Judge Orders Guantanamo To Release Five Terror Suspects In "Major Blow" To Bush Policy

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LARA JAKES JORDAN | November 20, 2008 11:49 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

In this image reviewed by the U.S. Military, a Guantanamo detainee, photographed through a glass window with a U.S military guard seen reflected on it, sleeps on a mattress on the floor of his cell, at the Camp 5 detention facility, at the U.S. Naval Base, in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Wednesday, Nov. 19, 2008. A federal judge on Thursday, Nov. 20 ordered the release of five Algerians held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the continued detention of a sixth in what is being called a blow to the Bush administration's policy to keep terror suspects locked up without charges. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley)

WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Thursday ordered the release of five Algerians held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the continued detention of a sixth in a major blow to the Bush administration's strategy to keep terror suspects locked up without charges.

In the first case of its kind, U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon said the government's evidence linking the five Algerians to al-Qaida was not credible as it came from a single, unidentified source. Therefore, he said, the five could not be held indefinitely as enemy combatants, and should be released immediately.

"To allow enemy combatancy to rest on so thin a reed would be inconsistent with this court's obligation," Leon told the crowded courtroom.

As a result, he said, "the court must and will grant their petitions and order their release."

As for the sixth Algerian, Belkacem Bensayah, Leon said there was enough reason to believe he was close to an al-Qaida operative and had sought to help others travel to Afghanistan to join the terrorists' fight against the United States and its allies.

Leon also urged senior Justice Department leaders and high-level officials at other government agencies involved in the case not to appeal his ruling. The Justice Department said later Thursday it had not decided whether it would.

Leon said the five Algerians already have been improperly held for seven years and deserve to go home. He said an appeal could delay their release for up to another two years.

"This is a unique case," Leon said, trying to assuage any Justice Department fears that hundreds of other detainees also could be released based on his ruling. "Few if any others will be factually like it. Nobody should be lulled into a false sense that all of the ... cases will look like this one."

Story continues below
advertisement

One of the men to be released is Lakhdar Boumediene, whose landmark Supreme Court case last summer gave the Guantanamo detainees the right to challenge their imprisonment.

The Algerians' attorneys said they would appeal Bensayah's detention but hugged each other and colleagues in congratulations after Leon's ruling.

"It's a relief," said attorney Robert C. Kirsch.

The Bosnian government already has agreed to take back the detainees, all of whom immigrated there from Algeria before they were captured in 2001.

Justice spokesman Peter Carr said the department is pleased Bensayah will remain at Guantanamo but "we are of course disappointed by, and disagree with, the court's decision that we did not carry our burden of proof with respect to the other detainees."

Leon was appointed by President George W. Bush and has been sympathetic to the argument that the president has broad authority during wartime. In 2005, Leon ruled that this same group of detainees had no right to challenge their detention in civilian courts.

Thursday's ruling is the first since the Supreme Court cleared the way last June for civilian courts to hear challenges by terror suspects being held indefinitely without charges.

It largely hinged on Leon's definition of an enemy combatant, which he said included al-Qaida or Taliban supporters who directly assisted in hostile acts against the U.S. or its allies.

Much of the evidence against the Algerians is classified and could not be discussed during the two open court hearings in the seven-day trial _ or even with the detainees themselves. The detainees listened to Thursday's ruling through a translated telephone conference call, but could not be heard during the nearly one-hour hearing.

The government initially detained Boumediene and the other Algerians on suspicion of plotting to bomb the U.S. Embassy in Sarajevo in October 2001. They were transferred to Guantanamo in January 2002.

The Justice Department last month backed off the embassy bombing accusations, but said the six men were caught and detained before they could join terrorists' global jihad. The Justice Department said it needed to be proactive against threats, especially in the months after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington.

The detainee's lawyers denied the men ever planned to join the battlefield. Even if they had, the lawyers argued, they did not fit Leon's definition of an enemy combatant because they never joined the terrorist fighters.

The cases of more than 200 additional Guantanamo detainees are still pending, many in front of other judges in Washington's federal courthouse.

___

On the Net:

Leon's order: https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2004cv1166-276

WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Thursday ordered the release of five Algerians held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the continued detention of a sixth in a major blow to the Bush administration's s...
WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Thursday ordered the release of five Algerians held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the continued detention of a sixth in a major blow to the Bush administration's s...
 
Comments
60
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Geez, a federal judge upholding the law. Who woulda thunk it.

A Bush appointee at that.

Holding people illegally and indefinitely. You would think someone should pay for that crime. How UnAmerican can you get?

Can we make the earth turn faster. So we get to Jan. 20, 2009 quicker?

Change cannot come fast enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 11/21/2008

Obuma will be releasing alll the prisoners in the hope to placating the terrorists. He believes surrendering is our best bet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 11/20/2008

All these sad, unevolved cretins with no knuckle-dragging right-wing champion left to cheer... so they come here and post graffiti.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

"The Justice Department last month backed off the embassy bombing accusations, but said the six men were caught and detained before they could join terrorists' global jihad."

Isn't this a blanket admission by the "Justice" department that these men did nothing? Detained (and tortured) for 7 years on suspicion that they may in the future do something wrong?

If we as Americans are to regain our moral standing in the world, everyone involved in these 'detentions' from George Bush, to John Yoo should be imprisoned and tried for war crimes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 11/20/2008

Maybe they can come stay with Judge Leon until we can determine what to do with them. Unless, of course, Judge Leon is jewish, gay, an atheist, believes in educating women, or is againt beheading "infidels"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 11/20/2008
- RnR I'm a Fan of RnR permalink

Not after they've been, probably, illegally seized, tortured, separated from their families with no justification. You'd probably be a terrorist if subjected to the same treatment.

Why single out Judge Leon? I'm sure the Iraqi's feel the same and threaten their kids when misbehaving that if they don't behave the Americans will take them away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 11/20/2008

Err, Ummm, Mmmm,

Bosnia agreed to take them. They are (apparently) Bosnian citizens.

Or in the words of Saint Ronald the Reagan: Freedom Fighters.

Remember the Bosnian War by any chance?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 11/21/2008

sounds a little like the "Thought Police"...if we start locking people up because they thought of committing a crime, boy there wouldn't be anyone on the streets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 11/20/2008

If they weren't terrorists then, they surely will be now. Bush's 7 years of detaining them ensured that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 11/20/2008

Can Bush grant himself a pardon? It appears that he is going to need one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 11/20/2008

I am a Bush supporter and I support the war. However, I fully agree that it is in "no ones" interest that innocent people are imprisoned for any length of time. However, I don't see how any of you can think that it would be in the Bush administration's interest to do so either?
Be that as it may, it is apparent to me that what motivates many of the posters here to so ardently support the interest of detainess at Guantanamo is not necessarily a commitment to human rights and justice. But more that it is a fundamental disdain for their own country for whatever reason or hosts of reasons. Maybe for some of you this is not your country at all,?Either in spirit or as a citizen.
In fact some of you may truly be an enemy of this country?
The desire for America to be true to it's ideals and values is one thing.
Leaping at each and every opportunity to eagerly cheer on any and all of America's enemies and detractors is quite another.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

Go ahead and wave your flag and make us laugh. America does have enemies, and your attitude is why there are more than ever before. You see people critical of their government as eager to cheer on any and all America's enemies. We don't cheer them on, we cheer the rule of law, which says either bring them to trial with what ever evidence you have, or turn them loose. We must be a nation of laws if democracy is to survive. I'm glad you have such keen insight to the motives of us posters, Dr. Freud (I mean, Dr. Fraud). And I'm glad you have so much trust in Bush to think it would not be in his interest to imprison innocent people. You say we may be enemies of this country, but you are the true enemy because it is you who turns a naive blind eye to what has been happening. A lot of these prisoners have been held for years on little or no evidence. If Bush & Company think they're guility, bring them to trail and prove it. That's the American Way whether you like it or not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 11/20/2008

We are all so polarized aren't we? With blind patriots on my side and useful idiots on yours.
Oh, and I didn't say I "trusted" Bush..I only said that I couldn't see how it was in his interest?...........Wait I know how..HE"S EEEEEEVIL!!! ...and and and....Halliburton...and Blackwater...hahaha........Man I'm really sorry that you missed the whole Viet Nam Era. But come on, take the peace sign poster of your wall and go help your mom clean the kitchen after dinner..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

If you can't see how it's in the interest of a regime to have the power to arbitrarily detain and torture those who disagree with them, you are woefully ignorant of history.

There is one standard in the country, the Constitution. If you violate the Constitution, you are an enemy of this country. Bush and his lackeys have shredded the Constitution, and anyone who supports them is an enemy of this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 11/20/2008

I support the troops, but never supported the war in Iraq. For you to even try to assume what it is that I feel as an American is beyond belief! My disdain is and has always been for Bush and for his destruction of America's reputation globally. His actions on behalf of America are attrocities against humanity. I am always amazed at the people who feel that committing crimes against people are excusable, because they are muslim and therefore terrorists.

http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2006/05/29/4713_print.html

It is never okay for children to be held in a prison camp! No one is cheering Al Qaeda, but to say that we are enemies of America is outrageous. The fact that you are a Bush supporter says it all!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 11/20/2008

Amen. You are 100% right. They are too much involved in the Gitmo prisoners. It doesn't have anything to do with their perceived maltreatment of the presoners (terrorists). It goea a lot deeper than that. They just don't like their country. It shows evrerytime you see a headline on this website. When was there a pro-American or a good story about their country posted here?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 11/20/2008

I love my Country.

And respect the Constitution as the law of the land.

You obviously don't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 11/21/2008
photo

Your President claimed that the US Constitution is "just a g.....d....mned piece of paper" so who really doesn't like America? Is it wrong to refuse to support a President with such disdain for his own country? Does that mean I don't like America because I find such attitudes coming from the Chief Executive to be beyond unacceptable?

The solutions to dealing with "terrorists" lie with our Constitution and our legal system. Gitmo was established specifically to sidestep US law and create a place where people could be held without legal protection. Everyone in Gitmo could have their cases tried right here in the US, as criminals.... Of course, there is always the Jose Padilla example if you want to see how a President can ignore the law and leave a prisoner with virtually no rights - and then find out that their case had no merit and they had to find some other reason to hold him because the backlash would be spectacular....

The French have dealt with terrorists quite effectively without fielding an army and creating a space beyond US legal standards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 11/20/2008

It was not Bush's claim that the Constitution is "just a g...d... piece of paper" that was the problem.

It was his actions in making the Constitution "just a G... D.. piece of paper".

He took aSacred Oath to protect and defend that "piece of paper."

And he violated that oath.

You are 100% correct. the solutions lie within the Constitution and legal system. A concept that should not be hard to grasp. Obeying the law AND the Constitution in not optional.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 11/21/2008
photo

I am so pleased that some headway is being made here. As an American citizen, it has concerned me greatly that Bush had changed so many of the protections we had in the constitution. While these are not American citizens that were being held indefinitely, one day it COULD be if things were to continue unchanged. The definition of enemy combatant is so loose that it could, if those in power decided, be used against any American citizen that protested or disagreed with the government. Worse, if Bush had his way, no one woud have their day in court. I hope that our new president will work to restore the rights and protections we lost under Bush. Obama, being a professor of constitutional law, should understand better than most the NEED for this to be addressed immediately.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 11/20/2008

Congratulations to the lawyers who donated thousands of hours to pushing these cases and for continuing to believe that somehow, somewhere, the Constitution would be vindicated. As a member of the bar, I am grateful that there are those who make us more than the mere caricatures of lawyer jokes. I am really grateful that Judge Leon actually read the Supreme Court opinion that reversed him on the same five detainees and in act that I am sure Bush, Cheney, Rove and his ilk will call "activist" he actually applied the law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 11/20/2008

At last, the truth begins to come out. This is why the Bush admin has tried to prevent the Gitmo prisoners from being given due process. They knew full well that as soon as their flimsy evidence was placed before a judge, the game would be up. It will forever be a stain on the US and the world (for turning a blind eye) that these men have had their lives ruined on no more evidence than George Bush says they're guilty. It is a further outrage that none of them will ever be able to gain compensation for their ordeal at the hands of this monster.

The US media share a huge part of the blame for this for not questioning their leaders more thoroughly. Why was Rumsfield continually allowed to state that every single Gitmo prisoner had been caught on the battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq? This was an outright lie. Men on business trips were taken from airports . Taxi drivers were plucked off the streets of Iraq for the crime of asking two many questions about a colleague's sudden disappearance (previously abducted by the Americans).

I believe that one day the shameful truth about this will emerge. It's just a shame that it will come too late to help the men imprisoned and tortured for so many years in Gitmo and that Bush and his despicable cohorts will never face financial or legal repercussions for their crimes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 11/20/2008

It would be nice to think America is re-developing a conscience. But, it's too early to say for sure.
All along, these guys should have been tried - quickly - in American courts. The other 250 still in Guantanamo should be released right away and paid a million bucks for every year they were in prison.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 11/20/2008

Imagine that. Soon we will have a President who respects the law. We may even become a Nation of Laws. (WHAT A CONCEPT)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 11/20/2008

We need a prison for Al Queda,Taliban and Etc., but no one should be denied their time in court or the right to defend themself against any kind of chg's. As a lawyer Obama reconize this, Bush didn't!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 11/20/2008

I have been so ashamed of being an American whose government condones and funds Guantanamo, that I can't wait till Jan.20, where at noon, at long last, President Obama can terminate Guantanamo once and for all, for the world to see.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 11/20/2008
photo

On that day all of these men can be set free. The world will rejoice and the healing will begin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 11/20/2008
- smag I'm a Fan of smag permalink

They must be falsly accused. They should be given free ticket to San Francisco so they can celebrate their love for mankind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 11/20/2008

They want to go to their home- keep your stupid San Fransisco, place for losers, to yourself!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 11/20/2008

So, uhh, we invade a sovereign country based on lies, an insurgency develops, we round up insurgents, label them "terror suspects", attempt to detain them indefinitely without due process and torture some.

In retrospect, the revolutionary colonists here got a better deal from the invading British.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 11/20/2008

You said that well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 11/20/2008

We didn't even invade a sovereign country.

We snatched those people from Bosnia.

The legal term for that is kidnapping.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 11/21/2008

Bush and co are so removed from the mess they have gotten America into, that they truly don't see these individuals as the same breed as them.
There have been enough deaths of soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan and I dread to think what the real count is of Iraqi and Afghan innocents.
This is the administration that rants on about freedom and democracy.
I would really love it if Bush, Chaney and Rumsfeld were asked to define their idea of what freedom and democracy means.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 11/20/2008

I never quite understood how we could invade another country and then when their citizens actually fight back we capture them and put them in prison WITHOUT CHARGES for being "enemy combatants". WTF!! What does that make our soldiers there??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 11/20/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect