More

Hillary Clinton As Secretary Of State? What The Pundits Think


First Posted: 11-19-08 09:39 AM   |   Updated: 12-20-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Pundits

Here is a roundup of the views of prominent pundits on Hillary Clinton as a possible Secretary of State:

Thomas Friedman:

Mrs. Clinton is a serious person. She is smart, tough, cunning, hard-working and knows the world -- all key qualities for a secretary of state. She would also bring a certain star quality to the top of the State Department that can be useful. I don't know if she is the best person in America for that job right now, or if she'll get it, but if one is just looking at qualifications, Senator Clinton certainly passes the bar...


The important question, the answer of which is not at all clear to me, is about the only relationship that matters for a secretary of state -- the kind of relationship he or she would have with the new president. My question: Is Obama considering Mrs. Clinton for this job in order to get her off his back or as a prelude to protecting her back?...

When it comes to appointing a secretary of state, you do not want a team of rivals.

David Broder:

Clinton is the wrong person for that job in this administration. It's not the best use of her talents, and it's certainly not the best fit for this new president....


The last thing Obama needs is a secretary of state carving out an independently based foreign policy. He needs an agent, not an author...

Even if Hillary Clinton were ready to play such a subordinate role, which she might be, in return for a promise that her voice would be heard in the most serious policy debates, the presence of Bill Clinton makes that a doubly difficult assignment. The former president has, through the Clinton Global Initiative and his own extensive foreign travels and worldwide contacts, made himself a force in international affairs. It would be unfair, and unlikely, for him to shut down his own private foreign policy actions because they might conflict with his wife's responsibilities. But foreign leaders would inevitably see Bill Clinton as an alternative route toward influencing American policy. And he would be unlikely to remain silent.

Steven Clemons, Senior Fellow at New America Foundation:

Her top, top, top advisers told me, 'Steve, she will animate things in the Middle East--she will deliver a Palestinian state. Gold-plated'...


She criticized him so much for going to meet foreign leaders without preconditions; now she is the one who is going to have to go and get all the preconditions sorted out.


Charles Krauthammer:

She's a reasonably good choice. But what's so sort of cynically brilliant and impressive about this is that with her out of the way, Obama is not going to have to show up in Iowa or New Hampshire in 2012. He has now cinched the renomination.


Maureen Dowd
:

It says it all that, at the moment Washington became obsessed with news that Hillary was a contender for State, Bill was getting a half-million for an hour's worth of chat sponsored by the National Bank of Kuwait, delivered from behind a podium with a camel and Arabic lettering on it. Last year, Bill made $10.1 million in speaking fees.


If Hillary gets to be the Mistress of Foggy Bottom, Bill's guilt over his primary tirades, which hindered her chances of becoming president, would be alleviated...

One person who famously opposed Hillary's presidential bid thinks she'd make a great secretary of state.

"She's smart and tough, a lot better than any of the old hacks like Holbrooke, Albright, etc.," says David Geffen. "Barack Obama is going to run policy, and Hillary will be an effective communicator. It also takes Bill out of the game. It completely turns him into an ally -- and probably a help to both of them. I think Obama is very smart to get as many smart people into the room as he can, to bring in Rahm and keep Lieberman and get Hillary into the cabinet. It brings an enormous amount of good will his way, and he's going to need every ounce of it, given the wars and financial catastrophe America is facing. It's getting bleaker every day. There are many, many, many more bubbles to burst."

Here is a roundup of the views of prominent pundits on Hillary Clinton as a possible Secretary of State: Thomas Friedman: Mrs. Clinton is a serious person. She is smart, tough, cunning, hard-working...
Here is a roundup of the views of prominent pundits on Hillary Clinton as a possible Secretary of State: Thomas Friedman: Mrs. Clinton is a serious person. She is smart, tough, cunning, hard-working...
Filed by Marcus Baram  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 104
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
11:14 PM on 11/19/2008
David Broder is so out of touch he might as well be writing his columns from the moon. He is probably wistful for the days of the telegraph. He will now try to get Ted Stevens appointed as the Washington Post's Chief Technology Officer.
10:43 PM on 11/19/2008
Please, not Hillary!!
Gov. Bill Richardson is the obvious pick for Sec. of State. He has the experience in international diplomacy, executive leadership, and the kind of personality that will get us off the hate list in most countries of the world. He has spoken highly of Mr. Obama during the campaign and I think he'll be aligned with the ideals of the Obama presidency. Not a "yes-man" —but Gov. Richardson seems to know how to work with people. (And, we can keep all the Dem. senators in their current roles)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrPragmatic
11:01 PM on 11/19/2008
Richardson is the wrong, wrong, wrong man for the job. Obama does not want or need a SOS that will "get us off the hate list" in the world. That mission has already been accomplished with our allies. But there are real problems in the world in countries that will always hate us and a "diplomat" is not what is needed. Just ask Israel if they want Richardson or HRC to have their back. A SOS needs to be tough, shrewd, and at the top of their game. Sorry, but Richardson is not right for SOS. In this case the best man for the job is a woman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hipocampelofantocame
retired pediatrician
11:03 PM on 11/19/2008
Ronversation: I agree with you 100%. Most of the world really doesn't trust
Hillary, myself included.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Watch out! He carries a big stick!
11:19 PM on 11/19/2008
I respectfully disagree on your world assertion. Believe it or not, and I haven't the faintest idea why, the world actually likes Hillary. They don't know her as a polarizing figure as we do in the US.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
nana4g
09:32 PM on 11/19/2008
Hillary is not interested in running for President in 4 years. The plan is for Obama to have 2 terms; he will need it to get anything done with the mess that grows messier with each day.

It is only the general public, the pundits, and the media who believe Hillary and Obama are "rivals". Let it go. If she is SoS, she will be representing his foreign policy. She is good at helping other people achieve goals; she is a public servant. He will have many of his own people running the office and she will be a great facilitator and negotiator. Whatever works out, Obama is smart enough to know what he is doing and why.

Everybody and his uncle have assumed the mantle of Health Care Reform in the Senate; she doesn't have a chance there. She put herself on the line for it 16 years ago, ahead of her time, before the nation and the Congress ever dreamed we would be in crisis soon, and she was ridiculed. Now, everyone is "the expert". She has much to offer and would be very good at State, but, however it works out, she will find some way to be useful; she always has.
08:52 PM on 11/19/2008
Again, I say let's make ex-Cleveland Browns Hall of Fame running back, Jim Brown the next Secretary of State. Treaties would be signed in mere minutes. Jim Brown could just sit and stare and get things done.
11:15 PM on 11/19/2008
Right, like he has been successful eliminating gangs in L.A.

Please. Get real.
08:24 PM on 11/19/2008
Hillary is not only a bad choice for SoS - she the WORST possible choice.

Just hire Kerry already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrPragmatic
09:55 PM on 11/19/2008
Kerry is the wrong choice. BO needs a bad cop to his good cop on the beat. This plays to both of their strengths: Obama the leader and statesman and his attack dog Clinton as the tough messenger and negoiater. Besides, Israel wants HRC as SOS and this is a main reason that BO wants her. ..I am surprised that this has not played in the media. Kerry could not even beat Bush as he is a bit of a stiff that is prone to gaffes. Richardson is too much of a diplomat to be SOS.
07:17 PM on 11/19/2008
There are a number of reasons that Hillary Clinton should not be the Secretary of State. The 3 A.M. commercial notwithstanding, her campaign against her opponents was anything but the higher ground. She was advised by someone whose conduct was and is under scrutiny for a variety of reasons. She fabricated a sniper incident in Bosnia. Her push to use NATO as military force for the first time in the Balkans to bomb the very people who were trying to unseat Milosevic will immediately impair her abilities to conduct diplomacy with Russia and others, not to mention her comment to obliterate Iran. Or was I watching the WWE instead of a debate?
photo
rabiddog6708
This Dog's bite is Worse Than his Bark
06:13 PM on 11/19/2008
Give Hillary the job...if only to piss off the Repubs. Make Bill Clinton the Ambassador to Sweden and have him tour with the Sweish Bikini Team.
07:36 PM on 11/19/2008
Or Spain. He seems to like the brunettes but maybe he just likes women in general. It occurred to me that Obama is really the only one who can sense Hillary's loyality to him but I actually think that this position would burish her credentials for a Presidential run but in 2016 not 2012. Kind of hard to run for pres while off in the middle east.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AsISaid
10:17 PM on 11/19/2008
How about Bill as the Ambassador to the Vatican. Oh, the irony.
05:42 PM on 11/19/2008
The thing that really creeps me out about Hillary at State is that is will give the GOP hit squads incentive to investigate both Clintons relentlessly for 8 years. We can't handle any more of that. My friend says the GOP doesn't have the strength to do that, but I think all it takes is a small, well-funded group and we know they exist. In this case, I think Obama really needs to turn the page.
05:22 PM on 11/19/2008
David Broder has been wrong so many times I've quit counting. Years ago when Gore had Bradley as an opponent for the democrat nominee he wrote that Bradley would win. His exact words were "the script for a possible upset is becoming clear".As we know he was dead wrong. Also Maureen Dowd has made her life work hating the Clintons. Tain't funny anymore' Dowd and her column have been over done.
05:01 PM on 11/19/2008
"She will deliver a Palestinian state!"

Ummm... and is that a BAD thing? It is about Effing time! A decade late me thinks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AsISaid
10:19 PM on 11/19/2008
See, that's what some are complaining about. "She" will not deliver anything as SOS. If it happens, her boss - President Obama - will do the delivering.
photo
FilthyHarry
Expletive Deleted
04:58 PM on 11/19/2008
I'd rather have her in a position that has an end date and that she can be fired from than a seat on the supreme court.
04:07 PM on 11/19/2008
Does Krauthammer really believe in his misguided conservative mind that Hillary would have opposed Barack in 2012 like Kennedy did Carter in '80. You know, conservatives are wondering why their party is in disarray, and the answer is so simple...they're dumb.
04:44 PM on 11/19/2008
If you paid attention to the Democratic primaries at all, you would know that Hillary will go to very low levels to become president. If, for some reason, Obama's first term goes badly (say the economy takes longer than expected to recover) I doubt she would have any qualms about jumping in, saying "I told you so, I was the better choice" and making a run against him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimk3
04:06 PM on 11/19/2008
Not sure why David Geffen is cnsidered an expert on this area. Rahm Emanuel, Hillary Clinton, Joe Lieberman... AIPAC. Is this what we want our foreign policy to be? Not the change I was hoping for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GZLives
07:34 PM on 11/19/2008
See if you can accept that AIPAC is merely a lobby ... and one with a lot less power and influence then the lobby for Saudi Arabia ? Can you do it ? Try real hard because all the AIPAC stuff is really getting tiresome. Why not just accuse every Jew of disloyalty since it seems anyone with a Jewish soundlng name is immediately accused of disloyalty by many on this site and frankly its pretty disgusting for people who are at the same time pretending they support this President and his judgment - or is he also suspect since he actually spoke in front of AIPAC ... Heavens ...
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
indc
03:57 PM on 11/19/2008
Broder has been so wrong for so long about nearly everything, particular issues of great significance. He is an very easy target to point to as example of someone very much out of touch and over his head who continues to be given a public voice.... it is foolish to waste time on him.
03:49 PM on 11/19/2008
She was wrong about Iraq. A little bit gullible and a lot not wanting to look weak. That is not what we need in a Secretary of State. Would she have gone to the UN with the fake vial of anthrax?