iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lieberman Keeps Committee Chair In Senate Vote

ANDREW TAYLOR | November 18, 2008 03:23 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., is questioned by reporters as he walks to the Old Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2008, where his colleagues will vote on party leadership and other matters. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)

WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Lieberman will keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee despite hard feelings over his support for GOP nominee John McCain during the presidential campaign.

The Connecticut independent will lose a panel post on the Environment and Public Works panel as punishment for criticizing Obama this fall.

Lieberman's colleagues in the Democratic caucus voted 42-13 Tuesday to approve a resolution condemning statements made by Lieberman during the campaign but allowing him to keep the Homeland Security Committee gavel.

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he had been very angry by Lieberman's actions but that "we're looking forward, we're not looking back."

Added Reid: "This was not a time for retribution, it was a time for moving forward on the problems of this country."

Lieberman's grasp on his chairmanship had gotten stronger since President-elect Barack Obama signaled to Democratic leaders that he's not interested in punishing Lieberman for boosting McCain and criticizing Obama during the long campaign.

"This is the beginning of a new chapter, and I know that my colleagues in the Senate Democratic Caucus were moved not only by the kind words that Senator Reid said about my longtime record, but by the appeal from President-elect Obama himself that the nation now unite to confront our very serious problems," Lieberman said after the vote.

Anger toward Lieberman seems to have softened since Election Day, and Democrats didn't want to drive him from the Democratic caucus by taking away his chairmanship and send the wrong signals as Obama takes office on a pledge to unite the country. Lieberman had indicated it would be unacceptable for him to lose his chairmanship.

Lieberman, who was Democratic presidential nominee Al Gore's running mate in 2000, was re-elected in 2006 as an independent after losing his state's Democratic primary to Greenwich businessman Ned Lamont amid intense anti-war sentiment. Lieberman is a strong supporter of the war.

He remains a registered Democrat and aligns with the party inside the Senate, where he supports the party position on most issues other the war.

But Lieberman angered colleagues in signing onto McCain's campaign, touring the country on McCain's campaign plane and speaking on his behalf at the GOP convention in September. Democrats were particularly upset that he had attacked Obama rather than simply saying positive things about McCain.

"There are some (statements) that I made that I wish I had not," Lieberman told reporters. "In the heat of campaigns, that happens to all of us, but I regret that. And now it's time to move on."

"It's time to unite our country," said Lieberman supporter Ken Salazar, D-Colo., said entering the meeting. Salazar and Lieberman's homestate colleague Christopher Dodd led

Salazar added afterwards: "It was very clear people want Senator Lieberman to be part of the caucus."

On the other side were senators who feel that one requirement to be installed in a leadership position is party loyalty.

Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Pat Leahy, D-Vt., and Senator-elect Jeff Merkeley, D-Ore., spoke against allowing Lieberman keep the Homeland Security and Government Affairs post. Reid, Majority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and John Kerry, D-Mass., were among those speaking in his favor, according to a Democratic aide requiring anonymity to discuss a private meeting.

Some, like Iowan Tom Harkin, still harbor hard feelings for statements Lieberman made during the campaign. Harkin took particular offense when Lieberman said a vote against funding the war in Iraq without a deadline for a troop withdrawal meant Obama had voted to cut off funding for troops in harm's way.

"That's outrageous what he said," Harkin said.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Lieberman will keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee despite hard feelings over his support for GOP nominee John McCain during the presidential ca...
WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Lieberman will keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee despite hard feelings over his support for GOP nominee John McCain during the presidential ca...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,244
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (65 total)
05:22 PM on 11/24/2008
I know that the Democrats want his experience and to insure his vote, but at what price. Maybe it really is better to "Get what you want" instead of simple revenge.
07:05 PM on 11/19/2008
Ever notice that Liarberman keeps on getting back up after falling?
The election in CT back in 2006 and now this?
He must be held by strings like a puppet.
But by whom?
Uh? from overseas you say?
11:25 AM on 11/19/2008
the godfather thought us to keep our friends close and our enemies closer.
07:02 PM on 11/19/2008
I thought they taught us that too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
transe
and in the end,,,the love you take is equal to the
10:09 AM on 11/19/2008
I would have liked nothing better than to have seen that cheese eating rat bumped out of every committee. He would have just been a suit in a seat. I wasn't happy yesterday, when it came out that he was going to keep his committee chair. Once I quit ranting at the t.v., I understood why it was done the way it was done. Team-Obama, is very shrewd, now they have Joe by the throat. I can't wait to see what happens after January, 20th.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:46 AM on 11/19/2008
I thought there was no "I" in "TEAM" ...except when it comes to Lieberman.
He changed all the rules.

So what can we learn from this kids...

If you play sports... shoot the ball... don't pass.... its all about you!

Stab your friends in the back if it helps you to stand out.
And if they turn away, coax them back with cash.

If your on the battlefield... stand behind the other soldiers... let them take the bullet.
And if captured... show no loyalty to country... become the enemy.

And never say your sorry, or you were wrong… it shows weakness. Totally unacceptable!

Then cover it up with a smile that covers your entire face.
It also helps having a face that only a mother could love.

Joe Lieberman I hated you for years, but after what your Dem pals did yesterday… I’m beginning to see the light.

Joe you’re my idol… I just wish you were an American.
09:43 AM on 11/19/2008
I remember this scene from Gladiator! The crowd chanting "Kill Kill Kill" but Maximus spares the guy. Then they chant "Maximus! Maximus the merciful!” Obama! Obama the merciful! Revenge would have tasted so sweet, watching Lieberman go down in flames, but you can't deny the political shrewdness of this move. Now Lieberman is Obama's little (female dog), if you know what I mean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zetacplus
Conservatism has failed America
02:27 PM on 11/19/2008
This isn't about revenge, it's about accountability and principles. A lot of democrats are outraged at this betrayal of trust from Lieberman, and to see him welcomed back with open arms is an insult. I will no longer give time or money to Obama or the DNC, not because of any so called revenge, but because they did not hold someone accountable for their actions and I do not support ideas like that. It sends the wrong message to America when you violate someones trust and there be no consequences. Life is about choices and Lieberman made his and he should live with the consequence HE chose for himself. Instead he is still in the party he openly ostracized--this will haunt the democrats for a long time---including Obama who supported this decision.
09:26 AM on 11/19/2008
It was the smart move to make. The Democrats have Lieberman by the throat for the rest of his term, and then CT voters will kick him out of the Senate. Obama does not care if Democratic voters are angry, he is doing the right thing for his agenda--and ultimately the right thing for the people who elected him. Have a little patience; Joe is toast the next time his name is on a ballot. Personally, I'm impressed by the fact that our President-elect is not easily swayed by the passions of his own supporters.
08:05 AM on 11/19/2008
After initially hearing that my senator, Dick Durbin opposed Lieberman keeping the chairs I decided not to write him. But I am incensed that Durbin supported Lieberman. Incensed is not the word. I'm sooo p_ issed steam is rising from my head.
06:50 AM on 11/19/2008
the godfather ,thought us many things ,one of them. keep your friends close and your enemies closer
02:19 AM on 11/19/2008
AIPAC WINS AGAIN!
06:38 AM on 11/19/2008
Did you hear on MSNBC that Joe gave the DNC a quarter of a million dollars this past year? That money certainly came from special interest groups like AIPAC. Our Senators are clearly bought off.
photo
sepiasiren
writer animator lover
01:20 AM on 11/19/2008
In about six months, when Obama is getting stuff done with little to no opposition, we will be saying "Ohhhhhhhh"
12:29 AM on 11/19/2008
Reid is full of sh yte but in retrospect it's a smarter idea to have Lieberman twist in the wind and just TRY to obstruct the new administration. Any negative national spotlight on him will undoubtedly make it easier to toss him in the dumpster next election cycle.
09:08 AM on 11/19/2008
Yes, he will loose re-election. Unfortunately it is in 2012, which is too far away.

I'll leave internal political strategies to the politicians. If Obama and other Dems think this the best way to handle this, I'll let it be. I am morally outraged at Lieberman, but success of the Obama administration is more important.

I'll just wait for and judge the final results. If Obama succeeds at moving our country forward, then I don't care what happens to Lieberman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ajax2
12:26 AM on 11/19/2008
Both Durbin and Dodd knew they didn't have a rational argument to keep Lieberman. The 60 seat argument is pure nonsense. Harry Reid couldn't get 60 votes with 90 seats. So they cowardly got cover from Obama. The next time Lieberman betrays the party and country, Durbin and Dodd should have their a..holes ripped.
photo
sepiasiren
writer animator lover
01:35 AM on 11/19/2008
it was a senate vote--stop blaming Obama...
09:14 AM on 11/19/2008
I don't think he was blaming Obama. He was blaming the old guard Democrats for having no spine and asking for Obama's help.

Obama doesn't want to waste any more time with Lieberman, and doesn't want to give people any excuse to martyr Lieberman or get their emotions going. The cra-z.ies on the right would use this incident for all they could.

Obama has too much work to do. Lieberman needs to fade away not go out with a bang.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ajax2
12:43 PM on 11/19/2008
RIF sepia
photo
sepiasiren
writer animator lover
12:10 AM on 11/19/2008
Besides, this was a senate vote--why are peopel blaming Obama--he isn't a dictator he will let the members vote and respect it...
11:57 PM on 11/18/2008
To the person who blames voters in CT for Lieberman, perhaps you could clarify that as Republicans in CT who failed to support their own candidate and supported him instead and a percentage of unaffiliated voters who supported him, but the fact remains that most every Democratic in the Senate caucus did the expedient thing and not necessarily the right thing. For heaven's sake he labeled himself as an Independent after he won in 2006, while remaining a registered Democrat in CT! In the long run doing something that is politically motivated almost always comes back to bite you and given Lieberman's history why the heck would these senators trust his word or him. Don't they get it's always been about him? What foolishness!