it.

In all, 65 Republicans joined 140 Democrats in voting "yes," while 133 Republicans and 95 Democrats voted "no."

The overriding question was what to do next.

"The legislation may have failed; the crisis is still with us," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a news conference after the defeat. "What happened today cannot stand."

Republican leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, the minority leader, said he and other Republicans were pained to back the measure, but in light of the potential consequences for the economy and all Americans, "We need to renew our efforts to find a solution that Congress can support."

Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., said there was scant time to reopen legislation that was the product of hard-fought bipartisan negotiations.

"What happened today was not a failure of a bill, it was a failure of will," said Dodd, the Banking Committee chairman. "Our hope is that cooler heads will prevail, people will think about what they did today and recognize that this is not just scare tactics _ it's reality."

A brutal round of partisan finger-pointing followed the vote.

Republicans blamed Pelosi's scathing speech near the close of the debate _ which assailed Bush's economic policies and a "right-wing ideology of anything goes, no supervision, no discipline, no regulation" of financial markets _ for the defeat. It was not much different from her usual tough words against the president and his party.

"We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House," Boehner said.

Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the whip, estimated that Pelosi's speech changed the minds of a dozen Republicans who might otherwise have supported the plan.

That amounted to an appalling accusation by Republicans against Republicans, said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the Financial Services Committee: "Because somebody hurt their feelings, they decide to punish the country."

More than a repudiation of Democrats, Frank said, Republicans' refusal to vote for the bailout was a rejection of their own president.

Indeed, many GOP lawmakers spurned Bush's urgent calls for action. "We have a gun to our head," said Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, R-Fla., who opposed the bill. "This isn't legislation _ it's extortion."

The two men campaigning to replace Bush watched the situation closely _ from afar _ and demanded action.

In Iowa, Republican John McCain said his rival Barack Obama and congressional Democrats "infused unnecessary partisanship into the process. Now is not the time to fix the blame; it's time to fix the problem."

Obama said, "Democrats, Republicans, step up to the plate, get it done."

Lawmakers were under extraordinary pressure from powerful outside groups, which gave notice they considered the legislation a "key vote" _ one they would consider when rating members of Congress.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said opponents of the bailout would pay for their stance.

"Make no mistake: When the aftermath of congressional inaction becomes clear, Americans will not tolerate those who stood by and let the calamity happen," said R. Bruce Josten, the Chamber's top lobbyist, in a letter to members.

The conservative Club for Growth made a similar threat to supporters of the bailout.

"We're all worried about losing our jobs," Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., declared in an impassioned speech in support of the bill before the vote. "Most of us say, 'I want this thing to pass, but I want you to vote for it _ not me.'"

"We're in this moment, and if we fail to do the right thing, Heaven help us," he said.

If Congress doesn't come around on a bailout, more pressure would fall on the Federal Reserve.

The Fed, which has been providing billions in short-term loans to squeezed banks to help them overcome credit stresses, could keep expanding those loans to encourage lending. And, it could keep working with other central banks to inject billions into financial markets overseas.

It also has the power to expand emergency lending to other types of companies and even to individuals if they are unable to secure adequate credit.

___

Associated Press writers Jeannine Aversa, Jim Abrams and Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — In a vote that shook the government, Wall Street and markets around the world, the House on Monday defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue for the nation's financial system, leavin...
WASHINGTON — In a vote that shook the government, Wall Street and markets around the world, the House on Monday defeated a $700 billion emergency rescue for the nation's financial system, leavin...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8,931
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (180 total)
02:04 AM on 10/01/2008
NO TAXES FOR RICH FOR TWO YEARS! WHAT "COOKS"

REPUB "COOKS" ARE GOING TO PAY ZERO TAX MONEY FOR NEXT TWO YEARS
WITH NO STRINGS ATTACHED - THIS WILL COST FAR MORE THAN $700 BILLION!
WITH NO CONTROLS

VOTE NO PLEASE VOTE NO!


Tom Delay the old Repub House Leader said he wants the CAPITAL GAINS TAX REDUCED TO ZERO FOR TWO YEARS!

That would be the BIGGEST BAILOUT IN OUR HISTORY!

IT WOULD MAKE THE $700 BILLION LOOK LIKE A peanut!

ANOTHER REPUB TAKE FROM THE MIDDLE CLASS!

OBAMA CAN KISS HIS PACKAGES GOODBYE!

DON'T LET THEM DO THIS!
02:00 AM on 10/01/2008
THEY WANT FAR MORE THAN $700 BILLION THEY WANT NO STINGS ATTACHED!!!!!

Tom Delay the old Repub House Leader said he wants the CAPITAL GAINS TAX REDUCED TO ZERO FOR TWO YEARS!

That would be the BIGGEST BAILOUT IN OUR HISTORY!

IT WOULD MAKE THE $700 BILLION LOOK LIKE A peanut!

ANOTHER REPUB TAKE FROM THE MIDDLE CLASS!

OBAMA CAN KISS HIS PACKAGES GOODBYE!

DON'T LET THEM DO THIS!
01:58 AM on 10/01/2008
NOW THEY WANT NO TAXES FOR A YEAR!

Tom Delay the old Repub House Leader said he wants the CAPITAL GAINS TAX REDUCED TO ZERO FOR TWO YEARS!

That would be the BIGGEST BAILOUT IN OUR HISTORY!

IT WOULD MAKE THE $700 BILLION LOOK LIKE A peanut!

ANOTHER REPUB TAKE FROM THE MIDDLE CLASS!

OBAMA CAN KISS HIS PACKAGES GOODBYE!

DON'T LET THEM DO THIS!
08:00 PM on 09/30/2008
Pelosi and Frank, now there's a perfectly.............worthless couple. Gosh, they do continue to degrade, erode, and an embarrass america. How proud you liberals must be. Maybe you can write and sing a song about them.
06:56 PM on 09/30/2008
Ever hear of Wantagate?
03:09 PM on 09/30/2008
Can't find comment to address this issue, somebody help me:
The Democrats have a valid point....why take full responsibility for pushing this bill through? Only 30% of House Republicans supported this bill vs 60% Dems even though it came from a Rep Administration.

Reps complained that Dems could have just pushed it through since they are the majority. Isn't it odd that a bill submitted by Reps would be rejected by them? And why should the Dems take sole responsibility for forcing the bill as it was when many of the conditions they wanted were rejected?

Am I watching too many youtube conspiracy videos or does it seem like the Reps are trying to force the Dems to pass a bill THEY submitted which then puts Dems on the spot if it doesn't work....? Say the Democratic house pushed this through, it doesn't work and all us taxpayers are on the hook for Bush's 700 billion dollar severance package while the economy continues to fall apart....what happens Nov 4th?

This was so important he "suspended" his campaign and tried to delay the debate to go "save" our economy, McCain's now saying he may not vote on this bill. If Dems pushed it thru based on their votes alone, McCain would have no negative attachment to this bill, neither would his party. But Obama and the Dems would have sole responsibility for it. McCain's "dead end" turns into full speed ahead...to Pennsylvania Ave.

Too cynical? Too partisan? What?
12:54 PM on 09/30/2008
To almost all the "ignorant" Americans who are opposed to the $700B bailout, some of the names and faces may have changed, but the method of delivery of Washington's message is the same as was used to gain public support of the Iraq War. Without adequate explanation, what the politicians from Bush on down are saying, in effect, is that "the bailout is absolutely necessary because I say it is." They have relied this time around on gaining support from the Americans who were lied to and misled about Iraq and who only learned years later that they had been duped, but this time those Americans followed that old adage of "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." The Washingtonians are the ones who forgot the lesson about the run-up to the Iraq War: that lesson is that no one is going to heed appeals from politicians based not on facts but on their assumed credibility. Trust them? Believe them? No way.
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
02:35 PM on 09/30/2008
I STRONGLY OPPOSE ANY WALL STREET BAILOUT. eSPECIALLY IF bUSH IS PUSHING IT.

But when Dennis Kucinich is also against the bailout, I KNOW it's wrong. I know Dennis is more for WE THE PEOPLE than any politician I know. Go Dennis!! If you were in office there'd been no 911, no Iraq War, no ridiculous trickle down economics. like McBush., and like Gore & Clinton, we'd still have peave & prosperity.

NO BAIL OUT, NO WAY, NO HOW.
04:58 PM on 10/01/2008
WARNING TO HOUSE AND SENATE DEMS

Despite Speaker Pelosi's "Play It Safe" Strategy (Impeachment off the table, Symbolic Votes, Non Binding Resolutions...The Dems seem to have forgotten the most important lesson in Politics 101

IGNORE YOUR CONSTITUENTS AT YOUR OWN PERIL!

"NO BANKER LEFT BEHIND PLAN!

It's troublesome how many Wall Stre economists think this bailout plan wont work. We're told the consequences of doing nothing could be so bad something must be passed quick.Seems we've been here before. We were told Iraq posed such a grave threat that we had to invade now. Or the consequences could come back in the form of a mushroom cloud. Now we're being told we must act now or the consequences could be a mushroom cloud over Wall Street.

It's playing the fear card again. Between the tax cuts for the wealthiest, the fraud and War profiteering in Iraq, and now a 700 billion dollar Wall Street bailout, there's been an incredible amount of wealth transferred from the poor and middle class to the already ultra rich. I fear this is one last looting of the U.S. Treasury by the Bu$hCo crime cabal before they go riding off into the sunset and out of office. They will have successfully tied the hands of our next President, preventing him from doing many of the things he may have wanted to do. We'll be too bankrupt a nation for any real economic prosperity or expansion.

Jeff Morris-Saugerties, N.Y.- DeJaVu57
12:30 PM on 09/30/2008
I wish we could give the dems credit on this one, but it is my understanding that a fair amount of them voted yet again to give George Bush a carte blanch check to do anything he wants without any oversight or measuring the merit of his proposal. If it wasn't for the republicans a) throwing a tantrum, and b) worrying about the upcoming elections, this sucker would have passed.

Who was the nimrod that said he wanted to shrink government enough to drown it in a bathtub? I guess small government only matters when it means the republicans are able to shovel more money to their corporate friends. When their friends are at risk for losing big bags of cash, well, it's bail-out time.

Lost in all this bail-out business is that lots of low and middle-income services (clinic, sopcial services, educational aid) is going to be slashed becasue of these greed heads.
11:13 AM on 09/30/2008
What Happened? This video explains it in detail..and has some scared on the hill..it's been passed around Congress and some politicians were able to get it pulled from You Tube:

http://beltwayblips.com/video/burning_down_the_house_what_caused_our_economic_crisis/
08:43 PM on 09/30/2008
This video is propaganda and "explains" the crisis by using partisan (Obama) blame and not putting everything in context while making McCain out to be someone whose panacea was mistaken for snake juice. This is how we get ourselves in messes like this. Things are not black and white.

This situation is America's fault. Everybody who purchased a house they couldn't afford. Those who didn't vote for regulation. Those whose greed was insatiable to the point of destroying livelihoods. And we will continue repeating patterns as long as we have this us and them mentality. We are in trouble and if we can't agree and work together then maybe states should start seceding from this broken union. And it is not going to be summed up in a video that blames one side and exonerates the other. We are all to blame. Well maybe not me I only have small credit card debt and have stopped using any credit. I don't own a home and my car is paid off, I don't gamble in the stock market either. Our system is smoke and mirrors, we don't produce much of anything anymore except crooks.

So make your bs videos and watch Rome burn.
11:06 AM on 09/30/2008
The conservative news and radio talk shows have done a great job in fostering hate between the rich and the poor in this country. They have preyed on all of the foibles of mankind to gain control of our government. They have spewed their vitrolic messages over the airways for at least eight years day and night. The public believes them. So, now the poor and what's left of the middle class will learn that the poor will get poorer. Bush is their poster boy as Mccain /Palin their poster leaders for the next 8 years. Nikita Krueschev predicted that " America will fall from with in". I thought that he was wrong but now I am beginning to wonder. These groups are bullies. They laugh and poke fun at other Americans. We put them in power. We need to remove every Republican in office and stop listening to these sickos and watching their TV shows.
The Democrats need to grow some balls.
We the people in America need each other. We have to help each other.. and be kind and loving to each other. Be family! We have lost that loving feeling. We have allowed our country to be in this fix by not being good stewards of our rewards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wassilij
shamanlight
08:30 AM on 09/30/2008
Take note on who votes for this B.S. bailout and vote the bastards out of office on Nov. 4th!! NO BAILOUT!!NOT NOW-- NOT LATER!!This is more of Bush administration scare tactics!!
08:29 AM on 09/30/2008
Well, the fertile minds of hollywood couldn't improve on this fiasco. Want to know what thinking people in America know and think, about Nancy not geeting the nod and the markets visit www.wisequeen.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
08:12 AM on 09/30/2008
Banks are holding money because they want to make the gains they are use too and the bailout will give them that chance

People have no money becuase of lost jobs and low or flat wages

This is the economic reality of right now. Just like is was with a Monetary Bubble on 1929

If the poor bailout the Rich, the Rich will reward them by taking away social security and medicare
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LHoney
REINSTATE GLASS STEAGALL!!!
07:53 AM on 09/30/2008
EVERYONE MUST READ THIS: http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=235