Iraq: Mosul's Five-Year Battle Still Sees No Victors

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DENIS D. GRAY | November 11, 2008 02:45 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Iraqi police investigate the site of a car bombing in Mosul, 360 kilometers (225 miles) northwest of Baghdad, Iraq on Saturday, Nov.1, 2008. Five years after the U.S.-led invasion and following a significant drop in violence countrywide over the past year, the battle for Iraq's third largest city still waxes and wanes. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)

MOSUL, Iraq — It's not a pretty sight: Sagging skeletons of two- and three-story buildings under a threatening gray sky. Abandoned shops with corrugated iron fronts riddled by bullet holes. And amid the garbage heaps and pools of fetid rainwater, a roadside bomb set to explode.

Five years after the U.S.-led invasion and following a significant drop in violence nationwide over the past year, the battle for Mosul, Iraq's third largest city, still waxes and wanes.

"This is our hottest area," says Sgt. 1st Class Ron Corella, a decorated combat veteran in this war-scarred quarter of the ancient city where moments before his troops spotted _ and disarmed _ that roadside bomb.

"The enemy knows that if we gain a foothold and they can't push us out, it's another safe haven they have lost. So they have to fight," Corella added.

Lt. Col. Robert Molinari, executive officer of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, says Mosul "looks like Baghdad about 18 months ago" at the height of violence in the Iraqi capital.

It was the generally successful pacification of Baghdad _ the fruit of the so-called troop surge _ that drew al-Qaida and other insurgents to this hub of northern Iraq to open a new battleground and safeguard their infiltration and supply routes.

But on-off security clampdowns, a lack of aid money and a power struggle between Kurds and Sunni Arabs are also blamed for Mosul's woes.

In the city's version of the Baghdad surge, 22,000 U.S. forces and Iraqi troops and police have spread out in an operation called "Mother of Two Springs" _ taken from an Arab nickname for Mosul _ that began in May and went into a new phase Oct. 15.

Story continues below
advertisement

Armored vehicles snake through mile-long lines of traffic, backed up behind checkpoints. Soldiers man sandbagged positions atop houses and mosques. Iraqi and U.S. troops stage patrols around the clock from some 40 makeshift bases in the city of 1.8 million people.

U.S. and Iraqi commanders cite some progress after months of struggling to root out insurgents in street-by-street battles.

Attacks, they say, are down to fewer than 70 a week, compared to about 130 before May. Insurgents have had to switch from well-coordinated attacks to hit-and-run strikes and hurried planting of roadside bombs. Some city quarters are relatively safe, with commerce reviving and shops staying open after dark.

"The people feel more secure, so some dare to come forward with tips about the bad guys," says police Lt. Col. Adel Kader, hunkered down in the Hadba district, one of the city's most violence-ridden.

But nobody is yet declaring victory, and Molinari says the current military push "just treats the symptoms, not the problems" of ethnic politics and a wrecked economy.

On the security front alone, Mosul is a complex nut to crack. Not just al-Qaida, but more than a dozen Sunni Muslim and other insurgent groups are on the loose, together with criminal syndicates and rival tribes.

"Al-Qaida looks to Mosul as a gateway to Iraq. It's a place that it doesn't want to lose," says Molinari, from Fort Hood, Texas. "It is not as such the last stand of al-Qaida. It's a last stand to maintain their lines of communication, thus their viability to conduct operations in Iraq."

Roughly equidistant from the borders of Syria, Iran and Turkey, Mosul has been an important junction on trade and smuggling routes for centuries. The route from Syria across the desert and along the Tigris River is the prime conduit for fresh insurgents.

The core of the insurgency is in the Ottoman Empire-era old town and nearby western Mosul _ densely populated areas, interlaced by narrow alleys stacked with cheek-by-jowl houses and burrowed under with tunnels and caverns.

This is where Corella charged an insurgent machine-gunner to earn a Bronze Star for valor, and where six soldiers were wounded in a recent roadside blast.

"It's key terrain for the insurgents. They continue to fight there because they badly need to control it," says Capt. Justin Davis Harper of Sherman, Texas, commander of the regiment's Killer Troop.

After an attack, he says, the insurgents slip into alleys too narrow for military vehicles. Within this enclave of eight square miles (20 square kilometers) are Mosul's wholesale and retail markets, magnets for extortion, smuggling and business serving as cover for insurgents.

Heavy trucks, ideal for hiding weapons, can move in and out to every point in Iraq and beyond.

"You can buy a bus ticket to just about anywhere, including Mecca," says Harper, referring to Islam's holiest city in Saudi Arabia.

"This is not a final, apocalyptic battle with someone walking off the field as the victor," he says. "It is an achievable goal but it will be months of hard effort and enough Iraqi forces doing the job. It will be messy. It will require time and patience."

And that has been Mosul's problem _ failure to sustain the effort.

Since the 2003 invasion, the pendulum here has swung several times between stark violence and fragile security, and this year is no different.

Last November, when the American regiment arrived, the city's western half was "entirely enemy territory," with other areas not much better, says Maj. John Oliver, operations officer of the regiment's 3rd Squadron.

U.S. and Iraqi forces then froze all commerce, secured the main arteries and fought their way into insurgent strongholds. A dramatic drop in attacks followed. But after midsummer, the violence began to pick up.

"Security was good, but reconstruction and political reconciliation did not happen, the money didn't come from Baghdad," says Oliver, of Fontana, Calif. "After two and a half months of people holding their breath and waiting, they said, `I've got to feed my family, so I'm going to take the money and start planting IEDs (roadside bombs) again.'"

How long the military surge will last here has not been announced.

"If the forces move out, the bad people will return. We need them to protect us, our children," says Ibrahim Hassan Yasim, a guard at a high school.

Reflecting the Iraqi lack of faith in the authorities, Yasim tells a U.S. patrol: "If I knew of any insurgents in our neighborhood, I wouldn't tell you. We need to stay safe."

Iraqi commanders differ about how long it will take to pacify Mosul. Some say months, others years _ depending on several variables.

U.S. troops could be pulled out of Iraq's cities by June 30 under a Status of Forces Agreement being negotiated by Washington and Baghdad.

Much depends on President-elect Barack Obama, who campaigned pledging to withdraw U.S. combat forces within 16 months. Also critical is an election early next year for the Nineveh provincial council, which oversees Mosul. The council is now dominated by Kurds who are just a third of the population, leading to paralyzed decision-making and anger by the Arab majority.

Still, U.S. commanders express some optimism.

"This is the last frontier and we have been neglecting Mosul for far too long," says Maj. Gen. Mark P. Hertling, commander of U.S. forces in northern Iraq. "The city has had its ups and downs so let's hope this will be the last push."

MOSUL, Iraq — It's not a pretty sight: Sagging skeletons of two- and three-story buildings under a threatening gray sky. Abandoned shops with corrugated iron fronts riddled by bullet holes. And ...
MOSUL, Iraq — It's not a pretty sight: Sagging skeletons of two- and three-story buildings under a threatening gray sky. Abandoned shops with corrugated iron fronts riddled by bullet holes. And ...
 
Comments
6
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Prime evidence that David Petraus is nothing but a social-climbing charlatan. Commanding the 101st Airborne in 2003-04 Petraus was the defacto "Mayor of Mosul" and many articles and TV segments were devoted to his peaceful and prosperous reign over the city (the locals even nicknamed him "King David"). However, within 10 months of Petraus's departure the Insurgents Petraus had claimed were a non-factor in Mosul utterly shattered the municipal police force and have held sway over large swaths of the city ever since.

Simultaneous with that disaster was Petraus's 2004-05 tenure at the Multi-National Security Transition Command where he was responsible for training the Iraqi National Police. This is the same set of Police alumni who engaged in the kidnappings and killings of Sunnis in 2005-06.

Finally, Petraus oversaw the Sons Of Iraq program in 2007 in which the United States paid extortion money to certain Insurgent groups in exchange for their defection to the US side in the conflict. When you pay people money NOT TO KILL try and kill you, that's not victory, it's a defeat.

David Petraus is probably the most overrated General Officer in the US Army since Ambrose Burnside.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 11/12/2008
photo

We have reduced the number of wedding parties.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 11/11/2008

In 2004-2005 the 1/24th INF did a fabulous job of locking Mosul down. They had order and on a few occastions even ran into top Al-Qaeda members. Politics got involved and many were let go. Alaska's infantry division took over and were slaughtered. They did not listen to any advice from Deuce Four and paid the price for it. My husbands recon platoon had only 2 deaths and I think the unit as a whole had less than 10. That is almost unheard during high combat operations. The point is our smart military broke up that unit out of Fort Lewis, WA after being distinguished with some honor as a unit. Mission was accomplished and it was ignored by the government. Why is that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 11/11/2008
photo

You can't win an occupation and those that say you can are either wrong or lying.

Getting in is always a mistake, and once your in, the only options are to leave or stay.

Leaving is an admission of defeat and staying is a continuation of a battle of attrition that will ultimately end in leaving.

A decision to engage in war is the most serious decision any nation makes, and should only be made as a necessary last resort.

We made this decision for all the wrong reasons and based on lies.

Let's pray it ends as well as it can, but it already hasn't ended well.

U.S. MILITARY DEATHS (IRAQ): 4,193
U.S. MILITARY WOUNDED (IRAQ): 30,774
IRAQI CIVILIAN DEATHS: 151,000
'EXCESS' IRAQI DEATHS: 655,000

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 11/11/2008

for a really eye-opening, often heartbreaking, sometimes inspiring account of life inside Mosul through the eyes of a 16 year-old girl, the livesstrong.blogspot.com blog is well worth a read. (nb - I have no link to that blog!)

It's also seems to illustrate how complex the situation is and why - altho I've been campaigning against the war since a year before it began - walking away overnight is not necessarily possible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 11/11/2008

Umm, Saddam has been executed, there are no WMD's and there's a new government in place. Why exactly is the USA spending $10 billion a month in Iraq and why are there so many US troops still there?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 11/11/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect