Obama's Mixed Success Reshaping Electorate: In Some States, Fewer Blacks Voted

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

National Journal Online   |  Ronald Brownstein   |   November 11, 2008 11:24 PM


Did Barack Obama meet his goals to reshape the electorate in key battleground states? Exit polls from 2004 and 2008 suggest the answer was yes in some respects, but no in others.

As the charts below demonstrate, the share of the vote cast by Hispanics rose substantially in Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada -- all states carried by President Bush in 2004 that Obama captured in 2008. At the same time, Obama improved on the Democratic share of the vote among Hispanics in all three states, as well as in Florida, another 2004 red state that he captured this week.

Read the whole story here.

Did Barack Obama meet his goals to reshape the electorate in key battleground states? Exit polls from 2004 and 2008 suggest the answer was yes in some respects, but no in others. As the charts below ...
Did Barack Obama meet his goals to reshape the electorate in key battleground states? Exit polls from 2004 and 2008 suggest the answer was yes in some respects, but no in others. As the charts below ...
 
Comments
3
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

This story is somewhat misleading. The number that's missing from this is the actual numbers of people of all flavors who voted in this election. There was a larger turnout across the board. So,even though the number of blacks that voted might be higher, their SHARE might well be less due to non-black voters with even larger numbers. Unless we know the actual numbers (or at least the proportional breakdown of total voters in the 2004 election), there's no fair comparison.

The number of black people in Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico is far less, I suspect, than the number of Hispanics, so the increased Latino SHARE of the vote in those states is more easily explained.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 11/12/2008

That was going to be my point as well. If other disaffected groups participate the proportions of any ONE of them will be diminished relative to the whole. Also I don't think that Obama's strategy involved turning out Conservative young voters. He was intent on mobilizing large numbers of those who supported him. If the goal was to increase total voter participation in that group his percentages would have been diminished. Sure, he could have gone out and done voter registration at prep schools and evangelical churches...but to what end?

My understanding is that youth voting increased by about 5% within that cohort vs. 2004 (when it increased a whopping 30%). But like this year the relative proportion of youth voters was wiped out due to the overall increases. But Obama received almost a 3:1 voting support from this group. It made up a significant portion of the SHARE of HIS VOTES.

That's really the statistic that is applicable in this case...not the overall proportion...but what proportion of Obamas SHARE vs. McCain (or for historical contrast- Kerry, Gore or Clinton).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 AM on 11/14/2008
photo

maybe now that they know their vote counts next time they will vote in larger numbers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 11/12/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER CAN BE GUESSED

Researchers have found that it is possible to guess many -- if...

Obamas Tour The Kremlin

MOSCOW — Russia's first lady Svetlana Medvedev took...