Lieberman Likely To Retain Prized Committee Chair

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ANDREW TAYLOR | November 17, 2008 09:19 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Lieberman appears increasingly likely to hold onto his prized chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee as he meets Tuesday with Democratic colleagues unhappy over his vocal support for GOP nominee John McCain during this year's presidential campaign.

Not long ago, Lieberman's hold on his chairmanship seemed to be slipping as Democrats sought to punish him for boosting McCain and criticizing President-elect Barack Obama during the long campaign.

Now, according to several Democratic aides who demanded anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, it appears that Lieberman will receive a lesser sanction, such as losing a subcommittee chairmanship on the Environment and Public Works Committee.

Anger toward Lieberman seems to have softened since Election Day and there's strengthening sentiment that taking away his chairmanship might drive him from the Democratic caucus and send the wrong signals as Obama takes office on a pledge to unite the country. Lieberman has signaled it would be unacceptable for him to lose his chairmanship.

Lieberman, who was Democratic presidential nominee Al Gore's running mate in 2000, was re-elected in 2006 as an independent after losing his state's Democratic primary. He remains a registered Democrat and aligns with the party inside the Senate.

Lieberman faces a vote of his Democratic colleagues on a secret ballot Tuesday after making his case at a closed-door caucus. While he appears likely to emerge without harsh sanction, his presentation and the reaction of colleagues could affect the outcome.

Obama has reportedly told Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada it would hurt the message of unity that he wants for his new administration if Lieberman leaves the Democratic caucus. Reid met with Lieberman last week and was initially inclined to strip him of the Homeland Security Committee chairmanship, according to a Senate Democratic aide.

"I was concerned and was upset about what happened earlier this year," Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., said on "Fox News Sunday." "But you know what? We turn the page."

Story continues below
advertisement

On the other side are senators who feel that one of the requirements to be installed in a leadership position is party loyalty.

"To reward Senator Lieberman with a major committee chairmanship would be a slap in the face of millions of Americans who worked tirelessly for Barack Obama and who want to see real change in our country," Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said in a statement on Friday. "Appointing someone to a major post who led the opposition to everything we are fighting for is not 'change we can believe in.'"

Reid has been working to find a compromise with Democratic supporters of Lieberman, including Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. Dodd and Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., have said it would be a mistake if any punishment by the party causes Lieberman to bolt to the Republican side.

Also a factor is an army of liberal bloggers who are eager to see Lieberman drummed out. Their antipathy to him goes back to his vocal support of the war in Iraq and his 2006 re-election bid.

At the same time, Senate Republicans on Tuesday face a vote on whether to expel from their ranks Ted Stevens of Alaska, the longest-serving Republican senator ever but convicted of seven felony counts last month. Stevens may very well not return to Washington anyway as he's fallen behind in an ongoing vote tally for a his re-election bid.

Among Senate Republicans there seems to be little enthusiasm for kicking Stevens when he's down. The common view is that he'll lose his race for a seventh full term and not be around next year anyway. The race could be decided after ballots are counted Tuesday.

But Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., vows to go ahead and force a vote on ousting Stevens from the GOP conference, which would strip him of his plum committee assignments next year if he is re-elected.

Also among the musical chairs is an avalanche of changes in Senate committee chairmanships sparked by Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd's decision to step aside at the age of 90. Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, is in line to succeed Byrd.

Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., is poised to take over Inouye's chairmanship of the Commerce Committee; Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., is in turn ready to take over for Rockefeller at the Intelligence Committee, and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., would chair the Rules Committee spot vacated by Feinstein.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., is slated to take over the Foreign Relations Committee from Vice President-elect Joe Biden.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Lieberman appears increasingly likely to hold onto his prized chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee as he meets Tuesday with Democratic colleagues unhappy ...
WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Lieberman appears increasingly likely to hold onto his prized chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee as he meets Tuesday with Democratic colleagues unhappy ...
 
Comments
915
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (22 pages total)
photo

So the dems turned the other cheek? Am I supposed to believe such platitudes from politicians?

Here is my theory. There is no bigger friend of Israel in congress than JLieberman. His friends paid him back and made some phone calls. It's politics, it's legal, and it's the way things work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 11/19/2008

Message to Joe Lieberman...

Sen. Lieberman, you have retained your Chairmanships, which I believe is wrong. I can't do anything about that, but I can tell you how disappointed I was, in you and embarressed I was, for you, during the campaign.
The things you said turned my stomach and made me furious. You chose to go to the low extremes of dirty Republican Politics. You CHOSE to smile as Palin and McCain engaged in insidious hateful Politics of ennuendo and hate incitement towards OUR DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE.

Frankly I feel your apology was lame and insincere, considering the feelings of the DEMOCRATIC VOTERS that you insulted with your speeches against OUR candidate...and I don't believe you give a damn.

You have become one of the Politicians who have lost their integrity to only caring about retaining personal power, prestige, and the limelight. Coveting the LIMELIGHT is the only explanation for your CHOOSING to be at the Republican Convention. For me, that is where you crossed over the line, and became pathetic. Republicans USED you...I am sure your good friend John McCain was sincere, but you are a fool of you believe OTHER Republicans had respect for YOUR disloyality to the Democratic Party...or THEY would treat you with forgivness had you done such a disrespectful disloyal thing to them.

You may have retained your Chairmanships, but you have lost MY respect. I believe it is accurate to say I speak for millions of others. Enjoy your PRESTIGE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 11/19/2008

It's all about money.

Lieberman swims in cash... he has many, many, many wealthy backers.

What other senator could get away with what Lieberman has pulled?

Not many.
No Republican would have survived it.
Could you imagine a high ranking Rep speaking at the Dem convention.... and keeping their status... if the Reps won.
Plus, the press would ripe them to pieces.

Not Joe... Joe does what Joe wants.
The press is his enabler.

If we knew could somehow know everything about the senators in congress... the dirt.
I believe we would find that there is no senator more corrupt Joe Lieberman.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 11/18/2008

Lieberman just kept his chairmanship.

Typical whimpy Democratic response. They have no idea how to wield power..........just wooly concepts roiling in their heads. What a bunch of whims!

But why am I surprised? FISA, Patriot Act, extraordinary rendition, Iraq War............we have more than sufficient record to prove their lack of firm resolve.

Pity Ron Paul wasn't in the running.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 11/18/2008

Remember when Lieberman ran against the real Democratic candidate, Ned Lamont? The Clintons, Schumer, Obama even, all went to Conn. and campaigned for Lieberman. These folks are all in cahoots. When they refer to each other as "my friend," they aren't kidding. They're friends and business associates, and one can only imagine the things they know about each other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 11/18/2008
photo

Call or write your Senators and voice your thoughts on this. If this is the decision making we can expect from the Democrats I say lets go back to Republican rule. This is beyond absurd, Lieberman does not belong in the Democratic caucus--his actions prove that. I will no longer donate to the Democrats and will look at other representatives come next election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 11/18/2008

Lieberman's Democratic pals in the Senate may not have the fortitude to punish him the way he deserves to be punished, but I'll bet there are enough people in Connecticut who feel as I do that he has shown himself to be a rat-faced little weasel. In four years he'll be gone from the Senate. In the meantime, the Senate "leadership" will just have to keep a close eye on him. He'll cause more trouble if he can; he'll think he can get away with anything, and who could fault him for thinking that? He's done it so far.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 11/18/2008

The lesson: Loyalty does not matter.

This guy is NOT a Democrat. Joe LIEberman must have some Mega-Dirt on Obama, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 11/18/2008

He doesn't have any dirt, the dems are just weak and don't like fighting and are pacifist cowards who know you people will vote for them no matter what out of fear of the republicans. I would rather let the republicans bring this entire country down than vote for a cowardly democrat. Obama voted for increased surveillance, voted for the 700 billion dollar bailout and his first act as president elect was to lobby for Lieberman. You can have this guy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 11/18/2008

Maybe Obama knows what he's doing, and just might be smarter than you and me. Given his recent political accomplishment "against all odds", I give him the benefit of any doubt that I may have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 11/18/2008

Lieberman acts like a foreign spy, so why not give him a raise? His comrade Neo Cons should also be given nice retirement packages and lifetime Secret Service protection on our dime. Why not?

Since HS is one of the most prominent faces of the Neo Con subversion, by all means, keep it functioning like the police state never left.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 11/18/2008
- EZD I'm a Fan of EZD permalink

MSNBC is reporting Lieberman to keep position, if this is true these Senators that are responsible should be voted out next chance we get. It is clear the people were saying we wanted him out, guess that meant nothing to the Dems...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 11/18/2008

We just got through with an election and believe me people won't remember this past next week, and thats what the sell out dem senators are counting on. When it comes down to it you people won;t risk the pain of republicans being in power, you'll vote dem. Look at teh people of Michigan, they voted Levin back in just because he's a dem. He has doen less than nothing for the state, but people figure that since he's a democrat and an incumbent that he must be worthy of their vote. There is no functioning democracy in this country. The people are so brainwashed that it doesnt really matter who they vote for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 11/18/2008
photo

Nope. Things have changed with the Internet.

What politicians say and do is recorded forever and accessible by anyone. Like minded people can easily band together. YouTube allows people to publish their own video content in a medium that has a larger audience than network TV. Blogs and sites like this one have a larger audience than most newspapers.

It has all changed and people that are passionate about something do not forget.

Neither dems or repubs have figured all this out yet, but it means more accountability and more democracy and more new faces in congress in two years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 11/19/2008
photo

Exactly! This is a major hit against Obama's decision making. I no longer support Obama like I once did. This decision reeks of cowardice and is a slap in every Democrats face who voted for Obama. I have the mind to ask for my campaign donations be refunded--this is not change I can believe in.

Shame on you Obama, and your Democratic cowards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 11/18/2008

Way to go, Dems.

Let the neocon-in-sheep's-clothing -- who lead the cheerleading for our excellent adventure in Iraq (retaliation for 9/11, don'tcha know?), dumped all over Obama and is itchy to drop The Big One on Iran -- retain his chairmanship of the critical Homeland Security Committee!

The HOMELAND SECURITY COMMITTEE!!!

If this is an example of Senate "collegiality", heaven help the republic. Maybe, just to make the turncoat Bush-enabler feel more at home, they can now let him appoint Karl Rove as his chief of staff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 11/18/2008

The spineless senate let him keep the Homeland Security chairmanship. A bunch of wimps. Don't give the dems any more money...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 11/18/2008
photo

I will no longer donate to Obama or to other Democrats. This is insanity at it's finest. How could they make such a colossal mistake? The Republicans are dancing in the isles because they are getting the Dumb Democrats to beat themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 11/18/2008

Sickening

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 11/18/2008

I KNEW IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Dems haven't changed.

Slap them in the face, and the turn the other cheek.

I give up!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 11/18/2008
photo

Write and/or call your senator and COMPLAIN LOUDLY. Our voices need to be heard. The entire goverment is a waste if they can't even get this simple decision right. I will go back to voting Republican, at least they have a backbone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 11/18/2008

Shows an appalling lack of sllab to let Liebelman keep his positions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 11/18/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (22 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect