Streamlined Modification Program: The New Homeowner Bailout From Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Streamlined Modification Program: The New Homeowner Bailout From Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALAN ZIBEL | November 11, 2008 11:03 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Troy Courtney stands on the porch of his Mill Valley, Calif., home on Saturday, Nov. 1, 2008. His family is about to move out of the house following a foreclosure. (AP Photo/Noah Berger)

WASHINGTON — Once again, the government has offered another plan to help troubled homeowners. Once again, critics say it doesn't go far enough. The plan announced Tuesday by federal officials and mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac sounds sweeping in its approach: Borrowers would get reduced interest rates or longer loan terms to make their payments more affordable.

But there's a catch. The plan focuses on loans Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee. They are the dominant players in the U.S. mortgage market but represent only 20 percent of delinquent loans.

Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., said the plan "falls short of what is needed to achieve wide-scale modifications of distressed mortgages."

With the government spending billions to aid distressed banks, "we must also devote some of that money to fixing the front-end problem: too many unaffordable home loans," Bair said in a statement.

Democrats on Capitol Hill aren't satisfied, either. "When the loan is chopped up into a million pieces and any investor can block a modification from happening, a program like this will only scratch the surface of the mortgage crisis," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

The economic crisis is still unnerving Wall Street. Stocks fell again as investors found few industries safe from the consumer spending slump. With Starbucks Corp. and luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers Inc. both posting disappointing quarterly results, the Dow Jones industrial average closed down nearly 180 points.

The financial crisis took on a new dimension on Capitol Hill. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for "emergency and limited financial assistance" for the battered auto industry and urged the outgoing Bush administration to join lawmakers in reaching a quick compromise during a postelection session of Congress.

The new mortgage assistance plan was announced by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which seized control of Fannie and Freddie in September, and other government and industry officials.

Story continues below
advertisement

Officials say they hope the new approach, which takes effect Dec. 15, will become a model for loan servicing companies that collect mortgage payments and distribute them to investors. These companies have been roundly criticized for being slow to respond to a surge in defaults.

James Lockhart, director of the housing finance agency, urged investors to "rapidly adopt this program as the industry standard."

Still, government officials had no estimate of how many homeowners would be able to qualify. Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee nearly 31 million U.S. mortgages, or nearly six of every 10 outstanding. But they have far lower overall delinquency rates _ under 2 percent.

To qualify, borrowers would have to be at least three months behind on their home loans and would have to owe 90 percent or more than the home is worth. Investors who do not occupy their homes would be excluded, as would borrowers who have filed for bankruptcy.

Qualified borrowers would get help in several ways: The interest rate would be reduced so that they would not pay more than 38 percent of their gross income on housing expenses. Another option is for loans to be extended to 40 years from 30, and for some of the principal to be deferred, interest-free.

Though lenders have beefed up their efforts to aid borrowers over the past year, their action hasn't kept up with the worst housing recession in decades.

More than 4 million American homeowners, or 9 percent of borrowers with a mortgage, were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of June, according to the most recent data from the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Indeed, Tuesday's announcement comes too late for Troy Courtney, a 44-year-old San Francisco police officer.

He moved out of his home in Mill Valley, Calif., earlier this month _ taking his children, three dogs and one cat with him _ after failing at several attempts to get a loan modification or a short sale. A short sale occurs when the lender agrees to receive less than the loan is worth.

Courtney worked overtime and tapped into his retirement account to try to catch up with two loans on his home. But in the end, he couldn't persuade Countrywide Financial, which managed the loan for Wells Fargo, to modify the loan.

"I feel like I missed the boat," he said of the new efforts to help more homeowners. "I'm just mad at the whole system."

One reason the problem has been so tough to solve for borrowers such as Courtney is that the vast majority of troubled loans were packaged into complex investments that have proved extremely hard to unwind.

Deutsche Bank estimates more than 80 percent of the $1.8 trillion in outstanding troubled loans have been packaged and sold in slices to investors worldwide. Most of those loans won't likely be helped by the new plan.

The rest are "whole loans," which are easier to modify because they have only one owner.

Still, after more than a year of slow and weak initiatives, there seems to be a serious effort among major retail banks to get at the heart of the credit crisis: falling U.S. home prices and record foreclosures.

Citigroup said Monday it is halting foreclosures for borrowers who live in their own homes, have decent incomes and stand a good chance of making lowered mortgage payments.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. last month expanded its mortgage modification program to an estimated $70 billion in loans, which could aid as many as 400,000 customers. The bank already has modified about $40 billion in mortgages, helping 250,000 customers since early 2007.

Starting Dec. 1, Bank of America Corp. plans to modify an estimated 400,000 loans held by newly acquired Countrywide Financial Corp. as part of an $8.4 billion legal settlement reached with 11 states in early October.

_______

Associated Press Writers David Espo and Sara Lepro contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Once again, the government has offered another plan to help troubled homeowners. Once again, critics say it doesn't go far enough. The plan announced Tuesday by federal officials an...
WASHINGTON — Once again, the government has offered another plan to help troubled homeowners. Once again, critics say it doesn't go far enough. The plan announced Tuesday by federal officials an...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
21
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

The government has already a very good program : HopeforHopeOwners . It is much better than the Streamline Modification one but the banks don't want to apply it.
In the Hope for Homeowners program the banks will have to forgive part of the debt and give an FHA mortgage ( http://www.hopenowmortgages.com/ for the whole information) with the streamline they can change the terms of the actual loan ( 40 years , divide the principal, etc) so they don't forgive anything..­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 12/11/2008
photo

Since TRICKY Adjustable mortgages are the root cause of this CRISIS we should find ways to bypass the Mortgage Banking System using technology! The Internet databases and computer software are being considered by Fannie and Freddie to deliver Low Fixed Rate Refinancing loans (my suggestion is the Fed Rate +2% or 3% and the Fed Rate is 1%). 98% of the application can be automated followed by manual review at the end by Fannie/Freddie representatives. This service can be offered in libraries for those not having internet access.

This circumvents the Mortgage Banker Association Banks which are blocking the reworking of the existing "TRICK" loans as they have to take losses. At the very least this new direct approach forces them to either rework these old "TRICK" loans or have a "Walk-Away" which is even more costly to them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 AM on 11/24/2008
- kstuff I'm a Fan of kstuff 5 fans permalink

It's too late, way too late. Way too little.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 11/12/2008
- Blue in NH I'm a Fan of Blue in NH 12 fans permalink
photo

Personally, I feel shafted. My wife and I have no debt except for the VA mortgage on our house. Because we bought it in 2005 we are probably under water on it. Meanwhile we have lost 30% of our retirement savings. What help can we expect as we move into retirement? None. It is really tempting to just walk away and let the bank have the house.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 11/12/2008
- Egalitare I'm a Fan of Egalitare 6 fans permalink
photo

But do you like the house you're in? Can you keep making the payments?

If the answers are "yes" and "yes", then you're not shafted.

Will you lose more "market value" on your home next year, the year after that? Probably. But depending on how close you are to retirement, your 30% "loss" needs to be compared to many people who lost a lot more.

Let's face it: no one wants to think they will be dependent on SSI, but if this situation has taught us anything, it's that those Sunday Morning Talk Show commercials that speak to a comfortable retirement weren't really talking to most of us. Most of us are going to retire on SSI, a meager pension (if you had one) and a PT job. Our 401ks and other instruments will buy us a few more creature comforts along the way, but not a beach house in the Hamptons or the Caymans or El Salvador.

Forty percent of all current retirees have ONLY SSI. And that number is only going to grow.

Wall Street caters to the top 1-2% in this country and around the globe. The rest of us are assets and liabilities, debits and credits to them. What we need to do is treasure our common assets: our parks and wildlife refuges, our infrastructure, our great cities, our "amber waves of grain", our ingenuity and most important EACH OTHER.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 11/12/2008

What help do you expect? You bought an overpriced house as a gamble that you will make money on it. Now you want a bailout? Thanks, but no, thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 11/12/2008
- Pdubya I'm a Fan of Pdubya 44 fans permalink

ever hear of inflation?

hyperinflation?

your turn will come.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 11/12/2008
- Caliwoman I'm a Fan of Caliwoman 9 fans permalink

What would happen if we all just stopped paying our mortgages in unison? The entire country?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 11/11/2008

You go first. After we see what happens to you, we, the rest of the country, will follow. Or not.

;-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 11/12/2008
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 380 fans permalink
photo

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG are under investigation!

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2008-09-29-fannie-freddie_N.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 11/11/2008

These guys remind me of the old movie short called, I believe, the Keystone Cops. They are trying to undo the damage of several trillions of bad mortgages with fig leaves buttressed by persistent mendacity. The task is impossible. The more our government obligates billions,, the more hundreds of billions will be demanded. There is no way our government can repair the trillions and trillions of bad real estate, credit card, automobile, banking leveraged bets, and other debt that must be flushed out through bankruptcy. Attempting to bail out bad debt will subject our country to bankruptcy proceedings and chaos. That calumny is unacceptable. The next President must put a stop of raiding our empty Treasury and let the chips fall where they may while creating new industries and jobs that lead to growth and productivity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 11/11/2008

THIS IS NO WAY TO RUN A RAILROAD

Bailouts are complex and should be implemented with more diligence than what we are witnessing.

Here is how to structure a BAILOUT FOR DETROIT, for example:

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/11/solution-for-detroit-gm-friends.html

Is anyone in Paulson's office or Congress paying attention?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 11/11/2008

The mortgage problems are not limited to people who borrowed more than they could afford. I live in Michigan and people don't have jobs. To find work in other cities and states would mean they would have to walk away from their homes that are worth far less than they were 2 years ago. I am making all my house payments but all my equity is gone. If anything happened to my job and I had to move, I would walk away with nothing. I might even still owe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 11/11/2008
- BillyMae I'm a Fan of BillyMae 7 fans permalink

Depends on whether your loan is recorse or nonrecourse, as to whether you would still owe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 11/11/2008

You totally missed the point.
But thanks for your help.
I'll look into that if Ioose my job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 11/11/2008

A 40 year mortgage is a financial life sentence. But unlike with a prison term you have the choice to walk away. And truth to be hold, for many borrowers that might actually be the better alternative. The banks know that and it is not to their advantage, so they rather make the ball at the end of the chain bigger while extending the length of the chain somewhat. In the end, it's not a good deal for the customer, but I doubt that people who fell for these extreme mortgages to begin with will have the intellectual honesty to walk out. Instead they will continue to throw good money after bad. And the banks win, again. Sad, truly sad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 11/11/2008
- phoenics I'm a Fan of phoenics 3 fans permalink

What I'd like to know is, for those homeowners who bought in good faith and who are now upside down on loans because of all of the foreclosures going on around them... what about us?

Can we get lower interest rates? That would certainly help. I've seen home values cut in HALF no more than 45 minutes from me... that's scary.

So what I'd like to know is how these bailout plans will help people like me who feel trapped in homes that are now worth far less?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 11/11/2008

i believe the fix for those that can pay their mortgages but are feeling the pain from the foreclosure crisis from others, is that the Empty housing situation will not get worse due to MORE foreclosures, further reducing your home value, but instead, will also get better as the market buys up lower priced, empty homes.
That way your home values will edge back up each quarter as more unsold homes are sold and off the market (which is what is deflating the market right now - cheap empty homes needing to be sold that are not).

Your home value will Definitely go back up if that works.
How much we dont know yet. Over extended time like 5 yrs, likely a significant amount.
The question is, will these newer procedures actually Work properly and Cut off the bleeding of Foreclosures to stem the tide of lowering house prices?

I think it all depends on how aggressive the feds get with banks holding the mortgages.
If they dont roll up their sleeves, pour money & effort into it, pry not much will change. If they let mortgage companies continue to try to squeeze every last dime out of people that are about to lose their homes, nope. If they make significant attempts to modify mortgages for real & take them down to normal market rates/ terms, then yeah, most lower income persons or people with a high debt to income ration will likely be able to scrape by and keep

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 11/11/2008

Is "buying in good faith" now the new euphemism for "sucker"?

Being upside down on a loan is not a problem. As long as you keep paying that mortgage you are fine. And so is the bank.

Now, if you have taken out an ARM and were hoping to refinance before you got hit with the higher rates... that is a problem. But it's a problem that happened when you signed the dotted line, not one that happened when home prices went down. Read your contract and try to find the clause where it says that your home is guaranteed to appreciate. You won't find it because it is no there. If it was anywhere at the time you took out the loan, it was, at best, in your head.

So now you better think twice as hard about how you are going to pay back at the new rate because you got yourself into trouble and only you can get yourself out of there. Alternatively you just walk away... and stop throwing good money after bad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 11/11/2008
- Egalitare I'm a Fan of Egalitare 6 fans permalink
photo

Assuming you are able to maintain your income and are under no pressure to sell your home over the next 5-7 years, you will be eventually able to continue adding equity to your home. And you'll have new neighbors who will help buttress the value of your home.

But anyone who thought their home equity was going to be their primary retirement fund was deluded then, is deluded now and will be deluded 10 years from now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 11/12/2008

At some point this is all going to come back and bite everybody in the a$$. They're not going to know what happened and the only question is going to be: Is it going to be too late to really roll any of this stuff back and change it? Will they have so much entrenched power, unelected entrenched power for generation after generation, will there be any chance to roll it back? At some point red lights are going to go off. The brains are going to start functioning normally again, and people are going to realize where all this is headed. The danger, of course, as we've been discussing is when you have 47 million Americans that pay no income tax (and whatever percentage of voters that is, 35, 40% of voters) when they figure out that they can vote themselves a mortgage or whatever they want without having to pay anything for it, you're not going to get 'em back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 11/11/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect