Al Gore: "The Climate For Change"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |   November 10, 2008 10:11 AM


In a New York Times op-ed, former Vice President Al Gore looks at Barack Obama's win through the lens of climate change, and offers a five-point plan for the next president:

The inspiring and transformative choice by the American people to elect Barack Obama as our 44th president lays the foundation for another fateful choice that he -- and we -- must make this January to begin an emergency rescue of human civilization from the imminent and rapidly growing threat posed by the climate crisis.


...

Here's what we can do -- now: we can make an immediate and large strategic investment to put people to work replacing 19th-century energy technologies that depend on dangerous and expensive carbon-based fuels with 21st-century technologies that use fuel that is free forever: the sun, the wind and the natural heat of the earth.

What follows is a five-part plan to repower America with a commitment to producing 100 percent of our electricity from carbon-free sources within 10 years. It is a plan that would simultaneously move us toward solutions to the climate crisis and the economic crisis -- and create millions of new jobs that cannot be outsourced.

First, the new president and the new Congress should offer large-scale investment in incentives for the construction of concentrated solar thermal plants in the Southwestern deserts, wind farms in the corridor stretching from Texas to the Dakotas and advanced plants in geothermal hot spots that could produce large amounts of electricity.

Second, we should begin the planning and construction of a unified national smart grid for the transport of renewable electricity from the rural places where it is mostly generated to the cities where it is mostly used. New high-voltage, low-loss underground lines can be designed with "smart" features that provide consumers with sophisticated information and easy-to-use tools for conserving electricity, eliminating inefficiency and reducing their energy bills. The cost of this modern grid -- $400 billion over 10 years -- pales in comparison with the annual loss to American business of $120 billion due to the cascading failures that are endemic to our current balkanized and antiquated electricity lines.

Third, we should help America's automobile industry (not only the Big Three but the innovative new startup companies as well) to convert quickly to plug-in hybrids that can run on the renewable electricity that will be available as the rest of this plan matures. In combination with the unified grid, a nationwide fleet of plug-in hybrids would also help to solve the problem of electricity storage. Think about it: with this sort of grid, cars could be charged during off-peak energy-use hours; during peak hours, when fewer cars are on the road, they could contribute their electricity back into the national grid.

Fourth, we should embark on a nationwide effort to retrofit buildings with better insulation and energy-efficient windows and lighting. Approximately 40 percent of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States come from buildings -- and stopping that pollution saves money for homeowners and businesses. This initiative should be coupled with the proposal in Congress to help Americans who are burdened by mortgages that exceed the value of their homes.

Fifth, the United States should lead the way by putting a price on carbon here at home, and by leading the world's efforts to replace the Kyoto treaty next year in Copenhagen with a more effective treaty that caps global carbon dioxide emissions and encourages nations to invest together in efficient ways to reduce global warming pollution quickly, including by sharply reducing deforestation.

Read the whole thing.

In a New York Times op-ed, former Vice President Al Gore looks at Barack Obama's win through the lens of climate change, and offers a five-point plan for the next president: The inspiring and transf...
In a New York Times op-ed, former Vice President Al Gore looks at Barack Obama's win through the lens of climate change, and offers a five-point plan for the next president: The inspiring and transf...
 
Comments
87
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

The cause of the problem, which most people choose to ignore, is that the human population of the earth is increasingly unsustainable as it grows unrelentingly and as everyone tries to inprove their own standard of living. The only way to beat this crisis is to limit and then cut the population by everyone around the world buying into the concept of one child per family for two or three generations. Population will be constrained at some stage by natural means, but it would be better for us humans to do it ourselves benignly without the thirst, hunger, disease and wars that will otherwise do the job. The sooner we decide to do it, the better the environment will be for future generations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 11/11/2008
photo

Everybody's too afraid to talk about that. It's like Impeachment, not for cowards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 11/11/2008

This reminds me of the election. No matter what the real facts are, as long as the media wants the sheep to believe, they will. Years from now we will have another has been politician tell us our biggest fear is global cooling. And he will become REAL wealthy too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Oh, you're just pissed that Dewey lost. You'll be up to your neck in seawater still griping. Buy a clue. When icebergs the size of Texas are breaking off, you're still buying lock, stock and barrel what big oil is selling you. We don't have time to save every Do Do bird that's squawking. Either walk erect or eat bananas. Your choice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Gore for EPA head. Yeah, I know. But I still like the idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 11/10/2008

Gore is right on point with this article. I know there are a lot of you out there who don't agree, but until we get started on this, we are just sticking our heads in the sand. The electricity grid IS a huge project, but it is the lynch pin in our hopes for a green economy and it would provide thousands of jobs in the process.

Hybrid and electric cars are the future. They aren't going to solve all the problems, but they will make a huge dent in our oil dependency. Retooling the auto industry is part of Obama's plans. Retooling and creating small and medium size businesses to make green parts and supplies will be the next economic revolution in this country.

Solar power has HUGE potential. Check out this article from Scientific American. As a huge solar grid comes on line, it also creates opportunity for a huge solar industry which will go all the way from national power to individual homes and businesses that will connect to the new grid and put in power and take it out for their use. I have friends in CA and AZ who have NO utility bills.

We need the new grid to make these projects work. And who knows what else will come of this. The technology is moving ahead quickly and with government support and everyone participating, the sky (pardon the pun) is the limit.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 11/10/2008

Wow, the anti-Gore anti-global-warming guys showed up fast. Maybe the flatlanders will show up next and weigh in on this subject too.
I'm glad Gore is involved. He's got a big head start in studying this issue. Doesn't mean Obama is going to do everything in any plan Gore offers, especially not right away.
Anyway requiring cash investment will probably have to wait, especially since Bush will continue looting the Treasury and digging us further and further into debt the next two months. I wish I was more confident that all that bailout money wasn't ending up in somebody's Swiss bank account. I'm sure the sharks are getting some good bites in any case, especially whenever the money moves from one place to another.
Back to Gore: If only we'd had a man with a brain for the last 8 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 11/10/2008

The "flatlanders" ??? isn't one of them on their way back to Alaska and the other heading to Iowa to gear up for 2012 ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 11/10/2008

Gore is aware there will have to be compromise, I hope. We're already dragging the neanderthal Republicans and conservatives kicking and screaming into the 21st century with the election of an African American for heaven's sake! Wind, yes! Solar, yes! Hybrids, yes! But we'll also have to wean ourselves from oil and that won't happen in 10 years. Patience, friends. Let's concentrate on ways to make conservatives and Republicans think doing the right thing will make them money. If they think they can grab all the money they will run to Congress to get new laws passed. We just have to make sure they think it's their idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Good point. After all, we did get them to breath through their noses (most of them).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 11/10/2008

ATTENTION ALL KOOL-AID DRINKERS !!! LIKE IT OR NOT FOSSIL-BASED FUELS WILL BE THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR AT LEAST THE NEXT 50 YEARS. I'M SURE IT IS A FEEL-GOOD THING TO BE FOR ALL THESE LITTLE PROGRAMS THAT WOULD WORK VERY WELL IN CITIES WITH POPULATIONS LESS THAN 10. LET'S FIND A WAY TO CLEAN UP COAL AND MAKE CARS MUCH MORE FUEL EFFICIENT AND DEVELOP WORK PROGRAMS FOR ALL THESE LOW LIFES LINING UP TO GO ON THE PUBLIC DOLE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 11/10/2008

I like the fuel efficient cars idea. I like the clean coal idea. Not sure about the rest here.... What color is the Kool-Aid?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

From the frothing this one's doing, I gather the color is either REDstate or Little GREEN Footballs. :)
gulp gulp gulp!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 11/10/2008

You are only right if we continue the present "head in the sand" thinking. Check my other post for the solar plan that could change the country within 10 years and really get us out of the woods in 20.

By the way, all your shouting, (caps) doesn't make you right or cause anyone to pay more attention to you. Most of us automatically skip posts like yours.

You are what makes this kind of change difficult. You have been brainwashed and you haven't learned to think outside the box and be innovative.

But look on the bright side. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Funny!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

oouch. My ears hurt from SO MUCH YELLING! OK, now that you have our "attention", what's all the ranting about? (I believe you want the Redstate tab).
Look, I don't have much time, right now, so stick around and I'll come back later to ignore you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

I thought dinosaurs were extinct!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 11/12/2008

Great!!! Gore is trying to stick it to Obama here we go everyone. What about coal?? what about oil?? i think if these things are off the table we are in trouble. Please don't put all your trust into Gore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

"Everyone"? Did ya forget where you were for a second there, Redstater? What about coal or oil? OK, we'll try this from a different tack. Pretend you're a little birdy in a cage... (not much of a stretch)... and you have a candle in there too keep you warm. Now pretend there's 6.5 billion of your fine feathered friends in there with you. And it's not a candle. It's the exhaust pipe of a car.
As far as putting all my trust in Gore? Are you nuts? I'm a Liberal, I place my mistrust equally among all. But until I hear a better solution, Gore's got me behind him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 11/10/2008

Where have you been. This is the Obama plan. Gore is just giving his blessing.

Coal has to be clean.
OIl is here and doesn't need to be propped up. It needs to be phased out.
Gore is right on point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

There is no such thing as clean coal. It's just a euphemism meant to palliate the coal producing states. Let's get off the coal train and get onboard the wind and solar train. Those are the only real renewable energy sources with a future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Watch "Heat" on PBS. If that doesn't scare the piss out of you, then you don't have urine in your body. We are WAAAAAAAAAY past denying this. It may be too late as it is! YOU damned flat earth, 6000 year old earth with kids riding on dinosaurs, global warming denying people better batten down the hatches. It's not the lord baby jesus coming to getcha, it's MOTHER NATURE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 11/10/2008

HALLELUJAH!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

You are healed, my son. Go in pieces.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Sixth: On your bike!
My fellow Americans {;>)))
With all of the great attention Al Gore has given to global warming, never, not even when Mr. Gore spoke recently on global warming in my "home town", Aalsmeer in the heart of the Netherlands did he or any influential American that I've found ever suggest much less lobby for re-introducing the bicycle into the American transportation and culture and end that love affaire with the car.

In the Netherlands the BIKE is king, not the auto. EVERYONE, from cabinet ministers on down uses the bike at least occassionally and usually very often to exclusively coupled with public transportation.I live out in the country and I do not use my car but MAYBE a couple of times a month. Couples, entire families bike together during the week, weekends and on vacations. It is a real pleasure.
Bikers in the Netherlands are very well protected by law as well as through car driver awareness and care. This also helps people alot more fit and thus reduces medical costs for society. I rarely, i.e. once or twice a month, see anyone grossly or even very overweight. On my trips to the States all I have to do is pivot 360 degrees and see several to many grossly overweight, , a sea of fat people.
So, my 300 million fellow Americans, on yourr bikes!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 11/10/2008


Dude,

Chill. Bikes don't work here well. The change that is needed to make the bicycle effective are too numerous to put into a 200 word comment. Suffice to say, it will take a _huge_ effort. I support the effort, though, and we will perhaps get there. But this is not the time to distract us with a system we CANNOT put in place effectively for decades, at best.

Just to get you thinking: I'm in Oakland, California. I sometimes have business in Los Angeles, sometimes in San Jose, and at other times Sacramento. I am far from alone. No bicycle is going to help me do that. What I need is efficient rail service - something like Die Bahn. Even when we are talking about just working across Oakland or in San Francisco, the size of the place and the hills involved would be for you, like having to go, say, from Utrecht to Osnabrueck... ...OK, that's an exageration, but European scale is _very_ different than what we have here.

All that said, I would like to move toward a more bicycle friendly place, it's just not ready for prime time.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 11/10/2008

Every little bit helps. We are a country of 300,000,000 people. Every little bit helps.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 11/10/2008

Yeah, I could get behind commuter rail service in Atlanta too. Bedroom communities are all 10 to 40 miles out of downtown. We ALL drive downtown every day. For a commuter train I would definitely bike to the station and ride the rails downtown.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 11/10/2008

Nobody is suggesting to commute to LA on a bike. We are, however trying to develop a high speed train. And you can put you bike on the train for when you get there, maybe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 11/10/2008

Well said! Please keep making this point.

Using bicycles will serve all of us well! School children should be encourage to ride their bikes to school--and schools ought to figure out ways to ensure their safety on bikes. Many communities in this country have bike trails. If we can connect them to downtown areas, many suburbanites will be able to bike to work.

One more thing: We should enourage gyms to hook their exercise machines to a generator--all the energy used at workout should be productive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 11/10/2008

Excellent. There will be details to work out, but when we get everyone thinking and doing we will make real progress.

The new electricity grid will make so many things possible.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 11/10/2008

Great idea for the Netherlands where it's completely flat and nothing is over a couple of miles away. I commute 26 miles each way, up and down VERY hilly terrain. Much as I applaud the idea there is no way I can do 2 marathons a day and still work 9.5 hours and take care of my home and family.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 11/10/2008

Kay:

But you wouldn't mind driving an electric car, right? Your time will come. Maybe a bike isn't for you.

I'm a bike rider, but I also know it is not going to work everywhere. No one is actually suggesting that. If we are all on board with saving energy, then things will get better. Every little bit helps.

Actually, the current financial crises has already had an effect on oil consumption in this country. In my neighborhood, for example, there are fewer fools out joy-riding and taking aimless trips and more people are carpooling.

Even if the price of oil stays down, if you don't have a job you still can't fill the tank.

The task at hand, the kind of thing that this election and Obama have done, is to get everyone involved and inspired to help. THAT IS HUGE. That is what we have not had since JFK had everyone doing 50 mile hikes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Excellent point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 11/10/2008

Then your work should be closer to your home...

But, don't worry, most "jobs" depend on the sea of cheap oil THAT'S RUNNING OUT! So you won't have to commute to that grind for long.

You WILL have to learn how to survive locally though. The days of the 1500 Caesar salad and the 9000 mile grapes from Chile are numbered and the number is small.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Hi, Kay. When I lived in Amsterdam I biked 32 kms round trip per day. When I lived in Germany I biked 50 kms round trip per day, and Germany is hilly and mountainous. It is the infrastructure which is important, but also the mentality. Biking costs 0,0 in gas, car maintenance, car insurance. I've had my same bike for 37 years. How long have you had your car and how many cars have you had in 37 years? How much did you pay for all those car expenses?
So you would wait until Obama & co rebuild all the infrastructure then go back and do it again to allow for bikes and public transportation?
I am not just talking about biking to work, I'm talking about biking to the store, biking for enjoyment, vacation instead of automatically hopping into a car on a gas burning exercise. The healthcare cost to society of obesity and smoking (most bikers don't smoke) is many billions per year.
On y'r bike, mate!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 11/12/2008

Digg posted an interview with Al Gore in which he said he has no interest in an official post. As an independent Nobel laureate, he's still able to be an unofficial advisor to the Obama administration while not being locked into the impossible task of pleasing everyone.

I'm disappointed that we won't see him as Sec of the Interior, but I see his point -- I wouldn't want to work in DC, either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 11/10/2008

His influence on the world stage is much greater as an indipendent person seperate from the Obama administration.

The buzz is caroline Kenedy for Un ambasadore

Obama could do something new and officaly make Gore the Unofficial (no strings ) ambasdore on the environment to the world/ UN Kenedy as our ambasadore to the Un but stepping aside on enviro issues for Gore to speak on our behalf and to stir the other nations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Meat is the primary cause of global warming. Burning fossil fuels is the secondary cause. When will Al Gore be courageous enough to speak up about this truth. It's like trying to achieve energy independence by drilling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

cite and explain because that sounds like bs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 11/10/2008

The meat that goveg is talking about is big agri-business corn fed, feed lot beef. Once you figure in the petrochemical fertilizers that allow corn to be grown in mass quantities, and the shipping of said corn and creation of feed from it, and the creation and shipment of antibiotics and medications for cows who are sick because they are not designed to live on corn and then the shipment of the meat itself to warehouses and stores (and the methane production off the cows, which *is* impressive), I'm not sure that it's the #1 carbon producer but it is right up there.

This is why those of who love meat and recognize that humans are designed to be omnivores, but who want a smaller footprint have started to support small, locally raised, pasture fed beef and raise our own chickens, etc. etc. etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

Well, I'm going to do MY part and eat up all the cows. There, problem solved. (it's going to take awhile, pass the A-1).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 11/10/2008

The problem is, if you eat all the cows, then you will be the problem. : -)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

I wish Obama would consider making Al Gore a cabinet-level Secretary on Environmental Affairs with broad authority to make the changes he has called for here. If we can spend $10billion per month in Iraq, then we can afford this program. As Obama has mentioned, the side-effect will be good jobs that cannot be outsourced! Good for the planet, good for the country, good for the economy, and good for the people....how can we lose?

I remember back a few months ago, when Gore made his speech on the environment, that he was ridiculed by the right-wing press. It was impossible, too expensive, a "dream", etc. Well, I believe Obama is going to prove them wrong. With Al's help, we can do this...YES WE CAN!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 11/10/2008

Gore has stated -- many times -- that he will NOT accept any position in the government, so what's with everyone insisting on Obama offering one? The man is doing quite well for himself and sees his most effective role as being one of spokesman. He doesn't need a government position to continue doing what he is doing. And he doesn't need a government postion to lend an air of authority on the subject. He can provide consultation from where he is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 11/10/2008

See , the liberal extremist good ole boys have started their agendas .This is why Rahm Emmanuel is Barack's chief of staff.... So that whack jobs like Al are put in their place immediately .Until we use ALL OF OUR RESOURCES , including Nukes , and fossil fuels ( yes that can be done ) we still see Al as doing this fro profit. The oil companies are still only making 7 - 8 % while Al's carbon credits are about 200%

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 11/10/2008

lol. What a laugh. Cap and trade is seen as a likely combination to be adopted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

This isn't about profit it is about saving the human race from an extinction of our own making.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 11/10/2008

It amazes me that anyone so ignorant can still figure out how to work a computer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

This fine fellow is oinking about us "liberal extremists" on a Progressive Liberal Democratic blog.... Didn't Dave Chappelle cover this with "Bigsby, the Black White Supremacist" episode?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 11/10/2008

zzzzzz -- yawn

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 11/10/2008

And what, pray tell, are you going to breath?

And when, pray tell, are you going to learn how to live underwater?

And how, pray tell, will you feed yourself on 1/4 the current arable land?

Ah, but you won't have the "liberal extremist good ole boys" to worry about...or anything else for that matter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 11/10/2008

Great Plan. Just one question. How do we get China and India on board?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 11/10/2008

I think you start by leading by example. Then you go the Indians and the Chinese and say, "This is what we did. And guess what? You're going to do it too. The rest of the world is already on board. We're going to sell you the technology. We're going to offer you incentives. And we're going to walk you through it step by step so you don't screw it up."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 11/10/2008

Agreed. And you help them do it by donating the technology.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 11/10/2008
photo

You have a fantastic point, but not one which should delay us from moving forward on our own. If we build the clean energy technologies of the future first then we will be in a perfect position to profit from their worldwide adoption.

Besides, once the glaciers which feed the headwaters of the Yellow, Yangtze and Ganges rivers melt the Chinese and Indians will need our help simply to survive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 11/10/2008

I was in China recently for work and had lunch with some Chinese friends (scientists) who had just returned to living in China after about 10 years of living in the US. They said -- and I don't have any sources to quote on this -- that China is investing heavily in renewable energy because they know it's their only way forward. There's simply no way they can continue their economic growth while relying on fossil fuels and outdated technologies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 11/10/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect